Distance education environments can take many forms, from asynchronous to blended synchronous environments. Blended synchronous learning environment (BSLE) can be defined as an innovative setting in which students can decide to attend classes either face-to-face or via a synchronous virtual connection. Many educators are unfamiliar teaching in BSLE because of lack of experience or exposure to this delivery method. Thus, it is important to understand the optimal organisational structures and the effective management of BSLE courses to facilitate student learning and interaction. Seeking to understand this teaching method, an exploratory mixed-method study was conducted to examine graduate students’ perceptions of the BSLE. Quantitative and qualitative data was collected from a questionnaire and analysed. The findings revealed that students were satisfied with the BSLE, interactions, and the instructor. However, findings showed that the instructor divided attention between face-to-face and online synchronous students, which can cause cognitive overload and compromise the quality of instruction. Additionally, this study suggests that technical difficulties can affect students’ satisfaction with BSLE courses. Implications for further research and limitations are discussed.
Arbaugh, J. B. & Hwang, A. (2006). Does “teaching presence” exist in online MBA courses? The Internet and Higher Education, 9(1), 9-21.
Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1-17.
Cunningham, U. (2014). Teaching the disembodied: Othering and activity systems in a blended synchronous learning situation. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6).
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. Handbook of distance education, 1, 113-127.
Hastie, M., Hung, I. C., Chen, N. S., & Kinshuk. (2010). A blended synchronous learning model for educational international collaboration. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 9e24.
Moore, M. G. (1993). 2 Theory of transactional distance. Theoretical principles of distance education, 22.
National Center for Education Statistics (2014). STEM in Postsecondary Education (US Department of Education, Washington).
New Media Consortium., & Consortium for School Networking. (2017). Horizon report. Austin, TX: The New Media Corsortium.
Oyarzun, B., & Martin, F. (2013). A Case Study on Multi-Modal Course Delivery and Social Learning Opportunities. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 15(1), 25.
Pollard, H., Minor, M., & Swanson, A. (2014). Instructor Social Presence within the Community of Inquiry Framework and Its Impact on Classroom Community and the Learning Environment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 17(2), n2.
Richardson, J. & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88.
Rasmussen, R. C. (2003). The quantity and quality of human interaction in a synchronous blended learning environment. (Doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University) Available from ProQuest Dissertations & theses. (UMI No. 305345928)
Szeto, E. (2015). Community of inquiry as an instructional approach: What effects of teaching, social and cognitive presences are there in blended synchronous learning and teaching? Computers & Education, 81, 191-201.
Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. Y. (2014). Towards a framework of interactions in a blended synchronous learning environment: what effects are there on students' social presence experience? Interactive Learning Environments, 2, 1-17.
Teng, D. C. E., Chen, N. S., & Leo, T. (2012). Exploring students’ learning experience in an international online research seminar in the Synchronous Cyber Classroom. Computers & Education, 58(3), 918-930.