Cite

Introduction

Mucous membrane is found in different areas of the body performing similar functions. However, they differ mainly based on their location . Mucous membrane functions as a barrier in such systems as: respiratory, urogenital and digestive. In this study we will be focusing strictly on the oral mucosa. The oral cavity is coated with a unceasing layer of mucous membrane type II [1]. This tissue is adjacent to the pharyngeal mucosa and the skin at the vermillion border of the lips. It is mainly of ectodermal origin and consists of layers of squamous epithelium. Like the skin, the mucosa serves as a protective barrier against mechanical and microbiological injuries, it is designed to receive stimuli such as touch, pain and temperature, and to serve as a secreting organ. Its permeability creates great conditions for the absorption of microparticles, such as various types of medications [2]. Keratinocytes and fibroblasts, which mainly form the structure of the oral mucosa, are subjected to numerous factors. Being one of the million parts that build the animal organism, they are involved in various processes. One of this biological phenomena is homeostasis. By this term we understand any self-regulating process by which biological systems incline to maintain stability while adapting to conditions that are most advantageous for survival [3]. This is an extremely complicated process, considering how many aspects creating it and how many elements are involved. With regard to the oral cavity, homeostasis involves balance between keratinoblasts, keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Keeping this equilibrium is crucial for morphological modification of oral mucosa [4]. As highly active elements, these cells show strong chemotaxis. For example, activated keratinocytes express surface receptors for cytokines, chemokines and opioids [5, 6, 7]. Morphological status of the oral mucosa significantly affects the metabolism and biochemistry of this tissue[8]. Based on the available literature and knowledge, we have developed an effective culture system for mucosal keratinocytes and fibroblasts, which are previously isolated from the oral mucosa of Sus scrofa f. domestica. In addition, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) still requires the use of large animals in comparative tests as a model similar to humans. In this case, it was necessary to use this particular animal model due to similarities :physiological, anatomical and nutritional to humans. Recognized ontological groups, whose representatives are genes with significantly reduced or increased expression, suggest that oral mucosa cells are involved in homeostasis and control of the body’s metabolism. Microarray approach enables us to learn about new metabolic pathways in which known and previously unknown genes are involved. Our previous microarray studies on gene expression in cultured cells have shown significant changes in the transcriptomic profile. And it was closely linked to which day of growth cells were currently in [9]. It is also confirmed, that during cultivation of the oral mucosa cells, the cells undergo significant differentiation and visible proliferation [8].

In this study, we will try to confirm that in the in vitro culture of oral mucosa , the expression of our selected genes undergo significant changes which are tied to such processes as: homeostasis, chemotaxis and organic/ingorganic response of the organism. We will analyze whether the increased or decreased expression of selected genes is in line with the available literature and we will try to explain why the expression of a given gene changes at a specific time frame in the cell culture.

Materials and Methods
Animals

For this study, a total of 20 pubertal crossbred Landrace gilts bred on commercial local farm were used. They had a mean age of 155 days (range 140 – 170 days), and the mean weight was 100 kg (95120 kg). All of the animals were housed under identical conditions and fed the same forage (depending on age and reproductive status). The experiments were approved by Local Ethic Committee.

Cell isolation and culture

After slaughter, samples of buccal pouch mucosa were obtained within 40 min and transported to the laboratory. The excised tissue was washed twice in Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (D-PBS) (137 mM NaCl, 27 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4) . The surface of the buccal pouch was surgically removed using sterile surgical blades. The tissue fragments were incubated with 0.05% collagenase I (Sigma Aldrich, Madison, USA) for 40 min at 38 °C in a shaking water bath and then were treated witch 0.5% Trypsin/EDTA (Cascade Biologics, Portland, USA) for 10 min. The cell suspension obtained from this digestion was filtered through mesh to remove non-dissociated tissue fragments. Isolated cells were washed three times by centrifugation (10 min at 200 g) with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Sigma Aldrich, Madison, USA) supplemented with gentamicin (20 μg/mL) and 0.1% BSA. The final cell pellet was resuspended in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Sigma Aldrich, Madison, USA) and 10 U/mL penicillin G, 10 mg/mL streptomycin, and 25 μg/mL amphotericin B. Cell viability was 90 to 95% as determined by trypan blue staining (Sigma Aldrich, Madison, USA). The cells were cultured at 38.5 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Once the keratinocyte cultures attained 70–80% confluency, they were passaged by washing with PBS, digested with 0.025% Trypsin/EDTA (Cascade Biologics, Portland, USA), neutralized by a 0.0125% trypsin inhibitor (Cascade Biologics, Portland, USA), centrifuged, and resuspended at a seeding density of 2x104 cells/cm2. The culture medium was changed every three days.

