Open Access

Will shared leadership engenders innovative work behaviors among salesmen toward improved performance?


Cite

j.ijme-2020-0020.tab.002.w2aab3b7c22b1b6b1ab1b2b6b2Aa

Correlations
TLIELTELPLIWB
TLPearson correlation10.625**0.568**0.380**0.323**
Sig. (2-tailed)0.0000.0000.0000.000
N299299299299299
IELPearson correlation0.625**10.529**0.446**0.423**
Sig. (2-tailed)0.0000.0000.0000.000
N299299299299299
TELPearson correlation0.568**0.529**10.289**0.230**
Sig. (2-tailed)0.0000.0000.0000.000
N300300300300300
PLPearson correlation0.380**0.446**0.289**10.855**
Sig. (2-tailed)0.0000.0000.0000.000
N299299299299299
IWBPearson correlation0.323**0.423**0.230**0.855**1
Sig. (2-tailed)0.0000.0000.0000.000
N299299299299299

j.ijme-2020-0020.apptab.002.w2aab3b7c22b1b6b1ab2b1ab2Aa

Item—total statistics
Items for questionnaireScale mean if item deletedScale variance if item deletedCorrected item-total correlationCronbach's alpha if item deleted
Item 160.6374.4580.4910.862
Item 260.6076.6820.3840.866
Item 360.5777.8720.3310.867
Item 460.6476.1920.4540.863
Item 560.7673.3880.4840.862
Item 660.6874.4010.5150.861
Item 760.6574.0730.4800.862
Item 860.7572.0370.6070.856
Item 960.6675.9890.4940.862
Item 1060.7475.6020.5560.860
Item 1160.6277.4430.3560.867
Item 1260.5077.1250.4280.864
Item 1360.4277.3570.3800.866
Item 1461.4071.5690.5600.858
Item 1561.3268.5310.6180.856
Item 1661.4167.8350.6260.855
Item 1761.3268.5510.6020.857

j.ijme-2020-0020.tab.005.w2aab3b7c22b1b6b1ab1b2b7b6Aa

Coefficientsa
ModelUnstandardized coefficientsStandardized coefficientsTSignificance
BStandard errorbeta
1 (Constant)0.1370.2940.4670.641
TL−0.0520.088−0.025−0.5950.552
IEL0.1580.0750.0882.1150.035
TEL−0.0990.083−0.045−1.1870.236
PL0.9740.0390.83824.8030.000

j.ijme-2020-0020.tab.004.w2aab3b7c22b1b6b1ab1b2b7b5Aa

ANOVAb
ModelSum of squaresdfMean squareFSignificance
1. Regression366.125491.531205.3960.000a
Residual131.4622950.446
Total497.587299

j.ijme-2020-0020.apptab.001.w2aab3b7c22b1b6b1ab2b1ab1Aa

ItemsStatements
1My colleagues provide a clear vision of whom and what our team is in idea generation, championing, and application
2My colleagues are driven by higher purposes in idea generation, championing, and application
3My colleagues show enthusiasm for my efforts in idea generation, championing, and application
4My colleagues seek a broad range of perspectives when it comes to idea generation, championing, and application
5My colleagues encourage me to go above and put extra efforts than normal in idea generation, championing, and application
6My colleagues encourage me to engage in idea generation, championing and application without supervision
7My colleagues urge me to assume responsibilities on idea generation, championing, and application on my own
8My colleagues encourage me to learn new ways of idea generation, championing, and application
9My colleagues encourage me to be determined when facing challenges on idea generation, championing, and application
10My colleagues encourage my team members on idea generation, championing, and application
11My colleagues advise me to coordinate team efforts in idea generation, championing, and application
12My colleagues urge me to embrace team work in idea generation, championing, and application
13My colleagues expect that collaborative team work on idea generation, championing, and application works well
14My colleagues decide on my performance in idea generation, championing, and application together with me
15My colleagues and I work together to decide on what my performance in idea generation, championing, and application should be
16My colleagues and I sit down together and reach agreement on my performance on idea generation, championing, and application.
17My colleagues work with me to develop my performance goals on idea generation, championing, and application

j.ijme-2020-0020.tab.003.w2aab3b7c22b1b6b1ab1b2b7b4Aa

Model summary
ModelRR2Adjusted R2Standard error of the estimate
10.858a0.7360.7320.668

Previous definitions of shared leadership

StudySubject titleDefinition
Perry et al. [1999]Empowered Selling Teams: How Shared Leadership Can Contribute to Selling Team OutcomesA team process where leadership is carried out by the team as a whole, rather than solely by an appointed leader, such as the sales manager or a lead salesperson (p. 36)
Pearce and Barkus [2004]The Future of Leadership: Combining Vertical and Shared Leadership to Transform Knowledge Work (and Executive Commentary)A simultaneous, ongoing, mutual influence process within a team that is characterized by “serial emergence” of official as well as unofficial leaders (p. 48)
Carson et al. [2007]Shared Leadership in Teams: An Investigation of Antecedents Conditions and PerformanceAn emergent team property that results from the distribution of leadership influence across multiple team members (p. 1218)
Vandewaerde et al. [2011]Board Team Leadership Revisited: A Conceptual Model of Shared Leadership in the BoardroomShared leadership in the boardroom can thus be conceptualized as a mutual and fluid influence process in which directors continuously switch between “leader” and ‘follower’ roles based on desired capabilities and expertise given the situation at hand, in order to lead the team to outcome achievement (p. 408)
Hoch [2013]Shared Leadership and Innovation: The Role of Vertical Leadership and Employee IntegrityA situation where multiple team members engage in leadership and is characterized by collaborative decision-making and shared responsibility for outcome (p. 161)
Daspit et al. [2014]TMT Shared Leadership and Firm Performance: Investigating the Mediating Role of Absorptive CapacityShared participation of members in leadership responsibilities (p. 227)