This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Bertram, S. (1972). Citations counts. In A. Pitemick (Ed.), Fourth Annual Meeting, American Society for Information Science, Western Canada Chapter (pp. 61–67). Vancouver: University of British Columbia.BertramS.1972Citations countsPitemickA.6167VancouverUniversity of British ColumbiaSearch in Google Scholar
Bonzi, S. (1982). Characteristics of a literature as predictors of relatedness between cited and citing works. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(4), 208–216.BonziS.1982Characteristics of a literature as predictors of relatedness between cited and citing works33420821610.1002/asi.4630330404Search in Google Scholar
Borgman, C.L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 3–72.BorgmanC.L.FurnerJ.2002Scholarly communication and bibliometrics36137210.1002/aris.1440360102Search in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). What co-citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80.BornmannL.DanielH.-D.2008What co-citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior641458010.1108/00220410810844150Search in Google Scholar
Boyack, K.W., Small, H., & Klavans, R. (2013). Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(9), 1759–1767.BoyackK.W.SmallH.KlavansR.2013Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text6491759176710.1002/asi.22896Search in Google Scholar
Brooks, T.A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229.BrooksT.A.1985Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations36422322910.1002/asi.4630360402Search in Google Scholar
Brooks, T.A. (1986). Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(1), 34–36.BrooksT.A.1986Evidence of complex citer motivations371343610.1002/asi.4630370106Search in Google Scholar
Cano, V. (1989). Citation behavior – Classification, utility, and location. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(4), 284–290.CanoV.1989Citation behavior – Classification, utility, and location40428429010.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198907)40:4<284::AID-ASI10>3.0.CO;2-ZSearch in Google Scholar
Case, D.O., & Higgins, G.M. (2000). How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 635–645.CaseD.O.HigginsG.M.2000How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication51763564510.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:7<635::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-HSearch in Google Scholar
Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process. The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.CroninB.1984The citation processLondonTaylor GrahamSearch in Google Scholar
Chubin, D.E., & Moitra, S.D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5(4), 423–441.ChubinD.E.MoitraS.D.1975Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting?5442344110.1177/030631277500500403Search in Google Scholar
Ding, Y., & Cronin, B. (2011). Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem. Information Processing and Management, 47(1), 80–96.DingY.CroninB.2011Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem471809610.1016/j.ipm.2010.01.002Search in Google Scholar
Ding, Y., Liu, X., Guo, C., & Cronin, B. (2013). The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 583–592.DingY.LiuX.GuoC.CroninB.2013The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis7358359210.1016/j.joi.2013.03.003Search in Google Scholar
Doumont, J. (Ed.). (2010). English communication for scientists. Cambridge: NPG Education. Retrieved on September 22, 2016, from http://www.nature.com/scitable/ebooks/english-communication-for-scientists-14053993.DoumontJ.2010CambridgeNPG EducationRetrieved on September 22, 2016, fromhttp://www.nature.com/scitable/ebooks/english-communication-for-scientists-14053993Search in Google Scholar
Dubin, D. (2004). The most influential paper Gerard Salton never wrote. Library Trends, 52(4), 748–764.DubinD.2004The most influential paper Gerard Salton never wrote524748764Search in Google Scholar
Edge, D. (1979). Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review. History of Science Cambridge, 17(36), 102–134.EdgeD.1979Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review173610213410.1177/00732753790170020211610633Search in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1962). Can citation indexing be automated? Essays of an Information Scientists: 1962–1973, 84–90. Retrieved on September 22, 2016, from http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/allvols.html.GarfieldE.1962Can citation indexing be automated?1962–19738490Retrieved on September 22, 2016, fromhttp://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/allvols.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing – Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.GarfieldE.1979New YorkJohn Wiley & SonsSearch in Google Scholar
