Reasons of Polish young potential employees’ interest In a university as the employer vr perceiving its employees

Open access

Summary

The article has a theoretical-empirical character. Its main goal was to identify reasons of young potential employees’ interest in working at a university. To prepare the theoretical part, the method of cognitive-critical analysis of world literature on marketing, management and HRM was applied. The results of this analysis show an existing cognitive gap and a research gap in the scope of considerations about reasons of interest of the mentioned group of employees in a university as the employer. Striving for reducing both gaps some empirical researches were conducted using the questionnaire method to gather the primary data which were analyzed statistically using the method of exploratory factor analysis, Kruskal-Wallis test, etc. The obtained results made it possible to check three research hypotheses. The possibility to perform a satisfying job was not the key reason for the respondents’ interest in working at a university. The internal structure of reasons for the respondents’ interest in a university as the employer was different for the following two groups: 1/people who think that university’s employees are perceived in Poland better than those who work in other organizations; 2/people who think that university’s employees are perceived in Poland as well as those who work in other organizations. The way of perceiving employees of an university was a feature statistically significantly differentiating the reasons of the respondents’ interest in starting work at the university only in the case of high social prestige and high wages.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Abdi H. Williams L. J. (2010). Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics Vol. 2 Iss. 4 pp. 433–459.

  • 2. Abduli S. (2013). Effective Human Resource Management in Small and Medium Size Enterprises in the Republic of Macedonia. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences Vol. 2 No. 2 pp. 169–183.

  • 3. Acikgoz Y. (2019). Employee recruitment and job search: Towards a multi-level integration. Human Resource Management Review Vol. 29 Iss 1 pp. 1–13.

  • 4. Baruk A. Goliszek A. (2018). Zmiany skojarzeń z uczelnią jako pracodawcą — opinie młodych polskich potencjalnych pracowników. Marketing Instytucji Naukowych i Badawczych Vol. 28 Iss. 2 pp. 1–18.

  • 5. Bhalla G. (2016). Collaboration and Co-Creation: The Road to Creating Value. The Marketing Journal Vol. May http://www.marketingjournal.org/collaboration-and-co-creation-the-road-to-creating-value/ (accessed on 10.07.2019).

  • 6. Bombiak E. Marciniuk-Kluska A. (2019). Socially Responsible Human Resource Management as a Concept of Fostering Sustainable Organization-Building: Experiences of Young Polish Companies. Sustainability Vol. 11 Iss. 4 p. 1044.

  • 7. Chakravarthy S. Prasad G.V.B. (2011). The Impact of Opinion Leader on Consumer Decision Making Process. International Journal of Management & Business Studies Vol. 1 Iss. 3 pp. 61–64.

  • 8. Chhinzer N. Russo A.M. (2018). An exploration of employer perceptions of graduate student employability. Education + Training Vol. 60 Iss. 1 pp. 104–120.

  • 9. Felix E. (2015). Marketing Challenges of Satisfying Consumers Changing Expectations and Preferences in a Competitive Market. International Journal of Marketing Studies Vol. 7 No. 5 pp. 41–52.

  • 10. Hadiyati E. (2016). Study of marketing mix and AIDA model to purchasing on line product in Indonesia. British Journal of Marketing Studies Vol. 4 No. 7 pp. 49–62.

  • 11. Hassan S. Nadzim S.Z.A. Shiratuddin N. (2015). Strategic Use of Social Media for Small Business Based on the AIDA Model. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 172 pp. 262–269.

  • 12. Horn B. Huang W. Comparison of Segmentation Approacheshttps://www.decisionanalyst.com/whitepapers/comparesegmentation/ (accessed on 04.04.2019).

  • 13. http://www.statystycy.pl/t4997_1_test_rangowy_kruskala-wallisa.php (dostęp: 18.05.2019).

  • 14. http://www.statystyka.az.l/test-anova-kruskala-wallisa.php (accessed on 18.05.2019).

  • 15. Huang T.-C. (2000). Are the human resource practices of effective firms distinctly different from those of poorly performing ones? Evidence from Taiwanese enterprises. The International Journal of Human Resource Management Vol. 11 Iss. 2 pp. 436–451.

