Reasons of Polish young potential employees’ interest In a university as the employer vr perceiving its employees

1. Abdi, H., Williams, L. J. (2010). Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, Vol. 2, Iss. 4, pp. 433–459.10.1002/wics.101Search in Google Scholar

2. Abduli, S. (2013). Effective Human Resource Management in Small and Medium Size Enterprises in the Republic of Macedonia. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 169–183.Search in Google Scholar

3. Acikgoz, Y. (2019). Employee recruitment and job search: Towards a multi-level integration. Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 29, Iss, 1, pp. 1–13.10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.02.009Search in Google Scholar

4. Baruk, A., Goliszek, A. (2018). Zmiany skojarzeń z uczelnią jako pracodawcą — opinie młodych polskich potencjalnych pracowników. Marketing Instytucji Naukowych i Badawczych, Vol. 28, Iss. 2, pp. 1–18.10.15199/46.2019.1.3Search in Google Scholar

5. Bhalla, G. (2016). Collaboration and Co-Creation: The Road to Creating Value. The Marketing Journal, Vol. May, http://www.marketingjournal.org/collaboration-and-co-creation-the-road-to-creating-value/ (accessed on 10.07.2019).Search in Google Scholar

6. Bombiak, E., Marciniuk-Kluska, A. (2019). Socially Responsible Human Resource Management as a Concept of Fostering Sustainable Organization-Building: Experiences of Young Polish Companies. Sustainability, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, p. 1044.10.3390/su11041044Search in Google Scholar

7. Chakravarthy, S., Prasad, G.V.B. (2011). The Impact of Opinion Leader on Consumer Decision Making Process. International Journal of Management & Business Studies, Vol. 1, Iss. 3, pp. 61–64.Search in Google Scholar

8. Chhinzer N., Russo A.M. (2018). An exploration of employer perceptions of graduate student employability. Education + Training, Vol. 60, Iss. 1, pp. 104–120.10.1108/ET-06-2016-0111Search in Google Scholar

9. Felix, E. (2015). Marketing Challenges of Satisfying Consumers Changing Expectations and Preferences in a Competitive Market. International Journal of Marketing Studies, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 41–52.10.5539/ijms.v7n5p41Search in Google Scholar

10. Hadiyati, E. (2016). Study of marketing mix and AIDA model to purchasing on line product in Indonesia. British Journal of Marketing Studies, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 49–62.Search in Google Scholar

11. Hassan, S., Nadzim, S.Z.A., Shiratuddin, N. (2015). Strategic Use of Social Media for Small Business Based on the AIDA Model. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 172, pp. 262–269.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.363Search in Google Scholar

12. Horn, B., Huang, W. Comparison of Segmentation Approaches, https://www.decisionanalyst.com/whitepapers/comparesegmentation/ (accessed on 04.04.2019).Search in Google Scholar

13. http://www.statystycy.pl/t4997_1_test_rangowy_kruskala-wallisa.php (dostęp: 18.05.2019).Search in Google Scholar

14. http://www.statystyka.az.l/test-anova-kruskala-wallisa.php (accessed on 18.05.2019).Search in Google Scholar

15. Huang, T.-C. (2000). Are the human resource practices of effective firms distinctly different from those of poorly performing ones? Evidence from Taiwanese enterprises. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 11, Iss. 2, pp. 436–451.10.1080/095851900339945Search in Google Scholar

16. Huete-Alcocer, N. (2017). A Literature Review of Word of Mouth and Electronic Word of Mouth: Implications for Consumer Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8, pp. 1–4.10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01256Search in Google Scholar

17. Livette, M. (2007). Influencer and other „buying” roles in the decision-making process of retirement housing purchasers. Property Management, Vol. 25, Iss. 3, pp. 242–256.10.1108/02637470710753620Search in Google Scholar

18. Madanat, H.G., Khasawneh, A. S. (2018). Level of effectiveness of human resource management practices and its impact on employees” satisfaction in the banking sector of Jordan. Journal of Organizational Culture. Communications and Conflict, Vol. 22, Iss. 1, pp. 1–19.Search in Google Scholar

