Acceso abierto

10 Years of Evaluation Practice in Media Assistance: Who, When, Why and How?


Cite

Abbott, S., & Taylor, M. (2011). ‘Measuring the Impact of Media Assistance Programs: Perspectives on Research-Practitioner Collaboration’. in Price, M. E., Abbott, S. & Morgan, L. (eds.), Measures of Press Freedom and Media Contributions to Development; Evaluating the Evaluators. New York: Peter Lang Publishing. AbbottS. TaylorM. 2011 ‘Measuring the Impact of Media Assistance Programs: Perspectives on Research-Practitioner Collaboration’ in PriceM. E. AbbottS. MorganL. (eds.), Measures of Press Freedom and Media Contributions to Development; Evaluating the Evaluators New York Peter Lang Publishing Search in Google Scholar

Alcorn, J., Chen, A., Gardner, E., & Matsumoto, H. (2011). Mapping Donor Decision Making on Media Development; An Overview of Current Monitoring and Evaluation Practice. Retrieved January 22, 2013, from http://www.mediamapresource.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/DonorDecionmaking.MediaMap.pdf AlcornJ. ChenA. GardnerE. MatsumotoH. 2011 Mapping Donor Decision Making on Media Development; An Overview of Current Monitoring and Evaluation Practice Retrieved January 22, 2013, from http://www.mediamapresource.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/DonorDecionmaking.MediaMap.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Arsenault, A., Himelfarb, S., & Abbott, S. (2011). Evaluating Media Interventions in Conflict Countries: Toward developing common principles and a community of practice. Retrieved February 24, 2014, from http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/PW77.pdf ArsenaultA. HimelfarbS. AbbottS. 2011 Evaluating Media Interventions in Conflict Countries: Toward developing common principles and a community of practice Retrieved February 24, 2014, from http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/PW77.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Banda, F., Berger, G., Panneerselvan, A. S., Nair, L., & Whitehouse, M. (2009). How to assess your media landscape: a toolkit approach. Retrieved August 17, 2012, from http://gfmd.info/images/uploads/toolkit.doc BandaF. BergerG. PanneerselvanA. S. NairL. WhitehouseM. 2009 How to assess your media landscape: a toolkit approach Retrieved August 17, 2012, from http://gfmd.info/images/uploads/toolkit.doc Search in Google Scholar

CAMECO (2007). Measuring Change: Planning, Monitoring ad Evaluation in Media and Development Cooperation. Forum Media and Development, Bad Honnef. CAMECO 2007 Measuring Change: Planning, Monitoring ad Evaluation in Media and Development Cooperation Forum Media and Development Bad Honnef Search in Google Scholar

CAMECO (2009). Measuring Change II Expanding Knowledge on Monitoring & Evaluation in Media Development. Forum Media and Development, Bad Honnef. CAMECO 2009 Measuring Change II Expanding Knowledge on Monitoring & Evaluation in Media Development Forum Media and Development Bad Honnef Search in Google Scholar

Chambers, R. (2008). Revolutions in Development Inquiry. London, New York: Earthscan. ChambersR. 2008 Revolutions in Development Inquiry London, New York Earthscan Search in Google Scholar

Chouinard, J. A. (2013). ‘The Case for Participatory Evaluation in an Era of Accountability’. American Journal of Evaluation 34(2): 237–253. ChouinardJ. A. 2013 ‘The Case for Participatory Evaluation in an Era of Accountability’ American Journal of Evaluation 34 2 237 253 10.1177/1098214013478142 Search in Google Scholar

Crawford, G., & Kearton, I. (2001). Evaluating Democracy and Governance Assistance. Retrieved April 11, 2011, from http://www.dfid.gov.uk/r4d/PDF/Outputs/Mis_SPC/R7894-FinRep.pdf CrawfordG. KeartonI. 2001 Evaluating Democracy and Governance Assistance Retrieved April 11, 2011, from http://www.dfid.gov.uk/r4d/PDF/Outputs/Mis_SPC/R7894-FinRep.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Dart, J., & Davies, R. (2003). ‘A dialogical, story-based evaluation tool: The most significant change technique’. American Journal of Evaluation 24(2): 137–155. DartJ. DaviesR. 2003 ‘A dialogical, story-based evaluation tool: The most significant change technique’ American Journal of Evaluation 24 2 137 155 10.1177/109821400302400202 Search in Google Scholar

