[Brams, S.J, Edelman, P.H., Fishburn, P.C. (2000). Paradoxes of Fair Division, ECONOMIC RESEARCH REPORTS C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics Department of Economics Faculty of Arts and Science, New York University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brams, S.J, Taylor, A.D. (1995). An Envy-free Cake Division Protocol. American Mathematical Monthly, 102(1), 9–18.10.1080/00029890.1995.11990526]Search in Google Scholar
[Brams, S.J, Taylor, A.D. (1996). Fair division: from cake-cutting to dispute resolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511598975]Search in Google Scholar
[Buckley, W., Burns T.R., and Meeker D. (1974), Structural Resolutions of Collective Action Problems. Behavioral Science, Vol. 19, 277–297.10.1002/bs.3830190502]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, T.R. (1990). Models of Social and Market Exchange: Toward a Sociological Theory of Games and Social Behavior. In: C. Calhoun, M. W. Meyer, and W. R. Scott (Eds.) Structures of Power and Constraints: Papers in Honor of Peter Blau. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, T.R. (1994). Two Conceptions of Human Agency: Rational Choice Theory and the Social Theory of Action. In: P. Sztompka (Ed), Human Agency and the Reorientation of Social Theory. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, T. R., Caldas J.C., Roszkowska E. (2005). Generalized Game Theory's Contribution to Multi-agent Modelling: Addressing Problems of Social Regulatiion, Social Order, and Effective Security. In: B. Dunin-Keplicz, A. Jankowski, A. Skowron, M. Szczuka (Eds.), Monitoring, Security and Rescue Techniques in Multiagent Systems. Springer Verlag: Berlin/London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, T.R, DeVille P. (1999). On Social Equilibria. Paper prepared for presentation at the International Economic Association's XIIth World Congress, Buenos Aires, Argentina.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, T.R., Flam, H. (1987). The Shaping of Social Organization: Social Rule System Theory with Applications London: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, T.R., Gomolińska A. (1998). Modeling Social Game Systems by Rule Complexes. In: L. Polkowski, A. Skowron (Eds.), Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing. Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, T. R., Gomolińska A. (2000). The Theory of Socially Embedded Games: The Mathematics of Social Relationships, Rule Complexes, and Action Modalities. Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 34(4), 379–406.10.1023/A:1004884423573]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, T.R. Gomolińska A. (2001). Socio-cognitive Mechanisms of Belief Change: Application of Generalized Game Theory to Belief Revision, Social Fabrication, and Self-fulfilling Prophesy. Cognitive Systems, 2(1), 39–54.10.1016/S1389-0417(01)00014-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, T.R., Gomolińska A., Meeker L.D. (2001). The Theory of Socially Embedded Games: Applications and Extensions to Open and Closed Games. Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 35(1), 1–32.10.1023/A:1004825116540]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, T.R, Gomolińska, A., Meeker, L. D., De Ville P. (1998). The General Theory of Games: Rule Complexes, Action Modalities, and Transformation. Uppsala Theory Circle Report, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, T.R., Roszkowska, E. (2004). Fuzzy Games and Equilibria: The Perspective of the General Theory of Games on Nash and Normative Equilibria, In: Pal S.K, Polkowski, L., Skowron A. (Eds.) Rough-Neural Computing. Techniques for Computing with Words. Springer-Verlag, 435–470.10.1007/978-3-642-18859-6_17]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, T.R., Roszkowska, E. (2005). Social Judgment In Multi-Agent Systems: The Perspective Of Generalized Game Theory. In: Ron Sun (Ed.), Cognition and Multi-agent Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, T.R., Roszkowska E., (2006a). Economic and Social Equilibria: The Perspective of GGT. Optimum – Studia Ekonomiczne, 3(31), 16–45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, T., Roszkowska, E. (2006b). Social Judgement in multi-agent systems: The Perspective of Generalized Game Theory. In: R. Sun(Ed.), Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction. From Modeling to Social Simulation, Cambridge University Press, 409–416.10.1017/CBO9780511610721.018]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, T.R., Roszkowska E. (2007). Multi-Value Decision-Making and Games: The Perspective of Generalized Game Theory on Social and Psychological Complexity, Contradiction, and Equilibrium. In: Y. Shi, (Ed.), Advances in Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Human Systems Management. Amsterdam: IOS Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chapman, B., (1998a). Law Games: Defeasible Rules and Revisable Rationality. Law and Philosophy, 17, 443–480.10.2307/3505089]Search in Google Scholar
[Chapman, B., (1998b). More Easily Done Than Said: Rules, Reasons and Rational Social Choice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 18, 293–329.10.1093/ojls/18.2.293]Search in Google Scholar
[Cook K.S. (1989). The Social Science Encyclopedia. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dubins L.E., Spanier E.H. (1961). How to Cut a Cake Fairly. American Mathematical Monthly, 68(1), 1–17.10.2307/2311357]Search in Google Scholar
[Elster, J. (1992). Local Justice. New York: Russell Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elster, J., (2006). Fairness and Norms. Social Research, 73(2), 365–376.10.1353/sor.2006.0033]Search in Google Scholar
[Granovetter, M., (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.10.1086/228311]Search in Google Scholar
[Gomolińska, A., (1999). Rule Complexes for Representing Social Actors and Interactions. Studies in Logic, Grammar, and Rhetoric, 3(16), 95–108.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gomolińska A., (2002). Derivability of Rules From Rule Complexes, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 10, 21–44.10.12775/LLP.2002.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Gomolińska, A., (2004). Fundamental Mathematical Notions of the Theory of Socially Embedded Games: A Granular Computing Perspective. In: S.K. Pal, L. Polkowski, A. Skowron (Eds.) Rough-Neural Computing: Techniques for Computing with Words. Springer-Verlag: Berlin/London, 411–434.10.1007/978-3-642-18859-6_16]Search in Google Scholar
[Gomolińska, A., (2005). Toward Rough Applicability of Rules. In: B. Dunin-Keplicz, A. Jankowski, A. Skowron, M. Szczuka (Eds.). Monitoring, Security, and Rescue Techniques in Multiagent Systems. Springer-Verlag: Berlin/London, 203–214.10.1007/3-540-32370-8_14]Search in Google Scholar
[Hwang, C. L., Yoon K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, A.G. (2000). Blackwell Dictionary of Sociology, Blackwell: London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Machado, N. (1998). Using the Bodies of the Dead: Legal, Ethical and Organizational Dimensions of Organ Transplantation. Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sen, A., (1998). Social Choice and Freedom. Nobel Prize Lecture, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden, December 13, 1998.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.10.4159/9780674042605]Search in Google Scholar
[Schelling, T.C. (1963). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon, H. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steinhaus, H. (1948). The Problem of Fair Division. Econometrica, 16, 101–104.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steinhaus, H. (1960). Mathematical Snapshots. London: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar