Comparison of Analysis Specifications and Practices for Diaphragm Wall Retaining System

[1]American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2012). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. Washington DC.American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials2012AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design SpecificationsWashington DCSearch in Google Scholar

[2]American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2016). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. Washington DC.American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials2016AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design SpecificationsWashington DCSearch in Google Scholar

[3]Bakhoum, M.M., Mourad, S.A. & Hassan, M.M. (2016). Comparison of actions and resistances in different building design codes. J. Adv. Res. 7(5), 757–767. 10.1016/j.jare.2015.11.001.BakhoumM.M.MouradS.A.HassanM.M.2016Comparison of actions and resistances in different building design codesJ. Adv. Res.7575776710.1016/j.jare.2015.11.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4]British Standards Institution. (2000). British standard: Execution of special geotechnical works - Diaphragm walls. BS EN 1538:2000. London.British Standards Institution2000British standard: Execution of special geotechnical works - Diaphragm wallsBS EN 1538:2000LondonSearch in Google Scholar

[5]British Standards Institution. (2004). UK National Annex to Eurocode 7 Geotechnical design, General rules. BS NA EN 1997-1:2004. London.British Standards Institution2004UK National Annex to Eurocode 7 Geotechnical design, General rulesBS NA EN 19971:2004LondonSearch in Google Scholar

[6]British Standards Institution. (2015). British standard: Code of practice for earth retaining structures. BS 8002:2015. London.British Standards Institution2015British standard: Code of practice for earth retaining structuresBS 8002:2015LondonSearch in Google Scholar

[7]British Standards Institution. (2015). British standard: Code of practice for foundations. BS 8004:2015. London.British Standards Institution2015British standard: Code of practice for foundationsBS 8004:2015LondonSearch in Google Scholar

[8]Brown, D., Wulleman, T. & Bottiau, M. (2016). A comparison of design practice of bored piles/drilled shafts between Europe and North America. The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute. 10(2), 54-63. 10.1080/19375247.2016.1254375BrownD.WullemanT.BottiauM.2016A comparison of design practice of bored piles/drilled shafts between Europe and North AmericaThe Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute.102546310.1080/19375247.2016.1254375Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[9]Bureau of Indian Standards. (1980). Indian standard: Code of practice for design and construction of diaphragm walls. IS 9556:1980(R2003). New Delhi.Bureau of Indian Standards1980Indian standard: Code of practice for design and construction of diaphragm wallsIS 9556:1980(R2003)New DelhiSearch in Google Scholar

[10]Bureau of Indian Standards. (1989). Indian standard: Code of practice for planning and design of ports and harbours-Part 2 Earth Pressures. IS 4651 (Part 2):1989. New Delhi.Bureau of Indian Standards1989Indian standard: Code of practice for planning and design of ports and harbours-Part 2 Earth PressuresIS 4651 (Part 2):1989New DelhiSearch in Google Scholar

[11]Bureau of Indian Standards. (2014). Indian standard: Code of practice for planning and design of ports and harbours-General design considerations. IS 4651 (Part 4). New Delhi.Bureau of Indian Standards2014Indian standard: Code of practice for planning and design of ports and harbours-General design considerationsIS 4651 (Part 4)New DelhiSearch in Google Scholar

[12]Canadian Geotechnical Society. (2006). Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual. 4th edition. Canada.Canadian Geotechnical Society2006Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual4thCanadaSearch in Google Scholar

[13]Canadian Standards Association. (2006). Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. CAN/CSA-S6-06. Ontario.Canadian Standards Association2006Canadian Highway Bridge Design CodeCAN/CSA-S6-06OntarioSearch in Google Scholar

[14]Canadian Standards Association. (2014). Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. CAN/CSA-S6-14. Ontario.Canadian Standards Association2014Canadian Highway Bridge Design CodeCAN/CSA-S6-14OntarioSearch in Google Scholar

[15]European committee for standardization. (2004). European standard: Eurocode7 Geotechnical Design Part 1: General rules. EN 1997-1:2004. Brussels.European committee for standardization2004European standard: Eurocode7 Geotechnical Design Part 1: General rulesEN 1997-1:2004BrusselsSearch in Google Scholar

