Due to the famous methodenstreit it is often well argued that Menger’s approach to social sciences can be seen as anti-historical, as according to him pure empirical studies are insufficient to establish a firm economic theory. By suggesting that some theorems have to precede historical studies, Menger may be seen as a representative of the a priori tradition in scientific method. The modern method in the mainstream of economic thinking is also to a large extent anti-historical and a priori, but because of its lack of realism and extensive reliance on very limiting assumptions. The main strength of the Mengerian anti-historical approach is lesser faith in imaginary constructs, implying a higher degree of realism in theorizing.
Knight Frank. 1940. “‘What is Truth’ in Economics?”. Journal of Political Economy 48:1.
Lakatos Imre. 1978.The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lange O. 1936. “On the Economic Theory of Socialism: Part One” Review of Economic Studies 4:1.
Mäki U. 2009. The Methodology of Positive Economics Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy. Cambridge University Press.
Menger Carl. 1985. Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences. New York University Press.
Mises L. 1966. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Chicago IL: Contemporary Books.
Mises Ludwig. 1990. Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth. Auburn Al: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Morgenstern Oskar. 1963. On the Accuracy of Economic Observations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Popper Karl. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.
Popper Karl. 1994. The Myth of the Framework. In defense of science and rationality (edited by M. A. Notturno). London: Routledge.
Schumpeter Joseph. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sen Amartya. 1985. The Standard of Living. Cambridge University Press.
Shankland R. S. 1964. “Michelson-Morley Experiment” American Journal of Physics 32 16.
Smith Barry. 1994. Austrian Philosophy. The Legacy of Franz Brentano Chicago: Open Court.
Smith Barry. 1996. “In Defense of (Fallibistic) Apriorism”. Journal of Libertarian Studies 12.
Streissler Erich. 1973. “To What Extent Was the Austrian School Marginalist?” in R. Collinson Black et al (eds.) The Marginal Revolution in Economics: Interpretation and Evaluation. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
Wade Hands D. 2009. Did Milton Friedman’s Positive Methodology License the Formalist Revolution? (w:) M¨aki U. 2009. The Methodology of Positive Economics Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy. Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
Wieser Friedrich. 1971. Natural Value. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.