Intercultural variation in academic discourse: Theme zones and the build-up of coherence in research articles

Bhatia, V. K., 1993. Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D., 2006. University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.23Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D. and Conrad, S., 2019. Register, genre, and style (2^nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108686136Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E., 1999. The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Bublitz, W., 1999. Introduction: Views on coherence. In: W. Bublitz, U. Lenk and E. Ventola, eds. Coherence in spoken and written discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1-7.10.1075/pbns.63.03bubSearch in Google Scholar

Chang, P. and Lee, M., 2019. Exploring textual and interpersonal Themes in the expository essays of college students of different linguistic backgrounds. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 54, pp. 75-90.10.1016/j.esp.2019.01.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Couture, B., 1986. Effective ideation in written text: A functional approach to clarity and exigence. In: B. Couture, ed. Functional approaches to writing: Research perspectives. Norwood/NJ: Ablex, pp. 69-92.Search in Google Scholar

Čmejrková, S. and Daneš, F., 1997. Academic writing and cultural identity: The case of Czech academic writing. In: A. Duzsak, ed. Culture and styles of academic discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 40-62.10.1515/9783110821048.41Search in Google Scholar

Daneš, F., 1974. Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In: F. Daneš, ed. Papers on functional sentence perspective. Prague: Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, pp. 106-128.10.1515/9783111676524.106Search in Google Scholar

Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and Povolná, R., eds., 2009. Coherence and cohesion in spoken and written discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Dontcheva-Navratilova, O., 2011. Coherence in political speeches. Brno: Masaryk University.Search in Google Scholar

Dontcheva-Navratilova, O., 2014. The changing face of Czech academic discourse. In: K. Bennett, ed. The semiperiphery of academic writing. Palgrave Macmillan: London, pp. 39-61.10.1057/9781137351197_3Search in Google Scholar

Dontcheva-Navratilova, O., 2015. Cross-cultural variation in citation practices: A comparative analysis of citations in Czech English-medium and international English-medium linguistic journals. In: R. Plo Alastrué and C. Pérez-Llantada, eds. English as a scientific and research language: Debates and discourses. English in Europe, vol. 2. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 185-205.10.1515/9781614516378-011Search in Google Scholar

Duszak, A., 1994. Academic discourse and intellectual styles. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 21, pp. 291-313.10.1016/0378-2166(94)90003-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Eggins, S., 2004. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. New York and London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Fetzer, A., 2008. Theme zones in English media discourse: Forms and functions. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 40, pp. 1543-1568.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.016Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Firbas, J., 1992. Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597817Search in Google Scholar

Fløttum, K., Dahl, T. and Kinn, T., 2006. Academic voices: Across languages and disciplines. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.148Search in Google Scholar

Flowerdew, L., 2004. The argument for using English specialized corpora to understand academic and professional language. In: U. Connor and T. Upton, eds. Discourse in the professions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 11-33.10.1075/scl.16.02floSearch in Google Scholar

Givón, T., 1995. Coherence in text vs. coherence in mind. In: M. A. Gernsbacher and T. Givón, eds. Coherence in spontaneous text. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 59-115.10.1075/tsl.31.04givSearch in Google Scholar

Grundy, P., 2013. ELF, aca:demic writing, and the semanticization of thought. Discourse and Interaction, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 25-39.10.5817/DI2013-1-25Search in Google Scholar

Gumperz, J., 1977. Sociocultural knowledge in conversational inference. In: M. Saville-Troike, ed. Linguistics and anthropology. Washington: Georgetown University Press, pp. 191-211.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., 1971. Linguistic function and literary style. In: D. C. Freeman, ed. Essays in modern linguistics. London/New York: Methuen, pp. 325-361.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., 1989. Functions of language. In: M. A. K. Halliday and R. Hasan. Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (2^nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 15-28.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., 1994. An introduction to functional grammar (2^nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., 2004. An introduction to functional grammar (3^rd ed.). London: Hodder Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4^th ed.). London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203783771Search in Google Scholar

Halloran, S., 1984. The birth of molecular biology: An essay in the rhetorical criticism of scientific discourse. Rhetoric review, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 70-83.10.1080/07350198409359083Search in Google Scholar

Hannay, M., 1994. The Theme zone. In: R. Boogart and J. Noordegraaf, eds. Nauwe betrekkingen. Voor Theo Janssen bij zijn vijftigste verjaardag. Amsterdam: Stichting Neerlandistiek Vrije Universiteit and Munster: Nodus Publikationen, pp. 107-117.Search in Google Scholar

Hannay, M., 2007. Patterns of multiple Theme and their role in developing English writing skills. In: C. S. Butler, R. H. Downing and J. Lavid, eds. Functional perspectives on grammar and discourse: In honour of Angela Downing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 257-278.10.1075/slcs.85.14hanSearch in Google Scholar

Harwood, N., 2005. ‘We do not seem to have a theory… The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied linguistics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 343-375.10.1093/applin/ami012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Harwood, N., 2009. An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 41, pp. 497-518.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Hawes, T. and Thomas, S., 2012. Theme choice in EAP and media language. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 11, pp. 175-183.10.1016/j.jeap.2012.04.005Search in Google Scholar

