Unification Strategies in Cognitive Science

Open access


Cognitive science is an interdisciplinary conglomerate of various research fields and disciplines, which increases the risk of fragmentation of cognitive theories. However, while most previous work has focused on theoretical integration, some kinds of integration may turn out to be monstrous, or result in superficially lumped and unrelated bodies of knowledge. In this paper, I distinguish theoretical integration from theoretical unification, and propose some analyses of theoretical unification dimensions. Moreover, two research strategies that are supposed to lead to unification are analyzed in terms of the mechanistic account of explanation. Finally, I argue that theoretical unification is not an absolute requirement from the mechanistic perspective, and that strategies aiming at unification may be premature in fields where there are multiple conflicting explanatory models.

Anderson, J. R. (2007). How Can the Mind Occur in the Physical Universe? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Arbib, M. A. (2005). From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(2), 105-24-67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000038

Arbib, M. A. (2012). How the brain got language: the mirror system hypothesis. New York: Oxford University Press.

Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working Memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). New York / San Francisco / London: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1

Bechtel, W. (1986). The Nature of Scientific Integration. In W. Bechtel (Ed.), Integrating Scientific Disciplines (pp. 3-52). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9435-1 1

Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental Mechanisms. New York: Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group).

Bechtel, W. (2016). Investigating neural representations: the tale of place cells. Synthese, 193(5), 1287-1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0480-8

Bechtel, W., & McCauley, R. N. (1999). Heuristic identity theory (or back to the future): The mind-body problem against the background of research strategies in cognitive neuroscience. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 67-72). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Benhamou, S. (1996). No evidence for cognitive mapping in rats. Animal Behaviour, 52(1), 201-212.

Bickle, J. (1998). Psychoneural reduction the new wave. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Boone,W., & Piccinini, G. (2015). The cognitive neuroscience revolution. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0783-4

Busemeyer, J. R., & Diederich, A. (2010). Cognitive modeling. Los Angeles: Sage.

Byrne, M. D. (2012). Unified theories of cognition.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(4), 431-438. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1180

Chaitin, G. J. (1987). Algorithmic information theory. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Churchland, P. M. (1985). Reduction, qualia, and the direct introspection of brain states. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(1), 8-28.

Clark, A. (2013).Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477

Clark, A. (2016). Surfing uncertainty: prediction, action, and the embodied mind.

Cooper, R. P. (2007). The Role of Falsification in the Development of Cognitive Architectures: Insights from a Lakatosian Analysis. Cognitive Science, 31(3), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1080/15326900701326592

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1987). From Evolution to Behavior: Evolutionary Psychology as the Missing Link. In J. Dupre (Ed.), The Latest on the Best. Essays on Evolution and Optimality (pp. 277-303). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Craver, C. F. (2002). Interlevel experiments and multilevel mechanisms in the neuroscience of memory. Philosophy of Science, 69(S3), 83-97.

Craver, C. F. (2007a). Explaining the Brain. Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Craver, C. F. (2007b). Explaining the Brain. Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Craver, C. F., & Darden, L. (2013). In search of mechanisms: discoveries across the life sciences.

Cummins, R. (1984). Functional analysis. Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology: An Anthology.

Cummins, R. (2000). “How does it work” versus “what are the laws?”: Two conceptions of psychological explanation. In F. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and Cognition (pp. 117-145). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Danks, D. (2014). Unifying the mind: cognitive representations as graphical models. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Darden, L., & Maull, N. (1977). Interfield Theories. Philosophy of Science, 44(1), 43-64.

Dawson, M. (1998). Understanding cognitive science. Malden Mass.: Blackwell.

Derdikman, D., & Moser, E. I. (2010). A manifold of spatial maps in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(12), 561-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.004

di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 176-80.

Eliasmith, C. (2013). How to build the brain: a neural architecture for biological cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Eliasmith, C., Stewart, T. C., Choo, X., Bekolay, T., DeWolf, T., Tang, Y., ... Rasmussen, D. (2012). A Large-Scale Model of the Functioning Brain. Science, 338(6111), 1202-1205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225266

Fodor, J. A. (1968). Psychological explanation: an introduction to the philosophy of psychology. New York: Random House.

Forster, M., & Sober, E. (1994). How to Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories will Provide More Accurate Predictions. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/45.1.1

Gallese, V. (2003). The Roots of Empathy: The Shared Manifold Hypothesis and the Neural Basis of Intersubjectivity. Psychopathology, 36(4), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1159/000072786

Glennan, S. S. (2002). Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation. Philosophy of Science, 69(S3), S342-S353. https://doi.org/10.1086/341857

Goodman, N. (1961). Safety, Strength, Simplicity. Philosophy of Science, 28(2), 150-151. https://doi.org/10.1086/287795

Hempel, C., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15(2), 135-175.

