A Survey of Artificial Intelligence Techniques Employed for Adaptive Educational Systems within E-Learning Platforms

Open access


The adaptive educational systems within e-learning platforms are built in response to the fact that the learning process is different for each and every learner. In order to provide adaptive e-learning services and study materials that are tailor-made for adaptive learning, this type of educational approach seeks to combine the ability to comprehend and detect a person’s specific needs in the context of learning with the expertise required to use appropriate learning pedagogy and enhance the learning process. Thus, it is critical to create accurate student profiles and models based upon analysis of their affective states, knowledge level, and their individual personality traits and skills. The acquired data can then be efficiently used and exploited to develop an adaptive learning environment. Once acquired, these learner models can be used in two ways. The first is to inform the pedagogy proposed by the experts and designers of the adaptive educational system. The second is to give the system dynamic self-learning capabilities from the behaviors exhibited by the teachers and students to create the appropriate pedagogy and automatically adjust the e-learning environments to suit the pedagogies. In this respect, artificial intelligence techniques may be useful for several reasons, including their ability to develop and imitate human reasoning and decision-making processes (learning-teaching model) and minimize the sources of uncertainty to achieve an effective learning-teaching context. These learning capabilities ensure both learner and system improvement over the lifelong learning mechanism. In this paper, we present a survey of raised and related topics to the field of artificial intelligence techniques employed for adaptive educational systems within e-learning, their advantages and disadvantages, and a discussion of the importance of using those techniques to achieve more intelligent and adaptive e-learning environments.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] L. A. James Evaluation of an Adaptive Learning Technology as a Predictor of Student Performance in Undergraduate Biology (Master’s thesis) Appalachian State University North Carolina USA May 2012.

  • [2] A.Ohle N. McElvany Teachers’ diagnostic competences and their practical relevance. Special Issue Editorial Journal for Educational Research Online vol. 7 no. 2 2015.

  • [3] B. Bloom The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-toone tutoring Educ. Res. vol. 13 pp. 4-16 1984.

  • [4] T. Kidd Online Education and Adult Learning. New York: Hershey 2010.

  • [5] M. Vandewaetere P. Desmet and G. Clarebout The contribution of learner characteristics in the development of computer-based adaptive learning environments Computers in Human Behavior vol. 27 No. 1 pp. 118-130 2011.

  • [6] C. Zhao and L. Wan A shortest learning path selection algorithm in e-learning in Proc. 6th IEEE Int’l. Conf. on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) 94-95 2006.

  • [7] I. E. Allen and J. Seaman Staying the Course: Online Education in the United States. Sloan-C Needham MA: Sloan Consortium 2008.

  • [8] Ambient Insight Research US Self-Paced e- Learning Market. Monroe WA: Ambient Insight Research 2009.

  • [9] S. Adkins The Worldwide Market for Self-paced eLearning Products and Services: 2011-2016 Forecast and Analysis Ambient Insight Premium Report 2013.

  • [10] D. Ryan E - learning Modules: DLR Associates Series Author House 2012

  • [11] R.C. Clark and R.E. Mayer E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning 3rd ed. San Francisco USA: JohnWiley & Sons 2011.

  • [12] H. Beetham and R.Sharpe Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age:Designing for 21st century learning New York NY:Routledge 2013.

  • [13] S.Selvakumarasamy and D.Dekson “Architecture of Adaptive E-Learning Ecosystem International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science (IJETTCS) 2013.

  • [14] B. Ciloglugil and M. Inceoglu User modeling for adaptive e-learning systems Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA 2012) vol. 7335 pp. 5561 2012.

  • [15] F. Essalmi L. J. B. Ayed M. Jemni Kinshuk and S. Graf A fully personalization strategy of Elearning scenarios Computers in Human Behavior vol. 26 no. 4 pp. 581-591 2010.

  • [16] Image from http://languageteachingtips.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/learningdeliverycontinuum.jpg Retrieved Feburary 8 2016

  • [17] V. J. Shute and D. Zapata-Rivera Adaptive educational systems in P. Durlach (Ed.) Adaptive Technologies for Training and Education (pp. 7-27). New York: Cambridge University Press 2012.

