This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Anderson, R.E. and J.R. Hair (1972): Consumerism, consumer expectations, and perceived product performance. In: Venkatesan, M. (Ed.): Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference. Association for Consumer Research, Iowa City, USA.AndersonR.E.HairJ.R.1972Consumerism, consumer expectations, and perceived product performanceVenkatesanM.Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference. Association for Consumer ResearchIowa City, USASearch in Google Scholar
Anderson, R.E. (1973): Consumer dissatisfaction: The effect of disconfirmed expectancy on perceived product performance. Journal of Marketing Research 10, 38–44.AndersonR.E.1973Consumer dissatisfaction: The effect of disconfirmed expectancy on perceived product performanceJournal of Marketing Research1038–4410.1177/002224377301000106Search in Google Scholar
Araki, M. and T. Ishii (2015): Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing. Trends in Plant Science 20, 145–149.ArakiM.IshiiT.2015Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editingTrends in Plant Science20145–14910.1016/j.tplants.2015.01.01025726138Search in Google Scholar
Assefa, G. and B. Frostell (2007): Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies. Technology in Society 29, 63–78.AssefaG.FrostellB.2007Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologiesTechnology in Society2963–7810.1016/j.techsoc.2006.10.007Search in Google Scholar
Bajpai, P. (2013): Biorefinery in the Pulp and Paper Industry. Academic Press, London, UK, 114 pp.BajpaiP.2013Biorefinery in the Pulp and Paper IndustryAcademic PressLondon, UK11410.1016/B978-0-12-409508-3.00002-XSearch in Google Scholar
Boons, F. and F. Lüdeke-Freund (2013): Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production 45, 9–19.BoonsF.Lüdeke-FreundF.2013Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agendaJournal of Cleaner Production459–1910.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007Search in Google Scholar
Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., del Río, P. and T. Könnölä (2010): Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production 18, 1073–1083.Carrillo-HermosillaJ.del RíoP.KönnöläT.2010Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studiesJournal of Cleaner Production181073–108310.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.014Search in Google Scholar
Clark, D., Aurenhammer, P., Bartlomé, O. and M. Spear (2012): Innovative wood-based products, 2011-2012. In: UNECE/FAO (Ed.): Forest Products Annual Market Review, 2011-2012. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, New York and Geneva, 141–150.ClarkD.AurenhammerP.BartloméO.SpearM.2012Innovative wood-based products, 2011-2012In: UNECE/FAO EdForest Products Annual Market Review, 2011-2012United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsNew York and Geneva141–15010.18356/15975eae-enSearch in Google Scholar
Costa-Font, M., Gil, J.M. and W.B. Traill (2008): Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy. Food Policy 33, 99–111.Costa-FontM.GilJ.M.TraillW.B.2008Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policyFood Policy3399–11110.1016/j.foodpol.2007.07.002Search in Google Scholar
Deliza, R. and H.J.H. MacFie (1996): The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: A review. Journal of Sensory Studies 11, 103–128.DelizaR.MacFieH.J.H.1996The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: A reviewJournal of Sensory Studies11103–12810.1111/j.1745-459X.1996.tb00036.xSearch in Google Scholar
de Assis, C.A., Houtman, C., Phillips, R., Bilek, E.M., Rojas, O.J., Pal, L., Peresin, M.S., Jameel, H. and R. Gonzalez (2017): Conversion economics of forest biomaterials: Risk and financial analysis of CNC manufacturing. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 11, 682–700.de AssisC.A.HoutmanC.PhillipsR.BilekE.M.RojasO.J.PalL.PeresinM.S.JameelH.GonzalezR.2017Conversion economics of forest biomaterials: Risk and financial analysis of CNC manufacturingBiofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining11682–70010.1002/bbb.1782Search in Google Scholar
