[Adler, Mark. 2012. The Plain Language Movement. In: Tiersma, Peter M. –Solan, Lawrence, M. (eds), The Oxford handbook of language and law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 67–83.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernstein, Basil. 1971. Class, codes and control: Volume 1 – Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London–New York: Routledge–Kegan Paul Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bhatia, Vijay K. 2010. Legal writing: Specificity. Specification in legislative writing: Accessibility, transparency, power and control. In: Johnson, Alison–Coulthard, Malcolm (eds), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics. Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gustafsson, Marita. 1975. Some syntactic properties of English law language. Publications of the Department of English 4. Turku: University of Turku.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hiltunen, Risto. 2001. Some syntactic properties of English law language: Twenty-five years after Gustafsson (1975). In: Hiltunen, Risto–Battarbee, K.–Peikola, M. –Tanskanen, S. -K. (eds), English in Zigs and Zags. Anglicana Turkuensia 23: 53–66. Turku: University of Turku.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jakobson, Roman. 1959. On linguistic aspects of translation. In: Fang, Achilles et al. (eds), On Translation. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press. 232–239.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kimble, Joseph. 2012. Writing for dollars, writing to please. The case for plain language in business, government, and law. Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mattila, Heikki E. S. 2012. Legal Vocabulary, Tiersma, Peter M. & Solan, Lawrence, M. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 27–38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mellinkoff, David. 1963. The language of the law. Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moldova, Zsófia. 2018. „Terhelt tájékoztatás” – A terhelti tájékoztató közérthetősége a büntetőeljárás kezdeti szakaszában [Comprehensibility of letter of rights at the beginning of criminal procedure]. Magyar Jogi Nyelv 2018/1: 30–35 (https://joginyelv.hu/terhelt-tajekoztatas-a-terhelti-tajekoztatokozerthetosege-a-buntetoeljaras-kezdeti-szakaszaban/).]Search in Google Scholar
[Szabó, Miklós (ed.). 2010. Nyelvében a jog. Nyelvhasználat a jogi eljárásban [Law in its language. Language usage in legal proceedings]. Miskolc: Bíbor.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szabó, Miklós–Vinnai, Edina (eds). 2018. A törvény szavai [The words of law]. Miskolc: Bíbor.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tiersma, Peter M. 1999. Legal Language. Chicago–London: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vinnai, Edina. 2017. Jog és nyelv határán. A jogi nyelvhasználat nemzetközi és hazai kutatása [On the edge of law and language. International and Hungarian research on legal language usage]. Budapest: Gondolat.]Search in Google Scholar