  • [18] S. Oxman and W. Wong White paper: Adaptive Learning Systems A white paper from DVX/ De- Vry Education Group and Integrated Education Solutions 2014.

  • [19] I. Adaptive LearningWhite paper based upon the Speak Up 2011 national findings Leveraging Intelligent Adaptive Learning to Personalize Education Intelligent Adaptive Learning: Speak Up Reports 2012.

  • [20] C. Martins L. Faria and E. Carrapatoso An adaptive educational system for higher education Proceedings of the 14th EUNIS 08 International Conference of European University Information Systems Denmark 2008.

  • [21] S. Haggard The maturing of the MOOC: Literature review of Massive Open Online Courses and other forms of Online Distance Learning (BIS Research Paper Number 130) Department for Business Innovation and Skills london uk Research Papers Research paper number 130 2013.

  • [22] X. Chen D. Barnett and C. Stephens Fad or future: The advantages and challenges of massive open online courses (MOOCs) In Research-to Practice Conference in Adult and Higher Education pp. 20-21 2013.

  • [23] D. Onah J. Sinclair R. Boyatt (2014) Dropout rates of massive open online courses: behavioural patterns. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies pp. 5825-5834 2014.

  • [24] H. Fournier R. Kop and H. Sitlia The Value of Learning Analytics to Networked Learning on a Personal Learning Environment in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge New York NY USA 2011 pp. 104-109.

  • [25] S. Fauvel and H. Yu A Survey on Artificial Intelligence and Data Mining for MOOCs SciRate 2016.

  • [26] L. C. Lin and . A. J. Prez Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: differences similarities and time evolution” Rev. Univ. Soc. Conoc. vol. 12 no. 3 pp. 98-112 2015.

  • [27] G. Siemens and R. S. J. d. Baker Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining: Towards Communication and Collaboration in Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge New York NY USA 2012 pp. 252-254.

  • [28] T. Daradoumis Haralabus J. Faulin . A. Juan Prez F. J. Martnez I. Rodrguez-Ardura and F. Xhafa Customer Relationship Management applied to higher education: developing an e-monitoring system to improve relationships in electronic learning environments International Journal of Services Technology and Management vol.14(1) pp. 103-125 2010.

  • [29] T. Daradoumis A. A. Juan F. Lera-Lpez and J. Faulin Using Collaboration Strategies to Support the Monitoring of Online Collaborative Learning Activity in Technology Enhanced Learning. Quality of Teaching and Educational Reform M. D. Lytras P. O. D. Pablos D. Avison J. Sipior Q. JinW. Leal L. Uden M. Thomas S. Cervai and D. Horner Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010 pp. 271-277.

  • [30] A. A. Juan T. Daradoumis J. Faulin and F. Xhafa A data analysis model based on control charts to monitor online learning processes Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Min. vol. 4 no. 2 pp. 159-174 2009.

  • [31] B. R. Prakash D. M. Hanumanthappa and V. Kavitha Big Data in Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics Int. J. Innov. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng Vol. 2 Issue 12 2014

  • [32] C. Romero and S. Ventura Data Mining in Education Wiley Int Rev Data Min Knowl Disc vol. 3 no. 1 pp. 12-27 2013.

  • [33] C. Romero and S. Ventura Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005 Expert Syst. Appl. vol. 33 no. 1 pp. 135-146 2007.

  • [34] C. Romero and S. Ventura Educational Data Mining: A Review of the State of the Art IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C Appl. Rev. vol. 40 no. 6 pp. 601-618 2010.

  • [35] A. Pea-Ayala Review: Educational Data Mining: A Survey and a Data Mining-based Analysis of Recent Works Expert Syst Appl vol. 41 no. 4 pp. 1432-1462 2014.

  • [36] A. M and Z. R. A. M. J. Md A Comprehensive Survey on Educational Data Mining and Use of Data Mining Techniques for Improving Teaching and Predicting Student Performance 2015 pp. 59-88

  • [37] R. Baker Data Mining for Education In: McGaw B Peterson P Baker E(eds) International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd edition) 7:112-118. Oxford UK: Elsevier 2010.

  • [38] R. Agrawal T. Imielinski and A. Swami Mining Association Rules between Sets of Items in Large Databases in: Proceedings Of The 1993 Acm Sigmod International Conference On Management Of Data Washington DC (USA 1993 pp. 207-216.

  • [39] E. Garca C. Romero S. Ventura and T. Calders Drawbacks and solutions of applying association rule mining in learning management systems 2007 pp. 15-25.

  • [40] C. Romero S. Ventura M. Pechenizkiy and R. S. J. d Baker Handbook of Educational Data Mining. CRC Press 2010

  • [41] B. K. Baradwaj and S. Pal Mining Educational Data to Analyze Students’ Performance ArXiv12013417 Cs Jan. 2012.

  • [42] E. Frias-Martinez G. Magoulas S. Chen and R Macredie Recent soft computing approaches to user modeling in adaptive hypermedia In Adaptive Hypermedia and AdaptiveWeb-Based Systems the series Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 3137 pp. 104-114 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2004.

  • [43] FM. Cin and AF. Baba Assessment of English proficiency by fuzzy logic approach In International Educational Technology Conference pp. 355-359. 2008.

  • [44] H. Gamboa Designing Intelligent Tutoring Systems : A Bayesian Approach Proc. of Ana Fred 3rd International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS’2001) 2001 pp. 452-458.

  • [45] A. Gertner and K.VanLehn Andes: A coached problem solving environment for physics In Intelligent Tutoring Systems vol.1839 pp. 133-142 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2000.

  • [46] J. Ma and D. N. Zhou Fuzzy set approach to the assessment of student centered learning IEEE Trans. Educ. vol. 33 pp. 237-241 2000.

  • [47] H. Seridi-Bouchelaghem T. Sari and M. Sellami A Neural Network for Generating Adaptive Lessons Journal of Computer Science 1 no. 2 pp. 232-243 2005.

  • [48] R. Sripan and B. Suksawat Propose of Fuzzy Logic-Based Students’ Learning Assessment Proceedings in the International Conference on Control Automation and Systems pp. 414-417 Gyeonggido Korea 2010.

  • [49] S. Venkatesan and S. Fragomeni Evaluating learning outcomes in PBL using fuzzy logic techniques 19th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education: To Industry and Beyond; Proceedings of the. Institution of Engineers Australia 2008.

  • [50] H. Cha Y. Kim S. Park T. Yoon Y. Jung and J. Lee Learning Style Diagnosis Based on User Interface Behavior for the Customization of Learning Interfaces in an Intelligent Tutoring System Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems the series Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 4053 pp. 513-524 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

  • [51] N. Idris N. Yusof and P. Saad Adaptive course sequencing for personalization of learning path using neural network International Journal of Advanced Soft Computing and Its Applications vol. 1 no.1 pp. 49-61 2009.

  • [52] S. Gutierrez-Santos J. Mayor-Berzal C. Fernandez-Panadero and CR. Kloos Authoring of Probabilistic Sequencing in Adaptive Hypermedia with Bayesian Networks Journal of Universal Computer Science vol.16 no. 19 pp. 2801-2820 2010.

  • [53] F. Moreno A. Carreras M. Moreno and E. R. Royo Using Bayesian Networks in the Global Adaptive E-learning Process EUNIS 2005 Manchester pp. 1-4 2005.

  • [54] D. Xu H. Wang and K. Su Intelligent student profiling with fuzzy models in Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS 2002) Hawaii U.S.A 2002.

  • [55] P. Brusilovsky and E. Milln. User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems The AdaptiveWeb the series Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 4321 pp. 3-53 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

  • [56] A. Ahmad O. Basir and K. Hassanein Adaptive user interfaces for intelligent e-Learning: issues and trends in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB2004) Xiyuan Hotel Beijing China pp. 925-934 2004.

  • [57] L. A. Zadeh Fuzzy sets Inf. Control vol. 8 pp. 338-353 1965.

  • [58] J. Bih Paradigm shift -an introduction to fuzzy logic IEEE Potentials vol. 25 no. 1 pp. 6-21 2006.

  • [59] J. Mendel Fuzzy logic system for engineering: A tutorial Proceedings of the IEEE 1995 vol. 83 no. 3 pp. 345-374.

