Religious Intuitions and the Nature of “Belief”

1. Aarnio, K., Lindeman, M. Religious people and paranormal believers: Alike or different? Journal of Individual Differences 28 (1), 2007, pp. 1-9.10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.1Search in Google Scholar

2. Bagozzi, R. P., Tybout, A. M., Craig, C. S., & Sternthal, B. The construct validity of the tripartite classification of attitudes, Journal of Marketing Research 16 (1), 1979, pp. 88-95.10.1177/002224377901600113Search in Google Scholar

3. Banerjee, K., Bloom, P. “Everything happens for a reason”: Children’s beliefs about purpose in life events, Child Development 86 (2), 2015, pp. 503-518.10.1111/cdev.1231225327783Search in Google Scholar

4. Bargh, J. A., Chartrand, T. L. The unbearable automaticity of being, American Psychologist 54 (7), 1999, pp. 462-479.10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462Search in Google Scholar

5. Barrett, J. L., Keil, F. C. Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts, Cognitive Psychology 31 (3), 1996, pp. 219-247.10.1006/cogp.1996.00178975683Search in Google Scholar

6. Barrett, J. L., Lanman, J. A. The science of religious beliefs, Religion 38 (2), pp. 109-124.10.1016/j.religion.2008.01.007Search in Google Scholar

7. Barsalou, L. W. Grounded cognition, Annual Review of Psychology 59, 2008, pp. 617-645.10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.09363917705682Search in Google Scholar

8. Bem, D. J. Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena, Psychological review 74 (3), 1967, pp. 183–200.10.1037/h00248355342882Search in Google Scholar

9. Bering, J. The belief instinct: The psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life, WW Norton & Company, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

10. Bering, J. M. Intuitive conceptions of dead agents’ minds: The natural foundations of afterlife beliefs as phenomenological boundary. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2 (4), 2002, pp. 263-308.10.1163/15685370260441008Search in Google Scholar

11. Bering, J. M. The folk psychology of souls, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5), 2006, pp. 453-498.10.1017/S0140525X0600910117156519Search in Google Scholar

12. Bering, J. M., Bjorklund, D. F. The natural emergence of reasoning about the afterlife as a developmental regularity, Developmental Psychology 40 (2), 2004, pp. 217-233.10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.21714979762Search in Google Scholar

13. Bering, J. M., McLeod, K., & Shackelford, T. K. Reasoning about dead agents reveals possible adaptive trends, Human Nature 16 (4), 2005, pp. 360-381.10.1007/s12110-005-1015-226189837Search in Google Scholar

14. Bloom, P. Religion is natural, Developmental Science 10 (1), 2007, pp. 147-151.10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00577.x17181713Search in Google Scholar

15. Breckler, S. J. Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 (6), 1984, pp. 1191-1205.10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1191Search in Google Scholar

16. Chatterjee, S. Hindu pilgrimages, pp. 269–279, In A. Wilder-Smith, E. Schwartz, & M. Shaw (eds.), Travel medicine: Tales behind the science, Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2007.10.1016/B978-0-08-045359-0.50036-1Search in Google Scholar

17. Chen, S., Chaiken, S. The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context, Dual-process theories in social psychology 15, 1999, pp. 73-96.Search in Google Scholar

18. Connors, M. H., Halligan, P. W. A cognitive account of belief: a tentative road map, Frontiers in Psychology 5, 2015, p. 1588.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01588432752825741291Search in Google Scholar

19. Devine, P. G. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (1), 1989, pp. 5-18.10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5Search in Google Scholar

20. Dijksterhuis, A., Nordgren, L. F. A theory of unconscious thought, Perspectives on Psychological Science 1 (2), 2006, pp. 95-109.10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.x26151465Search in Google Scholar

21. Farias, M. et al. Supernatural belief is not modulated by intuitive thinking style or cognitive inhibition, Scientific Reports 7 (1), 2017, p. 15100.10.1038/s41598-017-14090-9567811129118434Search in Google Scholar

22. Fazio, R. H. Attitudes as object–evaluation associations of varying strength, Social Cognition 25 (5), 2007, pp. 603-637.10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603267781719424447Search in Google Scholar

23. Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance, vol. 2, Palo Alto, CA, US: Stanford University Press, 1962.Search in Google Scholar

24. Fuller, C. J. Camphor flame: Popular Hinduism and society in India, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.10.1515/9780691186412Search in Google Scholar

25. Gawronski, B., Bodenhausen, G. V. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change, Psychological Bulletin 132 (5), 2006, pp. 692-731.10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.69216910748Search in Google Scholar

26. Gawronski, B., De Houwer, J. Implicit measures in social and personality psychology, pp. 283-310, In H. T. Reis, C. M. Judd (eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2^nd ed.), New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2014.10.1017/CBO9780511996481.016Search in Google Scholar

