[Marin, M.-F., Barbey, F., Rosenbaum, B.L., Hammoud, M.Z., Orr, S.P., Milad, M.R. (January 2020), Absence of Conditioned Responding in Humans: A Bad Measure or Individual differences? Psychophysiology, Vol. 57, No. 1.10.1111/psyp.1335030758048]Search in Google Scholar
[Matte, J.A. (1996), Forensic Psychophysiology Using The Polygraph: Scientific Truth Verification – Lie Detection. Williamsville, NY: J.A.M. Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matte, J.A. (1998), An analysis of the psychodynamics of the directed lie control question in the control question technique. Polygraph, 27(1), pp. 56–67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matte, J.A. (2002–2012), Supplement 2002–2012, Forensic Psychophysiology Using The Polygraph: Scientific Truth Verification – Lie Detection. Williamsville, NY: J.A.M. Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matte, J.A. (2015), Limited critique of book: Fundamentals of Polygraph Practice, by D.J. Krapohl and P.K. Shaw. Research Digest, International Society of Polygraph Examiners, Vol. 2, No. 5.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matte, J. A., Reuss, R.M. (1999), Validation of Potential Response Elements in the Directed-Lie Control Question. Polygraph, 28 (2), pp. 124–142.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, R. (2019), Literature Survey of Structural Weighing of Polygraph Signals: Why Double the EDA? Polygraph & Forensic Credibility Assessment, 48(2).]Search in Google Scholar
[Selle, N.K., Agan, N., Ben-Shakhar, G. (Sep 7, 2019), Hyde or Seek? Physiological Responses Reflect Both the Decision and the Attempt to Conceal Information. Perspectives on Psychological Science, https://doi.org/10.1177/0p956797819864598. Reprinted with Permission of Copyright Clearance Center/SAGE Publications, in Research Digest, International Society of Polygraph Examiners, Vol. 1, No. 3.]Search in Google Scholar
