Login
Registrati
Reimposta password
Pubblica & Distribuisci
Soluzioni Editoriali
Soluzioni di Distribuzione
Temi
Architettura e design
Arti
Business e Economia
Chimica
Chimica industriale
Farmacia
Filosofia
Fisica
Geoscienze
Ingegneria
Interesse generale
Legge
Letteratura
Linguistica e semiotica
Matematica
Medicina
Musica
Scienze bibliotecarie e dell'informazione, studi library
Scienze dei materiali
Scienze della vita
Scienze informatiche
Scienze sociali
Sport e tempo libero
Storia
Studi classici e del Vicino Oriente antico
Studi culturali
Studi ebraici
Teologia e religione
Pubblicazioni
Riviste
Libri
Atti
Editori
Blog
Contatti
Cerca
EUR
USD
GBP
Italiano
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrello
Home
Riviste
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Volume 10 (2019): Numero 1 (January 2019)
Accesso libero
Electrical impedance myography for assessing paraspinal muscles of patients with low back pain
Yun Wang
Yun Wang
,
Laura Freedman
Laura Freedman
,
Martin Buck
Martin Buck
,
Jose Bohorquez
Jose Bohorquez
,
Seward B. Rutkove
Seward B. Rutkove
e
John Keel
John Keel
| 31 dic 2019
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Volume 10 (2019): Numero 1 (January 2019)
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Sommario
Articolo
Immagini e tabelle
Bibliografia
Autori
Articoli in questo Numero
Anteprima
PDF
Cita
CONDIVIDI
Pubblicato online:
31 dic 2019
Pagine:
103 - 109
Ricevuto:
29 nov 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2019-0015
Parole chiave
Low back pain
,
paraspinal muscles
,
electrical impedance
,
radiculopathy
,
musculoskeletal
,
bioimpedance
,
asymmetry
,
age
,
body mass index
© 2019 Yun Wang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1
A. The Myolex mViewTM system for neuromuscular assessment, including laptop, power convertor box, impedance measuring unit, and electrode array; B. Detail of electrode array used in this study; magenta-current emitting, blue-voltage sensing. Only data from these 4 electrodes were used in this analysis.
Figure 2
Typical multifrequency data obtained from with the mView impedance-measuring system shown in Figure 1. This data is from a 34-year-old healthy volunteer.
Figure 3
A, B, C. The phase, resistance, and reactance values at 100 kHz (±standard deviation) for low back pain patients versus healthy controls. D, E, F. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots for these same values. While the population means may be different, this analytical approach has limited value in discriminating between LBP patients and healthy individuals.
Figure 4
A, B, C. Relative differences in 100 kHz values (absolute value (right-left difference /right-left average)) for low back pain patients versus healthy controls. D, E, F. ROC plots for these same values. The D-value is equal to the side-to-side difference divided by the average of both sides. While still not a strong discriminator, this approach is stronger.
Figure 5
A, B, C. Correlation between phase, resistance, and reactance values at 100 kHz and age. Both phase and reactance show a significant relationship, whereas resistance does not. D, E, F. Correlation between phase, resistance, and reactance values at 100 kHz and age. Both phase and resistance show a significant relationship, whereas reactance does not.
Demographic data
Low Back Pain Participants
Healthy Volunteer
Participants
47
86
Median age, IQR
51.0(39.5–57.5)
45.5(30.3–56.0)
Sex (male/female)
21/26
42/44
Body weight (lbs)
165.0(147.0–187.5)
162.0(136.3–197.0)
Height (inches)
67.0(64.5–70.0)
66.0(64.0–69.0)