Blended learning versus traditional teaching-learning-setting: Evaluation of cognitive and affective learning outcomes for the inter-professional field of occupational medicine and prevention / Blended Learning versus traditionelles Lehr-Lernsetting: Evaluierung von kognitiven und affektiven Lernergebnissen für das interprofessionelle Arbeitsfeld Arbeitsmedizin und Prävention

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Hrsg.) (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison-Wesley.AndersonL. W.KrathwohlD. R.2001A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and AssessingA Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational ObjectivesNew YorkAddison-WesleySearch in Google Scholar

Babb, S., Stewart, C., & Johnson, R. (2010). Constructing Communication in blended Learning Environments: Students’Perception of Good Practice in Hybrid Courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6 (4), 735–753. Zugänglich unter: http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no4/babb_1210.pdfBabbS.StewartC.JohnsonR.2010Constructing Communication in blended Learning Environments: Students’Perception of Good Practice in Hybrid CoursesMERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching64735753Zugänglich unterhttp://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no4/babb_1210.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (Hrsg.) (1972). Taxonomie von Lernzielen im kognitiven Bereich (4. Auflage). Weinheim und Basel: Beltz-Verlag.BloomB. S.1972Taxonomie von Lernzielen im kognitiven Bereich4Weinheim und BaselBeltz-VerlagSearch in Google Scholar

Botezatu, M., Hult, H., Tessma, M. K., & Fours, U. (2010). Virtual patient simulation: Knowledge gai or knowledge loss? Medical Teacher, 32(7), 562–568.BotezatuM.HultH.TessmaM. K.FoursU.2010Virtual patient simulation: Knowledge gai or knowledge loss?Medical Teacher32756256810.3109/0142159090351463020653378Search in Google Scholar

Boye, S., Moen, T., & Vik, T. (2012). An e-learning course in medical immunology: Does it improve learning outcome? Medical Teacher, 34(9), e649–e653. Zugänglich unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.675456BoyeS.MoenT.VikT.2012An e-learning course in medical immunology: Does it improve learning outcome?Medical Teacher349e649e653Zugänglich unterhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.67545610.3109/0142159X.2012.67545622497322Search in Google Scholar

Bruff, D. O., Fisher, D. H., McEwen K.E., & Smith, B.E. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC:Student Perceptions of an Experiment in Blended Learning. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 187–199. Zugänglich unter: http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/bruff_0613.pdfBruffD. O.FisherD. H.McEwenK.E.SmithB.E.2013Wrapping a MOOC:Student Perceptions of an Experiment in Blended LearningMERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching92187199Zugänglich unterhttp://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/bruff_0613.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

CEDEFOP, (2009). Der Perspektivwechsel hin zu Lernergebnissen Politik und Praxis in Europa. Europäisches Zentrum für die Förderung der Berufsbildung. Luxemburg: Amt für Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Union. Zugänglich unter: http://erwachsenenbildung.at/themen/nqr/grundlagen/grundbegriffe.php#lernergebnisseCEDEFOP2009Der Perspektivwechsel hin zu Lernergebnissen Politik und Praxis in Europa. Europäisches Zentrum für die Förderung der BerufsbildungLuxemburg: Amt für Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen UnionZugänglich unterhttp://erwachsenenbildung.at/themen/nqr/grundlagen/grundbegriffe.php#lernergebnisseSearch in Google Scholar

Dziuban, C. D., Hartmann, J. L., & Moskal, P. D. (2004). Blended Learning. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research Bulletin 2004(7), 1–44. Zugänglich unter: https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erb0407.pdfDziubanC. D.HartmannJ. L.MoskalP. D.2004Blended LearningEDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research Bulletin20047144Zugänglich unterhttps://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erb0407.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Ebner, M., Schön, S., & Nagler, W. (2013). Einführung. Das Themenfeld „Lernen und Lehren mit Technologien“. In: Ebner, M. & Schön, S. (Hrsg.), L3T Lehrbuch für Lehren und Lernen mit Technologien. Zugänglich unter: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/EbnerM.SchönS.NaglerW.2013Einführung. Das Themenfeld „Lernen und Lehren mit Technologien“EbnerM.SchönS.L3T Lehrbuch für Lehren und Lernen mit TechnologienZugänglich unterhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/Search in Google Scholar

Ellaway, R., & Masters, K. (2008a). AMEE Guide 32: e-learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Medical Teacher, 30(5), 455–473.EllawayR.MastersK.2008aAMEE Guide 32: e-learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessmentMedical Teacher30545547310.1080/0142159080210833118576185Search in Google Scholar

