Open Access

Menger’s Anti-Historical Method Versus the Neoclassical Anti-Historical Method

   | Jul 20, 2019

Cite

Bagus, Philip. 2011. “Morgenstern’s Forgotten Contribution: A Stab to the Heart of Modern Economics” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 70, No. 2.10.1111/j.1536-7150.2011.00783.xSearch in Google Scholar

Boland, Lawrence A. 1979. “A Critique of Friedman’s Critics” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 17, No. 2.Search in Google Scholar

Boland, Lawrence A. 1994, Scientific Thinking Without Scientific Method: Two Views of Popper, in New Directions in Economic Methodology, ed. by R. A. Backhouse, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203204085.ch8Search in Google Scholar

Bostaph, Samuel. 2003. “Wieser on Economic Calculation under Socialism” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 6:2.10.1007/s12113-003-1017-zSearch in Google Scholar

Bylund, Per L.; G.P Manish. 2017. “Private Property and Economic Calculation: A Reply to Andy Denis” Review of Political Economy, Vol. 29, No. 3.10.1080/09538259.2017.1352193Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Gregory. 2007. A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400827817Search in Google Scholar

Denis, Andy. 2015. “Economic Calculation: Private Property or Several Control” Review of Political Economy 27(4).10.1080/09538259.2015.1083189Search in Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1953. “Methodology of Positive Economics” in: Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Georgescu-Rogen, N. 1988. “Closing Remarks: About Economic Growth: A Variation on a Theme by David Hilbert”, Economic Development and Cultural Change 36:3 supplement.10.1086/edcc.36.s3.1566547Search in Google Scholar

Harding, Sandra G. 1976. Can Theories be Refuted?: Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0Search in Google Scholar

Hoppe, Hans Hermann. 2007. “The Limits of Numerical Probability: Frank H. Knight and Ludwig von Mises and the Frequency Interpretation” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 10, No. 1.10.1007/s12113-007-9005-3Search in Google Scholar

Huerta de Soto, Jesús. 1998. “The Ongoing Methodenstreit of The Austrian School” Journal desÉconomistes et desÉtudes Humaines, 1998, vol. 8, issue 1.10.1515/jeeh-1998-0105Search in Google Scholar

Jaffé, William. 1976. “Menger, Jevons, and Walras De-homogenized”, Economic Inquiry 14, December.10.1111/j.1465-7295.1976.tb00439.xSearch in Google Scholar

Knight, Frank. 1940. “‘What is Truth’ in Economics?”. Journal of Political Economy 48:1.10.1086/255500Search in Google Scholar

Lakatos, Imre. 1978.The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621123Search in Google Scholar

Lange, O. 1936. “On the Economic Theory of Socialism: Part One”, Review of Economic Studies 4:1.10.2307/2967660Search in Google Scholar

Mäki U. 2009. The Methodology of Positive Economics Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511581427Search in Google Scholar

Menger, Carl. 1985. Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences. New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mises, L. 1966. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Chicago, IL: Contemporary Books.Search in Google Scholar

Mises, Ludwig. 1990. Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth. Auburn, Al: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Morgenstern, Oskar. 1963. On the Accuracy of Economic Observations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.10.1063/1.3060577Search in Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. 1994. The Myth of the Framework. In defense of science and rationality (edited by M. A. Notturno). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya. 1985. The Standard of Living. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shankland, R. S. 1964. “Michelson-Morley Experiment” American Journal of Physics 32, 16.10.1119/1.1970063Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Smith, Barry. 1994. Austrian Philosophy. The Legacy of Franz Brentano, Chicago: Open Court.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Barry. 1996. “In Defense of (Fallibistic) Apriorism”. Journal of Libertarian Studies 12.Search in Google Scholar

Streissler, Erich. 1973. “To What Extent Was the Austrian School Marginalist?” in R. Collinson Black et al (eds.), The Marginal Revolution in Economics: Interpretation and Evaluation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wade Hands, D. 2009. Did Milton Friedman’s Positive Methodology License the Formalist Revolution?, (w:) M¨aki U. 2009. The Methodology of Positive Economics Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511581427.007Search in Google Scholar

Wieser, Friedrich. 1971. Natural Value. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2199-6059
ISSN:
0860-150X
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Philosophy, other