[1. Aarnio, K., Lindeman, M. Religious people and paranormal believers: Alike or different? Journal of Individual Differences 28 (1), 2007, pp. 1-9.10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.1]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Bagozzi, R. P., Tybout, A. M., Craig, C. S., & Sternthal, B. The construct validity of the tripartite classification of attitudes, Journal of Marketing Research 16 (1), 1979, pp. 88-95.10.1177/002224377901600113]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Banerjee, K., Bloom, P. “Everything happens for a reason”: Children’s beliefs about purpose in life events, Child Development 86 (2), 2015, pp. 503-518.10.1111/cdev.1231225327783]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Bargh, J. A., Chartrand, T. L. The unbearable automaticity of being, American Psychologist 54 (7), 1999, pp. 462-479.10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Barrett, J. L., Keil, F. C. Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts, Cognitive Psychology 31 (3), 1996, pp. 219-247.10.1006/cogp.1996.00178975683]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Barrett, J. L., Lanman, J. A. The science of religious beliefs, Religion 38 (2), pp. 109-124.10.1016/j.religion.2008.01.007]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Barsalou, L. W. Grounded cognition, Annual Review of Psychology 59, 2008, pp. 617-645.10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.09363917705682]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Bem, D. J. Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena, Psychological review 74 (3), 1967, pp. 183–200.10.1037/h00248355342882]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Bering, J. The belief instinct: The psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life, WW Norton & Company, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Bering, J. M. Intuitive conceptions of dead agents’ minds: The natural foundations of afterlife beliefs as phenomenological boundary. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2 (4), 2002, pp. 263-308.10.1163/15685370260441008]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Bering, J. M. The folk psychology of souls, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5), 2006, pp. 453-498.10.1017/S0140525X0600910117156519]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Bering, J. M., Bjorklund, D. F. The natural emergence of reasoning about the afterlife as a developmental regularity, Developmental Psychology 40 (2), 2004, pp. 217-233.10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.21714979762]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Bering, J. M., McLeod, K., & Shackelford, T. K. Reasoning about dead agents reveals possible adaptive trends, Human Nature 16 (4), 2005, pp. 360-381.10.1007/s12110-005-1015-226189837]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Bloom, P. Religion is natural, Developmental Science 10 (1), 2007, pp. 147-151.10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00577.x17181713]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Breckler, S. J. Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 (6), 1984, pp. 1191-1205.10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1191]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Chatterjee, S. Hindu pilgrimages, pp. 269–279, In A. Wilder-Smith, E. Schwartz, & M. Shaw (eds.), Travel medicine: Tales behind the science, Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2007.10.1016/B978-0-08-045359-0.50036-1]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Chen, S., Chaiken, S. The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context, Dual-process theories in social psychology 15, 1999, pp. 73-96.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Connors, M. H., Halligan, P. W. A cognitive account of belief: a tentative road map, Frontiers in Psychology 5, 2015, p. 1588.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01588432752825741291]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Devine, P. G. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (1), 1989, pp. 5-18.10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Dijksterhuis, A., Nordgren, L. F. A theory of unconscious thought, Perspectives on Psychological Science 1 (2), 2006, pp. 95-109.10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.x26151465]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Farias, M. et al. Supernatural belief is not modulated by intuitive thinking style or cognitive inhibition, Scientific Reports 7 (1), 2017, p. 15100.10.1038/s41598-017-14090-9567811129118434]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Fazio, R. H. Attitudes as object–evaluation associations of varying strength, Social Cognition 25 (5), 2007, pp. 603-637.10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603267781719424447]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance, vol. 2, Palo Alto, CA, US: Stanford University Press, 1962.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Fuller, C. J. Camphor flame: Popular Hinduism and society in India, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.10.1515/9780691186412]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Gawronski, B., Bodenhausen, G. V. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change, Psychological Bulletin 132 (5), 2006, pp. 692-731.10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.69216910748]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Gawronski, B., De Houwer, J. Implicit measures in social and personality psychology, pp. 283-310, In H. T. Reis, C. M. Judd (eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed.), New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2014.10.1017/CBO9780511996481.016]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Gendler, T. S. Alief and belief, The Journal of Philosophy 105 (10), 2008, pp. 634-663.10.5840/jphil20081051025]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Gervais, W. M. Religious cognition, pp. 81-105, In V. Saroglou (ed.), Religion, personality, and social behavior, Psychology Press, 2013.10.4324/9780203125359-11]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Gervais, W. M., Norenzayan, A. Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief, Science 336 (6080), 2012, pp. 493-496.10.1126/science.1215647]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Gervais, W. M., et al. Analytic atheism: A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon? Judgment and Decision Making 13 (3), 2018, pp. 268-274.10.1017/S1930297500007701]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Gomes, C. M., McCullough, M. E. The effects of implicit religious primes on dictator game allocations: A preregistered replication experiment, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144 (6), 2015, e94-e104.10.1037/xge000002726168038]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes, Psychological Review 102 (1), 1995, pp. 4-27.10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.47878162]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Guthrie, S. E. Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Haidt, J., Bjorklund, F., & Murphy, S. Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason, unpublished manuscript, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Hall, L., Johansson, P., & Strandberg, T. Lifting the veil of morality: Choice blindness and attitude reversals on a self-transforming survey, PLOS ONE 7 (9), 2012, e45457.10.1371/journal.pone.0045457344689323029020]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Hall, L., Johansson, P., Tärning, B., Sikström, S., & Deutgen, T. Magic at the marketplace: Choice blindness for the taste of jam and the smell of tea, Cognition 117 (1), 2010, pp. 54-61.10.1016/j.cognition.2010.06.01020637455]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Helbig, H. B., Graf, M., & Kiefer, M. The role of action representations in visual object recognition, Experimental Brain Research 174 (2), 2006, pp. 221-228.10.1007/s00221-006-0443-516636796]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Heywood, B. T., Bering, J. M. “Meant to be”: How religious beliefs and cultural religiosity affect the implicit bias to think teleologically, Religion, Brain & Behavior 4 (3), 2014, pp. 183-201.10.1080/2153599X.2013.782888]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Järnefelt, E., Canfield, C. F., & Kelemen, D. The divided mind of a disbeliever: Intuitive beliefs about nature as purposefully created among different groups of non-religious adults, Cognition 140, 2015, pp. 72-88.10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.00525880608]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Jong, J. Explaining Religion (Away?), Sophia 52 (3), 2013, pp. 521-533.10.1007/s11841-012-0338-9]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Jong, J. Beliefs are Object-Attribute Associations of Varying Strength, Contemporary Pragmatism 15 (3), 2018, pp. 284-301.10.1163/18758185-01503002]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Kelemen, D., Rosset, E. The human function compunction: Teleological explanation in adults, Cognition 111 (1), 2009, pp. 138-143.10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.00119200537]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Kelemen, D., Rottman, J., & Seston, R. Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142 (4), 2013, pp. 1074-1083.10.1037/a003039923067062]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Keysar, A., Navarro-Rivera, J. A world of atheism: Global demographics, pp. 553–586, In S. Bullivant, M. Ruse (eds.), The Oxford handbook of atheism, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199644650.013.011]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Laurin, K., Kay, A. C., & Fitzsimons, G. M. Divergent effects of activating thoughts of God on self-regulation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102 (1), 2012, pp. 4-21.10.1037/a002597122023712]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Lebreton, L. C., Van der Zwet, J., Damsteeg, J. W., Slat, B., Andrady, A., & Reisser, J. River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans, Nature Communications 8, 2017, p. 15611.10.1038/ncomms15611546723028589961]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Lindeman, M., Heywood, B., Riekki, T., & Makkonen, T. Atheists become emotionally aroused when daring God to do terrible things, International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 24 (2), 2014, pp. 124-132.10.1080/10508619.2013.771991]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Lindeman, M., Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Lipsanen, J. Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose, Cognition 134, 2015, pp. 63-76.10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.00825460380]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Maclean, K. Pilgrimage and power: The Kumbh Mela in Allahabad, 1765–1954, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2008.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195338942.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Maister, L., Slater, M., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Tsakiris, M. Changing bodies changes minds: owning another body affects social cognition, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (1), 2015, pp. 6-12.10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.00125524273]Search in Google Scholar
[51. McKay, R. T., Dennett, D. C. Our evolving beliefs about evolved misbelief, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6), 2009, pp. 541-561.10.1017/S0140525X09991555]Search in Google Scholar
