[1. Asokan, A., Viger, C., Curatola, A. P. (2002). An Experimental Investigation of Alternative Going‐ Concern Reporting Formats: A Canadian Experience // Canadian Accounting Perspectives. Vol. 1, No. 2, p. 141-162. doi: 10.1506/5947-nqtc-c3y5-h46n.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Bansal, P., Hunter, T. (2003). Strategic Explanations for the Early Adoption of ISO 14001 // Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 46, No. 3, p. 289-299. doi: 10.1023/a:1025536731830.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Behdad, K. (2009). System Dynamics Approach to Analysing the Cost Factors Effects on Cost of Quality // International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. Vol. 26, No. 7, p. 685-698. doi: 10.1108/02656710910975750.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Borut, R., Alic, M. (2010). Capitalising on ISO 9001 Benefits for Strategic Results // International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. Vol. 27, No. 7, p. 756-778. doi: 10.1108/02656711011062372.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. British Standard (1992). Internet access: <https// Guide-to-the-Economics-of-Quality-Part-1- Process-Cost-Model> [accessed November 10, 2016].]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Bushell, S. (1992). Implementing Plan, Do, Check and Act // The Journal for Quality and Participation. Vol. 15, No. 5, p. 58.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Campanella, J. (1999). Principles of Quality Costs: Principles, Implementation, and Use / ASQ World Conference on Quality and Improvement Proceedings. American Society for Quality.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Chiu, Y. F. D. (2002). A Study on the Economics of Quality in a Technology Management Environment. - PhD. Diss., Texas Tech University.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Chopra, A., Dixit, G. (2011). Behavior Patterns of Quality Cost Categories // The TQM Journal. Vol. 23, No. 5, p. 510-515. doi: 10.1108/17542731111157617.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Crosby, Ph. B. (1982). One Point of View: Quality Assurance: The Management of Quality // Research Management. Vol. 25, No. 4, p. 10-12.10.1080/00345334.1982.11756735]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Dahlgaard, J. J., Su Mi, D. P. (2006). Lean Production, Six Sigma Quality, TQM and Company Culture // The TQM Magazine. Vol. 18, No. 3, p. 263-281. doi: org/10.1108/09544780610659998.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Douglas, C. M., George C. R. (2000). Optimization Problems and Methods in Quality Control and Improvement // Journal of Quality Technology. Vol. 32, No. 1, p. 1-17.10.1080/00224065.2000.11979963]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Feigenbaum, A. V. (1994). Quality Education and America’s Competitiveness // Quality progress. Vol. 27, No. 9, p. 83.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Freeman, J. M. (1995). Estimating Quality Costs // Journal of the Operational Research Society. Vol. 46, No. 6, p. 675-686. doi: 10.1057/jors.1995.97.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Freiesleben, J. (2004). On the Limited Value of Cost of Quality Models // Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. Vol. 15, No. 7, p. 959-969. doi: org/10.1080/14783360410001681908.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Goetsch, D., Stanley, B. D. (2014). Quality Management for Organizational Excellence. 17th ed. - New York: Pearson Educated Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Godfrey, J. T., Pasewark, W. R. (1988). Controlling Quality Costs // Strategic Finance. Vol. 69, No. 9, p. 48.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Gryna, F. M., Juran, J. M. (1999). Quality and Costs. 2nd ed.- New York: McGraw-Hill. ]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Hammer, M. (2007). The Process Audit // Harvard Business Review. Vol. 85, No. 4, p. 111-124.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Hassan, A., Shariff Nabi Baksh, M., Shaharoun, A. M. (2000). Issues in Quality Engineering Research // International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. Vol. 17, No. 8, p. 858-875. doi: 10.1108/02656710010325093.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. He, D. (2010). Engineering Quality Systems: Cost of Quality // Modern Applied Science.Vol. 4, No. 5, p. 102. doi: 10.5539/mas.v4n5p102. ]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Hoyer, R. W., Hoyer, B. B., Crosby, P. B., Deming, W. E. (2001). What is Quality? // Quality Progress. Vol. 34, No. 7, p. 52. ]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Hwang, G. H., Aspinwall, E. M. (1996). Quality Cost Models and Their Application: A Review // Total Quality Management. Vol. 7, No. 3, p. 267-282. doi: 10.1080/09544129650034837.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Hwang, G. H, Tsauo, J. Y. , Wang, J. D. (1996).Estimation of Expected Quality Adjusted Survival by Cross-Sectional Survey // Statistics in Medicine. Vol. 15, No. 1, p. 93-102. doi: 10.1002/ (sici)1097-0258(19960115)15:1%3C93::aid-sim155%3E3.3.co;2-u.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Youde, R. K. (1992). Cost-of-Quality Reporting: How We See It // Strategic Finance. Vol. 73, No. 7, p. 34.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Johnson, M. A. (1995). The Development of Measures of the Cost of Quality for an Engineering Unit // International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. Vol. 12, No. 2, p. 86-100. doi: 10.1108/02656719510080640.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Juran, J. M. (1954).Universals in Management Planning and Controlling // Management Review. Vol. 43, No. 11, p. 748-761.