Neurohermeneutics A Transdisciplinary Approach to Literature

Open access

Summary

In the epistemic frame of the biocultural turn and of the neuroaesthetics, we have developed neurohermeneutics as an approach to literature that aims at contributing to the current debate about the linkage between literary, cognitive and neuroscientific studies, focusing on the relationship between mindbrain processes mirrored in the formal features of the text and the strategies activated by the author in a text in order to guide the reader in imagining, emotionally feeling and cognitively getting meanings out of the literary experience. The aim of the neurohermeneutical approach is to grasp and describe phenomenologically the mirroring process between the two extremes of the literary experience, i.e. the writer’s creative process as it is mirrored in the formal features of the literary work and the reader’s imaginative reconfiguration of the text, and what they share in common. The reader revives the mental imaginative processes of the author by creating his/her unrepeatable individual experiences of the text and subjectively redesigning it in an endless loop of features that trigger the imagination and its creative potential both while writing and by reading literature.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abramo F. Gambino R. & Pulvirenti G. (2017). Cognitive literary anthropology and neurohermeneutics. A theoretical proposal Enthymema8 44–62.

  • Beer R. D. (2003). The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adaptive Behavior11(4) 209–243.

  • Bortolussi M. & Dixon P. (2003). Psychonarratology: Foundations for the Empirical Study of Literary Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Caruana F. & Viola M. (2018). Come funzionano le emozioni: Da Darwin alle neuroscienze. Bologna: Milano.

  • Chatterjee A. (2014). The Aesthetic Brain: How we Evolved to Desire Beauty and Enjoy Art. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Chatterjee A. & Vartanian O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18 7 370–375.

  • Crane M. T. & Richardson A. (1999). Literary studies and cognitive science: toward a new interdisciplinarity. Mosaic 32(2) 123–140.

  • Cuccio V. et. al. (2013). Metafore che risuonano. Linguaggio e corpo tra filosofia e neuroscienze. EC. Rivista dell’Associazione Italiana Studi Semiotici 7 (17): 69–74.

  • Damasio A. (2010). Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. New York/Toronto: Pantheon Books.

  • Edelman G. (2007). Seconda natura. Scienza del cervello e conoscenza umana. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.

  • Esrock E. J. (1994). The Reader’s Eye: Visual Imaging as Reader Response. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Fauconnier G. & Turner M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.

  • Fludernik M. (1993). The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. The Linguistic Representation of Speech and Consciousness. London/New York: Routledge.

  • Fludernik M. (2006). An Introduction to Narratology. London/New York: Routledge.

  • Freedberg D. & Gallese V. (2007) Motion emotion and empathy in aesthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences11.5 197-202.

  • Freeman M. (1995). Metaphor making meaning. Dickinson’s conceptual universe. Journal of Pragmatics 24 643–666.

  • Freeman M. (2007). Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Literary Studies. State of the art in Cognitive Poetics. In D. Geeraerts H. Cuyckens (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1175–1202). Oxford University Press Oxford/New York.

  • Gallese V. (2004). Embodied simulation: From Neurons to Phenomenal Experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences4(1) 23–48.

  • Gallese V. (2005). Embodied Simulation: From Neurons to Phenomenal Experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences4(1) 23–48.

  • Gallese V. (2007). Before and below Theory of Mind: Embodied Simulation and the Neural Correlates of Social Cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London - B Biological Sciences362. 1480 659–669.

  • Gallese V. (2008). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis. Social Neuroscience 3 317–333.

  • Gallese V. (2009). Motor abstraction: A neuroscientific account of how action goals and intentions are mapped and understood. Psychological Research73(4) 486–498.

  • Gallese V. (2011) Embodied simulation theory: Imagination and memory. Neuropsychoanalysis13(2) 196–200.

  • Gallese V. (2012). Aby Warburg and the dialogue among aesthetics biology and physiology. Ph 2 48–62.

  • Gallese V. (2014). Bodily Selves in Relation: Embodied simulation as second-person perspective on intersubjectivity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369 20130177.

  • Gallese V. (2016). Finding the body in the brain. From Simulation Theory to Embodied Simulation. In H. Kornblith & B. McLaughlin (Ed.) Alvin Goldman and his Critics (pp. 297–317). New York: Blackwell.

  • Gallese V. (2017). Visions of the body: Embodied simulation and aesthetic experience. Aisthesis 1(1) 41–50.

  • Gallese V. (2018). The power of images: A view from the brain-body. Phenomenology and Mind14 70–79.

  • Gallese V. Rochat M. Cossu G. & Sinigaglia C. (2009). Motor cognition and its role in the phylogeny and ontogeny of action understanding. Developmental Psychology45 103–113.

  • Gallese V. & Sinigaglia C. (2011). What is so special with embodied simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences15(11) 512–519.

  • Gallese V. & Cuccio V. (2015). The paradigmatic body. Embodied simulation intersubjectivity and the bodily self. In T. Metzinger & J. M. Windt (Ed.) Open MIND. (pp. 1–23). Frankfurt: MIND Group.

