[Arundel, A., van de Paal, G., Soete, L. (1995). Innovation Strategies of Europe's Largest Industrial Firms: Results of the PACE Survey for Information Sources, Public Research, Protection of Innovations and Government Programmes, Maastricht: MERIT.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baldwin, C.Y., von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a paradigm shift: from producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation, Organ. Sci. 22 (6), 1399-1417.10.1287/orsc.1100.0618]Search in Google Scholar
[Bekkers, R., Duysters, G., Verspagen, B. (2002a). Intellectual property rights, strategic technology agreements and market structure: the case of GSM, Res. Policy 31, (7), 1141-1161.10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00189-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Bereuter, T., Ménière, Y., Rudyk, I. (2017). SME Case Studies on IP Strategy and IP Management - Releasing Untapped Value, les Nouvelles - Journal of the Licensing Executives Society Volume LII, No. 4, Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3068763.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bessen, J. (2004). Holdup and licensing of cumulative innovations with private information, Econ. Lett. 82 (3), 321-326.10.1016/j.econlet.2003.08.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Bogers, M., Zobel, A.-K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., Frederiksen, L., Gawer, A., Gruber, M., Haefliger, S., Hagedoorn, J., Hilgers, D.,Laursen, K., Magnusson, M.G., Majchrzak, A., McCarthy, I.P., Moeslein, K.M., Nambisan, S., Piller, F.T., Radziwon, A., Rossi-Lamastra, C., Sims, J., TerWal, A.L.J. (2017). The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis, Industry & Innovation 24 (1), 8-40.10.1080/13662716.2016.1240068]Search in Google Scholar
[Cassiman, B., Valentini, G. (2016). Open innovation: are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary? Strategic Manag. J. 37 (6),1034-1046.10.1002/smj.2375]Search in Google Scholar
[Chesbrough, H., Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation, In: Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J. (Eds.), New Frontiers in Open Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682461.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open Innovation: the New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahlander, L., Gann, D.M. (2010). How open is innovation?, Res. Policy 39 (6), 699-709.10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Duguet, E., Kabla, I. (1998). Appropriation strategy and the motivations to use the patent system: an econometric analysis at the firm level in French manufacturing, Ann. Econ. Statistics/Ann. d'Economie de Statistique (49/50), 289-327. 10.2307/20076119]Search in Google Scholar
[ELI-NP (2018). Retrieved from http://www.eli-np.ro/index.php.]Search in Google Scholar
[EP2790857 (2018). Retrieved from https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP12704244&lng=en&tab=doclist.]Search in Google Scholar
[EUIPO (2016). Intellectual Property SME Scoreboard, Retrieved from https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/web/observatory/sme-scoreboard-2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gallini, N. (2014). Cooperating with competitors: Patent pooling and choice of a new standard, International Journal of Industrial Organization 36, 4-21.10.1016/j.ijindorg.2014.02.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Granstrand, O. (1982). Technology, Management and Markets: an Investigation of R&D and Innovation in Industrial Organizations. Frances Pinter, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Granstrand, O., Sjolander, S. (1990). Managing innovation in multi-technology corporations, Res. Policy 19 (1), 35-60.10.1016/0048-7333(90)90033-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Granstrand, O., Patel, P., Pavitt, K. (1997). Multi-technology corporations: why they have 'distributed' rather than 'distinctive core' competences, Calif. Manag. Rev. 39 (4), 8-25.10.2307/41165908]Search in Google Scholar
[Granstrand, O. (1999). The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property: towards Intellectual Capitalism, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.10.4337/9781781008638]Search in Google Scholar
[Granstrand, O., Holgersson, M. (2013). Managing the intellectual property disassembly problem, Calif. Manag. Rev. 55 (4), 184-210.10.1525/cmr.2013.55.4.184]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, B.H., Ziedonis, R.H. (2001). The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979-1995, RAND J. Econ. 32 (1), 101-128.10.2307/2696400]Search in Google Scholar
[Holgersson, M., Wallin, M.W. (2017). The patent management trichotomy: patenting, publishing, and secrecy, Manag. Decis. 55 (6), 1087-1099.10.1108/MD-03-2016-0172]Search in Google Scholar
[Homepage PIN (2018). Retrieved from https://pincompany.weebly.com/.]Search in Google Scholar
[MHTC (2018). Retrieved from http://www.mhtc.ro/en/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nanoapparatus (2018). Retrived from http://nanoapparatus.ro/.]Search in Google Scholar
[PINucleus 1.0 (2018), Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ru-sUSscr34.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pisano, G. (2006). Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution, Res. Policy 35 (8), 1122-1130.10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Pisano, G.P., Teece, D.J. (2007). How to capture value from innovation: shaping intellectual property and industry architecture, Calif. Manag. Rev. 50 (1), 278-296.10.2307/41166428]Search in Google Scholar
[Saltzman, J., Chatterjee, S., Raman, M. (2008). A framework for ICT standards creation: the case of ITU-T standard H.350, Info. Syst., 33, pp. 285-299.10.1016/j.is.2007.10.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Sherif, M.H. (2006). Standards for telecommunications services, In: Jakobs, K. (Ed.), Advanced Topics in Information Technology Standards and Standardization Research, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 183-205.10.4018/978-1-59140-938-0.ch011]Search in Google Scholar
[Somaya, D. (2012). Patent strategy and management, J. Manag. 38 (4), 1084-1114.10.1177/0149206312444447]Search in Google Scholar
[Somaya, D., Teece, D.J.,Wakeman, S. (2011). Innovation in multi-invention contexts: mapping solutions to technological and intellectual property complexity, Calif. Manag. Rev. 53 (4), 47-79.10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.47]Search in Google Scholar
[Teece, D.J. (2006). Reflections on 'profiting from innovation'. Res. Policy 35 (8), 1131-1146.10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Teece, D.J. (2009). Dynamic Capabilities & Strategic Management: Organizing for Innovation and Growth, Oxford University Press, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsilikas, H., Tapia, C. (2017). SMEs And Standard Essential Patents: Licensing Efficiently In The Internet Of Things, les Nouvelles - Journal of the Licensing Executives Society, Volume LII No. 4, Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3009039.10.5771/9783845285191]Search in Google Scholar
[West, J., Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation, J. Prod. Innovation Manag. 31 (4), 814-831.10.1111/jpim.12125]Search in Google Scholar
[West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open innovation: the next decade, Res. Policy 43 (5), 805-811.10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Xie, Z., Hall, J., McCarthy, I.P., Skitmore, M., Shena, L. (2016). Standardization efforts: The relationship between knowledge dimensions, search processes and innovation outcomes, Technovation, 48-49, 69-78.10.1016/j.technovation.2015.12.002]Search in Google Scholar