What Students Tell Teachers about Practices that Integrate Subjects with English in a Lower Secondary School in Portugal

Barbero, Teresina. “Insegnare in Lingua Straniera: Quali Sfide? Quali Difficoltà?” CLIL: Un Nuovo Ambiente Di Apprendimento. Sviluppi e Riflessioni Sull’uso Veicolare Di Una Lingua Seconda/ Straniera, edited by Carmel Mary Coonan, Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina, 2006, pp. 105-17.Search in Google Scholar

Beacco, Jean-Claude, et al. Guide for the Development and Implementation of Curricula for Plurilingual and Intercultural Education. Council of Europe, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Blanchard, Brigitte, et al. “The PROFILES Project Promoting Science Teaching in a Foreign Language.” Science Education International, vol. 25, no. 2, 2014, pp. 78-96. www.icaseonline.net/sei/june2014/p4.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Bunch, George C., et al. “Documenting the Language Demands of Mainstream Content-Area Assessment for English Learners: Participant Structures, Communicative Modes and Genre in Science Performance Assessments.” Language and Education, vol. 24, no. 3, 2010, pp. 185-214, doi: 10.1080/0950078090351898610.1080/09500780903518986Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Canet Pladevall, Roser, and Natalia Evnitskaya. “Rethink, Rewrite, Remake or Learning to Teach Science Through English.” AICLE – CLIL – EMILE. Educació Plurilingüe: Experiencias, Research & Polítiques, edited by Cristina Escobar Urmeneta et al., Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 2011, pp. 167-77.Search in Google Scholar

Clegg, John. “Analysing the Language Demands of Lessons Taught in a Second Language.” Revista española de lingüística aplicada, vol. 1, 2007, pp. 113-28, dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/ articulo?codigo=2575499. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Council of Europe. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR). COE, 2011, rm.coe.int/1680459f97. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Coyle, Do. CLIL Planning Tools for Teachers. School of Education – University of Nottingham, 2005, www.unifg.it/sites/default/files/allegatiparagrafo/20-01-2014/coyle_clil_planningtool_kit.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Coyle, Do. “Listening to Learners: An Investigation into ‘Successful Learning’ across CLIL Contexts.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, vol. 16, no. 3, 2013, pp. 244-66, doi:10.1080/13670050.2013.777384.10.1080/13670050.2013.777384Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Coyle, Do, Philip Hood, and David Marsh. CLIL Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge UP, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Cummins, Jim. “Bilingualism, Language Proficiency and Metalinguistic Development.” Childhood Bilingualism: Aspects of Linguistic, Cognitive and Social Development, edited by Peter Homel et al., Erlbaum, 1987, pp. 57-73.Search in Google Scholar

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane, and Tarja Nikula. “Pragmatics of Content-Based Instruction: Teacher and Student Directives in Finnish and Austrian Classrooms.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 27, no. 2, 2006, pp. 241-67, doi:10.1093/applin/aml007.10.1093/applin/aml007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Escobar Urmeneta, Cristina, and Natalia Evnitskaya. “Do You Know Actimel? The Adaptive Nature of Dialogic Teacher-Led Discussions in the CLIL Science Classroom: A Case Study.” The Language Learning Journal, vol. 42, no. 2, 2014, pp. 165-80, doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.889507.10.1080/09571736.2014.889507Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

