Assessing students’ entrepreneurial skills needed in the Knowledge Economy

Open access

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore how students acquire entrepreneurial skills requested by a knowledge economy, in a country with an emergent economy. Knowledge economy is based dominantly on processing intangible resources, which needs different skills from the knowledge workers than from the industrial workers. Knowledge economy develops fast, including the countries with emergent economies like the Romania. Universities have to adapt to the requirements imposed by the knowledge economy and to change their teaching processes based on knowledge transfer into developing students’ skills which will allow them to perform in a turbulent business environment. The paper focuses on the entrepreneurial skills and presents an evaluation of students’ entrepreneurial skills in a Romanian university, students being enrolled in undergraduate and graduate programs of economics and business. The set of entrepreneurial skills considered in this paper have been selected based on literature, and they are expected to define the entrepreneurial behavior by the 2030 time horizon. The following skills have been considered: complex-problem solving, critical thinking, originality thinking, active learning, and judgement and decision making. For the quantitative research we developed and applied a questionnaire in order to assess the level of these skills for the students at “Stefan cel Mare” University in Suceava, Romania. We processed the obtained data set by using the specialized software package SPSS, version 25, and applied the statistical function of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) for the purpose of identifying which are the main factors influencing their perceptions about the investigated categories of skills. The results of the Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed a set of 5 factors which we correlated to validate the research hypothesis. Our results show that economics and business education contributes essentially to the development of these entrepreneurial skills.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Arkkelin D. (2014) Using SPSS to understand research and data analysis Psychology Curricular Materials. Book 1.

  • Argote L. (2013) Organizational learning: creating retaining and transferring knowledge 2nd edition Springer New York.

  • Barath T. (2015) “Learning organization as a tool for better and more effective schools” Procedia Manufacturing No.3 pp. 1494 – 1502 Elsevier.

  • Bedwell W.L. Fiore S.M. and Salas E. (2014) “Developing the future workforce: an approach for integrating interpersonal skills into the MBA classroom” Academy of Management Learning & Education Vol. 13 No. 2 pp. 171-186.

  • Bejinaru R. (2018) “Factorial analysis perspectives upon students’ skills in the knowledge economy” Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy Vol. 6 No. 2 pp. 265-284.

  • Bejinaru R. (2017a) “Universities in the knowledge economy” Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy Vol. 5 No.2 pp. 251-271.

  • Bejinaru R. (2017b)”Knowledge strategies aiming to improve the intellectual capital of universities” Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society Vol. 12 No. 3 pp. 500-523.

  • Bejinaru R. (2016)”Knowledge dynamics impact on intellectual capital in organizations” Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy Vol. 4 No. 4 pp. 515-534.

  • Bejinaru R. (2011)”Knowledge dynamics and the concept of BA” The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration Vol. 10 No. 3 pp. 217-223.

  • Bejinaru R. and Prelipcean G. (2017) “Successful strategies to be learnt from world-class universities” Management and Marketing Vol. 11 No.1 pp. 350-358.

  • Bereiter C. (2002) Education and mind in the knowledge edge Routledge London.

  • Bolisani E. and Bratianu C. (2017)”Knowledge strategy planning: an integrated approach to manage uncertainty turbulence and dynamics” Journal of Knowledge Management Vol. 21 No. 2 pp. 233-253.

  • Bratianu C. (2010) “A critical analysis of Nonaka’s model of knowledge dynamics” in Rodrigues S. (ed.) Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Intellectual Capital ISCTE Lisbon University Institute Lisbon Portugal 29-30 March 2010 pp. 115-120 Academic Conferences and Publishing International Reading.

  • Bratianu C. (2018) “Intellectual capital research and practice: 7 myths and one golden rule” Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society Vol. 13 No. 2 pp.859-879.

  • Bratianu C. and Bejinaru R. (2017)”Knowledge strategies for increasing IC of universities” in Lopez I.T. and Serrasqueiro R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Intellectual Capital Institute Universitario de Lisboa (ISCTE) Portugal 6-7 April 2017 pp. 34-42 Academic Conferences and Publishing International Reading.

  • Bratianu C. and Bolisani E. (2015) “Knowledge strategy: an integral approach for managing uncertainty in Massaro M. and Garlatti A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Knowledge Management University of Udine Italy 3-4 September 2015 pp. 169-177 Academic Conferences and Publishing International Reading.

  • Bratianu C. and Vasilache S. (2010) “A factorial analysis of the managerial linear thinking model” International Journal of Innovation and Learning Vol. 8 No. 4 pp. 393-407.

  • Bratianu C. and Vatamanescu E.M. (2017) “Students’ perception on developing conceptual generic skills for business: a knowledge-based approach VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems Vol. 47 No. 4 pp. 490-505.

  • Cantaragiu R. Paunescu C. and Hadad S. (2014) “The social impact of university entrepreneurship in Romania: is the institutional discourse replicated or adopted?” Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society Vol. 9 No. 4 pp. 403-422.

  • Chan D. and Lo W. (2007) “Running universities as enterprises: university governance changes in Hong Kong” Asia Pacific Journal of Education Vol. 27 No. 3 pp. 305-322.

  • Curtin P. (2004) “Employability skills for the future” in Gibb J. (ed.) Generic skills in vocational education and training. Research readings National Center for Vocational Educational Research Adelaide pp. 38-68.

  • Curtis D.D. (2004a)”The assessment of generic skills” in Gibb J. (ed.) Generic skills in vocational education and training. Research readings National Center for Vocational Education Research Adelaide pp. 136-156.