19. Mattingly, V., Kraiger, K. (2019). Can emotional intelligence be trained? A meta-analytical investigation. Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 29, Iss. 2, pp. 140–155.10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.03.002Search in Google Scholar

20. Mazur, B. (2014). Sustainable Human Resource Management in theory and practice. Economics and Management, Vol. 1, pp. 158–170.Search in Google Scholar

21. Michel, J.W., Tews, M.J., Allen, D. G. (2019). Fun in the workplace: A review and expanded theoretical perspective. Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 29, Iss. 1, pp. 98–110.10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.03.001Search in Google Scholar

22. Müceldili, B., Erdil, O. (2016). Finding Fun in Work: The Effect of Workplace Fun on Taking Charge and Job Engagement. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 235, Iss. 24, pp. 304–312.10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.034Search in Google Scholar

23. Olejniczak, A. (2019), Uwarunkowania stosowania koncepcji otwartych innowacji w instytucjach naukowych i badawczo-rozwojowych, Niepublikowana rozprawa doktorska przygotowana pod kierunkiem naukowym A. Baruk, http://wzip.p.lodz.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/streszczenie_pol_olejniczak.pdf (accessed on 10.07.2019).Search in Google Scholar

24. Özdemira, A., Tozlub, E., Æenc, E., Ateæoglu, H. (2016). Analyses of Word-of-mouth Communication and its Effect on Students’ University Preferences. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 235, Iss. 24, pp. 22–35.10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.022Search in Google Scholar

25. Ramaswamy, V., Ozcan, K. (2014). The Co-Creation Paradigm. Stanford University Press, Stanford.10.1515/9780804790758Search in Google Scholar

26. Robers, D.L., Darler, W. (2017). Consumer Co-Creation: An Opportunity to Humanise the New Product Development Process. International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 59, Iss. 1, pp. 13–33.10.2501/IJMR-2017-003Search in Google Scholar

27. Schnurr, B., Brunner-Sperdin, A., Stokburger-Sauer, N.E. (2017). The effect of context attractiveness on product attractiveness and product quality: the moderating role of product familiarity. Marketing Letters, Vol. 28, Iss, 2, pp. 241–253.10.1007/s11002-016-9404-3Search in Google Scholar

28. Stankevich, A. (2017). Explaining the Consumer Decision-Making Process: Critical Literature Review. Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, Vol. 2, Iss. 6, pp. 7–14.10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.26.3001Search in Google Scholar

29. Stone, D.L., Deadrick, D.L., Lukaszewski, K.M., Johnson, R. (2015). The influence of technology on the future of human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 25, Iss. 2, pp. 216–231.10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.002Search in Google Scholar

30. Szreder, M. (2010). Losowe i nielosowe próby w badaniach statystycznych. Przegląd Statystyczny, Vol. 4, pp. 168–174.Search in Google Scholar

31. Sztemberg-Lewandowska, M. (2008). Analiza czynnikowa w badaniach marketingowych. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Wrocław, p. 29.Search in Google Scholar

32. Tóth-Téglás, T., Hlédik, E., Fónadová, L. (2016). An Analysis of Employer Requirements of University Graduates. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 169–188.10.12700/APH.13.5.2016.5.10Search in Google Scholar

33. Visa, A., Einolander, J., Vanharanta, H. (2015). New Tools to Help in the Recruitment Process. Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 3, pp. 653–659.10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.297Search in Google Scholar

34. Voegtlin, Ch., Greenwood, M. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and human resource management: A systematic review and conceptual analysis. Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 3, pp. 181–197.10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.12.003Search in Google Scholar

35. Willman-Iivarinen, H. (2017). The future of consumer decision making. European Journal of Futures Research, Vol. 5, pp. 14–20.10.1007/s40309-017-0125-5Search in Google Scholar

36. Writer, F. (2014). The Co-Creation Paradigm. Strategic Direction, Vol. 30, Iss. 10, pp. 7–14.10.1108/SD-10-2014-0141Search in Google Scholar