Beyond cost saving. Other factor consideration in online purchases of used electronic goods: a conjoint analysis approach

Addinsoft (2014). XLSTAT 2014, Data analysis and statistics with Microsoft Excel, Paris, France.Search in Google Scholar

Afful-Dadzie, E. and Afful-Dadzie, A., 2017. Open Government Data in Africa: A preference elicitation analysis of media practitioners. Government Information Quarterly.10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.005Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, S. P., and Ginsburgh, V. A. (1994), “Price discrimination via second-hand markets”, European Economic Review, 38(1), 23-44.10.1016/0014-2921(94)90003-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Austin, P. (2015). “Should You Buy Refurbished Electronics?” Consumer Reports. Accessed January 05, 2018. http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/laptops/refurbished-electronics-buying-guide.Search in Google Scholar

Bernoulli, D. (1954), “Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk”, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 23-36.10.2307/1909829Search in Google Scholar

Bryan, S., and Parry, D. (2002), “Structural reliability of conjoint measurement in health care: An empirical investigation”, Applied Economics, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 561-567.10.1080/00036840110103733Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bryan, S., Gold, L., Sheldon, R., and Buxton, M. (2000), “Preference measurement using conjoint methods: An empirical investigation of reliability”, Health Econ. Health Economics, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 385-395.10.1002/1099-1050(200007)9:5<385::AID-HEC533>3.0.CO;2-WOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Busse, M. R., Knittel, C. R., and Zettelmeyer, F. (2013), “Are consumers myopic? Evidence from new and used car purchases”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 220-256.10.1257/aer.103.1.220Search in Google Scholar

Churchman, C. W., and Churchman, C. W. (1961), Prediction and optimal decision: Philosophical issues of a science of values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Clarke, A. (2010), The second-hand brand: liquid assets and borrowed goods. Cultures of commodity branding. Leftcoast Press, Walnut Creek, pp. 235-253.Search in Google Scholar

Clerides, S. (2008), “Gains from trade in used goods: Evidence from automobiles”, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 322-336.10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.07.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Czaga, P., and Fliess, B. (2004), “Used goods trade: A growth opportunity. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development”, The OECD Observer, (246/247), 12.Search in Google Scholar

Degeratu, A. M., Rangaswamy, A., and Wu, J. (2000), “Consumer choice behavior in online and traditional supermarkets: The effects of brand name, price, and other search attributes”, International Journal of research in Marketing, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 55-78.10.1016/S0167-8116(00)00005-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Equabank (2016). “9 z 10 Čechů prodává či nakupuje zboží z druhé ruky”, The equabank report. Accessed January 11, 2017. https://www.equabank.cz/n/9-z-10-cechuprodava-ci-nakupuje-zbozi-z-druhe-rukySearch in Google Scholar

Fishburn, P. C. (1968), “Utility theory”, Management Science, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 335-378.10.1287/mnsc.14.5.335Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ghose, A. (2009), “Internet exchanges for used goods: An empirical analysis of trade patterns and adverse selection”, Mis Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 263-291.10.2307/20650292Search in Google Scholar

Ghose, A., 2009. Internet exchanges for used goods: An empirical analysis of trade patterns and adverse selection. Mis Quarterly, pp. 263-291.10.2307/20650292Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Green, P. E., and Rao, V. R. (1971), “Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data”, Journal of Marketing research, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 355-363.Search in Google Scholar

Green, P. E., and Srinivasan, V. (1978), “Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook”, Journal of consumer research, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 103-123.10.1086/208721Search in Google Scholar

Green, P. E., Krieger, A. M., and Wind, Y. (2001), “Thirty years of conjoint analysis: Reflections and prospects”, Interfaces, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp.56-73.10.1287/inte.31.4.56.9676Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gregson, N., and Crewe, L. (1998), “Dusting down second hand rose: Gendered identities and the world of second-hand goods in the space of the car boot sale”, Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 77-100.10.1080/09663699825331Search in Google Scholar

Guiot, D., and Roux, D. (2010)’, “A second-hand shoppers’ motivation scale: Antecedents, consequences, and implications for retailers”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 86 No. 4, pp. 355-371.10.1016/j.jretai.2010.08.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Heese, H. S., Cattani, K., Ferrer, G., Gilland, W., and Roth, A. V. (2005), “Competitive advantage through take-back of used products”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 164, No. 1, pp. 143-157.10.1016/j.ejor.2003.11.008Search in Google Scholar

Kogan, K. (2011), “Second-hand markets and intra-supply chain competition”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 87, No. 4, pp. 489-501.10.1016/j.jretai.2011.10.001Search in Google Scholar

Koschate-Fischer, N., Diamantopoulos, A., and Oldenkotte, K. (2012), “Are consumers really willing to pay more for a favorable country image? A study of country-of-origin effects on willingness to pay”, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 19-41.10.1509/jim.10.0140Search in Google Scholar

Krantz, D. H. (1964), “Conjoint measurement: The Luce-Tukey axiomatization and some extensions”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 248-277.10.1016/0022-2496(64)90003-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kuhfeld, W. F. (2005), Marketing research methods in SAS. Experimental Design, Choice, Conjoint, and Graphical Techniques. Cary, NC, SAS-Institute TS-722.Search in Google Scholar

Kwarteng, M. A., Pilik, M., & Jurickova, E. (2017). Mining Interest in Online Shoppers’ Data: An Association Rule Mining Approach. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, Vol. 14, No. 7, pp. 1-15.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, H. G. (1998). Do electronic marketplaces lower the price of goods? Communications of the ACM, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 73-80.Search in Google Scholar

Leismann, K., Schmitt, M., Rohn, H., and Baedeker, C. (2013), “Collaborative consumption: towards a resource-saving consumption culture”, Resources, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 184-203.10.3390/resources2030184Search in Google Scholar

Luce, R. D., and Tukey, J. W. (1964), “Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement”, Journal of mathematical psychology, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-27.10.1016/0022-2496(64)90015-XSearch in Google Scholar

Malhotra, N. K. (1982), “Structural Reliability and Stability of Nonmetric Conjoint Analysis”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 199.10.1177/002224378201900204Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mccullough, J., and Best, R. (1979), “Conjoint Measurement: Temporal Stability and Structural Reliability”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, No 1, pp. 26-31.10.1177/002224377901600104Search in Google Scholar

Oraiopoulos, N., Ferguson, M. E., and Toktay, L. B. (2012), “Relicensing as a secondary market strategy”, Management Science, Vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 1022-1037.10.1287/mnsc.1110.1456Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Orme, B. (2010), Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research. Second Edition, Madison, Wis.: Research Publishers LLC.Search in Google Scholar

Pilík, M., Juřičková, E., & Adu Kwarteng, M. (2017). On-line shopping behaviour in the Czech Republic under the Digital Transformation of Economy. Economic Annals-XXI, 165.10.21003/ea.V165-24Search in Google Scholar

Rao, V. R. (2014), Applied conjoint analysis, New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-87753-0Search in Google Scholar

Scott, J. E., and Wright, P. (1976), “Modeling an organizational buyer’s product evaluation strategy: Validity and procedural considerations”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 211-224.10.1177/002224377601300301Search in Google Scholar

Shevlin, B. (2008), “When and How to Use Refurbished Equipment for IT Needs”, IT Professional Magazine, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 46.Search in Google Scholar

Shulman, J.D. and Coughlan, A.T., 2007. Used goods, not used bads: Profitable secondary market sales for a durable goods channel. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.191-210.10.1007/s11129-006-9017-xSearch in Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1957), Models of man: social and rational; mathematical essays on rational human behavior in social setting. Wiley. ASIN: B0007ELZJ4.Search in Google Scholar

Singh, S. (2015). “Rise of used goods markets: Why e-commerce companies like OLX, eBay are chasing second-hand goods”, The Economic Times. Accessed January 11, 2018. http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/retail/rise-of-used-goods-markets-why-e-commerce-companies-like-olx-ebay-are-chasing-second-hand-goods/articleshow/49488856.cms.Search in Google Scholar

Swan, P. L. (1972), “Optimum durability, second-hand markets, and planned obsolescence”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 80 No.3, pp. 575-585.10.1086/259906Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tversky, A. (1967), “A general theory of polynomial conjoint measurement”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-2010.1016/0022-2496(67)90039-9Search in Google Scholar

Van Damme, I. (2014), Second-Hand Trade and Respectability: Mediating Consumer Trust in Old Textiles and Used Clothing (Low Countries, Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries). In Selling Textiles in the Long Eighteenth Century, pp. 193-209, Palgrave Macmillan UK.10.1057/9781137295217_12Search in Google Scholar

Williams, C. C., and Paddock, C. (2003), “The meanings of informal and second-hand retail channels: some evidence from Leicester”, The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 317-336.10.1080/0959396032000101372Search in Google Scholar