The Pay-What-You-Want game: What can be learned from the experimental evidence on Dictator and Trust Games?

Open access

Abstract

This paper introduces the Pay-What-You-Want game which represents the interaction between a buyer and a seller in a Pay-What-You-Want (PWYW) situation. The PWYW game embeds the dictator game and the trust game as subgames. This allows us to use previous experimental studies with the dictator and the trust game to identify three factors that can influence the success of PWYW pricing in business practice: (i) social context, (ii) social information, and (iii) deservingness. Only few cases of PWYW pricing for a longer period of time have been documented. By addressing repeated games, we isolate two additional factors which are likely to contribute to successful implementations of PWYW as a long term pricing strategy. These are (iv) communication and (v) the reduction of goal conflicts. The central contribution of this study is an attempt to bridge the gap between laboratory experiments and the research on PWYW pricing, which relies largely on evidence from the field. By reviewing the relevant experiments, this study identifies factors crucial for the success of PWYW pricing and provides guidance to developing long-term applications of PWYW pricing.

Andreoni, J. and Bernheim, D.B. (2009), “Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects”, Econometrica, Vol. 77, No. 5, pp. 1607-1636.

Albert, M., Güth, W., Kirchler, E. and Maciejovsky, B. (2007), “Are we nice(r) to nice(r) people? An experimental analysis”, Experimental Economics, Vol. 10, pp. 53-69.

Armstrong S., Catherine, A. and Madrigal, R. (2015), “Anchors and norms in anonymous pay-what-you-want pricing contexts”, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Vol. 57, pp. 167-175.

Ben-Ner, A., Putterman, L. and Ren, T. (2011), “Lavish returns on cheap talk: Two-way communication in trust games”, The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 1-13.

Berg, J., Dickhaut, J. and McCabe, J. (1995), “Trust, reciprocity, and social history”, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 122-142.

Bohnet, I. and Frey, B.S. (1999), “The sound of silence in prisoner’s dilemma and dictator games”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 43-57.

Bolle, F. (1998), “Rewarding trust: An experimental study”, Theory and Decision, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 83-98.

Bouckaert, J. and Dhaene, G. (2004), “Inter-ethnic trust and reciprocity: results of an experiment with small businessmen”, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 869-886.

Brañas-Garza et al. (2013), “Moral cleansing and moral licensing: experimental evidence”, Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 199-212.

Camerer, C.F. (2003), Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Cárdenas, J.C. and Carpenter, J. (2008), “Behavioural development economics: Lessons from field labs in the developing world”, The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 311-338.

Cason, T.N. and Mui, V.L. (1998), “Social influence in the sequential dictator game”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 42, No. 2-3, pp. 248-265.

Chandran, S. and Morwitz, V.G. (2005), “Effects of participative pricing on consumers’ cognitions and actions: A goal theoretic perspective”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 249-259.

Collett, J.L. and Childs, E. (2011), “Minding the gap: Meaning, affect, and the potential shortcomings of vignettes”, Social Science Research, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 513-522.

Dana, J., Weber, R.A. and Kuang, J.X. (2007), “Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness”, Economic Theory, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 67-80.

Engel, C. (2011), “Dictator games: A meta study”, Experimental Economics, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 583-610.

Engle-Warnick, J. and Slonim, R.L. (2004), “The evolution of strategies in repeated trust games”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 553-573.

Falk, A. and Kosfeld, M. (2006), “The hidden costs of control”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 96, No. 5, pp. 1611-1630.

Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. (2000), “Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 159-181.

Fershtman, C. and Gneezy, U. (2001), “Discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116, No. 1, pp. 351-377.

Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J.L., Savin, N.E. and Sefton, M. (1994), “Fairness in simple bargaining experiments”, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 347-369.

Franzen, A. and Pointner, S. (2012), “anonymity in the dictator game revisited”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 81, No. 1, pp. 74-81.

Gautier, P.A. and van der Klaauw, B. (2012), “Selection in a field experiment with voluntary participation”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 27, pp. 63-84.

Gerpott, T.J. (2017), “Pay-what-you-want pricing: An integrative review of the empirical research literature”, Management Science Letters, Vol. 7, pp. 35-62.

Gerpott, T.J. (2016), “A review of the empirical literature on pay-what-you-want price setting”, Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 566-696.

Glaeser, E.L., Laibson, D.I., Scheinkman, J.A. and Soutter, C.L. (2000), “Measuring trust”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 115, No. 3, pp. 811-846.

Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Riener, G. and Nelson, L.D. (2012), “Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets”, Proceedings of the Royal Academy of Sciences, Vol. 109, No. 19, pp. 7236-7240.

Greiff, M. and Egbert, H. (2016), “A survey of the empirical evidence on PWYW pricing”, Bulgarian Economic Papers, BEP 02-2016, Sofia.

Hilbert, L.P. and Suessmair, A. (2015), “The effects of social interaction and social norm compliance in pay-what-you-want situations”, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, Vol. 5, pp. 548-556.

Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., Smith, V.L. (1994), “Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games”, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 346-380.

Hoffman, E., McCabe, K. and Smith, V.L. (1996), “Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No.3, pp. 653-660.

Huber, J., Goldsmith, K. and Mogilner, C. (2008), “Reinforcement versus balance response in sequential choice”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 19, No. 3-4, pp. 229-239.

Iriberri, N. and Rey-Biel, P. (2011), “The role of role uncertainty in modified dictator games”, Experimental Economics, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 160-180.

Jang, H, and Chu, W. (2012), “Are consumers acting fairly toward companies? an examination of pay-what-you-want pricing”, Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 348-360.

Johnson, J.W. and Peng Cui, A. (2013), “To influence or not to influence: external reference price strategies in pay-what-you-want pricing”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 275-281.

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L. and Thaler, R. (1986), “Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 4, pp. 728-741.

Kim, J.Y., Kaufmann, K. and Stegemann, M. (2014), “The impact of buyer-seller relationships and reference prices on the effectiveness of the pay what you want pricing mechanism”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 25, pp. 409-423.

Kim, J.Y., Natter, M. and Spann, M. (2009), “Pay what you want: A new participative pricing mechanism”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 44-58.

Kim, J.Y., Natter, M. and Spann, M. (2010), “Pay what you want: Relevance and consumer behavior”, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 80, No. 2, pp. 147-169.

Kim, J.Y., Natter, M. and Spann, M. (2014), “Sampling, discounts or pay-what-you-want: Two field experiments”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 327-334.

Krawczyk, M., Kukla-Gryz, A. and Tyrowicz, J. (2015), “Pushed by the crowd or pulled by the leaders”, Working Paper No. 25/2015 (173), Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.

Krzyżanowska, M. and Tkaczyk, J. (2016), “Pay-what-you-want as a participative pricing mechanism: Meta-analysis of development and knowledge dissemination”, International Journal of Management Cases, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 21-38.

Kunter, M. (2015), “exploring the pay-what-you-want payment motivation”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 2347-2357.

Lazear, E.P., Malmendier, U. and Weber, R.A. (2012), “Sorting in experiments with application to social preferences”, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 136-163.

Léon, F.J., Noguera, J.A. and Tena-Sánchez, J. (2012), “How much would you like to pay? Trust, reciprocity and prosocial motivations in El trato”, Social Science Information, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 389-417.

Machado, F. and Sinha, R.K. (2013), “The viability of pay what you want pricing”, Working Paper.

Mak, V., Zwick, R., Rao, A. and Pattaratanakun, J.A. (2015), “´Pay what you want´ as threshold public good provision”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 127, pp. 30-43.

Mullen, E. and Monin, B. (2016), “Consistency versus licensing effects of past moral behavior”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 67, pp. 363-385.

Ortmann, A., Fitzgerald, J. and Boeing, C. (2000), “Trust, reciprocity, and social history: A reexamination”, Experimental Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 81-100.

Racherla, P., Babb, J.S. and Keith, M.J. (2011), “Pay-what-you-want pricing for mobile applications: The effect of privacy assurances and social information”, Conference for Information Systems Applied Research Proceedings, Vol. 4, No. 1833, pp. 1-13.

Regner, T. and Riener, G. (2012), “Voluntary payments, privacy and social pressure on the internet: A natural field experiment”, DICE Discussion Paper, No. 82, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).

Riener, G. and Traxler, C. (2012), “Norms, moods, and free lunch: Longitudinal evidence on payments from a pay-what-you-want restaurant”, Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 476-483.

Ruffle, B.J. (1998), “More is better, but fair is fair: Tipping in dictator and ultimatum games”, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 247-265.

Santana, S. and. Morwitz, V.G. (2013), “We’re in this together: How sellers, social values, and relationship norms influence consumer payments in pay-what-you-want contexts”, Working Paper.

Schmidt, K.M., Spann, M. and Zeithammer, R. (2014), “Pay what you want as a marketing strategy in monopolistic and competitive markets”, Management Science, Vol. 61, No. 6, pp. 1217-1236.

Schons, L.M., Rese, M., Wieseke, J., Rasmussen, W., Weber, D. and Strotmann, W.C. (2013), “there is nothing permanent except change: analyzing individual price dynamics in ‘pay-what-you-want’ situations”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 25-36.

Slonim, R. and Garbarino, E. (2008), “Increases in trust and altruism from partner selection: Experimental evidence”, Experimental Economics, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 134-153.

Thomas, S. and Gierl, H. (2014), “Pay what you want: how to affect the price consumers are willing to pay”, Proceedings of the 13th ICORIA: International Conference on Research in Advertising, June 26-28 2014, Amsterdam.

Journal Information


CiteScore 2018: 0.70

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.203
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.351

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 829 298 12
PDF Downloads 227 171 7