Eichhorn, S.J., Dufresne, A., Aranguren, M., Marcovich, N.E., Capadona, J.R., Rowan, S.J., Weder, C., Thielemans, W., Roman, M. and S. Renneckar (2009): Review: Current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. Journal of Materials Science 45, 1.EichhornS.J.DufresneA.ArangurenM.MarcovichN.E.CapadonaJ.R.RowanS.J.WederC.ThielemansW.RomanM.RenneckarS.2009Review: Current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocompositesJournal of Materials Science45110.1007/s10853-009-3874-0Search in Google Scholar
Ekman, A., Campos, M., Lindahl, S., Co, M., Börjesson, P., Karlsson, E.N. and C. Turner (2013): Bioresource utilisation by sustainable technologies in new valueadded biorefinery concepts – Two case studies from food and forest industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 57, 46–58.EkmanA.CamposM.LindahlS.CoM.BörjessonP.KarlssonE.N.TurnerC.2013Bioresource utilisation by sustainable technologies in new valueadded biorefinery concepts – Two case studies from food and forest industryJournal of Cleaner Production5746–5810.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.003Search in Google Scholar
European Commission (2012): Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/official-strategy_en.pdfAccessed on 7 February 2018.European Commission2012Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europehttp://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/official-strategy_en.pdfAccessedon 7 February 2018Search in Google Scholar
Fenn, J. (2006): Understanding Gartner’s hype cycles. Gartner Inc., Stanford, USA.FennJ.2006Understanding Gartner’s hype cyclesGartner IncStanford, USASearch in Google Scholar
Fenn, J. and M. Raskino (2008): Hype Cycle Winners and Losers. In: Fenn, J. and M. Raskino (Eds.): Mastering the Hype Cycle: How to Choose the Right Innovation at the Right Time. Harvard Business School Press, Harvard, USA, pp. 3–24.FennJ.RaskinoM.2008Hype Cycle Winners and LosersFennJ.RaskinoM.Mastering the Hype Cycle: How to Choose the Right Innovation at the Right TimeHarvard Business School PressHarvard, USA3–24Search in Google Scholar
Greenwald, A.G. (1968): Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change. Academic Press Inc, New York, USA.GreenwaldA.G.1968Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude ChangeAcademic Press IncNew York, USA10.1016/B978-1-4832-3071-9.50012-XSearch in Google Scholar
Hansen, E. (2006): Structural panel industry evolution: Implications for innovation and new product development. Forest Policy and Economics 8, 774–783.HansenE.2006Structural panel industry evolution: Implications for innovation and new product developmentForest Policy and Economics8774–78310.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.008Search in Google Scholar
Hansen, E. and H. Juslin (2011): Strategic marketing in the global forest industries. 2nd ed., Authors Academic Press, Corvallis, Oregon, USA, 327 pp.HansenE.JuslinH.2011Strategic marketing in the global forest industries2nd edAuthors Academic PressCorvallis, Oregon, USA327Search in Google Scholar
Hellsmark, H. and P. Söderholm (2017): Innovation policies for advanced biorefinery development: Key considerations and lessons from Sweden. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 11, 28–40.HellsmarkH.SöderholmP.2017Innovation policies for advanced biorefinery development: Key considerations and lessons from SwedenBiofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining1128–4010.1002/bbb.1732Search in Google Scholar
Henseling, C., Hahn T. and K. Nolting (2006): Instrument in der Umwelt- und Nachhaltigkeitsforschung. Werkstatt Bericht Nr. 82, Berlin, Deutschland.HenselingC.HahnT.NoltingK.2006Instrument in der Umwelt- und NachhaltigkeitsforschungWerkstatt Bericht Nr. 82Berlin, DeutschlandSearch in Google Scholar
Hemström, K., Mahapatra, K. and L. Gustavsson (2014): Public perceptions and acceptance of intensive forestry in Sweden. Ambio 43, 196–206.HemströmK.MahapatraK.GustavssonL.2014Public perceptions and acceptance of intensive forestry in SwedenAmbio43196–20610.1007/s13280-013-0411-9Search in Google Scholar
Hesser, F. (2015): Environmental advantage by choice: Exante LCA for a new Kraft pulp fibre reinforced polypropylene composite in comparison to reference materials. Composites Part B: Engineering 79, 197–203.HesserF.2015Environmental advantage by choice: Exante LCA for a new Kraft pulp fibre reinforced polypropylene composite in comparison to reference materialsComposites Part B: Engineering7919720310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.038Search in Google Scholar