27. Gendler, T. S. Alief and belief, The Journal of Philosophy 105 (10), 2008, pp. 634-663.10.5840/jphil20081051025Search in Google Scholar

28. Gervais, W. M. Religious cognition, pp. 81-105, In V. Saroglou (ed.), Religion, personality, and social behavior, Psychology Press, 2013.10.4324/9780203125359-11Search in Google Scholar

29. Gervais, W. M., Norenzayan, A. Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief, Science 336 (6080), 2012, pp. 493-496.10.1126/science.1215647Search in Google Scholar

30. Gervais, W. M., et al. Analytic atheism: A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon? Judgment and Decision Making 13 (3), 2018, pp. 268-274.10.1017/S1930297500007701Search in Google Scholar

31. Gomes, C. M., McCullough, M. E. The effects of implicit religious primes on dictator game allocations: A preregistered replication experiment, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144 (6), 2015, e94-e104.10.1037/xge000002726168038Search in Google Scholar

32. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes, Psychological Review 102 (1), 1995, pp. 4-27.10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.47878162Search in Google Scholar

33. Guthrie, S. E. Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

34. Haidt, J., Bjorklund, F., & Murphy, S. Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason, unpublished manuscript, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

35. Hall, L., Johansson, P., & Strandberg, T. Lifting the veil of morality: Choice blindness and attitude reversals on a self-transforming survey, PLOS ONE 7 (9), 2012, e45457.10.1371/journal.pone.0045457344689323029020Search in Google Scholar

36. Hall, L., Johansson, P., Tärning, B., Sikström, S., & Deutgen, T. Magic at the marketplace: Choice blindness for the taste of jam and the smell of tea, Cognition 117 (1), 2010, pp. 54-61.10.1016/j.cognition.2010.06.01020637455Search in Google Scholar

37. Helbig, H. B., Graf, M., & Kiefer, M. The role of action representations in visual object recognition, Experimental Brain Research 174 (2), 2006, pp. 221-228.10.1007/s00221-006-0443-516636796Search in Google Scholar

38. Heywood, B. T., Bering, J. M. “Meant to be”: How religious beliefs and cultural religiosity affect the implicit bias to think teleologically, Religion, Brain & Behavior 4 (3), 2014, pp. 183-201.10.1080/2153599X.2013.782888Search in Google Scholar

39. Järnefelt, E., Canfield, C. F., & Kelemen, D. The divided mind of a disbeliever: Intuitive beliefs about nature as purposefully created among different groups of non-religious adults, Cognition 140, 2015, pp. 72-88.10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.00525880608Search in Google Scholar

40. Jong, J. Explaining Religion (Away?), Sophia 52 (3), 2013, pp. 521-533.10.1007/s11841-012-0338-9Search in Google Scholar

41. Jong, J. Beliefs are Object-Attribute Associations of Varying Strength, Contemporary Pragmatism 15 (3), 2018, pp. 284-301.10.1163/18758185-01503002Search in Google Scholar

42. Kelemen, D., Rosset, E. The human function compunction: Teleological explanation in adults, Cognition 111 (1), 2009, pp. 138-143.10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.00119200537Search in Google Scholar

43. Kelemen, D., Rottman, J., & Seston, R. Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142 (4), 2013, pp. 1074-1083.10.1037/a003039923067062Search in Google Scholar

44. Keysar, A., Navarro-Rivera, J. A world of atheism: Global demographics, pp. 553–586, In S. Bullivant, M. Ruse (eds.), The Oxford handbook of atheism, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199644650.013.011Search in Google Scholar

45. Laurin, K., Kay, A. C., & Fitzsimons, G. M. Divergent effects of activating thoughts of God on self-regulation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102 (1), 2012, pp. 4-21.10.1037/a002597122023712Search in Google Scholar

46. Lebreton, L. C., Van der Zwet, J., Damsteeg, J. W., Slat, B., Andrady, A., & Reisser, J. River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans, Nature Communications 8, 2017, p. 15611.10.1038/ncomms15611546723028589961Search in Google Scholar

47. Lindeman, M., Heywood, B., Riekki, T., & Makkonen, T. Atheists become emotionally aroused when daring God to do terrible things, International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 24 (2), 2014, pp. 124-132.10.1080/10508619.2013.771991Search in Google Scholar

48. Lindeman, M., Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Lipsanen, J. Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose, Cognition 134, 2015, pp. 63-76.10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.00825460380Search in Google Scholar

49. Maclean, K. Pilgrimage and power: The Kumbh Mela in Allahabad, 1765–1954, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2008.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195338942.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

50. Maister, L., Slater, M., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Tsakiris, M. Changing bodies changes minds: owning another body affects social cognition, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (1), 2015, pp. 6-12.10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.00125524273Search in Google Scholar

51. McKay, R. T., Dennett, D. C. Our evolving beliefs about evolved misbelief, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6), 2009, pp. 541-561.10.1017/S0140525X09991555Search in Google Scholar

