Social Representations Theory

Open access


This article argues that the theory of social representations can give valuable contributions to media research. It offers a new theory-based approach for studying how the media and citizens socially represent societal and political issues colouring our age, or some specific time period. Two fundamental communicative mechanisms – anchoring and objectification – are posited by the theory. These mechanisms, with a set of subcategories, are presented and it is shown how they can be used as conceptual analytical tools in empirical analysis. Concrete examples are given from a study on climate change and the media.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Altheide D.L. (2002) Creating Fear. News and the Construction of Crisis. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

  • Altheide D. and R.S. Michalowski (1999) ‘Fears in the News: A Discourse of Control’ The Sociological Quarterly 40(3): 475-503.

  • Bauer M. and G. Gaskell (1999) ‘Towards a Paradigm for Research on Social Representations’ Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 29(2): 163-186.

  • Beck U. and E. Beck-Gernsheim (2001) Individualization: Institutional Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage.

  • Berglez P. Höijer B. and U. Olausson (2009) ‘Individualisation and Nationalisation of the Climate Issue. Two Ideological Horizons in Swedish News Climate Change and the Media Media’ pp. 211-223 in T. Boyce and J. Lewis (eds). New York: Peter Lang.

  • Billig M. (1991) Ideology Rhetoric and Opinions. London: Sage.

  • Billig M. (1993) ‘Studying the Thinking Society: Social representations Rhetoric and Attitudes’ pp. 39-62 in G.M. Breakwell and D.V. Canter (eds) Empirical Approaches to Social Representations. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Bless H. Fiedler K. and F. Struck (2004) Social Cognition. How Individuals Construct Social Reality. Hove: Psychology cop.

  • Bostrom A. and D. Lashof (2007) ‘Weather it’s Climate Change?’ pp. 31-43 in Moser S.C. and L. Dilling (eds) Creating a Climate for Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bostrom A. Morgan M.G. Fischhoff B. et al. (1994) ‘What Do People Know About Global Climate Change? 1. Mental Models’ Risk Analysis 14(6): 959-970.

  • van Dijk T. (1998) Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.

  • Deaux K. and G. Philogéne (eds) (2001) Representations of the Social. Oxford UK: Blackwell.

  • Edwards P.N. (2001) ‘Representing the Global Atmosphere: Computer Models Data and Knowledge about Climate Change’ pp. 31-65 in Miller C. and P. Edwards (eds) Changing the Atmosphere. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

  • Fairclough Norman (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Furedi F. (2006) Culture of Fear Revisited: Risk-Taking and the Morality of Low Expectation. London: Continuum.

  • Giddens A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Hall S. (1986) ‘The Problem of Ideology: Marxism without Guarantees’ Journal of Communication Inquiry 10(2): 28-44.

  • Hall S. (1995) ‘The Rediscovery of ’Ideology’: Return of the Repressed in the Media Studies’ pp. 354-364 in Boyd-Barett O. and C. Newbold (eds) Approaches to Media. A Reader. London: Arnold.

  • Hall S. (1999) ‘Encoding/Decoding’ pp. 51-61 in Marris P. and S. Thornham (eds) Media Studies. A Reader. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (originally 1973).

  • Höijer. B. (2008) ‘Sociala representationer i medietexter’ [Social Representations in Media Texts] pp. 139-164 in M. Ekström (ed.) Mediernas språk. Malmö: Liber.

  • Höijer B. (2010) ‘Emotional Anchoring and Objectification in the Media Reporting on Climate Change’ Public Understanding of Science 19(6): 717-731.

  • Jodelet D. (1991) Madness and Social Representations. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

  • Joffe H. (2002) ‘Social Representations and Health Psychology’ Social Science Information 41(4): 559-580.

  • Kövecses Z. (2005) Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lakoff G. and M. Johnson (2003) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

  • Leiserowitz A. (2007) ‘Communicating the Risk of Global Warming: American Risk Perceptions Affective Images and Interpretive Communities’ pp. 44-63 in Moser S.C. and L. Dilling (eds) Creating a Climate for Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Levidow L. (2000) ‘Pollution Metaphors in the UK Biotechnology Controversy’ Science as Culture 9(3): 325-351.

  • Lippman W. (1998) Public Opinion. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers (first published in 1922).

  • Marková I. (2003) Dialogicality and Social Representations. The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Moscovici S. (1973) ‘Foreword’ pp. Xiii in C. Herzlich: Health and Illness. A Social Psychological Analysis. London: Academic Press.

  • Moscovici S. (1984a) ‘The Myth of the Lonely Paradigm: A Rejoinder’ Social Research 51: 939-967.

  • Moscovici S. (1984b) ‘The Phenomenon of Social Representations’ pp. 3-69 in R.M. Farr and S. Moscovici (eds) Social Representations. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Moscovici S. (1988) ‘Notes Towards a Description of Social Representations’ European Journal of Social Psychology 18: 211-250.

  • Moscovici S. (1993) The Invention of Society. Psychological Explanations to Social Phenomena. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.

  • Moscovici S. (2000) Social Representations. Explorations in Social Psychology. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.

  • Moscovici S. (2001) ‘Why a Theory of Social Representations?’ pp. 8-35 in K. Deaux and G. Philogéne (eds) Representations of the Social. Oxford UK: Blackwell Publishers.

  • Moscovici S. (2007) Psychoanalysis. Its Image and Its Public. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing (first published 1961).

  • Olausson U. (2009) ‘Global Warming – Global Responsibility? Media Frames of Collective Action and Scientific Certainty’ Public Understanding of Science 18: 421-436.

  • Olausson U. (2010) ‘Towards a European Identity? The News Media and the Case of Climate Change’ European Journal of Communication 25(2010)14: 138-152.

  • O’Neill S. and M. Hulme (2009) ‘An Iconic Approach for Representing Climate Change’ Global Environmental Change 19(4): 402-410.

  • Pickering M. (2001) Stereotyping. The Politics of Representation. Houndsmills: Palgrave.

  • Potter J. and D. Edwards (2000) ‘Social Representations and Discursive Psychology: from Cognition to Action’ Culture & Psychology 5(4): 447-458.

  • Ritchie D.L. (2006) Context and Connection in Metaphor. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Robertson A. (2001) ‘Mediated Threats’ pp. 61-83 in J. Eriksson (ed) Threat Politics. New Perspectives on Security Risk and Crises Management. Aldershot UK: Ashgate. St.

  • Clair R.N. (2002) The Major Metaphors of European Thought – Growth Game Language Drama Machine Time and Space. New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.

  • Smith N.W. and H. Joffe (2009) ‘Climate Change in the British Press: The Role of the Visual’ Journal of Risk Research 12(5): 647-663.

  • Stibbe A. (2001) ‘From Flu-Like Virus to Deadly Disease: Ideology and the Media’ Journal of Media Psychology 6(2): http:/

  • Wagner W. and N. Hayes (2005) Everyday Discourse and Common Sense. The Theory of Social Representation. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Voelklein C. and C. Howarth (2005) ‘A Review of Controversies about Social Representations Theory: A British Debate’ Culture & Psychology 11(4): 431-454.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.54

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.223
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.270

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1243 934 25
PDF Downloads 652 537 20