  • 16. Huete-Alcocer N. (2017). A Literature Review of Word of Mouth and Electronic Word of Mouth: Implications for Consumer Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology Vol. 8 pp. 1–4.

  • 17. Livette M. (2007). Influencer and other „buying” roles in the decision-making process of retirement housing purchasers. Property Management Vol. 25 Iss. 3 pp. 242–256.

  • 18. Madanat H.G. Khasawneh A. S. (2018). Level of effectiveness of human resource management practices and its impact on employees” satisfaction in the banking sector of Jordan. Journal of Organizational Culture. Communications and Conflict Vol. 22 Iss. 1 pp. 1–19.

  • 19. Mattingly V. Kraiger K. (2019). Can emotional intelligence be trained? A meta-analytical investigation. Human Resource Management Review Vol. 29 Iss. 2 pp. 140–155.

  • 20. Mazur B. (2014). Sustainable Human Resource Management in theory and practice. Economics and Management Vol. 1 pp. 158–170.

  • 21. Michel J.W. Tews M.J. Allen D. G. (2019). Fun in the workplace: A review and expanded theoretical perspective. Human Resource Management Review Vol. 29 Iss. 1 pp. 98–110.

  • 22. Müceldili B. Erdil O. (2016). Finding Fun in Work: The Effect of Workplace Fun on Taking Charge and Job Engagement. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 235 Iss. 24 pp. 304–312.

  • 23. Olejniczak A. (2019) Uwarunkowania stosowania koncepcji otwartych innowacji w instytucjach naukowych i badawczo-rozwojowych Niepublikowana rozprawa doktorska przygotowana pod kierunkiem naukowym A. Baruk http://wzip.p.lodz.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/streszczenie_pol_olejniczak.pdf (accessed on 10.07.2019).

  • 24. Özdemira A. Tozlub E. Æenc E. Ateæoglu H. (2016). Analyses of Word-of-mouth Communication and its Effect on Students’ University Preferences. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 235 Iss. 24 pp. 22–35.

  • 25. Ramaswamy V. Ozcan K. (2014). The Co-Creation Paradigm. Stanford University Press Stanford.

  • 26. Robers D.L. Darler W. (2017). Consumer Co-Creation: An Opportunity to Humanise the New Product Development Process. International Journal of Market Research Vol. 59 Iss. 1 pp. 13–33.

  • 27. Schnurr B. Brunner-Sperdin A. Stokburger-Sauer N.E. (2017). The effect of context attractiveness on product attractiveness and product quality: the moderating role of product familiarity. Marketing Letters Vol. 28 Iss 2 pp. 241–253.

  • 28. Stankevich A. (2017). Explaining the Consumer Decision-Making Process: Critical Literature Review. Journal of International Business Research and Marketing Vol. 2 Iss. 6 pp. 7–14.

  • 29. Stone D.L. Deadrick D.L. Lukaszewski K.M. Johnson R. (2015). The influence of technology on the future of human resource management. Human Resource Management Review Vol. 25 Iss. 2 pp. 216–231.

  • 30. Szreder M. (2010). Losowe i nielosowe próby w badaniach statystycznych. Przegląd Statystyczny Vol. 4 pp. 168–174.

  • 31. Sztemberg-Lewandowska M. (2008). Analiza czynnikowa w badaniach marketingowych. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu Wrocław p. 29.

  • 32. Tóth-Téglás T. Hlédik E. Fónadová L. (2016). An Analysis of Employer Requirements of University Graduates. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica Vol. 13 No. 5 pp. 169–188.

  • 33. Visa A. Einolander J. Vanharanta H. (2015). New Tools to Help in the Recruitment Process. Procedia Manufacturing Vol. 3 pp. 653–659.

  • 34. Voegtlin Ch. Greenwood M. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and human resource management: A systematic review and conceptual analysis. Human Resource Management Review Vol. 3 pp. 181–197.

  • 35. Willman-Iivarinen H. (2017). The future of consumer decision making. European Journal of Futures Research Vol. 5 pp. 14–20.

  • 36. Writer F. (2014). The Co-Creation Paradigm. Strategic Direction Vol. 30 Iss. 10 pp. 7–14.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 45 45 13
PDF Downloads 40 40 10