Microarray expression analysis and statistics

Total RNA (100 ng) from each pooled sample was subjected to two rounds of sense cDNA amplification (Ambion® WT Expression Kit). The obtained cDNA was used for biotin labeling and fragmentation by Affymetrix GeneChip® WT Terminal Labeling and Hybridization (Affymetrix). Biotin-labeled fragments of cDNA (5.5 μg) were hybridized to the Affymetrix® Porcine Gene 1.1 ST Array Strip (48°C/20 h). Microarrays were then washed and stained according to the technical protocol using the Affymetrix GeneAtlas Fluidics Station. The array strips were scanned employing Imaging Station of the GeneAtlas System. Preliminary analysis of the scanned chips was performed using Affymetrix GeneAtlasTM Operating Software. The quality of gene expression data was confirmed according to the quality control criteria provided by the software. The obtained CEL files were imported into downstream data analysis software.

All of the presented analyses and graphs were performed using Bioconductor and R programming languages. Each CEL file was merged with a description file. In order to correct background, normalize, and summarize results, we used the Robust Multiarray Averaging (RMA) algorithm. To determine the statistical significance of the analyzed genes, moderated t-statistics from the empirical Bayes method were performed. The obtained p-value was corrected for multiple comparisons using Benjamini and Hochberg’s false discovery rate. The selection of significantly altered genes was based on a p-value beneath 0.05 and expression higher than two fold.

Differentially expressed genes were subjected to selection by examination of genes involved in cell migration regulation. The differentially expressed gene list (separated for up- and down-regulated genes) was uploaded to DAVID software (Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery)[10].

Subsequently we analyzed the interaction between the genes belonging to chosen GO terms with GOplot package (Walter, Wencke, Fatima Sanchez-Cabo, and Mercedes Ricote. GOplot: an R package for visually combining expression data with functional analysis. Bioinformatics (2015): btv300.)

Finally interactions between differentially expressed genes/proteins belonging to the chosen GO terms were investigated by STRING10 software (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes) (von Mering et al., 2005). The list of gene names was used as a query for an interaction prediction. The search criteria were based on co-occurrences of genes/proteins in scientific texts (text mining), co-expression, and experimentally observed interactions. The results of such analyses generated a gene/protein interaction network where the intensity of the edges reflected the strength of the interaction score.

Ethical approval

The research related to animal use has been complied with all the relevant national regulations and instructional policies for the care and use of animals. Bioethical Committee approval no. 32/2012, 30.06.2012.

Results

Whole transcriptome profiling by affymetrix microarray, allow as analyzing gene expression changes between 7, 15 and 30 days of buccal pouch mucosa cells culture. By Affymetrix® Porcine Gene 1.1 ST Array Strip we examined expression of 12257 transcripts. Genes with fold change higher than abs (2) and wit corrected p value lower than 0.05 were considered as differentially expressed. This set of genes consists of 130 different transcripts. The first detailed analysis based on GO BP the identification of differentially expressed genes belonging to the significantly enrichment GO BP terms.

DAVID (Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery) software was used for extraction of gene ontology biological process term (GO BP) that contains differently expressed transcripts. Up and down regulated gene sets were subjected to DAVID searching separately and only gene sets where adj. p value were lower than 0.05 were selected. The DAVID software analysis showed that differently expressed genes belongs to 56 Gene ontology groups. In this paper we focused on “cellular divalent inorganic cation homeostasis”, “chemical homeostasis”, “chemotaxis”, “homeostatic process” and “response to organic substance” GO BP terms. These sets of genes were subjected to hierarchical clusterization procedure and presented as heatmaps (Fig. 1). The gene symbols, fold changes in expression, Entrez gene IDs and corrected p values of that genes were shown in table 1.

