Open Access

Critical Changes Over the 100 Year Evolution of Polygraph Practices


Cite

Aharoni, Zvi (1998), On Life and Death: The Tale of a Lucky Man, Minerva Press, p. 99.Search in Google Scholar

Horvath, F., Blair, J., Buckley, J. (2007), The Behavioural Analysis Interview: Clarifying the Practice, Theory and Understanding of Its Use and Effectiveness, International Journal of Police Science and Management, (10), pp. 101–158.10.1350/ijps.2008.10.1.101Search in Google Scholar

Illinois Law Regarding the Licensing of Polygraph and Regulating the Practice of the Polygraph, 224 (ILCS 4301), 8/23/63.Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, M., Bessarabova, E., Adame, B., Burgoon, J., Slowik, S. (2011), Deceptive Language by Innocent and Guilty Criminal Suspects, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, (30), pp. 357–375.10.1177/0261927X11416201Search in Google Scholar

Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600 (2004).Search in Google Scholar

National Academy of Science, The Polygraph and Lie Detection, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Office of Technological Assistance, Scientific Validity of Polygraph Testing, NTIS Order #PB84-181411, November, 1983.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, R. (2012), Reid Method: Developing Probable Lie Comparison Questions, Journal of the American Polygraph Association, Vol. 41, No. 2.Search in Google Scholar

Reid, J., Inbau, F. (1953), Lie Detection and Criminal Interrogation, Williams and Wilkins.Search in Google Scholar

Reid, J., Inbau, F. (1966), Truth and Deception: The Polygraph (“Lie Detector”) Technique, Williams and Wilkins.10.2307/1140568Search in Google Scholar

Reid, J., Inbau, F. (1967), Criminal Interrogation and Confession, Williams and Wilkins.10.2307/1140860Search in Google Scholar

Reid, J., Inbau, F. (1977), Truth and Deception: The Polygraph (“Lie Detector”) Technique, Williams and Wilkins, Second Edition, pp. 118–127.Search in Google Scholar

Slowik, S. (2016), Interrogation, International Encyclopedia of Communications, Wiley and Sons.10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic220Search in Google Scholar

Slowik, S., Horvath, F. (2019), Chicago: Where Polygraph Became a Science, European Polygraph, Vol. 13, No. 1 (47).10.2478/ep-2019-0001Search in Google Scholar

Stansbury v. California, 522 U.S. 318 (1994).Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1898-5238
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Law, Criminal Law, other, Criminology, Medicine, Clinical Medicine, Psychiatry, Psychotherapy