Aesthetic Universals in Neil Gaiman’s Post-Postmodern Mythmaking

Abstract

Aesthetic theory, as reflected in both contemporary cognitive (Patrick Colm Hogan) and more traditional structuralist criticism (H.G. Widdowson), points to the dynamics between familiarity and surprise as the driving force behind the pleasure we derive from reading fiction. This paper explains how Neil Gaiman’s works, particularly his novel Neverwhere, utilize genre expectations and reinvent mythologies in order to captivate audiences in the current age of unprecedented access to information and a rather superficial intertextuality. The paper draws on Brian Attebery’s analyses of the literature of the fantastic to place Gaiman within the context of both modernist and postmodernist legacies, while proposing that his works could be best understood as representative of the current cultural paradigm, sometimes labelled as the pseudo-modern or post-postmodernism. The discussion of the shifting paradigm is used as a backdrop for the scrutiny of the devices employed in Gaiman’s writing: the pre-modern focus on storytelling, prototypicality, modernist “mythic principle”, postmodernist textual strategies, and utilization of current technologies and mass-communication media.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Armstrong, Paul B. How Literature Plays with the Brain: The Neuroscience of Reading and Art. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013. Print.

  • Attebery, Brian. Stories about Stories: Fantasy and the Remaking of Myth. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2014. Print.

  • Campbell, Joseph. The Hero With a Thousand Faces. 1949. Commemorative ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004. Print.

  • Čipkár, Ivan. “The Cognitive Model of the Vampire and Its Accommodation in the Twentieth Century.” Moravian Journal of Literature and Film, vol. 5, no. 1. 2014: 23–44. Print.

  • Delahay, Matti. Imaginary Things: Modern Myth in Neil Gaiman’s American Gods (2001). 2009. University of Jyväskylä, Master’s thesis.

  • Eliot, T. S. “Ulysses, Order and Myth.” 1923. Selected Prose of T. S. Eliot. Ed. Frank Kermode. New York, NY: Harcourt, 1975. 175–178. Print.

  • Freud, Sigmund. “The Uncanny.” Trans. David McLintock. The Uncanny. New York: Penguin, 2003. Print.

  • Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. 1957. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000. Print.

  • Gaiman, Neil. Violent Cases. London: Escape Books, 1987. Print.

  • Gaiman, Neil. with M. John Harrison, Terry Pratchett, Geoff Ryman, and Diana Wynne Jones. “Whose Fantasy?” Hosted by Neil Gaiman. One of a series of events examining British genre fiction. London: Institute of Contemporary Arts. 1988. Web. Accessed 1 June 2018. sounds.bl.uk/Arts-literature-and-performance/ICA-talks/024M-C0095X0364XX-0100V0.

  • Gaiman, Neil. Neverwhere. 1996. London: Headline Review, 2005. Print.

  • Gaiman, Neil. Smoke and Mirrors: Short Fictions and Illusions. London: Headline Review, 1999. Print.

  • Gaiman, Neil. “Neil Gaiman: Man in Black.” Interview. AAR. 12 April 1999. Web. Accessed 1 June 2018. allaboutromance.com/author-interviews/neil-gaiman-interview/.

  • Gaiman, Neil. “A Conversation with Neil Gaiman.” Interview by Claire E. White. The Internet Writing Journal. March 1999. Web. Accessed 1 June 2018. www.writerswrite.com/journal/mar99/a-conversation-with-neil-gaiman-3991.

  • Gaiman, Neil. “Reflections on Myth (with Digressions into Gardening, Comics, and Fairy Tales).” Columbia: A Journal of Literature and Art, vol. 31, winter.1999: 7584. Print.

  • Gaiman, Neil. American Gods. 2001. London: Headline Review, 2005. Print.

  • Gaiman, Neil. 3 Feb. journal entry. Neil Gaiman’s Journal. 2003. Web. 1 June 2018. journal. neilgaiman.com/2003/02/long-occasionally-frustrating.asp.