  • Curtis D.D. (2004b)”International perspectives engineering skills” in Gib J. (ed.) Generic skills in cocational education and training. Research readings National Center for Vocational Education Research Adelaide pp. 19-37.

  • Davenport T.H. and Prusak L. (2000) Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know Harvard Business School Press Boston.

  • Dawe S. (2004) Focusing on generic skills in training packages National Center for Vocational Education Research Leabrook.

  • De Boer V. & Winnips K. (2015) “Flipped classroom at the University of Groningen” University of Groningen. Retrieved from http://www.rug.nl/e-learning/projecten/flipped-classroom.

  • Deca L. (2015) “Challenges for Romanian higher education” International Higher Education Vol. 82 pp.16-18.

  • De Winter J. C. F. Dodou D. and Wieringa P.A. (2009) “Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes” Multivariate Behavioral Research Vol. 44 No. 2 pp. 147-181.

  • Dima A.M. (2014) Trends in European higher education convergence IGI Global Hershey. Dombrowski E. Rotenberg L. and Bick M. (2013) Theory of knowledge Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • Donate M.J. and Canales J.I. (2012) “A new approach to the concept of knowledge strategy” Journal of Knowledge Management Vol.16 No. 1 pp.22-44.

  • Drucker P.F. (1993) Managing in turbulent times Harper Business New York.

  • Duderstadt J.J. (2003) A university for the 21st century The University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor.

  • Etzkowitz H. (2013)”Anatomy of the entrepreneurial university” Social Science Information Vol. 52 No. 4 pp. 515-538.

  • Gibbons-Wood D. and Lange T. (2000)” Developing core skills – lessons learned from Germany and Sweden” Education + Training Vol. 42 No. 1 pp. 24-32.

  • Gorsuch R. L. (1997) “Exploratory factor analysis: its role in item analysis” Journal of Personality Assessment Vol. 68 No. 3 pp. 532-560.

  • Groves K. and Paunescu C. (2008) Examining the antecedents and outcomes of Romanian entrepreneurial orientation Management & Marketing Vol. 3 No.11 pp. 3-18.

  • Hadad S. (2017a)”Knowledge economy: characteristics and dimensions” Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy Vol.5 No. 2 pp. 203-225.

  • Hadad S. (2017b)”Strategies for developing knowledge economy in Romania” Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society Vol. 12 No. 3 pp. 416-430.

  • Mintzberg H. (2004) Managers not MBAs: a hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development Financial Times/Prentice Hall London.

  • Moore B.N. and Parker R. (2007) Critical thinking 8th edition McGraw Hill New York.

  • Nesheim T. and Gressgard L.G. (2014) “Knowledge sharing in a complex organization: antecedents and safety effects” Safety Science Vol. 62 pp.28-36.

  • Nonaka I. and Takeuchi H. (1995) The knowledge-creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • Nonaka I. and Zhu Z. (2012) Pragmatic strategy. Eastern wisdom global success Cambridge University Press Cambridge UK.

  • O’Connor B. P. (2000) “SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and velicer’s MAP test” Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers Vol. 32 No. 3 pp. 396-402.

  • O’Dell C. and Hubert C. (2011) The new edge in knowledge: how knowledge management is changing the way we do business John Wiley & Sons New York.

  • Örtenblad A. (2015) “Towards increased relevance: context-adapted models of the learning organization” The Learning Organization Vol. 22 No. 3 pp.163 – 181.

  • Paunescu C.M. (2013). Challenges of entering the business market: the pre-entry knowledge and experience. Management & Marketing Vol. 8 No. 1 pp. 63-78.

  • Panter A. T. Swygert K. A. Dahlstrom W. G. and Tanaka J. S. (1997) “Factor analytic approaches to personality item-level data” Journal of Personality Assessment Vol. 68 pp. 561-589.

  • Powell W.W. and Snellman K. (2004) “The knowledge economy” Annual Review of Sociology Vol. 30 pp. 199-220.

  • Sass D. (2009) “Factor loading estimation error and stability using exploratory factor analysis” Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol. 70 No. 4 pp. 557-577.

  • SCANS (Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills) (1991) What work requires of school: a SCANS report for America 2000 U.S. Department of Labor Washington D.C.

  • Secundo G. Elena Perez S. Martinaidis Z. and Leitner K.H. (2014) “Intellectual capital management in European universities in times of changes: an IC maturity model” IFKAD University of Basilicata Italy 11-13 June 2014 Matera pp. 1095-1113.

  • Senge P. (1999) The fifth discipline: the art & practice of the learning organization Random House.

  • Shook C. and Bratianu C. (2010)”Entrepreneurial intent in a transitional economy: an application of the theory of planned behavior to Romanian students” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Vol.6 No.3 pp. 231-247.

  • Sin C. Taveres O. and Amaral A. (2016) “Who is responsible for employability? Student perceptions and practices” Tertiary Education and Management Vol. 22 No. 1 pp. 1-18.

  • Spender J.C. (2014) Business strategy. Managing uncertainty opportunity & enterprise Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • UKCES (2014) The future of work jobs and skills in 2030 by UK Commission for Employment and Skills accessed on 22nd April 2018 at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachmentdata/file/303334/er84-the-future-of-work-evidence-report.pdf

  • Volkmann C. (2004) Entrepreneurship studies – an ascending academic discipline in the twenty-first Century Higher Education in Europe Vol. 29 No. 2 pp. 177-185.

  • Zack M.H. (1999) “Developing a knowledge strategy” California Management Review Vol.41 No.3 pp.125-145.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.70

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.203
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.351

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 419 419 3
PDF Downloads 340 340 26