52. McLaughlin, O., Somerville, J. Choice blindness in financial decision making, Judgment and Decision Making 8 (5), 2013, pp. 561-572.10.1017/S1930297500003673Search in Google Scholar

53. Moors, A., Spruyt, A., & De Houwer, J. In search of a measure that qualifies as implicit: Recommendations based on a decompositional view of automaticity, pp. 19-35, In B. Gawronski, B. K. Payne (eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications, New York, NY: Guilford, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

54. Nisbett, R. E., Wilson, T. D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes, Psychological Review 84, 1977, pp. 231–259.10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231Search in Google Scholar

55. Nosek, B. A. Implicit–explicit relations. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16 (2), 2007, pp. 65-69.10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00477.xSearch in Google Scholar

56. Oman, D. Defining religion and spirituality, pp. 23-47, In R. F. Paloutzian, C. L. Park (eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2^nd ed.), New York: Guilford, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

57. Pechey, R., Halligan, P. W. Exploring the folk understanding of belief: Identifying key dimensions endorsed in the general population, Journal of Cognition and Culture 12 (1-2), 2012, pp. 81-99.10.1163/156853712X633947Search in Google Scholar

58. Pennycook, G., Cheyne J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit, Judgment and Decision Making 10 (6), 2015, pp. 549-563.10.1017/S1930297500006999Search in Google Scholar

59. Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief, Cognition 123 (3), 2012, pp. 335-346.10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.00322481051Search in Google Scholar

60. Pennycook, G., Ross, R. M., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. Atheists and agnostics are more reflective than religious believers: Four empirical studies and a meta-analysis, PLOS ONE 11 (4), 2016, e0153039.10.1371/journal.pone.0153039482440927054566Search in Google Scholar

61. Pew Center on Religion and Public Life. The Global Religious Landscape, Washington D.C.: Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

62. Preston, J. L., Ritter, R. S., & Hepler, J. Neuroscience and the soul: Competing explanations for the human experience, Cognition 127 (1), 2013, pp. 31-37.10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.00323318352Search in Google Scholar

63. Randolph-Seng, B., Nielsen, M. E. Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations, The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 17 (4), 2007, pp. 303-315.10.1080/10508610701572812Search in Google Scholar

64. Rosenberg, M. J., Hovland, C. I., McGuire, W. J., Abelson, R. P., & Brehm, J. W. Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (Yales studies in attitude and communication), Oxford, England: Yale University Press, 1960.Search in Google Scholar

65. Rozin, P., Nemeroff, C. Sympathetic magical thinking: The contagion and similarity “heuristics”, pp. 201-216, In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. 2002.10.1017/CBO9780511808098.013Search in Google Scholar

66. Salancik, G. R., Conway, M. Attitude inferences from salient and relevant cognitive content about behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 (5), 1975, pp. 829-840.10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.829Search in Google Scholar

67. Sanchez, C., Sundermeier, B., Gray, K., & Calin-Jageman, R. J. Direct replication of Gervais & Norenzayan (2012): No evidence that analytic thinking decreases religious belief, PLOS ONE 12 (2), 2017, e0172636.10.1371/journal.pone.0172636532526228234942Search in Google Scholar

68. Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science 18(9), 2007, pp. 803-809.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01983.x17760777Search in Google Scholar

69. Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141 (3), 2012, pp. 423-428.10.1037/a002539121928924Search in Google Scholar

70. Smith, S., Alogna, V. K., Balkcom, E. R., Halberstadt, J. B., & Bering, J. M. Challenges of religious skepticism: Do extinctivists fear a visit from the dead? Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Portland, OR, USA.Search in Google Scholar

71. Sosis, R., Alcorta, C. Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior, Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews: Issues, News, and Reviews 12 (6), 2003, pp. 264-274.10.1002/evan.10120Search in Google Scholar

72. Sperber, D. Intuitive and reflective beliefs, Mind & Language 12 (1), 1997, pp. 67-83.10.1111/1468-0017.00036Search in Google Scholar

73. Stepper, S., Strack, F. Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64 (2), 1993, pp. 211-220.10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.211Search in Google Scholar

74. Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (5), 1988, pp. 768-777.10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.768Search in Google Scholar

75. Tucker, M., Ellis, R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (3), 1998, pp. 830-846.10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830Search in Google Scholar

76. Wells, G. L., Petty, R. E. The effects of over head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses, Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1 (3), 1980, pp. 219-230.10.1207/s15324834basp0103_2Search in Google Scholar

77. Willard, A. K., Norenzayan, A. Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life’s purpose, Cognition 129 (2), 2013, pp. 379-391.10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.01623974049Search in Google Scholar

78. Zuckerman, P. Atheism: Contemporary numbers and patterns, pp. 47–66, In M. Martin (ed.), The Cambridge companion to atheism, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.10.1017/CCOL0521842700.004Search in Google Scholar