Computed Tomography Biomarkers of Vulnerable Coronary Plaques

1. Schaar JA, Muller JE, Falk E, et al. Terminology for high-risk and vulnerable coronary artery plaques. Report of a meeting on the vulnerable plaque, June 17 and 18, 2003, Santorini, Greece. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:1077-1082.10.1016/j.ehj.2004.01.00215191780Search in Google Scholar

2. Opolski MP, Kępka C, Rużyłło W. Computed tomography for detection of vulnerable coronary plaque – A Cassandra’s dream? Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej/Advances in Interventional Cardiology. 2014;10:147-152.Search in Google Scholar

3. Motoyama S, Masayoshi S, Harigaya H, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:49-57.10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.06819555840Search in Google Scholar

4. Maurovich-Horvat P, Schlett CL, Alkadhi H, et al. The napkin-ring sign indicates advanced atherosclerotic lesions in coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:1243-1252.10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.03.01923236975Search in Google Scholar

5. van Velzen JE, de Graaf FR, de Graaf MA, et al. Comprehensive assessment of spotty calcifications on computed tomography angiography: comparison to plaque characteristics on intravascular ultrasound with radiofrequency backscatter analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:893-903.10.1007/s12350-011-9428-2317504521769702Search in Google Scholar

6. Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, et al. Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:319-326.10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.04417659199Search in Google Scholar

7. Cilla M, Pena E, Martinez MA, Kelly DJ. Comparison of the vulnerability risk for positive versus negative atheroma plaque morphology. J Biomech. 2013;46:1248-1254.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.01223523380Search in Google Scholar

8. Benedek T, Gyöngyösi M, Benedek I. Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography for quantitative assessment of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:364-371.10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.00423333164Search in Google Scholar

9. Batty JA, Subba S, Luke P, Gigi LWC, Sinclair H, Kunadian V. Intracoronary imaging in the detection of vulnerable plaques. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016;18:28.10.1007/s11886-016-0705-1475433326879196Search in Google Scholar

10. Huynh K. Imaging: Combining IVUS and NIRS improves accuracy of fibroatheroma detection. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12:130.10.1038/nrcardio.2015.325622847Search in Google Scholar

11. Sinclair H, Bourantas C, Bagnall A, Mintz GS, Kunadian V. OCT for identification of Vulnerable Plaque in Acute Coronary Syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:198-209.10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.12.00525677892Search in Google Scholar

12. Rasouli ML, Shavelle DM, French WJ, McKay CR, Budoff MJ. Assessment of coronary plaque morphology by contrast enhanced computed tomographic angiography: CT Imaging of Coronary Artery Plaque 313 comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Coron Artery Dis. 2006;17:359-364.10.1097/00019501-200606000-0000616707959Search in Google Scholar

13. Nance JW Jr, Schlett CL, Schoepf UJ, et al. Incremental prognostic value of different components of coronary atherosclerotic plaque at cardiac CT angiography beyond coronary calcification in patients with acute chest pain. Radiology. 2012;264:679-690.10.1148/radiol.1211235022820732Search in Google Scholar

14. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, et al. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2004;109:14-17.10.1161/01.CIR.0000111517.69230.0F14691045Search in Google Scholar

15. Kim SY, Kim KS, Lee SY, et al. Assessment of non-calcified plaques Using 64-Slice Computed Tomography: Comparison with Intravascular Ultrasound. Korean Circ J. 2009;39:95-99.10.4070/kcj.2009.39.3.95277180519949594Search in Google Scholar

16. Sato A. Coronary plaque imaging by coronary computed tomography angiography. World J Radiol. 2014;6:148-159.10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.148403754124876919Search in Google Scholar

17. Conte E, Annoni A, Pontone G, et al. Evaluation of coronary plaque characteristics with coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease: a long-term follow-up study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;pii:jew200. [Epub ahead of print]10.1093/ehjci/jew20027679600Search in Google Scholar

18. Benedek T, Jako B, Benedek I. Plaque quantification by coronary CT and intravascular ultrasound identifies a low CT density core as a marker for plaque instability in acute coronary syndromes. Int Heart J. 2014;55:22-28.10.1536/ihj.13-21324463925Search in Google Scholar

19. Nadjiri J, Hausleiter J, Jähnichen C, et al. Incremental prognostic value of quantitative plaque assessment in coronary CT angiography during 5 years of follow up. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:97-104.10.1016/j.jcct.2016.01.00726837235Search in Google Scholar