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Juran, J. M., Blanton A. G. (1999). Quality Handbook. Republished McGraw-Hill, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Kent, T. W. (2005). Leading and Managing: It Takes Two to Tango // Management Decision. Vol. 43, No. 7/8, p. 1010-1017. doi: 10.1108/00251740510610008.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. King, A. A., Lenox, M. J., Terlaak, A. (2005). The Strategic Use of Decentralized Institutions: Exploring Certification with the ISO 14001 Management Standard // Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 48, No. 6, p. 1091-1106. doi: 10. 5465/amj.2005.19573111.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Krut, R., Gleckman, H. (1999). ISO 14001: A Missed Opportunity for Sustainable Global Industrial Development. - Working paper, London, Routledge. Department of Business & Economics. doi: 10.3828/twpr.21.1.k547624086n44076.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Makinen, I. (2008). Use of Uncertainty Estimates as Reported by Participants in Proficiency Testing for the Evaluation of Their Results: Pros and Cons // Accreditation and Quality Assurance. Vol. 14, No. 1, p. 35-41. doi: 10.1007/s00769-008-0462-y.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Moen, R. M. (1998). New Quality Cost Model Used as a Top Management Tool // The TQM Magazine. Vol. 10, No. 5, p. 334-341. doi: 10. 1108/09544789810231216.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Paulk, M. C., Weber, C. V., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B. (1995). The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. SEI series in software engineering. Reading. Mass.: Addison-Wesley.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Plunkett, J. J., Dale, B. G. (1988). Quality-Related Costing: Findings from an Industry-based Research Study // Engineering Management International. Vol. 4, No. 4, p. 247-257. doi: 10. 1016/0167-5419(88)90002-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Porter, L. J., Rayner, P. (1992). Quality Costing for Total Quality Management // International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 27, No. 1, p. 69-81. doi: 10.1016/0925-5273(92)90127-s.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Pratima, B., Hunter, T. (2003). Strategic Explanations for the Early Adoption of ISO 14001 // Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 46, No. 3, p. 289-299. doi: 10.1023/a:1025536731830.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Pursglove, A. B., Dale, B. G. (1996). Qualit Costing: The findings from an Industrial-based Research Study in Coating Manufacture. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B // Journal of Engineering Manufacture. Vol. 210, No. 6, p. 535-541. doi: 10.1243/pime_proc_1996_210_152_02.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Russell, J. P. (1990). The Quality Master Plan:A Quality Strategy for Business Leadership. - Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Schaffer, R ., Thomson, H. (1992). Successful Change Programs Begin with Results // Harvard Business Review. Vol. 70, No. 1, p. 80-89.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Schiffauerova, A., Thomson, V. (2006). A Review of Research on Cost of Quality Models and Best Practices // International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. Vol. 23, No. 6, p. 647-669. doi: 10.1108/02656710610672470.]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Shepherd, A. (2001). Contract Farming: Partnerships for Growth // Food & Agriculture Org. No. 145, p. 14-23.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Sower, V. E., Ross, Q., Broussard, E. (2007). Cost of Quality Usage and its Relationship to Quality System Maturity // International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. Vol. 24, No. 2, p. 121-140. doi: 10.1108/02656710710722257.]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Soteriou, A. (1998). Linking the Customer Contact Model to Service Quality // Journal of Operations Management. Vol. 16, No. 4, p. 495-508. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00026-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Starkey, R. (1998). Standardization of Environmental Management Systems: ISO 14001, ISO 14004 and EMAS // Corporate Environmental Management. No. 1, p. 61-89.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Superville, C. R., Gupta, S. (2001). Issues in modeling, monitoring and managing quality costs // The TQM magazine. Vol. 13, No. 6, p. 419-424. doi: 10.1108/eum0000000006178.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Suver, J. D., Neumann, B. R., Boles, K. E. (1992). Accounting for the Costs of Quality // Healthcare Financial Management: Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association. Vol. 46, No. 9, p. 28-31.]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Tatikonda, M., Rosenthal, S. (2000). Successful Execution of Product Development Projects: Balancing Firmness and Flexibility in the Innovation Process // Journal of Operations Management. Vol. 18, No. 4, p. 401-425. doi: 10. 1016/s0272-6963(00)00028-0.]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Vaxevanidis, N. M., Petropoulos, G. (2008). A Literature Survey of Cost of Quality Models // Journal of Engineering. Vol. 6, No. 3, p. 274-283.]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Viger, C., Anandarajan, A. (1999). Cost Management and Pricing Decisions in the Presence of Quality Cost Information: An Experimental Study With Marketing Managers // Journal of Cost Management. No. 13, p. 21-28.]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Walton, M. (1988). The Deming Management Method. - New York: Penguin.]Search in Google Scholar
[52. White, G. I., Sondhi, A., Fried, D. (1998). The Analysis and Use of Financial Statements. 3rd ed. New York. doi: 10.2469/faj.v54.n2.2169.]Search in Google Scholar