Figure 1

Heat map representation of differentially expressed genes belonging to the “cellular divalent inorganic cation homeostasis”, “chemical homeostasis”, “chemotaxis”, “homeostatic process” and “response to organic substance” GO BP terms. Arbitrary signal intensity acquired from microarray analysis is represented by colours (green, higher; red, lower expression). Log2 signal intensity values for any single gene were resized to Row Z-Score scale (from -2, the lowest expression to +2, the highest expression for single gene)

Gene symbols, Entrez gene IDs, ratio and corrected P values of studied genes

GENE SYMBOLGENE IDRATIO D7/D15RATIO D7/D30P VAL D7/D15P VAL D7/D30MEAN RATIO
SPP1397087-10.87016565-14.25386170.0162712040.023019379-12.56201368
CCL8100302703-9.10436286-9.8466712980.0099091620.002855033-9.475517079
CXCL2414904-6.305216475-2.7637651870.0282105710.100060673-4.534490831
PTGS2397590-5.663189033-3.050664860.0332721530.086182814-4.356926947
ATP13A3100522900-3.576872002-3.4272047350.0338445670.040686213-3.502038369
PPARD397671-2.416675019-4.0053911160.0520060620.023501509-3.211033067
ATP1B1396898-3.743863827-2.0104473740.0311184930.123030328-2.8771556
CCL2397422-3.929361381-1.4507799290.0407438210.404390916-2.690070655
LYN100152890-2.52053573-2.4545351960.0346364920.04233411-2.487535463
REL100525104-3.00471739-1.965554050.0234279480.05637387-2.48513572
FCER1G397406-2.351156762-2.4045880580.0268356760.023565415-2.37787241
ETS1100302363-2.513407982-2.1505219830.0311184930.047472133-2.331964982
SCARB1397018-2.623056585-1.6817499410.0346364920.134327075-2.152403263
STEAP1397573-2.349620022-1.886629360.0268356760.044202404-2.118124691
ITGB3397063-2.917250333-1.3110252150.0388980030.421388587-2.114137774
IL6399500-1.793617663-2.2493345650.0884647660.044202404-2.021476114
LMO2100512825-2.0687671-1.8563698050.0268356760.034894667-1.962568452
TGFB1397078-2.253272341-1.2263169220.0150164240.216600729-1.739794631
CEBPA397307-1.147965724-2.1750530030.3207822940.017618993-1.661509363
DMD497636-1.6036745931.6312092280.0724618040.0681616960.013767318
LGALS9396972-1.5727100662.9108823240.13986140.0235015090.669086129
ATP5B1001571561.1223311711.0732466630.4828867530.629795881.097788917
NPFFR2---1.0445702662.0100060040.8269962090.0267077711.527288135
OAS1---1.0233182222.2555192230.9115526380.0230193791.639418722
PIN11005128272.0226942061.5818520960.042525030.1175935141.802273151
DKK36646531.7780400652.3626759080.04660370.0235015092.070357987
ATP6V1G21001523582.3468914121.830723960.0130320380.0235015092.088807686
TADA31001574642.5100731241.9779354590.0150164240.0249341842.244004291
MEF2C7335901.8012793553.2239186820.0811989980.0235015092.512599019
RUNX21007379652.6584564362.6662268730.042525030.0474721332.662341655
CD343971602.3630675013.0933632560.0522913520.0348946672.728215378

Moreover in Gene Ontology database genes that formed one particular GO group can also belong to other different GO term categories. By this reason we explore the gene intersections between selected GO BP terms. The relation between those GO BP terms was presented as well chart and Venn diagram (Fig. 2) as well as heatmap (Fig. 3).