[52. McLaughlin, O., Somerville, J. Choice blindness in financial decision making, Judgment and Decision Making 8 (5), 2013, pp. 561-572.10.1017/S1930297500003673]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Moors, A., Spruyt, A., & De Houwer, J. In search of a measure that qualifies as implicit: Recommendations based on a decompositional view of automaticity, pp. 19-35, In B. Gawronski, B. K. Payne (eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications, New York, NY: Guilford, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Nisbett, R. E., Wilson, T. D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes, Psychological Review 84, 1977, pp. 231–259.10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Nosek, B. A. Implicit–explicit relations. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16 (2), 2007, pp. 65-69.10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00477.x]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Oman, D. Defining religion and spirituality, pp. 23-47, In R. F. Paloutzian, C. L. Park (eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.), New York: Guilford, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Pechey, R., Halligan, P. W. Exploring the folk understanding of belief: Identifying key dimensions endorsed in the general population, Journal of Cognition and Culture 12 (1-2), 2012, pp. 81-99.10.1163/156853712X633947]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Pennycook, G., Cheyne J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit, Judgment and Decision Making 10 (6), 2015, pp. 549-563.10.1017/S1930297500006999]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief, Cognition 123 (3), 2012, pp. 335-346.10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.00322481051]Search in Google Scholar
[60. Pennycook, G., Ross, R. M., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. Atheists and agnostics are more reflective than religious believers: Four empirical studies and a meta-analysis, PLOS ONE 11 (4), 2016, e0153039.10.1371/journal.pone.0153039482440927054566]Search in Google Scholar
[61. Pew Center on Religion and Public Life. The Global Religious Landscape, Washington D.C.: Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[62. Preston, J. L., Ritter, R. S., & Hepler, J. Neuroscience and the soul: Competing explanations for the human experience, Cognition 127 (1), 2013, pp. 31-37.10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.00323318352]Search in Google Scholar
[63. Randolph-Seng, B., Nielsen, M. E. Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations, The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 17 (4), 2007, pp. 303-315.10.1080/10508610701572812]Search in Google Scholar
[64. Rosenberg, M. J., Hovland, C. I., McGuire, W. J., Abelson, R. P., & Brehm, J. W. Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (Yales studies in attitude and communication), Oxford, England: Yale University Press, 1960.]Search in Google Scholar
[65. Rozin, P., Nemeroff, C. Sympathetic magical thinking: The contagion and similarity “heuristics”, pp. 201-216, In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. 2002.10.1017/CBO9780511808098.013]Search in Google Scholar
[66. Salancik, G. R., Conway, M. Attitude inferences from salient and relevant cognitive content about behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 (5), 1975, pp. 829-840.10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.829]Search in Google Scholar
[67. Sanchez, C., Sundermeier, B., Gray, K., & Calin-Jageman, R. J. Direct replication of Gervais & Norenzayan (2012): No evidence that analytic thinking decreases religious belief, PLOS ONE 12 (2), 2017, e0172636.10.1371/journal.pone.0172636532526228234942]Search in Google Scholar
[68. Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science 18(9), 2007, pp. 803-809.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01983.x17760777]Search in Google Scholar
[69. Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141 (3), 2012, pp. 423-428.10.1037/a002539121928924]Search in Google Scholar
[70. Smith, S., Alogna, V. K., Balkcom, E. R., Halberstadt, J. B., & Bering, J. M. Challenges of religious skepticism: Do extinctivists fear a visit from the dead? Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Portland, OR, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[71. Sosis, R., Alcorta, C. Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior, Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews: Issues, News, and Reviews 12 (6), 2003, pp. 264-274.10.1002/evan.10120]Search in Google Scholar
[72. Sperber, D. Intuitive and reflective beliefs, Mind & Language 12 (1), 1997, pp. 67-83.10.1111/1468-0017.00036]Search in Google Scholar
[73. Stepper, S., Strack, F. Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64 (2), 1993, pp. 211-220.10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.211]Search in Google Scholar
[74. Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (5), 1988, pp. 768-777.10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.768]Search in Google Scholar
[75. Tucker, M., Ellis, R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (3), 1998, pp. 830-846.10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830]Search in Google Scholar
[76. Wells, G. L., Petty, R. E. The effects of over head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses, Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1 (3), 1980, pp. 219-230.10.1207/s15324834basp0103_2]Search in Google Scholar
[77. Willard, A. K., Norenzayan, A. Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life’s purpose, Cognition 129 (2), 2013, pp. 379-391.10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.01623974049]Search in Google Scholar
[78. Zuckerman, P. Atheism: Contemporary numbers and patterns, pp. 47–66, In M. Martin (ed.), The Cambridge companion to atheism, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.10.1017/CCOL0521842700.004]Search in Google Scholar