Hetemäki, L., Hoen, H. and P. Schwarzbauer (2014): Conclusions and policy implications. In: Hetemäki, L. (Ed.): Future of the European Forest-Based Sector: Structural Changes Towards Bioeconomy. What Science Can Tell Us 6, European Forestry Institute, pp. 95–108.HetemäkiL.HoenH.SchwarzbauerP.2014Conclusions and policy implicationsHetemäkiL.Future of the European Forest-Based Sector: Structural Changes Towards BioeconomyWhat Science Can Tell Us 6European Forestry Institute95–108Search in Google Scholar
Karana, E., Hekkert, P. and P. Kandachar (2010): A tool for meaning driven materials selection. Materials & Design 31, 2932–2941.KaranaE.HekkertP.KandacharP.2010A tool for meaning driven materials selectionMaterials & Design312932–294110.1016/j.matdes.2009.12.021Search in Google Scholar
Kleinschmit, D., Lindstad, B.H., Thorsen, B.J., Toppinen, A., Roos, A. and S. Baardsen (2014): Shades of green: A social scientific view on bioeconomy in the forest sector. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29, 402–410.KleinschmitD.LindstadB.H.ThorsenB.J.ToppinenA.RoosA.BaardsenS.2014Shades of green: A social scientific view on bioeconomy in the forest sectorScandinavian Journal of Forest Research29402–41010.1080/02827581.2014.921722Search in Google Scholar
Krueger, R.A. and M.A. Casey (2009): Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 4th ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.KruegerR.A.CaseyM.A.2009Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research4th edSage PublicationsThousand Oaks, CaliforniaSearch in Google Scholar
Ljungberg, L.Y. and K.L. Edwards (2003): Design, materials selection and marketing of successful products. Materials & Design 24, 519–529.LjungbergL.Y.EdwardsK.L.2003Design, materials selection and marketing of successful productsMaterials & Design24519–52910.1016/S0261-3069(03)00094-3Search in Google Scholar
Mayring, P. (2003): Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. 8. Aufl., Beltz UTB, Weinheim, Deutschland.MayringP.2003Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. 8. AuflBeltz UTBWeinheim, DeutschlandSearch in Google Scholar
Morgan, D.L. (1998): The Focus Group Guidebook. Sage Publications, Tousand Oaks, California.MorganD.L.1998The Focus Group GuidebookSage Publications, Tousand OaksCalifornia10.4135/9781483328164Search in Google Scholar
Näyhä, A., Hetemäki, L. and T. Stern (2014): New products outlook. In: Hetemäki, L. (Ed.): Future of the European Forest-Based Sector: Structural Changes Towards Bioeconomy. What Science Can Tell Us 6, European Forestry Institute, pp. 43–54.NäyhäA.HetemäkiL.SternT.2014New products outlookHetemäkiL.Future of the European Forest-Based Sector: Structural Changes Towards Bioeconomy. What Science Can Tell Us 6European Forestry Institute43–54Search in Google Scholar
OECD/Eurostat. (2005): Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. OECD Publishing, Paris.OECD/Eurostat2005Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation DataOECD PublishingParisSearch in Google Scholar
Ollikainen, M. (2014): Forestry in bioeconomy – Smart green growth for the humankind. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29, 360–366.OllikainenM.2014Forestry in bioeconomy – Smart green growth for the humankindScandinavian Journal of Forest Research29360–36610.1080/02827581.2014.926392Search in Google Scholar
Pantano, E. and L. Di Pietro (2012): Understanding consumer’s acceptance of technology-based innovations in retailing. Journal of Technology, Management & Innovation 7, 1–19.PantanoE.Di PietroL.2012Understanding consumer’s acceptance of technology-based innovations in retailingJournal of Technology, Management & Innovation71–1910.4067/S0718-27242012000400001Search in Google Scholar
Patermann, C. and A. Aguilar (2018): The origins of the bioeconomy in the European Union. New Biotechnology 40, 20–24.PatermannC.AguilarA.2018The origins of the bioeconomy in the European UnionNew Biotechnology4020–2410.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.00228411152Search in Google Scholar
