Distributive Justice: From Steinhaus, Knaster, and Banach to Elster and Rawls — The Perspective of Sociological Game Theory

Brams, S.J, Edelman, P.H., Fishburn, P.C. (2000). Paradoxes of Fair Division, ECONOMIC RESEARCH REPORTS C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics Department of Economics Faculty of Arts and Science, New York University.Search in Google Scholar

Brams, S.J, Taylor, A.D. (1995). An Envy-free Cake Division Protocol. American Mathematical Monthly, 102(1), 9–18.10.1080/00029890.1995.11990526Search in Google Scholar

Brams, S.J, Taylor, A.D. (1996). Fair division: from cake-cutting to dispute resolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511598975Search in Google Scholar

Buckley, W., Burns T.R., and Meeker D. (1974), Structural Resolutions of Collective Action Problems. Behavioral Science, Vol. 19, 277–297.10.1002/bs.3830190502Search in Google Scholar

Burns, T.R. (1990). Models of Social and Market Exchange: Toward a Sociological Theory of Games and Social Behavior. In: C. Calhoun, M. W. Meyer, and W. R. Scott (Eds.) Structures of Power and Constraints: Papers in Honor of Peter Blau. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Burns, T.R. (1994). Two Conceptions of Human Agency: Rational Choice Theory and the Social Theory of Action. In: P. Sztompka (Ed), Human Agency and the Reorientation of Social Theory. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.Search in Google Scholar

Burns, T. R., Caldas J.C., Roszkowska E. (2005). Generalized Game Theory's Contribution to Multi-agent Modelling: Addressing Problems of Social Regulatiion, Social Order, and Effective Security. In: B. Dunin-Keplicz, A. Jankowski, A. Skowron, M. Szczuka (Eds.), Monitoring, Security and Rescue Techniques in Multiagent Systems. Springer Verlag: Berlin/London.Search in Google Scholar

Burns, T.R, DeVille P. (1999). On Social Equilibria. Paper prepared for presentation at the International Economic Association's XIIth World Congress, Buenos Aires, Argentina.Search in Google Scholar

Burns, T.R., Flam, H. (1987). The Shaping of Social Organization: Social Rule System Theory with Applications London: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Burns, T.R., Gomolińska A. (1998). Modeling Social Game Systems by Rule Complexes. In: L. Polkowski, A. Skowron (Eds.), Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing. Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

Burns, T. R., Gomolińska A. (2000). The Theory of Socially Embedded Games: The Mathematics of Social Relationships, Rule Complexes, and Action Modalities. Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 34(4), 379–406.10.1023/A:1004884423573Search in Google Scholar

Burns, T.R. Gomolińska A. (2001). Socio-cognitive Mechanisms of Belief Change: Application of Generalized Game Theory to Belief Revision, Social Fabrication, and Self-fulfilling Prophesy. Cognitive Systems, 2(1), 39–54.10.1016/S1389-0417(01)00014-6Search in Google Scholar

Burns, T.R., Gomolińska A., Meeker L.D. (2001). The Theory of Socially Embedded Games: Applications and Extensions to Open and Closed Games. Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 35(1), 1–32.10.1023/A:1004825116540Search in Google Scholar

Burns, T.R, Gomolińska, A., Meeker, L. D., De Ville P. (1998). The General Theory of Games: Rule Complexes, Action Modalities, and Transformation. Uppsala Theory Circle Report, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar

Burns, T.R., Roszkowska, E. (2004). Fuzzy Games and Equilibria: The Perspective of the General Theory of Games on Nash and Normative Equilibria, In: Pal S.K, Polkowski, L., Skowron A. (Eds.) Rough-Neural Computing. Techniques for Computing with Words. Springer-Verlag, 435–470.10.1007/978-3-642-18859-6_17Search in Google Scholar

Burns, T.R., Roszkowska, E. (2005). Social Judgment In Multi-Agent Systems: The Perspective Of Generalized Game Theory. In: Ron Sun (Ed.), Cognition and Multi-agent Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Burns, T.R., Roszkowska E., (2006a). Economic and Social Equilibria: The Perspective of GGT. Optimum – Studia Ekonomiczne, 3(31), 16–45.Search in Google Scholar

Burns, T., Roszkowska, E. (2006b). Social Judgement in multi-agent systems: The Perspective of Generalized Game Theory. In: R. Sun(Ed.), Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction. From Modeling to Social Simulation, Cambridge University Press, 409–416.10.1017/CBO9780511610721.018Search in Google Scholar

Burns, T.R., Roszkowska E. (2007). Multi-Value Decision-Making and Games: The Perspective of Generalized Game Theory on Social and Psychological Complexity, Contradiction, and Equilibrium. In: Y. Shi, (Ed.), Advances in Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Human Systems Management. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chapman, B., (1998a). Law Games: Defeasible Rules and Revisable Rationality. Law and Philosophy, 17, 443–480.10.2307/3505089Search in Google Scholar

Chapman, B., (1998b). More Easily Done Than Said: Rules, Reasons and Rational Social Choice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 18, 293–329.10.1093/ojls/18.2.293Search in Google Scholar

Cook K.S. (1989). The Social Science Encyclopedia. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Dubins L.E., Spanier E.H. (1961). How to Cut a Cake Fairly. American Mathematical Monthly, 68(1), 1–17.10.2307/2311357Search in Google Scholar

Elster, J. (1992). Local Justice. New York: Russell Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Elster, J., (2006). Fairness and Norms. Social Research, 73(2), 365–376.10.1353/sor.2006.0033Search in Google Scholar

Granovetter, M., (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.10.1086/228311Search in Google Scholar

Gomolińska, A., (1999). Rule Complexes for Representing Social Actors and Interactions. Studies in Logic, Grammar, and Rhetoric, 3(16), 95–108.Search in Google Scholar

Gomolińska A., (2002). Derivability of Rules From Rule Complexes, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 10, 21–44.10.12775/LLP.2002.002Search in Google Scholar

Gomolińska, A., (2004). Fundamental Mathematical Notions of the Theory of Socially Embedded Games: A Granular Computing Perspective. In: S.K. Pal, L. Polkowski, A. Skowron (Eds.) Rough-Neural Computing: Techniques for Computing with Words. Springer-Verlag: Berlin/London, 411–434.10.1007/978-3-642-18859-6_16Search in Google Scholar

Gomolińska, A., (2005). Toward Rough Applicability of Rules. In: B. Dunin-Keplicz, A. Jankowski, A. Skowron, M. Szczuka (Eds.). Monitoring, Security, and Rescue Techniques in Multiagent Systems. Springer-Verlag: Berlin/London, 203–214.10.1007/3-540-32370-8_14Search in Google Scholar

Hwang, C. L., Yoon K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, A.G. (2000). Blackwell Dictionary of Sociology, Blackwell: London.Search in Google Scholar

Machado, N. (1998). Using the Bodies of the Dead: Legal, Ethical and Organizational Dimensions of Organ Transplantation. Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Sen, A., (1998). Social Choice and Freedom. Nobel Prize Lecture, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden, December 13, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.10.4159/9780674042605Search in Google Scholar

Schelling, T.C. (1963). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Simon, H. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Steinhaus, H. (1948). The Problem of Fair Division. Econometrica, 16, 101–104.Search in Google Scholar

Steinhaus, H. (1960). Mathematical Snapshots. London: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar