Croatian produced unifloral honey characterized according to the protein and proline content and enzyme activities

Open access

Abstract

In honey, the content of proteins, including the enzymes, is relatively low and has a minor nutritive significance. On the other hand, the proteins, including the enzymes, are usually used as honey quality evaluation parameters. This is because protein content and enzyme activities vary regarding the botanical origin of the honey. Since the results of protein content, glucose-oxidase, and acid phosphatase, for honeys produced in Croatia, are not available, four of the most abundant honey types produced in Croatia (black locust, sage, chestnut, and honeydew honey) are characterised according to the protein and proline content and enzyme activities. The characterisation was done to determine specificities and contribute to the characterisation of unifloral honeys. Dark honey types (honeydew and chestnut honey) had a higher proline content, and diastase, invertase, and glucose-oxidase activity than lighter sage and black locust honey. Black locust honey has a naturally low enzyme activity and showed the highest acid phosphatase activity among the analysed honey types, while honeydew honey, otherwise known to possess high proline content and enzyme activity, had a low protein content comparable to black locust honey. Statistically significant correlations were obtained between all analysed parameters, with the exception of acid phosphatase activity.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alonso-Torre S. R. Cavia M. M. Fernández-Muiño M. A. Moreno G. Huidobro J. F. Sancho M. T. (2006). Evolution of acid phosphatase acitivity of honeys from different climates. Food Chemistry 97(4) 750-755. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.06.010

  • Anklam E. (1998). A review of the analytical methods to determine the geographical and botanical origin of honey. Food Chemistry 63(4) 549-562. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00057-0 AOAC International (2002). AOAC Official Method 979.20 Proline in honey. In: Official methods of analysis. 17thed. rev.1 Ch 44. Gaithersburg Maryland: 24.

  • Babacan S. Pivarnik L. F. & Rand A. G. (2002). Honey amylase activity and food starch degradation. Journal of Food Science: Food Chemistry and Toxicology 67(5) 1625-1630. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb08695.x

  • Balasubramanyam M. V. & Ramesha I. (2012). Amylase and starch content in rippenin of honey of indigenous hive bee Apis cerana indica. Journal of Chemical Biological and Physical Sciences 2(1) 237-241.

  • Baroni M. V. Chiabrando G. A. Costa C. Wunderlin D. A. (2002). Assessment of the floral origin of honey by SDS-Page immunoblot techniques. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50(6) 1362-1367. http://doi.org/10.1021/jf011214i

  • Bergmeyer H. U. Gawehn K. & Grassl M. (1974). Enzymes as biochemical reagents. In: Methods of enzymatic analysis vol. 1 2nd ed. (pp. 495-496). Academic Press Inc. New York.

  • Bogdanov S. Martin P. & Lüllmann C. (1997). Harmonised methods of the European Honey Commission. Apidologie (extra issue) 28 1-59.

  • Bogdanov S. Lüllmann C. Martin P. von der Ohe W. Russmann H. Vorwohl G. Persano Oddo L. Sabatini A. G. Marcazzan G. L. Piro R. Flamini C. Morlot M. Lheretier J. Borneck R. Marioleas P. Tsigouri A. Kerkvliet J. Ortiz A. Ivanov T. D´Arcy B. Mossel & B. Vit P. (1999). Honey quality and International regulatory standards: review of the International Honey Commission.” Bee world 80(2) 61-69.

  • Bradford M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilising the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72 248-254.

  • Cavrar S. Yildiz O. Şahin H. Karahalil F. & Kolayli S. (2013). Comparison of physical and biochemical characteristics of different quality of Turkish honey. UludağAricilik Dergisi 13(2) 55-62.

  • Cimpoiu C. Hosu A. Miclaus V. & Puscas A. (2013). Determination of the floral origin of some Romanian honeys on the basis of physical and biochemical properties. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 100 149-154. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2012.04.008

  • Council Directive 2001/110/EC of 20 Decmber 2001 relating to honey. (2002) Official Journal of European Community L 10 47-52.

  • Cotte J. F. Casabianca H. Giroud B. Albert M. Lheritier J. & Grenier-Loustalot M. F. (2004). Characterisation of honey amino acid profiles using high-pressure liquid chromatography to control authenticity. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 378(5). 1342-1350. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2430-z

  • González Paramás A. M. Gómez Bárez J. A. Cordón Marcos C. García-Villanova R. J. & Sánchez Sánchez J. (2006). HPLC-fluorimetric method for analysis of amino acids in products of the hive (honey and beepollen). Food Chemistry 95(1) 148-156. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.02.008

  • Hermosín I. Chicón R. M. & Cabezudo M. D. (2003). Free amino acid composition and botanical origin of honey. Food Chemistry 83(2) 263-268. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00089-X

  • Kenjerić D. Primorac Lj. Mandić M. L. Bubalo D. Perl Pirički & A. Flanjak I. (2006). Dalmatian sage (Salvia officinalis L.) honey characterisation. Deutcshe Lebensmittel-Rundschau 102(10) 479-484.

  • Louveaux J. Maurizio A. & Vorwohl G. (1978). Methods of melissopalynology. Bee World 59 139-157. Ministarstvo poljoprivrede ribarstva i ruralnog razvoja: Pravilnik o medu [Regulation of the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Rural Development of Jul 31 2009 refering to the detailed requirements of commercial quality of honey]. Narodne novine 93/09 2009a 7-8.

  • Ministarstvo poljoprivrede ribarstva i ruralnog razvoja: Pravilnik o kakvoći uniflornog meda [Regulation of the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Rural Development of Oct 12 2009 refering to the detailed requirements of quality of unifloral honey]. Narodne novine 122/09 2009b 15-16.

  • Nozal M. J. Bernal J. L. Toribio M. L. Diego J. C. & Ruiz A. (2004). Rapid and sensitive method for determining free amino acids in honey by gas chromatography with flame ionization or mass spectrometric detection. Journal of Chromatography A 1047(1) 137-146. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2004.07.013

  • Persano Oddo L. & Piro R. (2004). Main European unifloral honeys: descriptive sheets. Apidologie 35 S38-S81. http://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2004049

  • Persano Oddo L. Piazza M. G. & Pulcini P. (1999). In vertase activity in honey. Apidologie 30(1) 57-65. Petrov V. (1974). Quantitative determination of amino acids in some Australian honeys. Journal of Apicultural Research 13(1) 61-66. http://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1974.11099760

  • Primorac Lj. Angelkov B. Mandić M. L. Kenjerić D. Nedeljko M. Flanjak I. Perl Pirički A. & Arapceska M. (2009). Comparison of the Croatian and Macedonian honeydew honey. Journal of Central European Agriculture 10(3) 263-270.

  • Revised Codex Standard for honey CODEX STAN 12-1981 Rev.1 (1987) Rev.2 (2001). Alinorm 01/25 19-26.

  • Rybak-Chmielewska H. Szczęsna T. Waś E. Jaśkiewiez K. & Teper D. (2013). Characteristics of Polish unifloral honeys IV. Honeydew honey mainly Abies alba L. Journal of Apicultural Science 57(1) 51-59. http://doi.org/10.2478/jas-2013-0006

  • Sánchez M. P. Huidobro J. F. Muniategui S. & Sancho M. T. (2005). Evolution of acid phosphatase activity during the storage of honey. Deutcshe Lebensmittel- Rundschau 101(1) 9-15.

  • Schepartz A. I. & Subers M. H. (1964). The glucose oxidase of honey. I.Purification and some general properties of the enzyme. Biochimica et biophysica acta 85 228-237.

  • StatSoft Inc. (2013).STATISTICA (data analysis software system) version 12. www.statsoft.com. White J. W. (2000) Honey. In: The Hive and the Honey Bee. (pp. 869-918). Illinois: Dadant&Sons Hamilton.

  • Won S. R. Lee D. C. Ko S. H. Kim J. W. & Rhee H. I. (2008). Honey major protein characterisation and its application to adulteration detection. Food Research International 41 952-956. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2008.07.014

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.804
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.007

CiteScore 2018: 0.98

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.362
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.645

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 347 193 11
PDF Downloads 194 128 7