Griffith, B.C. (1990). Understanding science: Studies of communication and information. In C.L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics (pp. 33–45). Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.GriffithB.C.1990Understanding science: Studies of communication and informationBorgmanC.L.3345Newbury ParkSage Publications, Inc.Search in Google Scholar
Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36 (1), 16–38.HallB.H.JaffeA.TrajtenbergM.2005Market value and patent citations3611638Search in Google Scholar
Hanney, S., Frame, I., Grant, J., Buxton, M., Young, T., & Lewison, G. (2005). Using categorizations of citations when assessing the outcomes of health research. Scientometrics, 65(3), 357-379.HanneyS.FrameI.GrantJ.BuxtonM.YoungT.LewisonG.2005Using categorizations of citations when assessing the outcomes of health research65335737910.1007/s11192-005-0279-ySearch in Google Scholar
Harwood, N. (2008). Citers’ use of citees’ names: Findings from a qualitative interview-based study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 1007–1011.HarwoodN.2008Citers’ use of citees’ names: Findings from a qualitative interview-based study5961007101110.1002/asi.20789Search in Google Scholar
Herlach, G. (1978). Can retrieval of information from citation indexes be simplified? Multiple mention of a reference as a characteristic of the link between cited and citing article. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29(6), 308–310.HerlachG.1978Can retrieval of information from citation indexes be simplified? Multiple mention of a reference as a characteristic of the link between cited and citing article29630831010.1002/asi.4630290608Search in Google Scholar
Hou, W., Li, M., & Niu, D. (2011). Counting citations in texts rather than reference lists to improve the accuracy of assessing scientific contribution. BioEssays, 33(10), 724–727.HouW.LiM.NiuD.2011Counting citations in texts rather than reference lists to improve the accuracy of assessing scientific contribution331072472710.1002/bies.20110006721826692Search in Google Scholar
Jeong, Y.K., Song, M., & Ding, Y. (2014). Content-based author co-citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 197–211.JeongY.K.SongM.DingY.2014Content-based author co-citation analysis8119721110.1016/j.joi.2013.12.001Search in Google Scholar
Liu, M. (1993). The complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 370–408.LiuM.1993The complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies49437040810.1108/eb026920Search in Google Scholar
McCain, K.W., & Turner, K. (1989). Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics. Scientometrics, 17(1), 127–163.McCainK.W.TurnerK.1989Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics17112716310.1007/BF02017729Search in Google Scholar
Merton, R.K. (1942). Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1(1), 115–126.MertonR.K.1942Science and technology in a democratic order11115126Search in Google Scholar
Moravcsik, M.J., & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5(1), 86–92.MoravcsikM.J.MurugesanP.1975Some results on the function and quality of citations51869210.1177/030631277500500106Search in Google Scholar
Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity. Washington, DC: Computer Horizons.NarinF.1976Washington, DCComputer HorizonsSearch in Google Scholar
Peritz, B.C. (1992). On the objectives of citation analysis: Problems of theory and method. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(6), 448–451.PeritzB.C.1992On the objectives of citation analysis: Problems of theory and method43644845110.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199207)43:6<448::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-9Search in Google Scholar
Prabha, C.G. (1983). Some aspects of citation behavior – A pilot-study in business administration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(3), 202–206.PrabhaC.G.1983Some aspects of citation behavior – A pilot-study in business administration34320220610.1002/asi.4630340305Search in Google Scholar
Shadish, W.R., Tolliver, D., Gray, M., & Gupta, S.K.S. (1995). Author judgements about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science, 25(3), 477–498.ShadishW.R.TolliverD.GrayM.GuptaS.K.S.1995Author judgements about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals25347749810.1177/030631295025003003Search in Google Scholar
Small, H. (1977). A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research. Social Studies of Science, 7(2), 139–166.SmallH.1977A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research7213916610.1177/030631277700700202Search in Google Scholar