  • Gaiman, Neil. Anansi Boys. New York, NY: Morrow, 2005. Print.

  • Gaiman, Neil. Fragile Things: Short Fictions and Wonders. London: Headline Review, 2007. Print.

  • Gaiman, Neil. “Myth, Magic, and the Mind of Neil Gaiman: A Conversation with the Dream King.” Interview by Tim E. Ogline. Wild River Review. 2007. Web. Accessed 1 June 2018. www.wildriverreview.com/columns/pen-world-voices/myth-magic-and-the-mind-of-neil-gaiman/.

  • Gaiman, Neil. Interview by Lisa-Ann Lee. SG Magazine. 20 Nov. 2009. Web. 1 June 2018. sg.asia-city.com/events/article/first-person-neil-gaiman.

  • Gaiman, Neil. “Neil Gaiman’s Opinion on Fanfiction.” Tumblr. 24 April 2012. Web. 1 June 2018. neil-gaiman.tumblr.com/post/21746253134/neil-gaimans-opinion-on-fanfiction.

  • Gaiman, Neil. The Ocean at the End of the Lane. New York, NY: William Morrow, 2013. Print.

  • Gaiman, Neil. A Calendar of Tales. Keep Moving. Internet ad campaign. BlackBerry. Feb. 2013. Web. 1 June 2018. https://crackberry.com/keep-moving-projects

  • Gaiman, Neil. The Sleeper and the Spindle. London: Bloomsbury, 2014. Print.

  • Gaiman, Neil. Trigger Warning: Short Fictions & Disturbances. London: Headline Review, 2015. Print.

  • Gaiman, Neil. “Neil Gaiman at the Douglas Adams Memorial Lecture 2015.” YouTube. Save the Rhino International. 3 March 2015. Web. 1 June 2018. www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8UU-F1Yorg.

  • Gibbons, Alison. “Postmodernism Is Dead. What Comes Next?” The Times Literary Supplement. 12 June 2017. Web. Accessed 1 June 2018. www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/public/postmodernism-dead-comes-next/.

  • Hogan, Patrick Colm. Beauty and Sublimity: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Literature and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Print.

  • Hutcheon, Linda. The Politics of Postmodernism. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2002. Print.

  • Kirby, Alan. “The Death of Postmodernism and Beyond.” Philosophy Now, vol. 58, Nov–Dec, 2006. Web. Accessed 1 June 2018. philosophynow.org/issues/58/The_Death_of_Postmodernism_And_Beyond.

  • Klapcsik, Sandor. Liminality in Fantastic Fiction: A Poststructuralist Approach. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co., 2012. Print.

  • Kulka, Tomáš. Umění a kýč. Prague: Torst, 1994. Print.

  • Lukach, Katherine M. Transformative Encounters in the Works of Neil Gaiman. 2007. University of North Carolina, Master’s thesis.

  • Lyotard, Jean-Francois. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984. Print.

  • Onega, Susana. “The Mythical Impulse in British Historiographic Metafiction.” European Journal of English Studies, vol. 1, no. 2. 1997: 184204. Print.

  • Percy, Benjamin. “It All Floods Back: Neil Gaiman’s Ocean at the End of the Lane.” Review. New York Times. 27 June 2013. Web. Accessed 1 June 2018. www.nytimes.com/2013/06/30/books/review/neil-gaimans-ocean-at-the-end-of-the-lane.html.

  • Rauch, Stephen. Neil Gaiman’s The Sandman and Joseph Campbell: In Search of the Modern Myth. Cabin John, MD: Wildside Press, 2003. Print.

  • Schank, Roger C. and Robert P. Abelson. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1977. Print.

  • Tompkins, Jane. Sensational Designs: The Cultural Work of American Fiction 1790-1860. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986. Print.

  • Vuust, Peter and Morten Kringelbach. “The Pleasure of Music.” Pleasures of the Brain, Eds. Morten Kringelbach and Kent Berridge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. 255–269. Print.

  • Widdowson, H. G. Practical Stylistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. Print.

Journal + Issues

Search