Broad Spectrum Detection of Antibiotic Residues in Poultry Meat by a Multi-Plate Assay

1. Centre for Science and Environment, 2014:Antibiotics in Chicken Meat: study. New Delhi: Pollution Monitoring Laboratory, 36 p. PML/PR-48/2014.Search in Google Scholar

2. Cháfer-Pericás, C., Maquieira, Á., Puchades, R., 2010: Fast screening methods to detect antibiotic residues in food samples. Trends in Analytical chemistry, 29, 9, 1038—1049. DOI:10.1016/j.trac.2010.06.004.10.1016/j.trac.2010.06.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. European Commission, 2002: Commission Decision 2002/657/EC of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Official Journal of the European Communities, L. 221/8—36.Search in Google Scholar

4. Ezenduka, E. V., Ike, O. S., Anaelom, N. J., 2014: Rapid detection of antimicrobial residues in poultry: A consequence of non-prudent use of antimicrobials. Health, 6, 2, 149—152. DOI: 10.4236/health.2014.62023.10.4236/.2014.62023Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Gaudin, V., Fuselier, R., 2002: Star protocol—Screening test for antibiotic residues. AFSSA Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments—EU Community Reference Laboratory in Fougéres (France), LMV/UCM/P05/11.AN Version 2.Search in Google Scholar

6. Gaudin, V., Maris, P., Fuselier, R., Ribouchon, J. L., Cadieu, N., Rault, A., 2004: Validation of a microbiological method: the STAR protocol, a five-plate test, for the screening of antibiotic residues in milk. Food Additives and Contaminants, 21, 5, 422—433. DOI: 10.1080/02652030410001667575.10.1080/0265203041000166757515204543Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Gaudin, V., Hedou, C., Rault, A., Verdon, E., 2010: Validation of a Five Plate Test, the STAR protocol, for the screening of antibiotic residues in muscle from different animal species according to the European decision 2002/657/EC. Food Additives and Contaminants, 27, 7, 935—952. DOI: 10.1080/19440041003677483.10.1080/1944004100367748320432095Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Gondová, Z., Kožárová, I., Poláková, Z., Mad’arová, M., 2014: Comparison of four microbiological inhibition tests for the screening of antimicrobial residues in the tissues of food-producing animals. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 13, 4, 728—734. DOI: 10.4081/ijas.2014.3521.10.4081/ijas.2014.3521Search in Google Scholar

9. Guetiya Wadoum, R. E., Zambou, N. F., Anyangwe, F. F., Njimou, J. R., Coman, M. M., Verdenelli, M. C., et al., 2016: Abusive use of antibiotics in poultry farming in Cameroon and the public health implications (full paper). British Poultry Science, 57, 4, 483—493. Retrieved 15/01/2018 from Taylor and Francis online: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cbps20. DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2016.1180668.10.1080/00071668.2016.118066827113432Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Hao, H., Cheng, G., Iqbal, Z., Ai, X., Hussain, H. I., Huang, L., et al., 2014: Benefits and risks of antimicrobial use in food-producing animals. Frontiers in Microbiology, 5, 288. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00288.10.3389/fmicb.2014.00288405449824971079Search in Google Scholar

11. Kožárová, I., Mačanga, J., Goldová, M., Major, P., Tkáčiková, S., 2011: Detection of maduramycin residues of chickens and pheasants by the screening test for antibiotic residues (STAR). Food Additives and Contaminants: Part A, 28, 5, 608—618. DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2011.561879.10.1080/19440049.2011.56187921442501Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Kožárová, I., Marcinčák S., Reitznerová, A., Bartkovský, M., Mačanga. J., Marcinčáková, D., et al., 2016: Verification for the presence of inhibitory substances in poultry meat after the consumption of the feed mixture supplemented with fermented feed. Potravinarstvo, Scientific Journal for Food Industry, 10, 1, 612—618. DOI: 10.5219/682.10.5219/682Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13. Mund, M. D., Khan, U. H., Tahir, U., Bahar-EMustafa, Fayyaz, A., 2017: Antimicrobial drug residues in poultry products and implications on public health: A review. International Journal of Food Properties, 20, 7, 1433—1446. Retrieved 02/10/2017 from Taylor and Francis online: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ljfp20. DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2016.1212874.10.1080/10942912.2016.1212874Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Okerman, L., De Wasch, K., Van Hoof, J., 1998: Detection of antibiotics in muscle tissue with microbiological inhibition tests: effects of matrix. Analyst, 123, 2361—2365. DOI: 10.1039/A804903C.10.1039/A804903Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Pikkemaat, M. G., 2009: Microbiological screening methods for detection of antibiotic residues in slaughter animals. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 395, 893—905. DOI 10.1007/s00216-009-2841-6.10.1007/s00216-009-2841-6275818719484227Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Pikkemaat, M. G., Rapallini, M. L. B. A., Dijk, S. O. V., Elferink, J. W. A., 2009: Comparison of three microbial screening methods for antibiotics using routine monitoring samples. Analytica Chimica Acta, 637, 1‒2, 298—304. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.08.023.10.1016/j.aca.2008.08.02319286043Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Reyes-Herrera, I., Schneider, M. J., Cole, K., Farnell, M. B., Blore, P. J., Donoghue, D. J., 2005: Concentrations of Antibiotic Residues Vary between Different Edible Muscle Tissues in Poultry. Journal of Food Protection, 68, 10, 2217—2219. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-68.10.2217.10.4315/0362-028X-68.10.2217Search in Google Scholar

18. Van Boeckel, T. P., Brower, C., Gilbert, M., Grenfell, B. T., Levin, S. A., Robinson, T. P., et al., 2015: Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 18, 5649—5654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503141112.10.1073/pnas.1503141112442647025792457Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Vishnuraj, M. R., Kandeepan, G., Rao, K. H., Chand, S., Kumbhar, V., 2016: Occurrence, public health hazards and detection methods of antibiotic residues in foods of animal origin: A comprehensive review. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2016.1235458.10.1080/23311932.2016.1235458Open DOISearch in Google Scholar