Davies, R., & Dart, J. (2007). The ‘Most Significant Change’ (MSC) Technique: A Guide to Its Use. http://www.mande.co.uk/docs/MSCGuide.pdf DaviesR. DartJ. 2007 The ‘Most Significant Change’ (MSC) Technique: A Guide to Its Use http://www.mande.co.uk/docs/MSCGuide.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Inagaki, N. (2007). Communicating the impact of communication for development: recent trends in empirical research. Retrieved August 15, 2012, from http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2007/08/10/000310607_20070810123306/Rendered/PDF/405430Communic18082137167101PUBLIC1.pdf InagakiN. 2007 Communicating the impact of communication for development: recent trends in empirical research Retrieved August 15, 2012, from http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2007/08/10/000310607_20070810123306/Rendered/PDF/405430Communic18082137167101PUBLIC1.pdf 10.1596/978-0-8213-7167-1 Search in Google Scholar

Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). Program Evaluation Standards Statememt. Retrieved July 2014, from http://www.jcsee.org/program-evaluation-standards-statements Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation 1994 Program Evaluation Standards Statememt Retrieved July 2014, from http://www.jcsee.org/program-evaluation-standards-statements Search in Google Scholar

LaMay, C. (2011). ‘What Works? The Problem of Program Evaluation’. in Price, M. E., Abbott, S. & Morgan, L. (eds.), Measures of Press Freedom and Media Contributions to Development: Evaluating the Evaluators. New York: Peter Lang Publishing. LaMayC. 2011 ‘What Works? The Problem of Program Evaluation’ in PriceM. E. AbbottS. MorganL. (eds.), Measures of Press Freedom and Media Contributions to Development: Evaluating the Evaluators New York Peter Lang Publishing Search in Google Scholar

Lennie, J., & Tacchi, J. (2013). Evaluating Communication for Development: A Framework for Social Change. Oxford: Earthscan, Routledge. LennieJ. TacchiJ. 2013 Evaluating Communication for Development: A Framework for Social Change Oxford Earthscan, Routledge 10.4324/9780203078495 Search in Google Scholar

Manyozo, L. (2012). Media, Communication and Development: Three Approaches. New Delhi, Thousand Oaks, London, Singapore SAGE Publications. ManyozoL. 2012 Media, Communication and Development: Three Approaches New Delhi, Thousand Oaks, London, Singapore SAGE Publications Search in Google Scholar

Mefalopulos, P. (2005). ‘Communication for Sustainable Development: Applications and Challenges’. in Hemer, O. & Tufte, T. (eds.), Media and Glocal Change: Rethinking Communication for Development. Buenos Aires: CLACSO. MefalopulosP. 2005 ‘Communication for Sustainable Development: Applications and Challenges’ in HemerO. TufteT. (eds.), Media and Glocal Change: Rethinking Communication for Development Buenos Aires CLACSO Search in Google Scholar

Morris, N. (2003). ‘A Comparative Analysis of the Diffusion and Participatory Models in Development Communication’. Communication Theory 13(2): 225–248. MorrisN. 2003 ‘A Comparative Analysis of the Diffusion and Participatory Models in Development Communication’ Communication Theory 13 2 225 248 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00290.x Search in Google Scholar

Mosher, A. (2011). ‘Good, But How Good? Monitoring and Evaluation of Media Assistance Projects’. in Price, M. E., Abbott, S. & Morgan, L. (eds.), Measures of Press Freedom and Media Contributions to Development; Evaluating the Evaluators. New York: Peter Lang Publishing. MosherA. 2011 ‘Good, But How Good? Monitoring and Evaluation of Media Assistance Projects’ in PriceM. E. AbbottS. MorganL. (eds.), Measures of Press Freedom and Media Contributions to Development; Evaluating the Evaluators New York Peter Lang Publishing Search in Google Scholar

