This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Banerjee, P.M., & Cole, B. M. (2010). Breadth-of-impact frontier: How firm-level decisions and selection environment dynamics generate boundary-spanning inventions. Technovation, 30(7), 411–419.BanerjeeP.M.ColeB. M.2010Breadth-of-impact frontier: How firm-level decisions and selection environment dynamics generate boundary-spanning inventionsTechnovation30741141910.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.001Search in Google Scholar
Banks, M.G. (2006). An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds. Scientometrics, 69(1), 161–168.BanksM.G.2006An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compoundsScientometrics69116116810.1007/s11192-006-0146-5Search in Google Scholar
Bornehag, C.G., Sundell, J., Weschler, C.J., Sigsgaard, T., Lundgren, B., Hasselgren, M., & Hägerhed-Engman, L. (2004). The association between asthma and allergic symptoms in children and phthalates in house dust: A nested case-control study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(14), 1393–1397.BornehagC.G.SundellJ.WeschlerC.J.SigsgaardT.LundgrenB.HasselgrenM.Hägerhed-EngmanL.2004The association between asthma and allergic symptoms in children and phthalates in house dust: A nested case-control studyEnvironmental Health Perspectives112141393139710.1289/ehp.7187Search in Google Scholar
Bouyssou, D., & Marchant, T. (2011). Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent manner. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1761–1769.BouyssouD.MarchantT.2011Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent mannerJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6291761176910.1002/asi.21544Search in Google Scholar
Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2005). A Hirsch-type index for journals. The Scientist, 19(22), 8.BraunT.GlänzelW.SchubertA.2005A Hirsch-type index for journalsThe Scientist1922810.1007/s11192-006-0147-4Search in Google Scholar
Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1), 69–87.BreschiS.LissoniF.MalerbaF.2003Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversificationResearch Policy321698710.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5Search in Google Scholar
Chen, J.H., Jang, S.L., & Wen, S.H. (2010). Measuring technological diversification: Identifying the effects of patent scale and patent scope. Scientometrics, 84(1), 265–275.ChenJ.H.JangS.L.WenS.H.2010Measuring technological diversification: Identifying the effects of patent scale and patent scopeScientometrics84126527510.1007/s11192-009-0143-6Search in Google Scholar
Chen, Y.S., Shih, C.Y., & Chang, C.H. (2013). Patents and market value in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry: new evidence from threshold regression. Scientometrics, 97(2), 161–176.ChenY.S.ShihC.Y.ChangC.H.2013Patents and market value in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry: new evidence from threshold regressionScientometrics97216117610.1007/s11192-013-0999-3Search in Google Scholar
Chiu, Y.C., Lai, H.C., Liaw, Y.C., & Lee, T.Y. (2010). Technological scope: Diversified or specialized. Scientometrics, 82(1), 37–58.ChiuY.C.LaiH.C.LiawY.C.LeeT.Y.2010Technological scope: Diversified or specializedScientometrics821375810.1007/s11192-009-0039-5Search in Google Scholar
Denicolò, V. (1996). Patent races and optimal patent breadth and length. Journal of Industrial Economics, 44(3), 249–265.DenicolòV.1996Patent races and optimal patent breadth and lengthJournal of Industrial Economics44324926510.2307/2950496Search in Google Scholar
Gilbert, R., & Shapiro, C. (1990). Optimal patent length and breadth. RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 106–112.GilbertR.ShapiroC.1990Optimal patent length and breadthRAND Journal of Economics21110611210.2307/2555497Search in Google Scholar
Goldstein, L., & Zhang, H.M. (2009). Efficiency of the maximum partial likelihood estimator for nested case control sampling. Bernoulli, 15(2), 569–597.GoldsteinL.ZhangH.M.2009Efficiency of the maximum partial likelihood estimator for nested case control samplingBernoulli15256959710.3150/08-BEJ162Search in Google Scholar
Grönqvist, C. (2009). The private value of patents by patent characteristics: Evidence from Finland. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(2), 159–168.GrönqvistC.2009The private value of patents by patent characteristics: Evidence from FinlandJournal of Technology Transfer34215916810.1007/s10961-007-9067-6Search in Google Scholar
Guan, J.C., & Gao, X. (2009). Exploring the h-index at patent level. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 35–40.GuanJ.C.GaoX.2009Exploring the h-index at patent levelJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology601354010.1002/asi.20954Search in Google Scholar
Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32(8), 1365–1379.HagedoornJ.CloodtM.2003Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?Research Policy3281365137910.1016/S0048-7333(02)00137-3Search in Google Scholar
Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.HirschJ.E.2005An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research outputProceedings of the National Academy Sciences of the United States of America10246165691657210.1073/pnas.0507655102128383216275915Search in Google Scholar
Hu, X.J., & Rousseau, R. (2015). A simple approach to describe a company’s innovative activities and their technological breadth. Scientometrics, 102(1), 1401–1411.HuX.J.RousseauR.2015A simple approach to describe a company’s innovative activities and their technological breadthScientometrics10211401141110.1007/s11192-014-1464-7Search in Google Scholar
Hu, X.J., Rousseau, R., & Chen, J. (2012). A new approach for measuring the value of patents based on structural indicators for ego patent citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(9), 1834–1842.HuX.J.RousseauR.ChenJ.2012A new approach for measuring the value of patents based on structural indicators for ego patent citation networksJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6391834184210.1002/asi.22632Search in Google Scholar
ISTIS: Institute of Scientific & Technical Information of Shanghai (2003). Feature analysis on global pharmaceutical industry 2002–2003, small change in the periodic R&D. Retrieved on August 20, 2012, from http://www.istis.sh.cn/list/list.aspx?id=3958 (in Chinese).ISTIS: Institute of Scientific & Technical Information of Shanghai2003Feature analysis on global pharmaceutical industry 2002–2003, small change in the periodic R&D. Retrieved on August 20, 2012http://www.istis.sh.cn/list/list.aspx?id=3958(in Chinese)Search in Google Scholar
Kanniainen, V., & Stenbacka, R. (2000). Endogenous imitation and implications for technology policy. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 156(2), 360–381.KanniainenV.StenbackaR.2000Endogenous imitation and implications for technology policyJournal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics1562360381Search in Google Scholar
Klemperer, P. (1990). How broad should the scope of patent protection be? RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 113–130.KlempererP.1990How broad should the scope of patent protection be?RAND Journal of Economics21111313010.2307/2555498Search in Google Scholar
Lee, Y.G. (2009). What affects a patent’s value? An analysis of variables that affect technological, direct economic, and indirect economic value: An exploratory conceptual approach. Scientometrics, 79(3), 627–637.LeeY.G.2009What affects a patent’s value? An analysis of variables that affect technological, direct economic, and indirect economic value: An exploratory conceptual approachScientometrics79362763710.1007/s11192-007-2020-5Search in Google Scholar
Lerner, J. (1994). The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis. RAND Journal of Economics, 25(2), 319–333.LernerJ.1994The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysisRAND Journal of Economics25231933310.2307/2555833Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L. (2015). Can technology life-cycles be indicated by diversity in patent classifications? The crucial role of variety. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1441–1451.LeydesdorffL.2015Can technology life-cycles be indicated by diversity in patent classifications? The crucial role of varietyScientometrics10531441145110.1007/s11192-015-1639-x464311426594072Search in Google Scholar
Liu, Y.X., & Rousseau, R. (2009). Properties of Hirsch-type indices: The case of library classification categories. Scientometrics, 79(2), 235–248.LiuY.X.RousseauR.2009Properties of Hirsch-type indices: The case of library classification categoriesScientometrics79223524810.1007/s11192-009-0415-1Search in Google Scholar
Lodh, S., & Battaggion, M.R. (2014). Technological breadth and depth of knowledge in innovation: The role of mergers and acquisitions in biotech. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(2), 383–415.LodhS.BattaggionM.R.2014Technological breadth and depth of knowledge in innovation: The role of mergers and acquisitions in biotechIndustrial and Corporate Change24238341510.1093/icc/dtu013Search in Google Scholar
McMillan, G.S., & Thomas, P. (2005). Financial success in biotechnology: Company age versus company science. Technovation, 25(5), 463–468.McMillanG.S.ThomasP.2005Financial success in biotechnology: Company age versus company scienceTechnovation25546346810.1016/j.technovation.2004.10.009Search in Google Scholar
Merges, R.P., & Nelson, R.R. (1990). On the complex economics of patent scope. Columbia Law Review, 90(4), 839–916.MergesR.P.NelsonR.R.1990On the complex economics of patent scopeColumbia Law Review90483991610.2307/1122920Search in Google Scholar
Miller, D.J. (2006). Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 601–619.MillerD.J.2006Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performanceStrategic Management Journal27760161910.1002/smj.533Search in Google Scholar
