Iniciar sesión
Registrarse
Restablecer contraseña
Publicar y Distribuir
Soluciones de Publicación
Soluciones de Distribución
Temas
Arquitectura y diseño
Artes
Ciencias Sociales
Ciencias de la Información y Bibliotecas, Estudios del Libro
Ciencias de la vida
Ciencias de los materiales
Deporte y tiempo libre
Estudios clásicos y del Cercano Oriente antiguo
Estudios culturales
Estudios judíos
Farmacia
Filosofía
Física
Geociencias
Historia
Informática
Ingeniería
Interés general
Ley
Lingüística y semiótica
Literatura
Matemáticas
Medicina
Música
Negocios y Economía
Química
Química industrial
Teología y religión
Publicaciones
Revistas
Libros
Actas
Editoriales
Blog
Contacto
Buscar
EUR
USD
GBP
Español
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrito
Home
Revistas
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Volumen 10 (2019): Edición 1 (January 2019)
Acceso abierto
Electrical impedance myography for assessing paraspinal muscles of patients with low back pain
Yun Wang
Yun Wang
,
Laura Freedman
Laura Freedman
,
Martin Buck
Martin Buck
,
Jose Bohorquez
Jose Bohorquez
,
Seward B. Rutkove
Seward B. Rutkove
y
John Keel
John Keel
| 31 dic 2019
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Volumen 10 (2019): Edición 1 (January 2019)
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Resumen
Artículo
Figuras y tablas
Referencias
Autores
Artículos en este número
Vista previa
PDF
Cite
Compartir
Publicado en línea:
31 dic 2019
Páginas:
103 - 109
Recibido:
29 nov 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2019-0015
Palabras clave
Low back pain
,
paraspinal muscles
,
electrical impedance
,
radiculopathy
,
musculoskeletal
,
bioimpedance
,
asymmetry
,
age
,
body mass index
© 2019 Yun Wang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1
A. The Myolex mViewTM system for neuromuscular assessment, including laptop, power convertor box, impedance measuring unit, and electrode array; B. Detail of electrode array used in this study; magenta-current emitting, blue-voltage sensing. Only data from these 4 electrodes were used in this analysis.
Figure 2
Typical multifrequency data obtained from with the mView impedance-measuring system shown in Figure 1. This data is from a 34-year-old healthy volunteer.
Figure 3
A, B, C. The phase, resistance, and reactance values at 100 kHz (±standard deviation) for low back pain patients versus healthy controls. D, E, F. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots for these same values. While the population means may be different, this analytical approach has limited value in discriminating between LBP patients and healthy individuals.
Figure 4
A, B, C. Relative differences in 100 kHz values (absolute value (right-left difference /right-left average)) for low back pain patients versus healthy controls. D, E, F. ROC plots for these same values. The D-value is equal to the side-to-side difference divided by the average of both sides. While still not a strong discriminator, this approach is stronger.
Figure 5
A, B, C. Correlation between phase, resistance, and reactance values at 100 kHz and age. Both phase and reactance show a significant relationship, whereas resistance does not. D, E, F. Correlation between phase, resistance, and reactance values at 100 kHz and age. Both phase and resistance show a significant relationship, whereas reactance does not.
Demographic data
Low Back Pain Participants
Healthy Volunteer
Participants
47
86
Median age, IQR
51.0(39.5–57.5)
45.5(30.3–56.0)
Sex (male/female)
21/26
42/44
Body weight (lbs)
165.0(147.0–187.5)
162.0(136.3–197.0)
Height (inches)
67.0(64.5–70.0)
66.0(64.0–69.0)