Ellaway, R., & Masters, K. (2008b). E-learning in medical education Guide 32 Part2: Technology, management and design. Medical Teacher, 30(5), 474–489.EllawayR.MastersK.2008bE-learning in medical education Guide 32 Part2: Technology, management and designMedical Teacher30547448910.1080/0142159080210834918576186Search in Google Scholar

European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, European Students’ Union, European University Association & European Association of Institutions in Higher Education, (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). Brüssel: EURASHE. Zugänglich unter: http://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdfEuropean Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, European Students’ UnionEuropean University Association & European Association of Institutions in Higher Education2015Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG)BrüsselEURASHE. Zugänglich unterhttp://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. (4. Ausgabe). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.FieldA.2013Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics4Los AngelesSage PublicationsSearch in Google Scholar

Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Introduction to Hybrid Courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6). Zugänglich unter: https://hccelearning.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/introduction-to-hybridcourse1.pdfGarnhamC.KaletaR.2002Introduction to Hybrid Courses. Teaching with Technology Today86Zugänglich unterhttps://hccelearning.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/introduction-to-hybridcourse1.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Gläser-Zikuda, M., Stuchlíková, I., & Janík, T. (2013). Emotional Aspects of Learningand Teaching: Reviewing the Field – Discussing the Issues. Orbis Scholae, 7(2), 7–22. Zugänglich unter: http://www.orbisscholae.cz/archiv/2013/2013_2_01.pdfGläser-ZikudaM.StuchlíkováI.JaníkT.2013Emotional Aspects of Learningand Teaching: Reviewing the Field – Discussing the IssuesOrbis Scholae72722Zugänglich unterhttp://www.orbisscholae.cz/archiv/2013/2013_2_01.pdf10.14712/23363177.2015.18Search in Google Scholar

Gormley, G. J., Collins, K., Boohan, M., Bickle, I. C., & Stevenson M. (2009). Is there a place for e-learning in clinical skills? A survey of undergraduate medical students’ experiences and attitudes. Medical Teacher, 31(1), e6–e12. Zugänglich unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590802334317GormleyG. J.CollinsK.BoohanM.BickleI. C.StevensonM.2009Is there a place for e-learning in clinical skills? A survey of undergraduate medical students’ experiences and attitudesMedical Teacher311e6e12Zugänglich unterhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159080233431710.1080/0142159080233431719253150Search in Google Scholar

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended Learning Systems. In: Bonk, C. J. (Hrsg.), The handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs (S. 3–19). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.GrahamC. R.2006Blended Learning SystemsBonkC. J.The handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs319San FranciscoPfeifferSearch in Google Scholar

Green, Z., A., & Batool, S. (2017). Emotionalized learning experiences: Tapping into the affective domain. Evaluation and Program Planning, 62(2017) 35–48. Zugänglich unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.004GreenZ. A.BatoolS.2017Emotionalized learning experiences: Tapping into the affective domainEvaluation and Program Planning6220173548Zugänglich unterhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.00410.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.00428242513Search in Google Scholar

Güzer, B., & Caner, H. (2014). The past, present and future of blended learning: an in depth analysis of literature. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2014), 4596–4603. Zugänglich unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992GüzerB.CanerH.2014The past, present and future of blended learning: an in depth analysis of literatureProcedia Social and Behavioral Sciences116201445964603Zugänglich unterhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.99210.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992Search in Google Scholar

Ilic, D., Nordin, R. B., Glasziou, P., Tilson, J. K., & Villanueva, E. (2015). A randomised controlled trial of a blended learning education interventionfor teaching evidence-based medicine. BMC Medical Education, 15(39), 1–10. Zugänglich unter: http://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-0150321-6IlicD.NordinR. B.GlasziouP.TilsonJ. K.VillanuevaE.2015A randomised controlled trial of a blended learning education interventionfor teaching evidence-based medicineBMC Medical Education1539110Zugänglich unterhttp://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-0150321-6Search in Google Scholar

Ivarsson A., Anderson M. B., Johnson U., & Lindwall M. (2013). To adjust or not adjust: Nonparametric effect sizes, confidence intervals, and real-world meaning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(2013), 97–102.IvarssonA.AndersonM. B.JohnsonU.LindwallM.2013To adjust or not adjust: Nonparametric effect sizes, confidence intervals, and real-world meaningPsychology of Sport and Exercise1420139710210.1016/j.psychsport.2012.07.007Search in Google Scholar

Kaur, M. (2013). Blended learning – its challenges and future. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93(2013), 612–617. Zugänglich unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.248KaurM.2013Blended learning – its challenges and futureProcedia Social and Behavioral Sciences932013612617Zugänglich unterhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.24810.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.248Search in Google Scholar

Kerres, M., & de Witt, C. (2004). Pragmatismus als theoretische Grundlage für die Konzeption von eLearning. In: Mayer, H. O., Treichel, D. (Hrsg.), Handlungsorientiertes Lernen und eLearning (S.78–99). München: Oldenbourg-Verlag.KerresM.de WittC.2004Pragmatismus als theoretische Grundlage für die Konzeption von eLearningMayerH. O.TreichelD.Handlungsorientiertes Lernen und eLearning7899MünchenOldenbourg-VerlagSearch in Google Scholar

Koraneekij, P., & Khlaisang, J. (2015). Development of Learning Outcome Based E-Portfolio Model Emphasizing on Cognitive Skills in Pedagogical Blended E-Learning Environment for Undergratuate Students at Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174(2015), 805–813. Zugänglich unter: http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.664KoraneekijP.KhlaisangJ.2015Development of Learning Outcome Based E-Portfolio Model Emphasizing on Cognitive Skills in Pedagogical Blended E-Learning Environment for Undergratuate Students at Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn UniversityProcedia Social and Behavioral Sciences1742015805813Zugänglich unterhttp://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.66410.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.664Search in Google Scholar

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.KrathwohlD. R.2002A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An OverviewTheory Into Practice41421221810.1207/s15430421tip4104_2Search in Google Scholar

Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Bertram, B. M. (1973). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Co. Inc.KrathwohlD. R.BloomB. S.BertramB. M.1973Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational GoalsHandbook II: Affective DomainNew YorkDavid McKay Co. Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Kröncke, K.-D. (2010). Computer-based learning versus practical course in pre-clinical education: Acceptance and knowledge retention. Medical Teacher, 32(5), 408–413.KrönckeK.-D.2010Computer-based learning versus practical course in pre-clinical education: Acceptance and knowledge retentionMedical Teacher32540841310.3109/0142159090339461120423260Search in Google Scholar

Makhdoom, N., Khoshhal, K.I., Algaidi, S., Heissam, K., & Zolaly, M. A. (2012). ‘Blended learning’ as an effective teaching and learning strategy in clinical medicine: a comparative cross-sectional university-based study. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 8 (1), 12–17.MakhdoomN.KhoshhalK.I.AlgaidiS.HeissamK.ZolalyM. A.2012‘Blended learning’ as an effective teaching and learning strategy in clinical medicine: a comparative cross-sectional university-based studyJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences81121710.1016/j.jtumed.2013.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Mayer, O., & Kriz, W. (2010). Evaluation von eLernprozessen. München: Oldenbourg-Verlag.MayerO.KrizW.2010Evaluation von eLernprozessenMünchenOldenbourg-Verlag10.1524/9783486704747Search in Google Scholar

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Pratices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Zugänglich unter: http://repository.alt.ac.uk/629/MeansB.ToyamaY.MurphyR.BakiaM.JonesK.2010Evaluation of Evidence-Based Pratices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning StudiesWashington, D.CU. S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy DevelopmentZugänglich unterhttp://repository.alt.ac.uk/629/Search in Google Scholar

Morton, C. E., Saleh, S. N., Smith, F. S., Hemani, A., Ameen, A., Bennie, T. D., & Toro-Troconis, M. (2016). Blended learning: how can we optimise undergraduate student engagement? BMC Medical Education, 16(195), 1–8. Zugänglich unter: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973547/pdf/12909_2016_Article_716.pdfMortonC. E.SalehS. N.SmithF. S.HemaniA.AmeenA.BennieT. D.Toro-TroconisM.2016Blended learning: how can we optimise undergraduate student engagement?BMC Medical Education1619518Zugänglich unterhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973547/pdf/12909_2016_Article_716.pdf10.1186/s12909-016-0716-z497354727492157Search in Google Scholar

Nordin, A. B., & Alias, N. (2013). Learning Outcomes and Student Perception in Using of Blended Learning in History. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103(2013), 577–585.NordinA. B.AliasN.2013Learning Outcomes and Student Perception in Using of Blended Learning in HistoryProcedia Social and Behavioral Sciences103201357758510.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.375Search in Google Scholar

Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013). Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 38–46. Zugänglich unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003OwstonR.YorkD.MurthaS.2013Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiativeThe Internet and Higher Education183846Zugänglich unterhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.00310.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003Search in Google Scholar

Peroz, I., Beuche, A., & Persoz, N. (2009). Randomized controlled trial comparing lecture versus self studying by an online tool. Medical Teacher, 31(6), 508–512.PerozI.BeucheA.PersozN.2009Randomized controlled trial comparing lecture versus self studying by an online toolMedical Teacher31650851210.1080/0142159080220350419811166Search in Google Scholar

Physio Austria (Hrsg.) (2016). Die Physiotherapeutin/Der Physiotherapeut. Kompetenzprofil. Wien: Physio Austria Bundesverband der PhysiotherapeutInnen Österreichs. Zugänglich unter: http://www.physioaustria.at/system/files/general/phy_kompetenzprofil_deutsch_fin_022016.pdfPhysio Austria2016Die Physiotherapeutin/Der PhysiotherapeutKompetenzprofilWienPhysio Austria Bundesverband der PhysiotherapeutInnen ÖsterreichsZugänglich unterhttp://www.physioaustria.at/system/files/general/phy_kompetenzprofil_deutsch_fin_022016.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Poonam, K. & Prajna, P. S. (2016). Blended learning approach for teaching and learning anatomy: Students’and teachers’perspective. Journal of the Anatomical Society of India, 65(1), 43–47. Zugänglich unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jasi.2016.06.001PoonamK.PrajnaP. S.2016Blended learning approach for teaching and learning anatomy: Students’and teachers’perspectiveJournal of the Anatomical Society of India6514347Zugänglich unterhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jasi.2016.06.00110.1016/j.jasi.2016.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Reasons, S., Valadares, K., & Slavkin, M. (2005). Questioning the hybrid model: Student outcomes in different course formats. Journal of Asynchronous Learning, 9(1), 83–94.ReasonsS.ValadaresK.SlavkinM.2005Questioning the hybrid model: Student outcomes in different course formatsJournal of Asynchronous Learning91839410.24059/olj.v9i1.1804Search in Google Scholar

River, J., Currie, J., Crawford, T., Betihavas V., & Randall, S. (2016). A systematic review examining the effectiveness of blended technology with team-based learning. Nurse Education Today, 45(2016), 185–192. Zugänglich unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.012RiverJ.CurrieJ.CrawfordT.BetihavasV.RandallS.2016A systematic review examining the effectiveness of blended technology with team-based learningNurse Education Today452016185192Zugänglich unterhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.01210.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.01227541947Search in Google Scholar

Rowe, M., Frantz, J., & Bozalek, V. (2012). The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare students: A systematic review. Medical Teacher, 34(4), e216–e221. Zugänglich unter: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/0142159X.2012.642831RoweM.FrantzJ.BozalekV.2012The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare students: A systematic reviewMedical Teacher344e216e221Zugänglich unterhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/0142159X.2012.64283110.3109/0142159X.2012.64283122455712Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M. (2006). The Impact of E-Learning in Medical Education. Academic Medicine, 81(3), 207–212.RuizJ. G.MintzerM. J.LeipzigR. M.2006The Impact of E-Learning in Medical EducationAcademic Medicine81320721210.1097/00001888-200603000-0000216501260Search in Google Scholar

Schewior-Popp, S. (2014). Lernsituationen planen und gestalten. Handlungsorientierter Unterricht im Lernfeldkontext (2. Auflage). Stuttgart und New York: Georg-Thieme-Verlag.Schewior-PoppS.2014Lernsituationen planen und gestaltenHandlungsorientierter Unterricht im Lernfeldkontext2Stuttgart und New YorkGeorg-Thieme-VerlagSearch in Google Scholar

Tam, M. (2014). Outcomes-based approach to quality assessment and curriculum improvement in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 22(2), e158–e168. Zugänglich unter: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/QAE-09-2011-0059TamM.2014Outcomes-based approach to quality assessment and curriculum improvement in higher educationQuality Assurance in Education222e158e168Zugänglich unterhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/QAE-09-2011-005910.1108/QAE-09-2011-0059Search in Google Scholar

Tomczak, M., & Tomczak, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends in Sport Sciences, 1(21), 19–25.TomczakM.TomczakE.2014The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect sizeTrends in Sport Sciences1211925Search in Google Scholar

Tosun, S. (2015). The effects of blended learning on EFL students’ vocabulary enhancement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199(2015), 641–647. Zugänglich unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.592TosunS.2015The effects of blended learning on EFL students’ vocabulary enhancementProcedia Social and Behavioral Sciences1992015641647Zugänglich unterhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.59210.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.592Search in Google Scholar