O’Donoghue, T., Scotchmer, S., & Thisse, J.F. (1998). Patent breadth, patent life, and the pace of technological progress. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 7(1), 1–32.O’DonoghueT.ScotchmerS.ThisseJ.F.1998Patent breadth, patent life, and the pace of technological progressJournal of Economics & Management Strategy7113210.1111/j.1430-9134.1998.00001.xSearch in Google Scholar
Olivo, C., Lebedeva, I., Chu, C.Y., Lin, C.Y., & Wu, S.Y. (2011). A patent analysis on advanced biohydrogen technology development and commercialisation: Scope and competitiveness. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(21), 14103–14110.OlivoC.LebedevaI.ChuC.Y.LinC.Y.WuS.Y.2011A patent analysis on advanced biohydrogen technology development and commercialisation: Scope and competitivenessInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy3621141031411010.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.100Search in Google Scholar
Ozman, M. (2007). Breadth and depth of main technology fields: An empirical investigation using patent data. Middle East Technical University Working Paper, 2007.OzmanM.2007Breadth and depth of main technology fields: An empirical investigation using patent dataMiddle East Technical University Working Paper2007Search in Google Scholar
Palokangas, T. (2011). Optimal patent length and breadth in an economy with creative destruction and non-diversifiable risk. Journal of Economics, 102(1), 1–27.PalokangasT.2011Optimal patent length and breadth in an economy with creative destruction and non-diversifiable riskJournal of Economics102112710.1007/s00712-010-0161-0Search in Google Scholar
Prencipe, A. (2000). Breadth and depth of technological capabilities in CoPS: The case of the aircraft engine control system. Research Policy, 29(7–8), 895–911.PrencipeA.2000Breadth and depth of technological capabilities in CoPS: The case of the aircraft engine control systemResearch Policy297–889591110.1016/S0048-7333(00)00111-6Search in Google Scholar
Reitzig, M. (2003). What determines patent value? Insights from the semiconductor industry. Research Policy, 32(1), 13–16.ReitzigM.2003What determines patent value? Insights from the semiconductor industryResearch Policy321131610.1016/S0048-7333(01)00193-7Search in Google Scholar
Rousseau, R. (2016). Citation data as a proxy for quality or scientific influence are at best PAC (Probably Approximately Correct). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (to appear); DOI: 10.1002/asi.23525.RousseauR.2016Citation data as a proxy for quality or scientific influence are at best PAC (Probably Approximately Correct)Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (to appear)10.1002/asi.23525Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sapsalis, E, van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., & Navon, R. (2006). Academic versus industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent value. Research Policy, 35(10), 1631–1645.SapsalisEvan Pottelsberghe de la PotterieB.NavonR.2006Academic versus industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent valueResearch Policy35101631164510.1016/j.respol.2006.09.014Search in Google Scholar
Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of inventions. Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172–187.TrajtenbergM.1990A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of inventionsRand Journal of Economics21117218710.2307/2555502Search in Google Scholar
Valiant, L. (2013). Probably Approximately Correct. New York: Basic Books.ValiantL.2013Probably Approximately CorrectNew YorkBasic BooksSearch in Google Scholar
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N.J. (2012). The inconsistency of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 406–415.WaltmanL.van EckN.J.2012The inconsistency of the h-indexJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology63240641510.1002/asi.21678Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Q., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2000). Complexity and the functions of the firm: Breadth and depth. Research Policy, 29(7–8), 805–818.WangQ.von TunzelmannN.2000Complexity and the functions of the firm: Breadth and depthResearch Policy297–880581810.1016/S0048-7333(00)00106-2Search in Google Scholar
WIPO (2000). Patent law treaty, available at http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/plt/ (last visited on 2016, February 20).WIPO2000Patent law treatyhttp://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/plt/(last visited on 2016, February 20)Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, G.P., Chen, X.D., & Niu, X. (2012). The technology complexity based on patent width and depth (in Chinese). Science Research Management, 33(3), 113–135.ZhangG.P.ChenX.D.NiuX.2012The technology complexity based on patent width and depth (in Chinese)Science Research Management333113135Search in Google Scholar
