[Arppe, Antti, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Dylan Glynn, Martin Hilpert and Arne Zeschel. 2010. Cognitive corpus linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora 5 (1): 1-27.10.3366/cor.2010.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Bird, Steven, Edward Loper and Ewan Klein. 2009. Natural language processing with Python. Cambridge, MA: O’Reilly Media Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ellis, Nick C., Matthew B. O’Donnell and Ute Römer. 2013. Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Language Learning 63 (Supp. 1): 25-51.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00736.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Ellis, Nick C., Matthew B. O’Donnell and Ute Römer. Forthcoming. The processing of verb-argument constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality. Cognitive Linguistics.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ellis, Nick C., Matthew B. O’Donnell and Ute Römer. Submitted. Second language processing of verb-argument constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ellis, Nick C. and Rita Simpson-Vlach. 2009. Formulaic language in native speakers: Triangulating psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and education. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5 (1): 61-78.10.1515/CLLT.2009.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Francis, Gill, Susan Hunston and Elizabeth Manning. 1996. Grammar patterns 1: Verbs. London: Harper Collins.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gilquin, Gaëtanelle and Stefan Th. Gries. 2009. Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5 (1): 1-26.10.1515/CLLT.2009.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, Sylvie De Cock and Sylviane Granger (eds.). 2010. LINDSEI: Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.]Search in Google Scholar
[Granger, Sylviane, Estelle Dagneaux, Fanny Meunier and Magali Paquot (eds.). 2009. ICLE: International Corpus of Learner English. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gries, Stefan Th. 2013. Data in Construction Grammar. In G. Trousdale and T.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0006]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoffmann (eds.). The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 93-108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gruenewald, Paul J. and Gregory R. Lockhead. 1980. The free recall of category examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6 (3): 225-240.]Search in Google Scholar
[Römer, Ute, Matthew B. O’Donnell and Nick C. Ellis. 2012. What do speakers know about English Verb-Argument constructions? Combining corpus and psycholinguistic evidence from L1 and L2 settings. Paper presented at ICAME 33 in Leuven, Belgium, May 2012 ]Search in Google Scholar
[Römer, Ute, Matthew B. O’Donnell and Nick C. Ellis. Forthcoming. Using COBUILD grammar patterns for a large-scale analysis of verb-argument constructions: Exploring corpus data and speaker knowledge. In M.Charles, N. Groom and S. John (eds.). Corpora, grammar, text and discourse: In honour of Susan Hunston. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.]Search in Google Scholar
[Römer, Ute, Matthew B. O’Donnell and Nick C. Ellis. Submitted. Second language learner knowledge of verb-argument constructions: Effects of language transfer and typology.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wulff, Stefanie. 2009. Converging evidence from corpus and experimental data to capture idiomaticity. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5 (1): 131-159. 10.1515/CLLT.2009.006]Search in Google Scholar
