Screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ found on stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications without mass: radiological-histological correlation
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Zheng Y, Weaver DL, Cutter G, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94:1546-54.ErnsterVLBallard-BarbashRBarlowWEZhengYWeaverDLCutterGet alDetection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammographyJ Natl Cancer Inst20029415465410.1093/jnci/94.20.1546Search in Google Scholar
Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ, Hermann G, de Csepel J, Estabrook A, et al. Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics. Ann Surg 2002; 235: 246-51.GajdosCTartterPIBleiweissIJHermannGde CsepelJEstabrookAet alMammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristicsAnn Surg20022352465110.1097/00000658-200202000-00013Search in Google Scholar
de Roos MA, van der Vegt B, de Vries J, Wesseling J, de Bock GH. Pathological and biological differences between screen-detected and interval ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14:2097-104.de RoosMAvan der VegtBde VriesJWesselingJde BockGHPathological and biological differences between screen-detected and interval ductal carcinoma in situ of the breastAnn Surg Oncol200714209710410.1245/s10434-007-9395-7Search in Google Scholar
Holland R, Hendriks JH, Vebeek AL, Mruvanac M, Schuurmans Stekhoven JH. Extent, distribution, and mammographic/histological correlation of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Lancet 1990; 335:519-22.HollandRHendriksJHVebeekALMruvanacM Schuurmans StekhovenJHExtent, distribution, and mammographic/histological correlation of breast ductal carcinoma in situLancet19903355192210.1016/0140-6736(90)90747-SSearch in Google Scholar
Henrot P, Leroux A, Barlier C, Genin P. Breast microcalcifications: The lesions in anatomical pathology. Diagn Interv Imaging 2014; 95: 141-52.HenrotPLerouxABarlierCGeninPBreast microcalcifications: The lesions in anatomical pathologyDiagn Interv Imaging2014951415210.1016/j.diii.2013.12.011Search in Google Scholar
Faverly DR, Burgers L, Bult P, Holland R: Three dimensional imaging of mammary ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical implications. Semin Diagn Pathol 1994; 11:193-8.FaverlyDRBurgersLBultPHollandRThree dimensional imaging of mammary ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical implicationsSemin Diagn Pathol1994111938Search in Google Scholar
Mai KT, Yazdi HM, Burns BF, Perkins DG. Pattern of distribution of intraductal and infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a three-dimensional study using serial coronal giant sections of the breast. Hum Pathol 2000; 31:464-74.MaiKTYazdiHMBurnsBFPerkinsDGPattern of distribution of intraductal and infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a three-dimensional study using serial coronal giant sections of the breastHum Pathol2000314647410.1053/hp.2000.6536Search in Google Scholar
de Ross MAJ, Pijnappel RM, Post WJ, de Vries J, Baas PC, Groote LD. Correlation between imaging nad pathology in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. World J Surg Oncol 2004; 2: 4.de RossMAJPijnappelRMPostWJde VriesJBaasPCGrooteLDCorrelation between imaging nad pathology in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breastWorld J Surg Oncol20042410.1186/1477-7819-2-4Search in Google Scholar
Lester SC, Bose S, Chen YY, Connolly JL, de Baca ME, Fitzgibbons PL, et al. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009; 133: 15-25.LesterSCBoseSChenYYConnollyJLde BacaMEFitzgibbonsPLet alProtocol for the examination of specimens from patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breastArch Pathol Lab Med2009133152510.5858/133.1.15Search in Google Scholar
Schwartz GF, Lagios MD, Carter D, Connolly J, Ellis IO, Eusebi V, et al. Consensus conference on the classification of ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer 1997; 80: 1798-802.SchwartzGFLagiosMDCarterDConnollyJEllisIOEusebiVet alConsensus conference on the classification of ductal carcinoma in situCancer199780179880210.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971101)80:9<1798::AID-CNCR15>3.0.CO;2-0Search in Google Scholar
