<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
As mediation and its support across the European Union have been growing, we can assume that the public is better aware of this option of dispute resolution. The law acquaintance with the focus on mediation has not been studied extensively, although the identification of the current state is crucial for formulating the effective strategies for its broader use. The aim of this paper based on the quantitative survey on a representative sample in the Czech Republic is to examine the mediation awareness and its differences across individual characteristics. The statistical analysis identifies very low awareness of mediation and its aspects. Moreover, this knowledge is higher among people with higher education, among middle-aged people and older people living in bigger municipalities. Based on the findings, the authors suggest that targeted campaigns organised by the state should be conducted through the channels accessible to the sociodemographic groups with lower awareness of mediation.
</abstract>

Mediation in the Context of Law Acquaintance<xref ref-type="fn" rid="j_danb-2020-0001_fn_001">1</xref>

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
Czech workers’ compensation is “exemplified” by the adoption of the Worker’s Accident Insurance Act in 2006, four deferments of its effective date and then complete annulment of the Act. A temporary settlement aimed at resolving the incompatibility of the communist model of workers’ compensation for work accidents and occupational illnesses with the transition to a market economy after 1989 involved the implementation of statutory employer liability insurance for work accidents and occupational illnesses, outsourced to two private insurance companies; the current Czech government does not seem to have a know how to deal with it. The objective of this paper is primarily to advise the government using primarily the formulation and comparison of four basic social workers’ compensation models and furthermore considering the existing sickness, pension and health insurance systems. The choice of a social model is namely a matter of public choice, but intensive lobbying also constitutes part of these processes. The analyses result in a recommendation to “dissolve” the statutory employer liability insurance into a jointly collected social insurance contribution for sickness and pension insurance, and partly to transform the current accident benefits into increased sickness and pension benefit assessments and partly to cancel them.
</abstract>

Social Workers’ Compensation Models and the Czech Statutory Employer Liability Insurance


<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
The purpose of this study is to analyze economic reforms conducted in Ukraine during the period of the state’s independence. And also to identify, with the help of scientific tools – system analysis, management problems in the economy, their diagnosis, identification of the consequences that led to these problems, and ways development (at conceptual level) for their solving. The authors of the article proposed the concept of reforms in Ukraine. At the heart of the concept is the administrative reform aimed at creating organizational conditions under which corruption in power is almost completely neutralized. It is argued that such conditions are created by ensuring transparency, introduction of new information technologies, and minimizing the proportion of the so-called “human factor”. Within the framework of the innovative project (model) of economic management, it is envisaged to redistribute central power between the central apparatus of economic management, local authorities and the non-state sector.
</abstract>

National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Heroyiv Oborony st.

Economic Reformation of Ukraine: Historical and Legal Aspects

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
Job polarization simply refers to the decline or disappearance of employment in middle skill occupations. Recent literature focuses on this phenomenon as a source of rising income inequality in countries. The hypothesis is that growth in employment over the last decades has favoured jobs at the low and high skill occupations with declines in employment shares in the middle of the distribution. First, this paper seeks to investigate whether labour polarization occurs in Central and Eastern European countries. Secondly, the paper assesses the role of technology on employment in the Central and Eastern European countries. Using employment shares and a cointegrated panel autoregressive distributed lag model, the paper presents comprehensive results on labour polarization and the impact of technology on employment in the labour markets of the Central and Eastern European countries. The results show positive impact of technology on high skill employment while negative on low and middle skill employment in the long-run. The study finds that though middle skill employment shares declined, there is no clear case of a U-shape employment distribution to indicate labour polarization.
</abstract>

Job Polarization in Europe: Evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries


<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
The purpose of this article is to explore the subject of applying to the European Court of Human Rights in tax cases, the place of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in the system of sources of tax law, the problems arising from the application of ECtHR decisions by Ukrainian courts in tax cases. The research was carried out using formal-dogmatic, system-structural, comparative-legal, historical and other methods of scientific cognition. The author concludes that it is important to use the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights to resolve public law disputes, the subject of which is public finances. After all, the Ukrainian tax system and tax legislation, the tax status of taxpayers and tax authorities should be based on the fundamental principles enshrined in the Convention and which have repeatedly been systematically interpreted in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights.
</abstract>

Features of the Application of the Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights by Ukrainian Courts in Tax Cases


AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 15 (2024): Issue 1 (March 2024)

Volume 14 (2023): Issue 4 (December 2023)

Volume 14 (2023): Issue 3 (September 2023)

Volume 14 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)

Volume 14 (2023): Issue 1 (March 2023)

Volume 13 (2022): Issue 4 (December 2022)

Volume 13 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)

Volume 13 (2022): Issue 2 (June 2022)

Volume 13 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)

Volume 12 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)

Volume 12 (2021): Issue 3 (September 2021)

Volume 12 (2021): Issue 2 (June 2021)

Volume 12 (2021): Issue 1 (March 2021)

Volume 11 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)

Volume 11 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)

Volume 11 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)

Volume 11 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

Volume 10 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)

Volume 10 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)

Volume 10 (2019): Issue 2 (June 2019)

Volume 10 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)

Volume 9 (2018): Issue 4 (December 2018)

Volume 9 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)

Volume 9 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)

Volume 9 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)

Volume 8 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)

Volume 8 (2017): Issue 3 (September 2017)

Volume 8 (2017): Issue 2 (June 2017)

Volume 8 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)

Volume 7 (2016): Issue 4 (December 2016)

Volume 7 (2016): Issue 3 (September 2016)

Volume 7 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)

Volume 7 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)

Volume 6 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)

Volume 6 (2015): Issue 3 (September 2015)

Volume 6 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)

Volume 6 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)

Volume 5 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)

Volume 5 (2014): Issue 3 (September 2014)

Volume 5 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)

Volume 5 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)

Volume 4 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)

Volume 4 (2013): Issue 3 (September 2013)

Volume 4 (2013): Issue 2 (June 2013)

Volume 4 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)

DANUBE

 DANUBE is an international professional journal referring to the tradition of the humanities-oriented periodical of the same title, which was first published in Vienna as early as 1923. Just as the Danube River connects European capitals, the DANUBE Journal creates a strong network of links between European researchers who have dedicated their professional lives to the social sciences and humanities. The journal also welcomes authors from other regions, as long as they respect the Aims &amp; Scope of the journal. The journal has been published by the De Gruyter, a prestigious publisher with a history of almost 270 years, since 2021 in collaboration with the PRIGO University. It is printed, but in particular it is published and distributed as an electronic Open Access resource. It is listed in most key citation databases, while it has been listed in the Scopus database since 2010.  Only anonymized manuscripts containing high-quality original research that strictly respect Aims &amp; Scope of the Journal and the Instructions for authors may be submitted, solely via Editorial Manager.  Rejection Rate   48%   Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 

DANUBE

Volume 11 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

Mediation in the Context of Law Acquaintance¹

Social Workers’ Compensation Models and the Czech Statutory Employer Liability Insurance

Economic Reformation of Ukraine: Historical and Legal Aspects

Job Polarization in Europe: Evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries

Features of the Application of the Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights by Ukrainian Courts in Tax Cases

Wyszukiwanie

Wszystkie tomy i zeszyty w tym czasopiśmie

DANUBE

Volume 11 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

Mediation in the Context of Law Acquaintance1

Social Workers’ Compensation Models and the Czech Statutory Employer Liability Insurance

Economic Reformation of Ukraine: Historical and Legal Aspects

Job Polarization in Europe: Evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries

Features of the Application of the Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights by Ukrainian Courts in Tax Cases

Wyszukiwanie

Wszystkie tomy i zeszyty w tym czasopiśmie

Mediation in the Context of Law Acquaintance¹