In vitro evaluation of immunogenic properties of active dressings

1. Andersen T., et al.; Alginates as biomaterials in tissue engineering, Carbohydr. Chem., 37, 2012Search in Google Scholar

2. Anderson J.M.; Biological responses to materials, Annu. Rev. Mater.Res. 31, 200110.1146/annurev.matsci.31.1.81Search in Google Scholar

3. Barnett S., Varley S.; The effects of calcium alginate on wound healing, Ann R Coll Surg Engl., 69, 4, 1987Search in Google Scholar

4. Barrientos S., et al.; Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing, Wound Repair Regen. 16, 5, 200810.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00410.xSearch in Google Scholar

5. Burrow T., Welch M.J.; The development and use of alginate fibres in nonwovens for medical end-uses. In: Cusick GE, ed. Nonwoven Conference Papers, UMIST 1983Search in Google Scholar

6. Eberlein T., et al; Comparison of PHMB-containing dressing and silver dressings in patients with critically colonised or locally infected wounds, J Wound Care, 21, 1, 2012.10.12968/jowc.2012.21.1.12Search in Google Scholar

7. Eming SA., et al.; Accelerated wound closure in mice deficient for interleukin-10, J.Pathol. 170.1, 2007.10.2353/ajpath.2007.060370Search in Google Scholar

8. Gallin J. I., et al.; Inflammation: Basic Principles and Clinical Correlates, New York Raven, 1999 2nd ed.Search in Google Scholar

9. Gallucci RM., et al; Interleukin-6 treatment augments cutaneous wound healing in immunosuppressed mice, J Interferon Cytokine Res., 21, 8, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

10. Iannuccelli V., et al; Biodegradable intraoperative system for bone infection treatment II. In vivo evaluation. Int J Pharm, 143, 1996.10.1016/S0378-5173(96)04711-4Search in Google Scholar

11. Ishikawa K et al; Self-setting barrier membrane for guided tissue regeneration method: initial evaluation of alginate membrane made with sodium alginate and calcium chloride aqueous solutions.J Biomed Mater Res., 47, 1999.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199911)47:2<111::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-0Search in Google Scholar

12. Jones V., Harding K.; Chronic Wound Care: A Clinical Source Book for Healthcare Professionals, 245-251, 2001Search in Google Scholar

13. Kaneda K, Kuroda S, Goto N, Sato D, Ohya K, Kasugai S. ; Is sodium alginate an alternative haemostatic material in the tooth extraction socket?, J Oral Tissue Engin; 5, 2008Search in Google Scholar

14. Krucinska I., et al.; Dibutyrylchitin nonwoven biomaterials manufactured directly from polymer solution. International Conference FiberMed06 - Fibrous Products in Medical and Health Care, Tampere, Finland, 2006Search in Google Scholar

15. Krucińska I., et al.; Producing Wound Dressing Materials from Chitin Derivatives by Forming Nonwovens Directly from Polymer Solution, Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 15, 5-6, 2007Search in Google Scholar

16. Krucińska I., et al..; Biological Estimation of Dibutyrylchitin Nonwovens Manufactured by the Spraying of Polymer Solution Technique, in Progress on Chemistry and Application of Chitin and its Derivative, Polish Chitin Society, Polish Chitin Society, Monograph XI, 2006Search in Google Scholar

17. Krzyżanowska-Gołąb D., Lemańska-PerekA., Kątnik-Prastowska I.; Fibronektyna jako aktywny składnik macierzy pozakomórkowej, Postepy Hig Med. Dosw. (online), 61, 2007Search in Google Scholar

18. Labler L .et.al.; Vacuum-assisted closure therapy increases local interleukin-8 and vascular endothelial growth factor levels in traumatic wounds, J Trauma., 66,3,2009.Search in Google Scholar

19. Mano J.et al.; Natural origin biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: present status and some moving trends, J R Soc. Interface. 22, 4, 200710.1098/rsif.2007.0220Search in Google Scholar

20. Matthew IR.et al; Subperiosteal,behavior of alginate and cellulose wound dressing materials. Biomaterials, 16, 4, 199510.1016/0142-9612(95)93254-BSearch in Google Scholar

21. Muzzarelli R.A. et al.; The biocompatibility of dibutyrylchitin in the context of wound dressings. Biomaterials, 26, 29, 200510.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.006Search in Google Scholar

22. Pielka S. et al.; Healing acceleration by a textile dressings containing dibutyrylchitin and chitin. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 2, 41, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

23. Pluta J., Haznar D.; Właściwości fizykochemiczne oraz kinetyka uwalniania substancji leczniczej z matryc żelatynowo-alginianowych, Polimery w Medycynie, 36, 3, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

24. Schoukens G., Kiekens P., Krucińska I.; New bioactive textile dressing materials from dibutyrylchitin, Intern. J. of Clothing Science and Technology, 21, 2-3, 200910.1108/09556220910933817Search in Google Scholar

25. Szewczyk M. et al.: Zasady wyboru opatrunków hydrofiber i alginianowych w leczeniu owrzodzeń żylnych, Zakażenia, 6, 2004Search in Google Scholar

26. Szosland et al.; Opatrunki z dibutyrylochityny i chityny wspomagające gojenie się ran, IV Międzynarodowa Konferencja Naukowa Medtex 2002, Łódź.Search in Google Scholar

27. Szosland L., Janowska G.; Patent PL No 169077 B1, 1996Search in Google Scholar

28. Thomay A.A. et al.; Disruption of Interleukin-1 Signaling Improves the Quality of Wound Healing, J Pathol. 174, 6, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

29. Turner T. D.; The development of wound management products, Wounds, 3, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

30. Vercellotti G. M. et al.; Inflamed Fibronectin: An Altered Fibronectin Enhances Neutrophil Adhesion, Blood, 62, 5, 198310.1182/blood.V62.5.1063.bloodjournal6251063Search in Google Scholar

31. Wang L., et al.;Evaluation of sodium alginate for bone marrow cell tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 24, 20, 200310.1016/S0142-9612(03)00167-4Search in Google Scholar

32. Winter G.D.; Formation of the Scab and the Rate of Epithelization of Superficial Wounds in the Skin of the Young Domestic Pig, Nature, 193, 196210.1038/193293a014007593Search in Google Scholar

33. Wu S. F. et al; Repair of facial nerve with alginate sponge without suturing: an experimental study in cats. Scand J Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Hand Surg., 36, 3, 2002.10.1080/02844310275371800512141200Search in Google Scholar