[Balzter, H., Braun, P.W. & Kohler W. (1998). Cellular automata models for vegetation dynamics. Ecol. Model., 107, 113−125. DO I: 10.1016/S0304-3800(97)00202-0.]Search in Google Scholar
[Botkin, D.B., Janak, J.F. & Wallis J.R. (1972). Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth. J. Ecol., 60, 849−872. http://www.jstor.org/stable/225857010.2307/2258570]Search in Google Scholar
[Brzeziecki, B. (1999). Tree stand ecological model. Rules of construction, parameterization, examples of use (in Polish). Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bugmann, H. (1994). On the ecology of mountainous forests in a changing climate: a simulation study. PhD. thesis No. 10638, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Switzerland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bugmann, H. (2001). A review of forest gap models. Climatic Change 51. Kluwer Academic Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Colasanti, R.L. & Grime J.P. (1993). Resource dynamics and vegetation processes: a deterministic model used two-dimensional cellurar automata. Funct. Ecol., 7, 169−176. http://www.jstor.org/stable/238988310.2307/2389883]Search in Google Scholar
[Dunkerley, D.L. (1999). Banded chenopod shrub lands of arid Australia: modeling responses to inter annual rainfall variability with cellular automata. Ecol. Model., 121, 127−138. DO I: 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00088-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frąk, R., Kozak, I., Widelska, E. & Kozak H. (2009). Prognosis of landscape changes in the basin of the Bojarski stream with application of CELLAUT model (in Ukrainian). In Ecosystems of upper part of Prut river basin (pp. 246−252). Regional Conference, 15-17. 05. 2009. Lvov: Voroxta.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gawrońska, G. (2000): An influence of atmospheric pollution upon forests of the Carpathian Region (in Polish). Rocznik Ochrony Środowiska, 2, 195−204.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hassel, M.P., Comins, H.N. & May R.M. (1991). Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics. Nature, 353, 255−258. DO I: 10.1038/353255a0.]Search in Google Scholar
[Karafyllidis, I. & Thanailakis A. (1997). A model for predicting forest fire spreading using cellular automata. Ecol. Model., 99, 87−97. DO I: 10.1016/S0304-3800(96)01942-4.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kozak, I. & Menshutkin V.V. (1999). Computer simulations of forest Ecosystems Dynamics. Biology Bulletin, 26(6), 586−592.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kozak, I. & Menshutkin V. (2000a). Possibilities of application of computer modelling for prediction of tree stand succesion dynamics on the example of fir-beech tree stand in the Bieszczady Mountains. Forestry (Poland), 3, 113−122.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kozak, I. & Menshutkin V. (2000b). An investigation of forest succesion in Bieszczady Mountains using a computer models. Folia Forestalica Polonica, Series A - Forestry, 42, 67−81.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kozak, I. & Menshutkin V. (2001). Prediction of beech forest succesion in Bieszczady Mountains using a computer model. J. For. Sci. (Prague), 47, 333−339.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kozak, I., Menshutkin, V., Jóźwina, M. & Potaczała G. (2002). Computer simulation of fir forest dynamics in the Bieszczady Mountains in response to climate change. J. For. Sci. (Prague), 48, 425−431.10.17221/11909-JFS]Search in Google Scholar
[Kozak, I., Menshutkin, V., Ferchmin, M., Potaczała, G., Jóźwina, M., Kozak, O. & Seńko Z. (2003a). Prognozowanie zmian lasu sosnowego w obszarze ochrony ścisłej Nart w Kampinoskim Parku Narodowym z wykorzystaniem modelu FOR KOM E. Parki Narodowe i Rezerwaty Przyrody, 22(4), 483−497.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kozak, I., Menshutkin, V., Jóźwina, M. & Potaczała G. (2003b). Modelling of beech forest dynamics in the Bieszczady Mountains in response to climate change. Ekológia (Bratislava), 22(2), 152−161.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kozak, I., Menshutkin, V.V. & Klekowski R.Z. (2003c). Modeling of landscape elements (in Polish). Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kozak, I., Menshutkin, V., Parpan, V., Shparyk, Yu., Parpan, T., Viter, R., Kozak O. & Seńko Z. (2005). Computer simulations of natural beech forest dynamics in the Boberka river basin in the Ukrainian Beskids. Natural Forests in the Temperate Zone of Europe - Values and Utilization (pp. 121−129). Birmensdorf: Published by Swiss Federal Research Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kozak, I., Chłódek, D., Zawadzki, A., Kozak, H. & Potaczała G. (2007a). Conversion simulation of spruce stands in the Bieszczady mountains with the aid of FOR KOM E model (in Polish). Leśne Prace Badawcze, 2, 7−26.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kozak, I., Parpan, V., Potaczała, G., Kozak, H. & Zawadzki A. (2007b). Natural forest regeneration in spruce monocultures in the Ukrainian Beskids - prognosis by FOR KOM E model. J. For. Sci. (Prague), 53(4), 162−169.10.17221/2355-JFS]Search in Google Scholar
[Kucharzyk, S. (2005). An influence of the exposition and elevation above sea level upon the dynamics of forest stands at the upper timberline at Bieszczadzki National Park (in Polish). Roczniki Bieszczadzkie, 13, 173−201.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kucharzyk, S. & Sugiero D. (2007). A differentiation of the dynamics of reforestation processes in beech stands of Bieszczady, depending on the slope exposition and elevation (in Polish). Sylwan, 7, 29−38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leemans, R. & Prentice I.C. (1989). FORSKA, a general forest succesion model. Uppsala: Meddelanden fran Vaxbiologiska Institutionen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lek, S. & Guegan J.F. (1999). Artificial neural networks as a tool in ecological modelling, an introduction. Ecol. Model., 120, 65-73. DO I: 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00092-7.10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00092-7]Search in Google Scholar
[McGarigal, K. & Marks B.J. (1995). FRAGSTATS . Spatial analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351.10.2737/PNW-GTR-351]Search in Google Scholar
[Michalik, S. & Szary A. (1997). Forest communities of Bieszczadzki National Park (in Polish). Monografie Bieszczadzkie 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pacala, S.W., Canham, C.D. & Silander J.A.J. (1993). Forest models defined by field measurements: I. The design of a northeastern forest simulator. Can. J. For. Res., 23, 1980−1988. DO I: 10.1139/x93-249.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prentice, I.C. & Leemans R. (1990). Pattern and process and the dynamics of forest structure: a simulation approach. J. Ecol., 78, 340−355. http://www.jstor.org/stable/226111610.2307/2261116]Search in Google Scholar
[Pretzsch, H., Biber, P. & Durský J. (2002). The single tree-based stand simulator SILVA : construction, application and evaluation. For. Ecol. Manag., 162, 3-21. DO I: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00047-6.10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00047-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Seńko, Z. & Jóźwina M. (2004). CELAUT model perspective in landscape ecology (in Ukrainian). Visnyk of L’viv University. Series Geographical, 31, 333−339.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shugart, H.H. & West D.C. (1977). Development of an Appalachian deciduos forest model and its application to assessment of the impact of the chestnut blight. J. Environ. Manag., 5, 161−179.]Search in Google Scholar
[Urban, D.L. (1990). A versatile model to simulate forest pattern: a user’s guide to ZELIG version 1.0. Charlottesville, VA : University of Virginia, Environmental Sciences Department.]Search in Google Scholar
[Urban, D.L., Bonan, G.B., Smith, T.M. & Shugart H.H. (1991). Spatial applications of gap models. For. Ecol. Manag., 42, 95−110. DO I: 10.1016/0378-1127(91)90067-6. ]Search in Google Scholar