Figure 2

The circle plot showing the differently expressed genes and z-score of the “cellular divalent inorganic cation homeostasis”, “chemical homeostasis”, “chemotaxis”, “homeostatic process” and “response to organic substance” GO BP terms. The outer circle shows a scatter plot for each term of the fold change of the assigned genes. Green circles display up- regulation and red ones down- regulation. The inner circle shows the z-score of each GO BP term. The width of the each bar corresponds to the number of genes within GO BP term and the color corresponds to the z-score

Figure 3

The representation of the mutual relationship of differently expressed genes “cellular divalent inorganic cation homeostasis”, “chemical homeostasis”, “chemotaxis”, “homeostatic process” and “response to organic substance” GO BP terms. The ribbons indicate which gene belongs to which categories. The middle circle represents logarithm from fold change (LogFC) between D15/D7, D30/D7 and D30/D15 respectively. The color of each block corresponds to the LogFC of each gene (green – upregulated, red – downregulated). The genes were sorted by logFC from most to least changed gene

STRING-generated interaction network among differentially expressed genes belonging to each of selected GO BP terms. Using such prediction method provided us molecular interaction network formed between protein products of studied genes (Fig. 4). The last figure (Fig. 5) is showing the differences in occurrence of differently expressed genes in frequency from 1 to 5.

Figure 4

Heatmap showing the gene occurrence between genes that belongs to GO BP terms. The yellow color is associated with gene occurrence in the GO Term. The intensity of the color is corresponding to amount of GO BP terms that each gene belongs to

Figure 5

STRING-generated interaction occurrence differently expressed genes that belongs to the “cellular divalent inorganic cation homeostasis”, “chemical homeostasis”, “chemotaxis”, “homeostatic process” and “response to organic substance” GO BP terms. The intensity of the edges reflects the interaction. The explanation of each symbol is included on the legend included in figure

Discussion

The oral mucosa is characterized by intensive and constant changes in its morphology and biochemistry. The basis for the proper functioning of the mucosa is the balance between keratinoblasts, keratinocytes and fibroblasts. This balance can be influenced by many external factors, such as environmental changes, mechanical stress, and drug delivery [8]. To characterize oral soft tissues comportment, we shall use mucosal biomechanical parameters as reference. Thanks to this, we will be able to refer to clinical applications such as pressure-pain thresholds, stimuli for tissue remodeling or testing new drugs and dressings [11]. Epithelial regeneration processes form the basis of stem cell and oral cancer research. These synthetically cultured tissue analogies are used in transplant surgery to treat numerous tissue dysfunctions in areas such as the urethra or esophagus [12,13].

However, to apply the epithelial properties listed above into the practice, we first need to know their molecular background. We chose genes with noticeable expression changes and from that group we have discussed 10 selected genes with the highest and lowest expression from the whole pool studied. The control sample in this study was day 7 of the culture. The 15th and 30th days were compared to this sample.

The CD34 gene showed the highest expression in relation to the seventh day. Single-pass membrane protein encoded by this gene, may play a role in the attachment of stem cells to the bone marrow extracellular matrix or to stromal cells. This protein is extremely phosphorylated and glycosylated by protein kinase C [14].