Tabar L, Tot T, Dean PB. Breast Cancer: The art and science of early detection with mammography. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 2005.TabarLTotTDeanPBBreast Cancer: The art and science of early detection with mammographyStuttgart, New YorkThieme200510.1055/b-002-59230Search in Google Scholar
Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD. Treatment selection for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast using the University of Southern California/ Van Nuys (USC/VNPI) Prognostic Index. Breast J 2015; 21:127-32.SilversteinMJLagiosMDTreatment selection for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast using the University of Southern California/ Van Nuys (USC/VNPI) Prognostic IndexBreast J2015211273210.1111/tbj.1236825600630Search in Google Scholar
Dinkel HP, Gassel AM, Tschammler A. Is the appearance of microcalcifications on mammography useful in predicting histological grade of malignancy in ductal cancer in situ? Br J Radiol 2000; 73: 938-44.DinkelHPGasselAMTschammlerAIs the appearance of microcalcifications on mammography useful in predicting histological grade of malignancy in ductal cancer in situ?Br J Radiol2000739384410.1259/bjr.73.873.1106464511064645Search in Google Scholar
Slanetz PJ, Giardino AA, Oyama T, Koerner FC, Halpern EF, Moore RH, et al. Mammographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ does not reliably predict histologic subtype. Breast J 2001; 7: 417-21.SlanetzPJGiardinoAAOyamaTKoernerFCHalpernEFMooreRHet alMammographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ does not reliably predict histologic subtypeBreast J200174172110.1046/j.1524-4741.2001.07607.x11843854Search in Google Scholar
Holland R, Hendriks JH. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation. Semin Diagn Pathol 1994; 11: 181-92.HollandRHendriksJHMicrocalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlationSemin Diagn Pathol19941118192Search in Google Scholar
Evans A, Clements K, Maxwell A, Bishop H, Hanby A, Lawrence G, et al. Sloane Projest Steering Group: Lesion size is major determinant of the mammograhic features of ductal carcinoma in situ: findings from the Sloane Project. Clin Radiol 2010; 65: 181-4.EvansAClementsKMaxwellABishopHHanbyALawrenceGet alSloane Projest Steering Group: Lesion size is major determinant of the mammograhic features of ductal carcinoma in situ: findings from the Sloane ProjectClin Radiol201065181410.1016/j.crad.2009.05.01720152272Search in Google Scholar
Barreau B, de Mascarel I, Feuga C, MacGrogan G, Dilhuydy MH, Picot V, et al. Mammography of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: review of 909 cases with radiographic-pathologic correlations. Eur J Radiol 2005; 54: 55-61.BarreauBde MascarelIFeugaCMacGroganGDilhuydyMHPicotVet alMammography of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: review of 909 cases with radiographic-pathologic correlationsEur J Radiol200554556110.1016/j.ejrad.2004.11.01915797293Search in Google Scholar
Evans A, Pinder S, Wilson R, Sibbering M, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162: 1307-11.EvansAPinderSWilsonRSibberingMet alDuctal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic and pathologic findingsAJR Am J Roentgenol199416213071110.2214/ajr.162.6.81919888191988Search in Google Scholar
Stomper PC, Connolly JL. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumor subtype. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159: 483-5.StomperPCConnollyJLDuctal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumor subtypeAJR Am J Roentgenol1992159483510.2214/ajr.159.3.13239231323923Search in Google Scholar
