Differentiation between Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas Species Isolated from Fish Using Molecular and MALDI-TOF Method

1. Urumova V: Investigations on the resistance of porcine commensal E. coli isolates to beta lactams, Acta Vet (Beograd) 2015, 65 (4), 538-547.10.1515/acve-2015-0045Search in Google Scholar

2. Leclercq R, Cantón R, Brown DFJ, Giske CG, Heisig P, MacGowan AP, Mouton JW, Nordmann P, Rodloff AC, Rossolini GM, Soussy CJ, Steinbakk M, Winstanley TG, Kahlmeter G: EUCAST expert rules in antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Clin Microbiol Infect 2013, 19: 141–160.10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03703.x22117544Search in Google Scholar

3. EUCAST and Comite de l’antibiogramme de la Societe Francaise de Microbilogie: Recommandations 2015.Search in Google Scholar

4. Wellinghausen N, Köthe J, Wirths B, Sigge A, Poppert S: Superiority of Molecular Techniques for Identification of Gram-Negative, Oxidase-Positive Rods, Including Morphologically Nontypical Pseudomonas aeruginosa, from Patients with Cystic Fibrosis, J Clin Microbiol 2005, 43(8):4070-5.10.1128/JCM.43.8.4070-4075.2005123390616081953Search in Google Scholar

5. Carmody LA, Spilker T, Li Puma JJ: Reassessment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia phenotype, J Clin Microbiol 2011, 49:1101–1103.10.1128/JCM.02204-10306769121191048Search in Google Scholar

6. Bosshard PP, Zbinden R, Abels S, Böddinghaus B, Altwegg M, Böttger EC: 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing versus the API 20NE system and the VITEK 2 ID-GNB Card for identification of non fermenting Gram Negative bacteria in the clinical laboratory, J Clin Microbiol 2006, 44 (4): 1359–1366.10.1128/JCM.44.4.1359-1366.2006144863816597863Search in Google Scholar

7. Mellmann A, Cloud J, Maier T, Hall G, Wilson D, Keckevoet U, Ramminger I, Iwen P, Dunn J, La Sala P, Kostrzewa M, Harmsen D: Evaluation of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry in Comparison to 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing for Species Identification of Non fermenting Bacteria, J Clin Microbiol 2008, 46 (6);1946–1954.10.1128/JCM.00157-08244684018400920Search in Google Scholar

8. Spilker T, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Li Puma JJ: PCR-Based Assay for Differentiation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Other Pseudomonas Species Recovered from Cystic Fibrosis Patients, J Clin Microbiol 2004, 42(5): 2074–2079.10.1128/JCM.42.5.2074-2079.200440467815131172Search in Google Scholar

9. Gallo SW, Ramos PL, Sanchez FCA, Oliveira SD: A specific polymerase chain reaction method to identify Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2013, 108(3): 390–391.10.1590/S0074-02762013000300020400558123778655Search in Google Scholar

10. Lane DJ: 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematic. Wiley, Chichester; 1991, 115–175.Search in Google Scholar

11. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs, Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25: 3389–3402.10.1093/nar/25.17.33891469179254694Search in Google Scholar

12. http://rapidcell.proteinreader.com/maldi-msms-biotypization-protocol/.Search in Google Scholar

13. Blackburn JK, Mitchell MA, Blackburn MCH, Curtis A, Thompson BA: Evidence of Antibiotic Resistance in Free-Swimming, Top-Level Marine Predatory Fishes J. Zoo Wildl Med 2010, 41(1):7-16.10.1638/2007-0061.120722248Search in Google Scholar

14. Naiemi N, Duim B, Bart A: A CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia J Med Microbiol, 2006, 55: 1607-1608.10.1099/jmm.0.46704-017030926Search in Google Scholar

15. Maravić A, Skočibušić M, Fredotović Ž, Cvjetan S, Šamanić I, Puizina J: Characterization of Environmental CTX-M-15-Producing Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014, 58(10): 6333–6334.10.1128/AAC.03601-14418797525092701Search in Google Scholar