Cite

Figure 1

Effect size estimate (the left side showing large discrimination, the right side showing efficacy of intervention).
Effect size estimate (the left side showing large discrimination, the right side showing efficacy of intervention).

NOSE (the original questionnaire).

Not a problemVery mild problemModerate problemFairly bad problemSevere problem
Nasal congestion or stuffiness01234
Nasal blockage or obstruction01234
Trouble breathing through my nose01234
Trouble sleeping01234
Unable to get enough air through my nose during exercise or exertion01234

Cross-cultural adaptation (phases and steps leading to adapted and validated QoL tool).

Phase I

Two experts in rhinology blinded one to another translated the original NOSE questionnaire.

A third expert reviewed both translations and created a new version.

A fourth expert reviewed it, blinded to both initial versions.

The latest version was sent to a translator with no medical background to form and backtranslate.

A board of experts (3 rhinologists, 1 audiologist, 3 general ENT consultants, 1 family medicine practitioner, 1 ENT specialist in training, 1 non-medical translation consultant) reviewed results and synthesized the final version of NOSE-si. It was proofread, and the final report was created.

Phase IIThe pilot phase consisted of submitting NOSE-si to a limited number (n=33) of patients in the study group and control group.Patient and expert comments with results were reevaluated by an expert committee and a preliminary statistical analysis was done to compare the pilot version of NOSE-si to the original tool and other CCA processed NOSE questionnaires (13, 16).Since high degree of internal consistency reliability was found, the expert committee accepted NOSE-si as the final version.
Phase IIIBoth the study and control group were enrolled. Retesting was scheduled 7-14 days after the initial testing for the study group and controls (90 patients). Patients had to fill out the same questionnaire and send it back to the researchers.
Phase IVThe postintervention test in the study group (90 days after surgery - submucosal resection of nasal septum).

Clinical characteristics of study patients.

Study group(with complaints)(n=58)Control group(no complaints)(n=58)P value(study vs. control)
Sex
  Male15 (25.7%)27 (46.6%)
  Female43 (74.3%)31 (53.4%)0.004

Fisher’s Exact test

Age (y)37.8 (± 13.92)40.1 (± 14.43)0.452

Independent samples Mann Whitney U test

Body mass index (BMI)25.21 (± 4.19)22.85 (± 3.86)0.003

Independent samples Mann Whitney U test

Smokers16 (27.6%)14 (24.1%)0.832

Fisher’s Exact test

Mean NOSE-si score70.52 (± 15.46)3.97 (± 5.9)<0.001

T-test

NOSE-si correlation (inter-item and item-total correlation; original NOSE field names are used).

Inter-Item Correlation Matrix
Nasal congestion or stuffinessNasal blockage or obstructionTrouble breathing through my noseTrouble sleepingUnable to get enough air through my nose during exercise or exertion
Nasal congestion or stuffiness1.0000.9160.8990.8220.881
Nasal blockage or obstruction0.9161.0000.9090.8440.887
Trouble breathing through my nose0.8990.9091.0000.8510.875
Trouble sleeping0.8220.8440.8511.0000.800
Unable to get enough air through my nose during exercise or exertion0.8810.8870.8750.8001.000
eISSN:
1854-2476
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Clinical Medicine, Hygiene and Environmental Medicine