Education for urban development is a process with a primary role to preserve and use of environment, to manage spatial planning and urban development as a whole holistic system. In relation to education for sustainable development, creativity of urban planning and design can significantly improve quality of life of their urbanites. Ergo, students and teachers are an epic symbiosis in a process of teaching. Actually, this interaction can be more bonded and interdependent with high-tech didactic tools. The digital era has implemented in the education system new creative methods of learning, a new way style in schooling. The new turn of the century began a crucial activity for the city of Prishtina in terms of urban, demographic and education phenomena. The study and aim of this paper are to examine the teaching process, with the focus on creativity of interactive education. The research methods consist of empirical observation, and direct observation of teaching methods. Findings indicate that through an informal meeting places for interactive education, the teaching process in architectural studies can bring more: sustainable development and awareness of space, a didactic process which bonds multidimensional threads between students and teachers. Research concludes that uniform old teaching platform, cannot respond to all specific issues faced by students in this globalization era. Therefore, new teaching strategies must involve creativity of interactive education.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Bajçinovci, B., Jerliu, F. (2016). Challenges of Architectural Design in relation to Environment and Air Pollution. A Case study: Prishtina’s first public parking garage. Journal of Science, Humanities and Arts. Freiburg. Germany, DOI: 10.17160/josha.3.7.254.
2. Bajçinovci, B., Jerliu, F. (2017). The Concept of “Modelarium” and its Impact on Creativity and Artistic Education. Review of Artistic Education no.14 2017. De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/rae-2017-0030.
3. Bajcinovci, B. (2018). Creativity of Interactive Academic Education for Sustainable Urban Development, JOSHA. Freiburg. Germany.
4. De Bono, E. (2015). Lateral thinking, Creativity step by step. Harper Colophon; Reissue edition. ISBN-10: 0060903252, ISBN-13: 978-0060903251.
5. Gharajedaghi, J. (2006). Systems Thinking. Managing Chaos and Complexity. Elsevier.
8. Hewett, Baecker, Card, Carey, Gasen, Mantei, Perlman, Strong and Verplank. (1992).”ACM SIGCHI Curricula for Human-Computer Interaction”. ACM SIGCHI.
9. Iliško, D. (2005). Pedagogical challenges for implementing holistic curriculum in Latvia. Journal of Teacher Education and Training, 5, 28-39.
10. Iliško, D. (2007). Teachers as agents of societal change. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 7, 14-26. doi: 10.2478/v10099-009-0002-9.
11. Municipal of Prishtina, 2004.
12. Paşca, Eugenia Maria. (2016). Variables and Constants in the curriculum for the music specializations of the Romanian University Education. Review of Artistic Education no. 11-12 2016, pp. 253-262. DOI: 10.1515/rae-2016-0030
13. Salite, I. (2009). Teacherís perspectives on learning programs design for sustainability: The Latvia experience. Proceedings of the International conference Citizenship, Multiculturalism, Cosmopolitanism,November 3-4, 2008, Nicosia, University of Cyprus,Vol. 1, 145-158, ISBN 978-9963-9442-1-7.