RUNX2 encodes protein which is essential for osteoblastic differentiation and skeletal morphogenesis. It also acts as a scaffold for nucleic acids and regulatory factors participating in skeletal gene expression. Core binding factor (CBF) binds to the core site, 5’-PYGPYGGT-3’, of a number of enhancers and promoters, including murine leukemia virus, polyomavirus enhancer, T-cell receptor enhancers, osteocalcin and osteopontin [15]. In turn, MEF2C refers to myogenesis. The protein encoded by this gene, MEF2 polypeptide C, has both trans-activating and DNA binding activities. This protein may play a role in keeping the differentiated state of muscle cells. Mutations and deletions at this locus have been associated with severe cognitive disability, cerebral malformations and epilepsy. It also controls cardiac morphogenesis and myogenesis, and is likewise involved in vascular development. Enhances transcriptional activation mediated by SOX18 [16,17]. The next place in the table was placed by the TADA3 gene. DNA-binding transcriptional activator proteins encoded by this gene, increases the rate of transcription. It happens when the transcriptional machinery bound to the basal promoter in conjunction with adaptor proteins [18]. The protein encoded by this gene is also a component of the histone acetyl transferase (HAT) coactivator complex. It plays a crucial role in chromatin modulation, cell cycle progression and cellular response to DNA damage [19]. The next 4 genes appeared in the group “response to organic substance”. ATP6V1G2 is the gene that encodes a component of vacuolar ATPase (V-ATPase) [20]. It is multi-subunit enzyme that facilitates acidification of intracellular compartments of eukaryotic cells. It is necessary for such intracellular processes as protein sorting and activation, synaptic vesicle proton gradient generation and receptor-mediated endocytosis. It is ubiquitously expressed and is present in endomembrane organelles such as vacuoles, lysosomes and endosomes [21,22]. The protein secreted by the next gene DKK3, contains two cysteine rich regions and is involved in embryonic development via its connections with the Wnt signaling pathway. The expression of this gene is decreased in a variety of cancer cell lines and it may function as a tumor suppressor gene [23, 24, 25]. The conformational regulation of cell growth, immune response, induction and maintenance of pluripotency has also it’s place by catalization of Peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans insomerases, which are encoded by the gene PIN1.This enzyme also plays a vital role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease and similar to DKK3, in some cancers [26,27]. OAS1gene is induced by interferons and encodes a protein that plays a role in other cellular processes such as cell growth, apoptosis, differentiation and gene regulation. A significant role in regulation plays also the NPFFR2 gene, but it regulates reactions in the opioid system. It also functions in pain modulation. NPFF receptors have been implicated in hormonal modulation, regulation of food intake, thermoregulation and nociception [28, 29, 30]. The last gene with the highest expression is ATP5B which is now called ATP Synthase F1 Subunit Beta and it’s abbreviation changed to ATP5F1B. It takes part in chemical homeostasis by encoding a subunit of mitochondrial ATP synthase. It catalyzes ATP synthesis and utilizes an electrochemical gradient of protons within the inner membrane for the duration of oxidative phosphorylation. Among its related pathways are ATP synthesis by chemiosmotic coupling respiratory electron transport, heat production by uncoupling proteins and purine nucleotides de novo biosynthesis [31,32].

All genes above showed a significantly positive change in expression. Most of them indicated the highest result at the beginning of the cultivation , which has its scientific substantiation. In most cases, these were “-blasting” genes (osteoblasting, myoblasting, etc.), which indicates the tissue formation process that is most intense during the first seven days of culture. There were also genes that affected mainly purely molecular processes, such as activities associated with ATPase or chromatine modulation, which are most active during cell growth and division. This clearly indicates the correctness of our assumption that these genes are subject to the highest expression in the first days of cell culture.

We will now look at genes that significantly reduced their expression and (when averaged) are arranged as follows, starting with the gene with the most negative expression.

SPP1, which stands for Secreted Phosphoprotein 1 is the gene that encodes protein involved in the attachment of osteoclasts to the mineralized bone matrix. The encoded protein is secreted and compels hydroxyapatite with high similarity. In the cell membrane, the osteoclast vitronectin receptor is found and may be involved in the binding process. Diseases associated with SPP1 include Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Papillary Cystadenocarcinoma. Gene Ontology (GO) notes related to this gene contain extracellular matrix binding and cytokine activity. It is also probably crucial to cell-matrix interaction [33, 34, 35]. CCL8 (inorganic cation homeostasis)- is one of several chemokine genes grouped on the q-arm of chromosome 17. Chemokines form a superfamily of secreted proteins. They are involved in inflammatory and immunoregulatory processes. This superfamily is divided into four subfamilies based on the composition of N-terminal cysteine residues of the fully grown peptide. This chemokine is a part of the CC subfamily which is described by two adjacent cysteine residues. This cytokine displays chemotactic activity for lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils. This cytokine may provide to tumor-associated leukocyte infiltration. Gene Ontology (GO) annotations linked to this gene include chemokine and protein kinase activity. An important paralog of this gene is CCL11. Chemotactic factor that may play a role in neoplasia and inflammatory host responses [36, 37, 38]. Another member of chemokine superfamily is CXCL2, that encodes secreted proteins involved in inflammatory and immunoregulatory processes. Diseases correlated with CXCL2 include Pneumonia and Peritonitis. A vital paralog of this gene is CXCL1. It is produced by activated neutrophils and monocytes and finally expressed at sites of inflammation [39,40]. PTGS2 also known as cyclooxygenase also has its role in the inflammatory reaction. This gene is constitutively expressed in some tissues in physiological conditions, such as the brain, kidney and endothelium and in pathological conditions, such as in cancer. PTGS2 is accountable for production of inflammatory prostaglandins. Although, after averaging, the expression of PTGS2 showed a negative tendency, it should be noted that in the first 7 days it was much stronger than later. This is explained by the fact that up-regulation of this gene is also associated with phenotypic changes, increased cell adhesion, tumor angiogenesis and resistance to apoptosis[41, 42, 43, 44].