Provasnek, A.K., Sentic, A. and E. Schmid (2017): Integrating Eco-Innovations and Stakeholder Engagement for Sustainable Development and a Social License to Operate. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 24, 173–185.ProvasnekA.K.SenticA.SchmidE.2017Integrating Eco-Innovations and Stakeholder Engagement for Sustainable Development and a Social License to OperateCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management24173–18510.1002/csr.1406Search in Google Scholar
Ramcilovic-Suominen, S. and H. Pülzl (2018): Sustainable development – A ‘selling point’ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework? Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 4170–4180.Ramcilovic-SuominenS.PülzlH.2018Sustainable development – A ‘selling point’ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework?Journal of Cleaner Production1724170–418010.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.157Search in Google Scholar
Ranacher, L., Lähtinen, K., Järvinen, E. and A. Toppinen (2017): Perceptions of the general public on forest sector responsibility: A survey related to ecosystem services and forest sector business impacts in four European countries. Forest Policy and Economics 78, 180–189.RanacherL.LähtinenK.JärvinenE.ToppinenA.2017Perceptions of the general public on forest sector responsibility: A survey related to ecosystem services and forest sector business impacts in four European countriesForest Policy and Economics78180–18910.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.016Search in Google Scholar
Ranacher, L. and T. Stern (2016): Are your messages being heard? Evaluation of the forest-based sector’s communication on sustainable forest management in Austria. Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Agrarökonomie, Band 25, 159–168.RanacherL.SternT.2016Are your messages being heard? Evaluation of the forest-based sector’s communication on sustainable forest management in AustriaJahrbuch der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Agrarökonomie, Band25159–168Search in Google Scholar
Rametsteiner, E., Hansen, E. and A. Niskanen (2006): Introduction to the special issue on innovation and entrepreneurship in the forest sector, Forest Policy and Economics 8, 669–673.RametsteinerE.HansenE.NiskanenA.2006Introduction to the special issue on innovation and entrepreneurship in the forest sector, Forest Policy and Economics8669–67310.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.001Search in Google Scholar
Reid, M. S., Villalobos, M. and E.D. Cranston (2017): Benchmarking Cellulose Nanocrystals: From the Laboratory to Industrial Production. Langmuir 33, 1583–1598.ReidM. S.VillalobosM.CranstonE.D.2017Benchmarking Cellulose Nanocrystals: From the Laboratory to Industrial ProductionLangmuir331583–159810.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0376527959566Search in Google Scholar
Rogers, E.M. (2003): Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed., Free Press, New York, USA.RogersE.M.2003Diffusion of Innovations. 5th edFree PressNew York, USASearch in Google Scholar
Roos, A., Lindström, M., Heuts, L., Hylander, N., Lind, E. and C. Nielsen (2014): Innovation diffusion of new wood-based materials – reducing the “time to market”. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29, 394–401.RoosA.LindströmM.HeutsL.HylanderN.LindE.NielsenC.2014Innovation diffusion of new wood-based materials – reducing the “time to market”Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research29394–40110.1080/02827581.2014.931454Search in Google Scholar
Ruef, A. and J. Markard (2010): What happens after a hype? How changing expectations affected innovation activities in the case of stationary fuel cells. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22, 317–338.RuefA.MarkardJ.2010What happens after a hype? How changing expectations affected innovation activities in the case of stationary fuel cellsTechnology Analysis & Strategic Management22317–33810.1080/09537321003647354Search in Google Scholar
Sandin, G., Peters, G.M. and M. Svanström (2016): Life Cycle Assessment of Forest Products. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland.SandinG.PetersG.M.SvanströmM.2016Life Cycle Assessment of Forest ProductsSpringer International PublishingCham, Switzerland10.1007/978-3-319-44027-9Search in Google Scholar