European Commission. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Eurydice Reports, 2006, publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/756ebdaa-f694-44e4-8409-21eef02c9b9b. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. Civil Society Platform on Multilingualism. COM, 2011, elen.ngo/wp-content/uploads/ 2016/05/report-civil-society_en.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. Key Data on Teaching Languages at School in Europe – 2017. Eurydice Reports, 2017, doi:10.2797/12061.10.2797/12061Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Grandinetti, Maria, et al. “How CLIL Can Provide a Pragmatic Means to Renovate Science Education – Even in a Sub-Optimally Bilingual Context.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, vol. 16, no. 3, 2013, pp. 354-74. doi:10.1080/13670050.2013.777390.10.1080/13670050.2013.777390Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lasagabaster, David, and Juan Manuel Sierra. “Immersion and CLIL in English: More Differences than Similarities.” ELT Journal, vol. 64, no. 4, 2010, pp. 367-75, doi:10.1093/elt/ccp082.10.1093/elt/ccp082Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lin, Angel M. Y. Language Across the Curriculum & CLIL in English as an Additional Language (EAL) Contexts. Theory and Practice. Springer, 2016.10.1007/978-981-10-1802-2Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, David. CLIL/EMILE – The European Dimension. Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential. Continuing Education Centre in Jyväskylä, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, David. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) A Development Trajectory. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Córdoba, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, David, and Gisella Langé, editors. Using Languages to Learn and Learning to Use Languages. University of Jyväskylä, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, David, et al. European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education. ECML, 2011, www.ecml.at/Portals/1/documents/ECML-resources/CLIL-EN.pdf?ver=2018-03-21-153925-563. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Mehisto, Peeter. “Criteria for Producing CLIL Learning Material.” Encuentro, vol. 21, 2012, pp. 15-33, files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED539729.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Milton, James, and Paul Meara. “Are the British Really Bad at Learning Foreign Languages?” Language Learning Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, 1998, pp. 68-76, doi:10.1080/09571739885200291.10.1080/09571739885200291Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nikula, Tarja, et al. “CLIL Classroom Discourse: Research from Europe.” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language, vol. 1, no. 1, 2013, pp. 70-100, doi:10.1075/jicb.1.1.04nik.10.1075/jicb.1.1.04nikOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pavón Vázquez, Víctor, and Maria Ellison. “Examining Teacher Roles and Competences in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).” Lingvarvm Arena, vol. 4, 2013, pp. 65-78, ler.letras.up.pt/uploads/ficheiros/12007.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez Cañado, María Luisa. “Are Teachers Ready for CLIL? Evidence from a European Study.” European Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 39, no. 2, 2016, pp. 202-21, doi:10.1080/02619768.2016.1138104.10.1080/02619768.2016.1138104Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Piacentini, Valentina, et al. “Abordagem Holística no Sistema Educativo Português para Desenvolver a(s) Literacia(s) das Ciências Integradas com o Inglês – Holistic Approach in the Portuguese Education System to Develop Literacies of Science Integrated with English.” Indagatio Didactica, vol. 8, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1975-992. revistas.ua.pt/ index.php/ID/article/view/3981/3663. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Piacentini, Valentina, et al. “The Language Focus of Science Education Integrated with English Learning.” Enseñanza de las Ciencias, vol. Extra, 2017, pp. 399-404, ddd.uab.cat/record/184622. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Douglas A., and Rodger W. Bybee. “Scientific Literacy, Science Literacy, and Science Education.” Handbook of Research on Science Education Volume II, edited by Norman G. Lederman and Sandra K. Abell, Routledge, 2014, pp. 545-58.Search in Google Scholar

Scott, Philip H., et al. “The Tension between Authoritative and Dialogic Discourse: A Fundamental Characteristic of Meaning Making Interactions in High School Science Lessons.” Science Education, vol. 90, no. 4, 2006, pp. 605-31, doi:10.1002/sce.20131.10.1002/sce.20131Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Simões, Raquel A., et al. “The Project English Plus: A CLIL Approach in a Portuguese School.” Indagatio Didatica, vol. 5, no. 4, 2013, pp. 30-51, revistas.ua.pt/index.php/ID/ article/ viewFile/ 2565/2430. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Tedick, Diane J., and Laurent Cammarata. “Content and Language Integration in K-12 Contexts: Student Outcomes, Teacher Practices, and Stakeholder Perspectives.” Foreign Language Annals, vol. 45, no. 51, 2012, pp. S28-S53, doi:10.111/j.1944-9720.2012.01178.x.10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01178.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ting, Yen-Ling Teresa. “CLIL Appeals to How the Brain Likes its Information: Examples from CLIL-(Neuro)Science.” International CLIL Research Journal, vol. 1, no. 3, 2010, pp. 3-18, www.icrj.eu/13/article1.html. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Vieira, Rui M., et al. A Educação em Ciências com Orientação CTS. Atividades para o Ensino Básico. Areal Editores, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Wellington, Jerry, and Jonathan Osborne. Language and Literacy in Science Education. Open UP, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Wolff, Dieter. “The European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education.” Synergies Italie, vol. 8, 2012, pp. 105-16, gerflint.fr/Base/Italie8/dieter_wolff.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.Search in Google Scholar