ATP13A3 and ATP1B1 are representatives of three groups: “cellular divalent inorganic cation homeostasis”, “chemical homeostasis” and “homeostatic process”. ATP13A3 is a member of the P-type ATPase family of proteins that carry a variety of cations across membranes [45]. In turn, ATP1B1 gene encodes protein that belongs to the family of H+/K+ and Na+/K+ ATPases beta chain proteins. They’re responsible for determining and maintaining the electrochemical gradients of K and Na ions across the plasma membrane. These kind of gradients are essential for sodium-coupled transport of a variety of organic and inorganic molecules, osmoregulation and for electrical excitability of nerve and muscle [46,47]. Next is PPARD which encodes a member of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) family. The encoded protein is thought to function as nuclear receptor signaling and an integrator of transcriptional repression. An important paralog of this gene is PPARA – a ligand-activated transcription factor. It is the receptor that binds peroxisome proliferators such as fatty acids and hypolipidemic [48,49].

CCL2 and LYN belong to all of the analyzed GO groups. Protein encoded by CCL2 displays chemotactic activity for monocytes and basophils but not for neutrophils or eosinophils. It has been involved in the pathogenesis of diseases described by monocytic infiltrates like rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and atherosclerosis [38,50,51]. LYN encodes a tyrosine protein kinase, which is involved in the erythroid differentiation and regulation of mast cell degranulation, and erythroid differentiation. It also plays an important role in hematopoiesis, the regulation of innate and adaptive immune responses, integrin signaling, responses to growth factors and cytokines. It also responses to genotoxic agents and DNA damage [52, 53, 54]. The last gene is REL which encodes a protein that belongs to the Rel homology domain/immunoglobulin-like fold, plexin, transcription factor family. Representatives of this family regulate genes involved in inflammation, the immune response, apoptosis and oncogenic processes [55,56].

As revealed above, genes that showed negative expression in the study usually involve lytic processes or responses to pathogenic phenomena. These processes do not occur at such early stages of cell culture or do not take place at all in physiological conditions with no pathogen.

Conclusions

In summary, the data we have collected show primarily changes in gene expression that occurred in the thirty-day cell culture of oral mucosa tissue. We assume that presented genes can be new gene markers for studied processes. It should be noted, however, that this is not a complete and comprehensive analysis of the subject. To clearly determine the role of these genes, it would be necessary to analyze them in a much larger number of aspects. In addition, there are always several types of cells in samples tested on microarrays, which means different results for different percentages of a given type of cells. Finally, the main purpose of the analysis is cell transcripts, which may not always give a complete picture, because there may be a change in the protein product due to processes such as: translation regulation, alternative splicing and post-translational modification. It should also be remembered that our research takes place in vitro, which often gives erroneous results compared to in vivo tests. However, these studies are enough to have a look at how the basic molecular mechanisms work to drive the behavior of oral mucosa cells and can serve as a beginning for clinical trials. Genes have been identified that can be considered as markers for the above-mentioned processes in porcine oral mucosa cells. The differences in expression that we have observed throughout the culture suggest that the homeostasis process itself and the intensity of metabolism occurring in cells is regulated by genes that are involved in “lifespan regulatory mechanisms”[57]. We observed a diverse expression profile of genes involved in 5 gene ontology groups, namely: “cellular divalent inorganic cation homeostasis”, “chemical homeostasis”, “chemotaxis”, “homeostatic process” and “response to organic substance”. Genes have been identified that can be considered as markers for the above-mentioned processes in porcine oral mucosa cells. The differences in expression that we have observed throughout the culture suggest that the homeostasis process itself and the intensity of metabolism occurring in cells is regulated by genes that are involved in “lifespan regulatory mechanisms”. However, these results need to be confirmed by further analysis on protein level, possibly focused on particular, isolated cell populations found in the oral mucosal tissue.

eISSN:
2544-3577
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Molecular Biology, Biochemistry