Myers, M., Woods, N., & Odugbemi, S. (2005). Monitoring and Evaluating Information and Communcation for Development (ICD) Programs: Guidelines. Retrieved September 28, 2012, from http://web.idrc.ca/uploads/user-S/11592105581icd-guidelines.pdf MyersM. WoodsN. OdugbemiS. 2005 Monitoring and Evaluating Information and Communcation for Development (ICD) Programs: Guidelines Retrieved September 28, 2012, from http://web.idrc.ca/uploads/user-S/11592105581icd-guidelines.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Parks, W., Gray-Felder, D., Hunt, J., & Byrne, A. (2005). Who Measures Change? An Introduction to Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation of Communication for Social Change. Retrieved September 28, 2012, from http://www.communicationforsocialchange.org/pdf/who_measures_change.pdf ParksW. Gray-FelderD. HuntJ. ByrneA. 2005 Who Measures Change? An Introduction to Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation of Communication for Social Change Retrieved September 28, 2012, from http://www.communicationforsocialchange.org/pdf/who_measures_change.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Passey, K. R. (2012). ‘Media Assistance M&E and Democratization Measurment Characteristics in USAID Program Reporting Documents’. (Master of Arts), University of Missouri, Colombia. Retrieved from https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/15370/research.pdf?sequence=2 PasseyK. R. 2012 ‘Media Assistance M&E and Democratization Measurment Characteristics in USAID Program Reporting Documents’ (Master of Arts), University of Missouri Colombia Retrieved from https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/15370/research.pdf?sequence=2 Search in Google Scholar

Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental Evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York: The Guilford Press. PattonM. Q. 2011 Developmental Evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use New York The Guilford Press Search in Google Scholar

Plottu, B., & Plottu, E. (2009). ‘Approaches to Participation in Evaluation’. Evaluation 15(3): 343–359. PlottuB. PlottuE. 2009 ‘Approaches to Participation in Evaluation’ Evaluation 15 3 343 359 10.1177/1356389009106357 Search in Google Scholar

Pretty, J. N. (1995) ‘Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture’. World development 23(8): 1247–1263. PrettyJ. N. 1995 ‘Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture’ World development 23 8 1247 1263 10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F Search in Google Scholar

Price, M. E., Abbott, S., & Morgan, L. (Eds.). (2011) Measures of Press Freedom and Media Contributions to Development: Evaluating the Evaluators. New York: Peter Lang Publishing. PriceM. E. AbbottS. MorganL. (Eds.). 2011 Measures of Press Freedom and Media Contributions to Development: Evaluating the Evaluators New York Peter Lang Publishing Search in Google Scholar

Raman, V. V., & Bhanot, A. (2008). Political crisis, Mediated Deliberation and Citizen Engagement: A case study of Bangladesh and Nirbachoni Sanglap. Retrieved September 13, 2012, from http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/pdf/wstrust/Bangladesh_Sanglap_Governance.pdf RamanV. V. BhanotA. 2008 Political crisis, Mediated Deliberation and Citizen Engagement: A case study of Bangladesh and Nirbachoni Sanglap Retrieved September 13, 2012, from http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/pdf/wstrust/Bangladesh_Sanglap_Governance.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Sparks, C. (2005). ‘Civil Society as Contested Concept: Media and Political Transformation in Eastern and Central Europe’. in Hackett, R. A. & Zhao, Y. (eds.), Democratizing Global Media; One world, many struggles. Lanham; Boulder; New York; Toronto; Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. SparksC. 2005 ‘Civil Society as Contested Concept: Media and Political Transformation in Eastern and Central Europe’ in HackettR. A. ZhaoY. (eds.), Democratizing Global Media; One world, many struggles Lanham; Boulder; New York; Toronto; Oxford Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, M. (2010). Methods of Evaluating Media Interventions in Conflict Countries. Retrieved July 21, 2012, from http://www.global.asc.upenn.edu/fileLibrary/PDFs/taylorcaux2.pdf TaylorM. 2010 Methods of Evaluating Media Interventions in Conflict Countries Retrieved July 21, 2012, from http://www.global.asc.upenn.edu/fileLibrary/PDFs/taylorcaux2.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Waisbord, S. (2011). ‘The Global Promotion of Media Diversity: Revisiting operational models and bureaucratic imperatives’. in Price, M. E., Abbott, S. & Morgan, L. (eds.), Measures of Press Freedom and Media Contributions to Development: Evaluating the Evaluators. New York: Peter Lang. WaisbordS. 2011 ‘The Global Promotion of Media Diversity: Revisiting operational models and bureaucratic imperatives’ in PriceM. E. AbbottS. MorganL. (eds.), Measures of Press Freedom and Media Contributions to Development: Evaluating the Evaluators New York Peter Lang Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2001-5119
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
2 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Social Sciences, Communication Science, Mass Communication, Public and Political Communication