Hawes, T., 2015. Thematic progression in the writing of students and professionals. Ampersand, vol. 2, pp. 93-100.10.1016/j.amper.2015.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Hůlková, I., 2017. Conjunctive adverbials viewed as pragmatic markers in the genre of research articles. Brno: Masaryk University.10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-8873-2017Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., 1996. Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 433-454.10.1093/applin/17.4.433Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., 1998. Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.54Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., 1999. Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 314-367.10.1093/applin/20.3.341Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., 2001. Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 20, pp. 207-226.10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., 2002. Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1091-1112.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., 2004. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. (Michigan classics edition). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London/New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. and Salager-Meyer, F., 2008. Science writing. In: B. Cronin, ed. Annual review of information science and technology, vol. 42, pp. 297-338.10.1002/aris.2008.1440420114Search in Google Scholar

Johns, A. M., 1997. Text, role and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524650Search in Google Scholar

Kilgarriff, A., Rychlý, P., Smrz, P. and Tugwell, D., 2004. The Sketch Engine. In: Proc Eleventh EURALEX International Congress. Lorient, France.Search in Google Scholar

Knittlová, D., 1990. Funkční styly v angličtině a češtině. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého, Filozofická fakulta.Search in Google Scholar

Kortmann, B., 1991. Free adjuncts and absolutes in English: Problems of control and interpretation. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, G., 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London/New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, J., 1977. Semantics (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, J. R., 1985. Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis. In: J. D. Benson and W. S. Greaves, eds. The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 248-274.Search in Google Scholar

Matthiessen, C. M. I. M, Teruya, K. and Lam, M., 2010. Key terms in systemic functional linguistics. London/New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Search in Google Scholar

Mauranen, A., 2012. Exploring ELF. Academic English shaped by non-native speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mur-Dueñas, P., 2007. “I/we focus on…: A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 6, 143-162.10.1016/j.jeap.2007.05.002Search in Google Scholar

Mur-Dueñas, P., 2011. An intercultural analysis of metadiscouse features in research articles written in English and in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 3068-3079.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Povolná, R. 2012. Cross-cultural variation in the degree of dialogicality in research articles: On some text-organizing devices. In: O. Dontcheva-Navratilova, R. Jančaříková, G. Miššíková and R. Povolná. Coherence and Cohesion in English Discourse. Brno: Masaryk University. 29-58.Search in Google Scholar

Povolná, R. 2015. On cross-cultural variation in the use of conjuncts in research articles by Czech and native speakers of English: Can conjuncts contribute to the interactive and dialogic character of academic texts? In: R. Plo Alastrué and C. Pérez-Llantada, eds. English as a scientific and research language: Debates and discourses. English in Europe, vol. 2. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 115-140.10.1515/9781614516378-008Search in Google Scholar

Ruiying, Y. and Allison, D., 2003. Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 22, pp. 365-385.10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1Search in Google Scholar

Schmied, J., 2009. Discourse approaches to specialised and popular academic English: Analysing adverbial clause connections. In: O. Dontcheva-Navratilova and R. Povolná, eds. Coherence and cohesion in spoken and written discourse. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 167-181.Search in Google Scholar

Schmied, J., 2011. Academic writing in Europe: A survey of approaches and problems. In: J. Schmied, ed. Academic writing in Europe: Empirical perspectives. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag, pp. 1-22.Search in Google Scholar

Schmied, J., 2015. Academic writing in English in comparison: Degree adverbs, connecting adverbials, and contrastive/concessive markers in the ChemCorpus and comparable data-bases. In: R. Plo Alastrué and C. Pérez-Llantada, eds. English as a scientific and research language: Debates and discourses. English in Europe, vol. 2. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 159-184.10.1515/9781614516378-010Search in Google Scholar

Šinkūnienė, J., 2018. The power of English: I and we in Lithuanian, Lithuanian English and British English research writing. In: P. Mur-Dueñas and J. Šinkūnienė, eds. Intercultural perspectives on research writing. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 59-80.10.1075/aals.18.03sinSearch in Google Scholar

Swales, J. M., 1990. Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, J. M., 2004. Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524827Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, G., 2001. Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, vol. 22, no.1, pp. 58-78.10.1093/applin/22.1.58Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, G., 2014. Introducing functional grammar. (3^rd ed.). London/New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203785270Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, P. and Tribble, C., 2001. Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language Learning and Technology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 91-105.Search in Google Scholar

Vande Kopple, W., 1985. Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and communication, vol. 36, pp. 82-93.10.2307/357609Search in Google Scholar

Vassileva, I., 2001. Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 20, pp. 83-102.10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00029-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Vassileva, I., 1998. “Who am I/who are we in academic writing?” International Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 163-192.10.1111/j.1473-4192.1998.tb00128.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wei, J., 2016. Thematic choice in Chinese college students’ English essays. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 41, pp. 50-67.10.1016/j.esp.2015.09.003Search in Google Scholar

Yakhontova, T., 2006. Cultural and disciplinary variation in academic discourse: The issue of influencing factors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 5, pp. 153-167.10.1016/j.jeap.2006.03.002Search in Google Scholar

Zapletalová, G., 2009. Communication strategies in academic texts. In: Ch. Hopkinson, L. Sedlářová, R. Tomášková, S. Wilamová and G. Zapletalová. Communication strategies in text and talk. Ostrava: Filozofická fakulta Ostravské Univerzity, pp. 133-190.Search in Google Scholar

Zareva, A., 2013. Self-mention and the projection of multiple identity roles in TESOL graduate student presentations: The influence of the written academic genres. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 32, pp. 72-83.10.1016/j.esp.2012.11.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar