<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> Recent evolutionary experimental psychological research found that high verbal proficiency (VP) increased the perceived attractiveness of individuals (more so for males than females), especially in the context of a long-term relationship. Our study had the objective of replicating and extending this research. Similar to previous studies, audio files in which speakers performed scripted self-presentations that had equal content but varied on VP were used as stimuli for opposite-sex participants. VP was found to increase attractiveness ratings. The effects were mostly small for numerous variables relating to short-term mating, whereas they were moderate to large for long-term mating. Our participants attributed more future income, but not more total number of mates to speakers with higher VP. Female menstrual cycle effects on attractiveness ratings were not found. Contrary to former research, being more verbally proficient was not found to be more beneficial for one sex over the other.</abstract>

Media Psychology, Julius Maximilian, University of Würzburg, Campus Hubland Nord, Oswald-Kulpe-Weg 82, D-97074, Würzburg,

Julius Maximilian, University of Würzburg,

Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg,

Only Cheap Talk after All? New Experimental Psychological Findings on the Role of Verbal Proficiency in Mate Choice

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> The analysis of collaborative exchanges of couples during their household activities is at the core of this paper. Although the management of responsibilities around household tasks is a potential source of contention within the decision-making process about home activities, another complementary perspective considers practices of communication during household activities as ways to build or reinforce the family educational processes. Our goal is to capture these daily interactions as indicators of collaborative relationships among couples, exemplifying how communicative exchanges contribute to the creation of frames for family participation in routines. In the first part of the paper, a review of issues regarding the division of labor within the family setting will be introduced in order to examine how these aspects relate to the ongoing negotiation of responsibilities and expectations between women and men. Thereafter, the methodological design of the study will be presented, as well as the qualitative analysis of data based on the argumentative topic model. A discussion of participants’ responsibilities in household tasks will be presented as indicators of their collaborative relationships during everyday activities. Lastly, implications for family studies will be highlighted in order to illustrate how family members ascribe meanings during routines.</abstract>

Collaborative Relationships Among Couples: Frames of Interaction During Everyday Household Activities

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> This study examined the roles of child gender and attachment in mother-child narrative conversations and child independent narratives. Children (Mage = 56 months) told personal narratives independently and while engaged in narrative conversations with their mothers. The Attachment Story Completion Task-Revised (Verschueren &amp; Marcoen, 1994) measured child attachment representations. Results indicated that attachment was linked to maternal conversational style and child independent narratives. Mothers with secure sons continued their topics more than mothers of secure daughters, and secure boys’ independent narratives were less elaborative than those of secure girls. However, no gender differences were found among insecure dyads. We argue that mothers of secure boys sensitively recognize their sons’ cues within the conversational context and respond to the need for further verbal assistance, thus providing more on-topic replies in narrative conversations.</abstract>

Mother-Child Conversations and Child Memory Narratives: The Roles of Child Gender and Attachment

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> This study offers an experimental perspective to investigate the word order and animacy effects of intransitives in Turkish, an agglutinative language with a canonical, flexible Subject-Object-Verb order. Four experiments were conducted to investigate a total of 528 Turkish speakers’ acceptability judgments using rating scales (Experiments 1 and 3; 7-point Likert scales) and forced choice tasks (Experiments 2 and 4; choosing one of two sentences) for various orders of linguistic forms in a simple intransitive sentence. Results from scalar acceptability judgments showed that there were significant main effects of order and subject, indicating that participants gave significantly higher ratings to SV sentences than VS sentences and that their ratings changed significantly according to the animacy of the subjects. Results from the forced choice tasks showed that participants preferred SV sentences to VS sentences. These findings suggest that Turkish speakers prefer SV order over VS order even though both are readily available.</abstract>

An Experimental Approach to Basic Word Order in Turkish Intransitives

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 28 (2024): Issue 1 (January 2024)

Volume 27 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)

Volume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)

Volume 25 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)

Volume 24 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)

Volume 23 (2019): Issue 1 (January 2019)

Volume 22 (2018): Issue 1 (January 2018)

Volume 21 (2017): Issue 1 (January 2017)

Volume 20 (2016): Issue 3 (December 2016)

Volume 20 (2016): Issue 2 (November 2016)

Volume 20 (2016): Issue 1 (October 2016)

Volume 19 (2015): Issue 3 (December 2015)

Volume 19 (2015): Issue 2 (October 2015)

Volume 19 (2015): Issue 1 (May 2015)

Volume 18 (2014): Issue 3 (December 2014) Children's Language and Communicative Knowledge, Part Two. In childhood and beyond, Issue Editor: Barbara Bokus

Volume 18 (2014): Issue 2 (August 2014) Children's Language and Communicative Knowledge, Part One. In Memory of Professor Grace Wales Shugar, Issue Editor: Barbara Bokus

Volume 18 (2014): Issue 1 (May 2014)

Volume 17 (2013): Issue 3 (December 2013)

Volume 17 (2013): Issue 2 (September 2013)

Volume 17 (2013): Issue 1 (June 2013)

Volume 16 (2012): Issue 3 (December 2012)

Volume 16 (2012): Issue 2 (December 2012) Language as a Tool for Interaction, Issue Editor: Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi

Volume 16 (2012): Issue 1 (June 2012)

Volume 15 (2011): Issue 2 (December 2011)

Volume 15 (2011): Issue 1 (June 2011)

Volume 14 (2010): Issue 2 (January 2010)

Volume 14 (2010): Issue 1 (June 2010)

Volume 13 (2009): Issue 2 (January 2009)

Volume 13 (2009): Issue 1 (June 2009)

Volume 12 (2008): Issue 2 (December 2008)

Volume 12 (2008): Issue 1 (June 2008)

Psychology of Language and Communication

 eISSN: 2083-8506, pISSN: 1234-2238   Psychology of Language and Communication is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal committed to publishing high-quality research in the areas of language and communication. We have adhered to the Diamond Open Access standard since our inception in 1997, allowing both the submission of manuscripts and access to full-text articles free of charge.   Psychology of Language and Communication publishes in the Volume Open mode. A new, single Volume Open is initiated at the beginning of each calendar year. Articles accepted for publication are continuously published in the yearly Volume Open, at a rate of about 1-2 articles per month.   We operate under Fair Open Access Principles and CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. We assure the quality of our manuscripts by a thorough assessment by the editorial team and a double-blind peer review process. We follow the COPE publication ethics principles.   Scope   We publish articles on various aspects of psychological studies on language and communication processes in both children and adults. This includes language production and comprehension, the brain's cognitive and social bases of speech, the nature and strategies of various types of discourse, language development, disorders of linguistic and communicative competences, corpus studies, social media communication, psychological text analysis, social perception of spoken and written language, and human-AI communication.   Psychology of Language and Communication integrates previously disparate perspectives and approaches in the psychology of communication into one place, promoting an interdisciplinary perspective on language and communication and providing a forum for researchers from all over the world. We welcome manuscripts representing perspectives in psychology, linguistics, sociology, philosophy, and computer science, provided they align with the journal's central focus. We believe that through these multiple perspectives, we can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the role that language and communication processes play in our world. We welcome original empirical studies (as full-length articles or short reports), replication studies, and reports of null findings. We are also keen to report on methodological advancements in the fields of language and communication research, theoretical papers, and literature reviews.   We are eager to collaborate with students and Early Career Researchers who have conducted solid work but might require additional support and feedback to prepare their work for peer-reviewed publication.   We encourage the proposal of special issues in two ways. First, researchers can suggest calls for papers, act as guest editors, and collaborate with us. Secondly, we invite conference and symposium organizers to contact us in advance regarding the publication of special issues. We are eager to provide an outlet for high-quality, thematically consistent collections of papers following a conference. Possible themes include both novel areas and approaches in the psychology of language and communication as well as overviews and critical reflections on established topics.   Why submit    All submissions undergo a preliminary assessment by a member of the Editorial Board and are then sent out for a thorough evaluation to two or three peer reviewers in a double-blind review process, where the identities of authors and reviewers are kept confidential.   Promotion of each published article.   Fast publishing.   Publishing without charge.    We are indexed in the following databases, among others:    Scopus   DOAJ   PsychINFO   EBSCO    Rejection Rate    80%    Follow us on Twitter - X       Archiving   Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.   For previous issues (1997–2007) go to plc.psychologia.pl/   Plagiarism Policy   The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process.   Co-financing   Psychology of Language and Communication is co-financed by the Polish Ministry of Education and Science (Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki) under the program "Rozwój Czasopism Naukowych" (RCN/SP/0485/2021/1).   Obituary Tribute: Ida Kurcz   Obituary Tribute: Jan E. Okuniewski   Obituary Tribute: Grace Wales Shugar 