Small, H. (1982). Citation context analysis. In B.J. Dervin & M.J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences, 3, (pp. 287–310). Norwood: Ablex.SmallH.1982Citation context analysisDervinB.J.VoigtM.J.3287310NorwoodAblexSearch in Google Scholar
Suppe, F. (1998). The structure of a scientific paper. Philosophy of Science, 65(3), 381–405. Retrieved on September 22, 2016, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/188275.SuppeF.1998The structure of a scientific paper653381405Retrieved on September 22, 2016, fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/18827510.1086/392651Search in Google Scholar
Tabatabaei, N. (2013). Contribution of information science to other disciplines as reflected in citation contexts of highly cited JASIST papers. Montreal. (McGill University P.hD. dissertation)TabatabaeiN.2013Contribution of information science to other disciplines as reflected in citation contexts of highly cited JASIST papers(McGill University P.hD. dissertation)Search in Google Scholar
Tang, R., & Safer, M.A. (2008). Author-rated importance of cited references in biology and psychology publications. Journal of Documentation, 64(2), 246–272.TangR.SaferM.A.2008Author-rated importance of cited references in biology and psychology publications64224627210.1108/00220410810858047Search in Google Scholar
Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., & Tidhar, D. (2006). Automatic classification of citation function. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 103–110). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.TeufelS.SiddharthanA.TidharD.2006Automatic classification of citation function103110Stroudsburg, PAAssociation for Computational Linguistics10.3115/1610075.1610091Search in Google Scholar
Tranöy, K.E. (1980). Norms of inquiry: Rationality, consistency requirements and normative conflict. In Rationality in Science (pp. 191–202). Springer Netherlands.TranöyK.E.1980Norms of inquiry: Rationality, consistency requirements and normative conflict191202Springer Netherlands10.1007/978-94-009-9032-6_13Search in Google Scholar
Vinkler, P. (1987). A quasi-quantitative citation model. Scientometrics, 12(1), 47–72.VinklerP.1987A quasi-quantitative citation model121477210.1007/BF02016689Search in Google Scholar
Voos, H., & Dagaev, K.S. (1976). Are all citations equal? Or Did we op. cit. your idem? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1(6), 19–21.VoosH.DagaevK.S.1976Are all citations equal? Or Did we op. cit. your idem?161921Search in Google Scholar
White, H.D. (1990). Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In C.L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, 84, 106. Newbury Park: Sage.WhiteH.D.1990Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defenseBorgmanC.L.84106Newbury ParkSageSearch in Google Scholar
White, M.D. & Wang, P.L. (1997). A qualitative study of citing behavior: Contributions, criteria, and metalevel documentation concerns. Library Quarterly, 67(2), 122–154.WhiteM.D.WangP.L.1997A qualitative study of citing behavior: Contributions, criteria, and metalevel documentation concerns67212215410.1086/629929Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2015a). Re-citation analysis: Promising for research evaluation, knowledge network analysis, knowledge representation and information retrieval? Proceedings of the 15th International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, June 30–July 3, 2015, Istanbul, Turkey.ZhaoD.StrotmannA.2015aRe-citation analysis: Promising for research evaluation, knowledge network analysis, knowledge representation and information retrieval?2015Istanbul, TurkeySearch in Google Scholar
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2015b). Analysis and visualization of citation networks. Williston, VT: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.ZhaoD.StrotmannA.2015bWilliston, VTMorgan & Claypool Publishers10.2200/S00624ED1V01Y201501ICR039Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2016). Dimensions and uncertainties of author citation rankings: Lessons learned from frequency-weighted in-text citation counting. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 671–682.ZhaoD.StrotmannA.2016Dimensions and uncertainties of author citation rankings: Lessons learned from frequency-weighted in-text citation counting67367168210.1002/asi.23418Search in Google Scholar
Zhu, X., Turney, P., Lemire, D., & Vellino, A. (2015). Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(2), 408–427.ZhuX.TurneyP.LemireD.VellinoA.2015Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal66240842710.1002/asi.23179Search in Google Scholar