Tang X, Yamashita T, Hara M, Kumaki N, Tokuda Y, Masuda S. Histopathological characteristics of breast ductal carcinoma in situ and association with imaging findings. Breast Cancer 2015; Feb 3 [DOI10.1007/s12282-015-0592-0 Epub ahead of print].TangXYamashitaTHaraMKumakiNTokudaYMasudaSHistopathological characteristics of breast ductal carcinoma in situ and association with imaging findingsBreast Cancer2015Feb 310.1007/s12282-015-0592-0Epub ahead of print25644245Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cho KR, Seo BK, Kim CH, Whang KW, Kim YH, Woo OH, et al. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound and mammographic findings correlated with histological findings. Yonsei Med J 2008; 49: 103-10.ChoKRSeoBKKimCHWhangKWKimYHWooOHet alNon-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound and mammographic findings correlated with histological findingsYonsei Med J2008491031010.3349/ymj.2008.49.1.103261525518306476Search in Google Scholar
Schulz S, Sinn P, Golatta M, Rauch G, Junkermann H, Schuetz F, et al. Prediction of underestimated invasiveness in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast on percutaneous biopsy as rationale for recommending concurrent sentinel lymph node biopsy. Breast 2013; 22: 537-42.SchulzSSinnPGolattaMRauchGJunkermannHSchuetzFet alPrediction of underestimated invasiveness in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast on percutaneous biopsy as rationale for recommending concurrent sentinel lymph node biopsyBreast2013225374210.1016/j.breast.2012.11.00223237921Search in Google Scholar
Park HS, Park S, Cho J, Park JM, Kim SI, Park BW. Risk predictors of underestimation and the need for sentinel node biopsy in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ by preoperative needle biopsy. J Surg Oncol 2013; 107: 388-92.ParkHSParkSChoJParkJMKimSIParkBWRisk predictors of underestimation and the need for sentinel node biopsy in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ by preoperative needle biopsyJ Surg Oncol20131073889210.1002/jso.2327323007901Search in Google Scholar
Szynglarewicz B, Kasprzak P, Halon A, Matkowski R. Preoperatively diagnosed ductal cancers in situ of the breast presenting as even small masses are of high risk for the invasive foci in postoperative specimen. World J Surg Oncol 2015; 13: 218.SzynglarewiczBKasprzakPHalonAMatkowskiRPreoperatively diagnosed ductal cancers in situ of the breast presenting as even small masses are of high risk for the invasive foci in postoperative specimenWorld J Surg Oncol20151321810.1186/s12957-015-0641-3450409626179898Search in Google Scholar
Bae S, Yoon JH, Moon HJ, Kim MJ, Kim EK. Breast microcalcifications: diagnostic outcomes according to image-guided biopsy method. Korean J Radiol 2015; 16: 996-1005.BaeSYoonJHMoonHJKimMJKimEKBreast microcalcifications: diagnostic outcomes according to image-guided biopsy methodKorean J Radiol201516996100510.3348/kjr.2015.16.5.996455979626357494Search in Google Scholar
Rauch GM, Kuerer HM, Scoggins ME, Fox PS, Benveniste AP, Park YM, et al. Clinicopathologic, mammographic, and sonographic features in 1,187 patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by estrogen receptor status. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 139: 639-47.RauchGMKuererHMScogginsMEFoxPSBenvenisteAPParkYMet alClinicopathologic, mammographic, and sonographic features in 1,187 patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by estrogen receptor statusBreast Cancer Res Treat20131396394710.1007/s10549-013-2598-7398279623774990Search in Google Scholar
Mun HS, Shin HJ, Kim HH, Cha JH, Kim H. Screening-detected calcified and non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the imaging and histopathological features. Clin Radiol 2013; 68: e27-35.MunHSShinHJKimHHChaJHKimHScreening-detected calcified and non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the imaging and histopathological featuresClin Radiol201368e273510.1016/j.crad.2012.09.00323177096Search in Google Scholar
Kim MY, Kim HS, Choi N, Yang JH, Yoo YB, Park KS. Screening mammography-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic features based on breast cancer subtypes. Clin Imaging 2015; 39: 983-6.KimMYKimHSChoiNYangJHYooYBParkKSScreening mammography-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic features based on breast cancer subtypesClin Imaging201539983610.1016/j.clinimag.2015.06.00626259866Search in Google Scholar