Scarlat, N., Dallemand, J.F., Monforti-Ferrario, F. and V. Nita (2015): The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and facts. Environmental Development 15, 3–34.ScarlatN.DallemandJ.F.Monforti-FerrarioF.NitaV.2015The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and factsEnvironmental Development153–3410.1016/j.envdev.2015.03.006Search in Google Scholar
Schaltegger, S. and M. Wagner (2011): Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions, Business Strategy and the Environment 20, 222–237.SchalteggerS.WagnerM.2011Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions, Business Strategy and the Environment20222–23710.1002/bse.682Search in Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1934): The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Harvard, USA.SchumpeterJ.1934The theory of economic developmentHarvard University PressHarvard, USASearch in Google Scholar
Siegrist, M., Stampfli, N., Kastenholz, H. and C. Keller (2008): Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging. Appetite 51, 283–290.SiegristM.StampfliN.KastenholzH.KellerC.2008Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packagingAppetite51283–29010.1016/j.appet.2008.02.02018406006Search in Google Scholar
Sijtsema, S.J., Onwezen, M.C., Reinders, M.J., Dagevos, H., Partanen, A. and M. Meeusen (2016): Consumer perception of bio-based products – An exploratory study in 5 European countries. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 77, 61–69.SijtsemaS.J.OnwezenM.C.ReindersM.J.DagevosH.PartanenA.MeeusenM.2016Consumer perception of bio-based products – An exploratory study in 5 European countriesNJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences7761–6910.1016/j.njas.2016.03.007Search in Google Scholar
Stendahl, M. (2009): Management of product development projects in the wood industry. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 24, 434–447.StendahlM.2009Management of product development projects in the wood industryScandinavian Journal of Forest Research24434–44710.1080/02827580903183588Search in Google Scholar
Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boningner, D. and S. Edwards (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighting immediate and distant outcomes of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66, 742–752.StrathmanA.GleicherF.BoningnerD.EdwardsS.1994The consideration of future consequences: Weighting immediate and distant outcomes of behaviourJournal of Personality and Social Psychology66742–75210.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742Search in Google Scholar
Stern, T., Ranacher, L., Mair, C., Berghäll, S., Lähtinen, K., Vihakara, M. and A. Toppinen (2018): Perceptions on the future importance of forest sector innovations: biofuels, biomaterials or niche products? Forests 9, 255.SternT.RanacherL.MairC.BerghällS.LähtinenK.VihakaraM.ToppinenA.2018Perceptions on the future importance of forest sector innovations: biofuels, biomaterials or niche products?Forests925510.3390/f9050255Search in Google Scholar
UNECE/FAO (2016): Forest Products Annual Market Review 2015-2016 https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/ timber/publications/fpamr2016.pdf Accessed on 7 February 2018.UNECE/FAO2016Forest Products Annual Market Review 2015-2016https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/timber/publications/fpamr2016.pdfAccessed on 7 February 2018Search in Google Scholar
UN (2015): Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN General Assembly 21st October 2015. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E. Accessed on 2 February 2018.UN2015Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN General Assembly 21st October 2015http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=EAccessed on 2 February 2018Search in Google Scholar
Voegtling, C. and A.G. Scherer (2017): Responsible innovation and the innovation of responsibility: Governing sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Business Ethics 143, 227–243.VoegtlingC.SchererA.G.2017Responsible innovation and the innovation of responsibility: Governing sustainable development in a globalized worldJournal of Business Ethics143227–24310.1007/s10551-015-2769-zSearch in Google Scholar
WCED (1987): Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 400 pp.WCED1987Our Common FutureOxford University PressOxford, UK400Search in Google Scholar