[16]European committee for standardization. (2004). European standard: Eurocode7 Geotechnical Design Part 2: Ground investigation and testing. EN 1997-2:2004. Brussels.European committee for standardization2004European standard: Eurocode7 Geotechnical Design Part 2: Ground investigation and testingEN 1997-2:2004BrusselsSearch in Google Scholar

[17]Fellenius, B.H. (2014). Piled foundation design as reflected in codes and standards. Proceedings of the DFI-EFFC International Conference on Piling and Deep Foundations, 21-23 May 2014 ( pp 1013-1030). Stockholm.FelleniusB.H.2014Piled foundation design as reflected in codes and standardsProceedings of the DFI-EFFC International Conference on Piling and Deep Foundations21-23 May201410131030StockholmSearch in Google Scholar

[18]Fenton, G.A., Naghibi, F., Dundas, D., Bathurst, R.J.& Griffiths, D.V. (2016) Reliability-Based Geotechnical Design in the 2014 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. Can. Geotech. J. 53(2), 236-251. 10.1139/cgj-2015-0158.FentonG.A.NaghibiF.DundasD.BathurstR.J.GriffithsD.V.2016Reliability-Based Geotechnical Design in the 2014 Canadian Highway Bridge Design CodeCan. Geotech. J.53223625110.1139/cgj-2015-0158Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19]Khabbaz, H. & Aung, Y. (2015). Anchored wall design: comparing the global and partial factors of safety incorporating the Australian standards. International Journal of Geomate 9(1), 1395-1402. 10.21660/2015.17.4291.KhabbazH.AungY.2015Anchored wall design: comparing the global and partial factors of safety incorporating the Australian standardsInternational Journal of Geomate911395140210.21660/2015.17.4291Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[20]Lewandowska, A.S. & Czajewska, M.M. (2007). Design of diaphragm walls according to EN 1997-1:2004 Eurocode 7. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2007 (pp_291-296). Madrid: IOS Press.LewandowskaA.S.CzajewskaM.M.2007Design of diaphragm walls according to EN 1997-1:2004 Eurocode 7Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering2007291296MadridIOS PressSearch in Google Scholar

[21]Simpson, B. (2000). Partial factors: where to apply them? International Workshop on Limit State Design in Geotechnical Engineering, 18 November 2000. Melbourne.SimpsonB.2000Partial factors: where to apply them?International Workshop on Limit State Design in Geotechnical Engineering18 November2000MelbourneSearch in Google Scholar

[22]Standards Australia. (2002). Australian standard: Earth Retaining Structures. AS 4678-2002. Sydney.Standards Australia2002Australian standard: Earth Retaining StructuresAS 4678-2002SydneySearch in Google Scholar

[23]Standards Australia. (2002). Structural design actions-permanent, imposed and other actions. AS/NZS 1170-1-2002. Sydney.Standards Australia2002Structural design actions-permanent, imposed and other actionsAS/NZS 1170-1-2002SydneySearch in Google Scholar

[24]Standards Australia. (2004). Australian standard: Bridge design Part 3 Foundations and soil-supporting structures. AS 5100-3-2004. Sydney.Standards Australia2004Australian standard: Bridge design Part 3 Foundations and soil-supporting structuresAS 5100-3-2004SydneySearch in Google Scholar

[25]Tabsh, S.W. (2013). Comparison between reinforced concrete designs based on the ACI 318 and BS 8110 codes. Structural Engineering & Mechanics. 48(4), 467-477. 10.12989/sem.2013.48.4.467.TabshS.W.2013Comparison between reinforced concrete designs based on the ACI 318 and BS 8110 codesStructural Engineering – Mechanics.48446747710.12989/sem.2013.48.4.467Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[26]Wijaya, J. & Taiebat, H. (2009). Factor of safety in AS-4678: Earth retaining structures. Australian Geomechanics Journal. 44 (4), 27-31.WijayaJ.TaiebatH.2009Factor of safety in AS-4678: Earth retaining structuresAustralian Geomechanics Journal.4442731Search in Google Scholar