  • [60] J. Mendel Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic Systems Prentice Hall 2001.

  • [61] J. Mendel H. Hagras W. Tan W. Melek and H. Ying Introduction to Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Control John Wiley and IEEE PressHoboken NJ 2014

  • [62] A. Jameson Numerical uncertainty management in user and student modeling: An overview of systems and issues Use Modeling and User-adapted Interaction vol. 5(3-4) pp. 103-251 1996.

  • [63] A. Kavi R. Pedraza-Jimnez H. Molina-Bulla F.J. Valverde-Albacete J. Cid-Sueiro and A. Navia- Vzquez Student Modelling Based on Fuzzy Inference Mechanisms Proceedings of the IEEE Region 8 EUROCON 2003 Computer as a Tool Ljubljana Slovenia 2003.

  • [64] D. Chang and C. Sun (1993) Fuzzy Assessment Learning Performance of Junior High School Students Proceedings of the 1993 First National Symposium on Fuzzy Theory and Applications Hsinchu Taiwan Republic of China pp. 1-10 1993.

  • [65] S. Chen and C. Lee New methods for students’ evaluating using fuzzy sets Fuzzy Sets and Systems vol.104 pp. 209-218 1999.

  • [66] O. Nyknen Inducing fuzzy models for student classification Journal of Educational Technology and Society vol.9 pp. 223-2342006.

  • [67] S. Weon J. Kim Learning achievement evaluation strategy using fuzzy membership function In Proceedings of the 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers In Education ConferenceReno NV (pp. 19-24)2001.

  • [68] A. Kavi Fuzzy user modeling for adaptation in educational hypermedia IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews vol. 34 no. 4 pp. 439-449 2004.

  • [69] K. Almohammadi and H. Hagras An Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Based System for Customised Knowledge Delivery within Pervasive E-Learning Platforms Proceeings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics pp. 2872-2879 2013.

  • [70] K. Almohammadi and H. Hagras An adaptive fuzzy logic based system for improved knowledge delivery within intelligent E-Learning platforms Proccedings of the the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) pp. 1-8 2013.

  • [71] K. Almohammadi B. Yao and H. Hagras An interval type-2 fuzzy logic based system with user engagement feedback for customized knowledge delivery within intelligent E-learning platforms Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) pp. 808-817 2014.

  • [72] K. Almohammadi H. Hagras B. Yao A. Alzahrani D.Alghazzawi and G. Aldabbagh A Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Recommendation System for Adaptive Teaching Journal of Soft Computing 2015.

  • [73] T. M. Lakshmi A. Martin R. M. Begum and V. P. Venkatesan An Analysis on Performance of Decision Tree Algorithms using Student’s Qualitative Data I.J.Modern Education and Computer Science vol. 5 pp. 18-27 2013.

  • [74] Margret H. Dunham Data Mining: Introductory and advance topic Pearson Education India 2006.

  • [75] J.R.Quinlan Induction of Decision Tree Journal of Machine learning Morgan Kaufmann Vol.1 1986 pp. 81-106.

  • [76] C.-M. Chen Intelligent Web-based Learning System with Personalized Learning Path Guidance Comput. Educ. vol. 51 no. 2 pp. 787-814 2008.

  • [77] C. F. Lin Y.-C. Yeh Y. H. Hung and R. I. Chang Data Mining for Providing a Personalized Learning Path in Creativity: An Application of Decision Trees Comput Educ vol. 68 pp. 199-210 2013.

  • [78] B. Kumar Baradwaj S. Pal Mining Educational Data to Analyze Students’ Performance International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications Volume 2 No. 6 2011 pp 63-69.

  • [79] Adhatrao K Gaykar A Dhawan A Jha R Honrao V Predicting Students’ Performance using ID3 and C4.5 classification algorithmsInternational Journal of Data Mining & Knowledge Management Process Volume 3 No. 5 pp 39-52 2013 DOI :10.5121/ijdkp.2013.3504.

  • [80] M. Pandey V. Kumar Sharma A Decision Tree Algorithm Pertaining to the Student Performance Analaysis and Prediction International Journal of Computer Applications volume 61 No. 13 Jan 2013 pp 1-5 DOI 10.5120/9985-4822

  • [81] B. K. Baradwaj and S. Pal Mining Educational Data to Analyze Students’ Performance ArXiv12013417 Cs 2012.