Hensel, W. M. (2013). On Reduction and Interfield Integration in Neuroscience. In M. Miłkowski & K. Talmont-Kamiński (Eds.), Regarding the Mind, Naturally: Naturalist Approaches to the Sciences of the Mental (pp. 167-181). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Hickok, G. (2014). The myth of mirror neurons: the real neuroscience of communication and cognition. New York: WW Norton.

Hochstein, E. (2015). One mechanism, many models: a distributed theory of mechanistic explanation. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0844-8

Hooker, C. A. (1981a). Towards a General Theory of Reduction. Part I: Historical and Scientific Setting. Dialogue, 20(1), 38-59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300023088

Hooker, C. A. (1981b). Towards a General Theory of Reduction. Part II: Identity in Reduction. Dialogue, 20(2), 201-236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300023301

Hooker, C. A. (1981c). Towards a General Theory of Reduction. Part III: Cross- Categorical Reduction. Dialogue, 20(3), 496-529. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300023593

Hora, J., & Campos, P. (2015). A review of performance criteria to validate simulation models. Expert Systems, 32(5), 578-595. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12111

Kitcher, P. (1989). Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World. In P. Kitcher & W. C. Salmon (Eds.), Scientific Explanation (Vol. 505, pp. 410-505). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umiltà, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science (New York, N.Y.), 297(5582), 846-8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1070311

Laird, J. E., Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1987). SOAR: An architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 33(1), 1-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(87)90050-6

Li, M., & Vitanyi, P. (1993). An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943). A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115-133.

Metta, G., Natale, L., Nori, F., Sandini, G., Vernon, D., Fadiga, L., ... Montesano, L. (2010). The iCub humanoid robot: An open-systems platform for research in cognitive development. Neural Networks, 23(8), 1125-1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.010

Miłkowski,M. (2013). Explaining the Computational Mind. Cambridge,Mass.:MIT Press.

Morse, A. F., Herrera, C., Clowes, R., Montebelli, A., & Ziemke, T. (2011). The role of robotic modelling in cognitive science. New Ideas in Psychology, 29(3), 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.02.001

Mouras, H., Stol´eru, S., Moulier, V., P´el´egrini-Issac, M., Rouxel, R., Grandjean, B., ... Bittoun, J. (2008). Activation of mirror-neuron system by erotic video clips predicts degree of induced erection: an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 42, 1142-1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.051

Newell, A. (1973). You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 283-308). New York: Academic Press.

Newell, A. (1990). Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press.

O’Reilly, R. C., & Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience. Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Piccinini, G., & Craver, C. F. (2011). Integrating psychology and neuroscience: functional analyses as mechanism sketches. Synthese, 183(3), 283-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9898-4

Ponseti, J., Bosinski, H. A., Wolff, S., Peller, M., Jansen, O., Mehdorn, H. M., ... Siebner, H. R. (2006). A functional endophenotype for sexual orientation in humans. NeuroImage, 33(3), 825-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.002

Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New Yorker, The. Hutchinson.

Quine, W. V. (1948). On What There Is. The Review of Metaphysics, 2(5), 21-38.

Ramón y Cajal, S. (1990). New ideas on the structure of the nervous system in man and vertebrates. (L. W. Swanson, Trans.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Richardson, R. C. (2007). Evolutionary Psychology as Maladapted Psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230

Roberts, S., & Pashler, H. (2000). How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review, 107(2), 358.

Salmon, W. C. (1998). Causality and explanation. Oxford University Press, USA.

Schaffner, K. F. (1993). Discovery and explanation in biology and medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Schurz, G. (1991). Relevant Deduction: From Solving Paradoxes Towards a General Theory. Erkenntnis, 35, 391-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388295

Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Thagard, P. (2007). Coherence, Truth, and the Development of Scientific Knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 74, 28-47.

Van Orden, G. C., & Kloos, H. (2003). The Module Mistake. Cortex, 39(1), 164-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70092-3

Votsis, I. (2015). Unification: Not Just a Thing of Beauty. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 30(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.12695

Weisberg, M. (2006). Robustness Analysis. Philosophy of Science, 73(5), 730-742. https://doi.org/10.1086/518628

Zenil, H. (2010). Compression-based investigation of the dynamical properties of cellular automata and other systems. Journal of Complex Systems, 19(1).

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

The Journal of University of Bialystok

Journal Information

Cite Score 2017: 0.28

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.136
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.293


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 106 106 15
PDF Downloads 45 45 12