Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Selected Slovak Brands on the Principle of DEA Models with the Possibility to Optimise them

Open access


Nowadays, when marketing and branding change, companies are trying to find new ways to evaluate the effectiveness of their marketing activities as they impact on current and future business results. The main objective of the contribution is to evaluate the effectiveness of decision making unit (DMU) production units in the form of selected Slovak brands through the non-parametric data envelopment analysis (DEA) method. The sample size consists of 10 Slovak brands (Slovenská sporiteľňa, VÚB banka, Tatra banka, ESET, Slovnaft, Matador, Rajec, Sygic, Sedita and Zlatý bažant). Through DEA, we have gained a portfolio of effective and portfolio of ineffective brands operating in Slovakia. Depending on the choice of the DEA model, effective brands included Slovenská sporiteľňa, Sygic, Zlatý Bažant, Rajec and Sedita. Other brands were classified as ineffective. The result for ineffective brands is the creation of archetypal characters that we propose in Results section. The part of Results section is the focus of the businesses of the brands in question on the use of social media, to a larger extent, create a social media voice so that the personality of the brand is reflected in contributions in social media communicating on Facebook, Instagram or Twitter. In contribution, deduction, induction, analysis and marketing research methods were used.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aaker D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing the value of brand name. New York NY: Free Press.

  • Banker R. D. Charnes A. & Cooper W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science (30) pp. 1078-1092.

  • Bechter C. Farinelli G. & Daniel R. D. (2016). Advertising between archetype and brand personality. Administrative Sciences (6).

  • Coelli T. et al. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. New York: Springer.

  • Cooper W. W. Huang Z. & Li S. (1996). Satisfying DEA models under chance constraints. Annals of Operational Research (66) pp. 279-295.

  • Farrell M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (120) pp. 253-290.

  • Fetscherin M. & Toncar M. F. (2009). Valuating brand equity and product related attributes in the context of the German automobile market. Brand Management (17) pp. 134-145.

  • Fiala P. (2008). Modely a metody rozhodovani. Praha: Oeconomica.

  • Charles V. & Zavala J. J. (2017). A satisficing DEA model to measure the customer-based brand equity. Rairo- Operations Research (51) pp. 547-566.

  • Charnes A. Cooper W. W. & Rhodes E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research (2) pp. 429-444.

  • Cheng Q. (2005). “What determines residual income?” The Accounting Review. (80) pp. 85-112.

  • Jablonsky J. & Dlouhy M. (2015). Modely hodnoceni efektivnosti a alokace zdroju. Praha: Professional Publishing.

  • Jansky M. (2011). „The Feltham-Ohlson Model: Goodwill and Price Volatility”. Working paper. Charles University in Prague. pp. 1-71.

  • Jourdan P. (2002). Measuring brand equity: proposal for conceptual and methodological improvements. Advances in Customer Research pp. 290-297.

  • Kapferer J. N. (1992). Strategic Brand Management. New York NY: Kogan Page.

  • Keller K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing measuring and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing (57) pp. 1-22.

  • Kliestik T. (2009). The quantification effectiveness activities traffic company by the rules of data envelopment analysis. E + M Ekonomie a management (12) pp. 133-145.

  • Kotler P. & Keller K. L. (2012). Marketing Management (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Majerova J. & Kliestik T. (2015). Brand valuation as an important component of brand value building and managing. In 4th World Conference on Business Economics and Management. Conference proceedings pp. 546-552.

  • Nadanyiova M. (2015). The quality mark SK and its impact on the shopping behavior of Slovak customers. Economics and finance (23) pp. 1509-1514.

  • Podhorska I. & Siekelova A. (2016). The impact of internally generated goodwill on the financial performance of companies. In 16th international scientific conference: Globalization and its socio-economic consequences. Conference proceedings pp. 1736-1743.

  • Salaga K. Bartosova V. & Kicova E. (2015). Economic value added as a measurement tool of financial performance. Economics and finance (26) pp. 484-489.

  • Seo E. J. & Park J. W. (2018). A study on the effects of social media marketing activities on brand equity and customer response in the airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management (66) pp. 36-41.

  • Tasci A. D. Hahm J. & Breiter-Terry D. (2018). Consumer-based brand equity of a destination for sport tourists versus non-sport tourists. Journal of Vacation Marketing (24) pp. 62-78.

  • Tasci A. D. (2018). Testing the cross-brand and cross-market validity of a consumer based brand equity (CBBE) model for destination brands. Tourism management (65) pp. 143-159.

  • Trendy (2016). Spotrebitel chce byt prekvapovan. [Accessed 15.02.2018]. Available from Internet: https://www.mediaguru.cz/2016/01/trendy-2016-spotrebitel-chce-byt-prekvapovan/>

  • Woodside A. G. & Sood S. C. (2016). Theory of brand enabling archetype enactment by consumer. Advances in Culture Tourism and Hospitality Research (11) pp. 7-19.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 233 151 1
PDF Downloads 163 108 1