  • [82] Giarratano J. & Riley G Expert systemsprinciple and programming (3rd ed.). Boston MA: PWS Publishing Company 1998.

  • [83] M. Huang H. Huang and M. Chen Constructing a personalized e-learning system based on genetic algorithm and case-based reasoning approach Expert Syst. Appl. vol. 33 no. 3 pp. 551-564 Oct. 2007.

  • [84] L. Fausett Ed. Fundamentals of Neural Networks: Architectures Algorithms and Applications. Upper Saddle River NJ USA Prentice-Hall Inc. 1994.

  • [85] S. Haykin Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River NJ USA: Prentice Hall PTR 1998.

  • [86] A. S. Drigas K. Argyri and J. Vrettaros Decade Review Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Student Modeling in Best Practices for the Knowledge Society. Knowledge Learning Development and Technology for All vol. 49 M. D. Lytras P. Ordonez de Pablos E. Damiani D. Avison A. Naeve and D. G. Horner Eds. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2009 pp. 552-564.

  • [87] B. Naik and S. Ragothaman Using Neural Networks to Predict MBA Student Success Coll. Stud. J. vol. 38 no. 1 p. 143 2004.

  • [88] Z. Ibrahim and D. Rusli Predicting students’ academic performance: comparing artificial neural network decision tree and linear regression in 21st Annual SAS Malaysia Forum 2007.

  • [89] C. Gonzalez J. Burguillo and M. Llamas A Qualitative Comparison of Techniques for Student Modeling in Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2006 pp. 13-18.

  • [90] Martn J. VanLehn K. OLAE: Progress toward a multi-activityBayesian student modeler. Proceedings of the World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. 1993 pp. 410-417.

  • [91] P. Garca A. Amandi S. Schiaffino and M. Campo Using Bayesian networks to detect students’ learning styles in a web-based education system Proc ASAI Rosario pp. 115-126 2005.

  • [92] C. Conati A. Gertner and K. Vanlehn Using Bayesian networks to manage uncertainty in student modeling User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. vol. 12 no. 4 pp. 371-417 2002.

  • [93] V. J. Shute E. G. Hansen and R. G. Almond You Can’t Fatten A Hog by Weighing It - Or Can You? Evaluating an Assessment for Learning System Called ACED Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. vol. 18 no. 4 pp. 289-316 2008.

  • [94] K. Vanlehn C. Lynch K. Schulze J. A. Shapiro R. Shelby L. Taylor D. Treacy A. Weinstein and M. Wintersgill The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Lessons LearnedInt. J. Artif. Intell. Ed vol. 15 no. 3 pp. 147-204 2005.

  • [95] C. J. Burke and M. Rosenblatt. A markovian function of a markov chain.The Annals of Mathematical Statistics Vol. 29 No. 4 pp. 1112-1122 1958.

  • [96] B. Shih K. R. Koedinger and R. Scheines Discovery of Student Strategies using Hidden Markov Model Clustering the Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. 2010.

  • [97] L. Rabiner and B. Juang An introduction to hidden Markov models IEEE ASSP Mag. vol. 3 no. 1 pp. 4-16 1986

  • [98] T. Doleck R. B. Basnet E. G. Poitras and S. P. Lajoie Mining learner-system interaction data: implications for modeling learner behaviors and improving overlay models J. Comput. Educ. vol. 2 no. 4 pp. 421-447 Aug. 2015.

  • [99] Morteza.S. Anari Maryam. S. Anari Intelligent ELearning Systems Using Student Behavior Prediction J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res. 2(12)12017-12023 2012.

  • [100] X. Huang J. Yong J. Li J. Gao Prediction of student actions using weighted Markov models IT in Medicine and Education IEEE International Symposium on Digital Object Identifier 2008.

  • [101] S. Azough and M. B. E. H. Bouyakhf Adaptive E-learning using Genetic Algorithms IJCSNS Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur. vol. 10 no. 7 pp. 237-277 2010.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 4.70

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.351
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 4.066

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2278 777 53
PDF Downloads 1893 557 53