<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Plain language movement has a long history and has achieved significant changes in the USA and in many European countries. However, the situation is not as good as that in Hungary, especially in the field of law. As a researcher in two empirical “law and language” projects in Hungary since 2000, the author presents her experiences gained during preparing and analysing tape recordings of police interrogations and court hearings as regards comprehension of legal language. The paper focuses especially on the understandability of providing information on the rights and obligations of laymen in legal procedures given by legal professionals. It also summarizes the recent changes in Hungarian legal regulations providing a better understanding of rights and obligations (partly based on the 2012/13/ EU Directive on the right to information in criminal proceedings). As regards the practice of adjudication, the paper compares the way of providing information to laymen before and after the modification of legal norms. Two positive examples can be mentioned: (1) a few years ago, a group of legal and linguistic experts prepared a so-called Stylebook with recommendations to improve the structure and wordings of court verdicts, and (2) within the framework of a project called <italic>The Year of Comprehensibility at Courts, 2017</italic> the improvement of comprehensible communication was integrated into an obligatory training for judges.</p></abstract>

Plain language movement has a long history and has achieved significant changes in the USA and in many European countries. However, the situation is not as good as that in Hungary, especially in the field of law. As a researcher in two empirical “law and language” projects in Hungary since 2000, the author presents her experiences gained during preparing and analysing tape recordings of police interrogations and court hearings as regards comprehension of legal language. The paper focuses especially on the understandability of providing information on the rights and obligations of laymen in legal procedures given by legal professionals. It also summarizes the recent changes in Hungarian legal regulations providing a better understanding of rights and obligations (partly based on the 2012/13/ EU Directive on the right to information in criminal proceedings). As regards the practice of adjudication, the paper compares the way of providing information to laymen before and after the modification of legal norms. Two positive examples can be mentioned: (1) a few years ago, a group of legal and linguistic experts prepared a so-called Stylebook with recommendations to improve the structure and wordings of court verdicts, and (2) within the framework of a project called The Year of Comprehensibility at Courts, 2017 the improvement of comprehensible communication was integrated into an obligatory training for judges.

Plain Language in Law in Hungary

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"Plain Language in Law in Hungary"}

Plain language movement has a long history and has achieved significant changes in the USA and in many European countries. However, the situation is not as...

Plain Language in Law in Hungary

Published Online: Jan 21, 2020

Page range: 93 - 104

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2019-0028

Keywords
plain legal language, intralingual translation, linguistic model of adjudication, right to information in criminal proceedings, right to fair trial

© 2019 Edina Vinnai, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Plain Language in Law in Hungary

Published Online: Jan 21, 2020

Page range: 93 - 104

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2019-0028

Keywordsplain legal language, intralingual translation, linguistic model of adjudication, right to information in criminal proceedings, right to fair trial

© 2019 Edina Vinnai, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Keywords
plain legal language, intralingual translation, linguistic model of adjudication, right to information in criminal proceedings, right to fair trial