  • Gallese V. & Guerra M. (2015). Lo Schermo Empatico: Cinema e Neuroscienze. Milan:o Raffaello Cortina Editore.

  • Gambino R. & Pulvirenti G. (2012). Nello specchio delle parole: Proserpina e Ifigenia Una lettura neurocognitiva di due figure del mito classico nell’opera di Goethe. Studi germanici. 1 193–235.

  • Gambino R. & Pulvirenti G. (2013). Imagination as poetics of cognition. Enthymema8 83–95.

  • Gambino R. & Pulvirenti G. (2014). Immaginazione come poetica della cognizione: Faust nel Regno delle Madri. In S. Calabrese S. Ballerio (Ed.) Linguaggio letteratura e scienze neurocognitive. (pp. 128–168) Milano LEDIpublishing.

  • Gambino R. & Pulvirenti G. (2015a). Leggere Goethe al tempo delle neuroscienze: l’immaginazione e la sua rappresentazione poetica. Cultura tedesca 161–194.

  • Gambino R.. & Pulvirenti G. (2015b). “Ombra della carne o suo veleno”. Il problema mente-corpo nella “Storia meravigliosa di Peter Schlemihl” di Adelbert von Chamisso. Le forme e la storia. N.S. VIII.1 433–454.

  • Gambino R. & G. Pulvirenti (2017). The Paradox of Ekphrasis. Metacritic Discourse Perception and Imagination in art description. Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory. 3.1. 151-179.

  • Gambino R. & Pulvirenti G. (2018a). Storie menti mondi. Approccio neuroermeneutico alla letteratura. Milano: Mimesis.

  • Gambino R. & Pulvirenti G. (2018b). La mente di Heinrich von Kleist. Milano: Mimesis.

  • Gerrig R. (1993). Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.

  • Gibbs R. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought Language and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hanauer D. (1997). Poetic Text Processing. Journal of Literary Semantics 26 157–172.

  • Herman D. (1999). (ed.) Narratologies: New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

  • Hoffstaedter P. (1987). Poetic Text Processing and its Empirical Investigation. Poetics 16: 75-91.

  • Holland N. (1988). The Brain of Robert Frost. New York: Routledge.

  • Hogan P. C. (1996). Towards a cognitive science of poetics. College Literature 23 164–178.

  • Hogan P. C. (2003). Cognitive Science. Literature and the Arts. New York and London: Routledge.

  • Hogan P. C. (2009). The Mind and its Stories: Narrative Universals and Human Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hogan P. C. (2011a). What Literature Teaches us about Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hogan P. C. (2011b). Affective Narratology: The Emotional Structure of Stories. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.

  • Hogan P. C. (2013a). How Authors’ Minds Make Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hogan P. C. (2013b). Narrative Discourse: Authors and Narrators in Literature Film and Art. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.

  • Hogan P. C. (2013c). Parallel Processing and the Human Mind: Re-understanding Consciousness with James Joyce’s Ulysses. Journal of Literary Semantics42 149–164. doi:10.1515/jls-2013-0007

  • Hogan P. C. (2014a). Literary brains: Neuroscience Criticism and Theory. Literature Compass11 (4) 293–304. doi:10.1111/lic3.12144

  • Hogan P. C. (2014b). Ulysses and the Poetics of Cognition. New York: Routledge.

  • Hogan P. C. (2014c). Conversations on Cognitive Cultural Studies: Literature Language and Aesthetics with Frederick Luis Aldama. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.

  • Iser W. (1976). Der Akt des Lesens: Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung. München: Fink Verlag.

  • Iser W. (1980). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.

  • Iser W. (1991). Das Fiktive und das Imaginäre. Perspektiven literarischer Anthropologie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp

  • Ishizu T. & Zeki S. (2013). The brain’s specialized systems for aesthetic and perceptual judgment. European Journal of Neuroscience37 1413–1420. doi:10.1111/ejn.12135

  • Ishizu T. & Zeki S. (2014). A neurobiological enquiry into the origins of our experience of the sublime and beautiful. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11 November 2014. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00891

  • Jacobs A. M. (2015a). Towards a Neurocognitive Poetics Model of Literary Reading. In R. M. Willems (Ed.) Towards a Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use (pp. 135–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

  • Jacobs A. M. (2015b). Neurocognitive Poetics: Methods and Models for Investigating the Neuronal and Cognitive-affective Bases of Literature Reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9 186 1–21. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186

  • Jacobs A. M. & Kinder A. (2015c). Worte als Worte erfahren: wie erarbeitet das Gehirn Gedichte. In A. Pompe (Ed.) Kind und Gedicht (pp. 57–76). Berlin: Rombach.

  • Johnson M. (1987). The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Lakoff G. & Johnson M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • LeDoux J.E. (1996). The Emotional Brain. New York: Simon and Schuster.

  • Leech G. (1969). A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. London: Longman.

  • Martindale C. (1978). The Evolution of English poetry. Poetics 7 231–248. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(78)90039-6

  • Martindale C. (1988). Cognition Psychobiology and Aesthetics. In F. H. Farley R. W. Neperud (Ed.) The Foundation of Aesthetics Art and Art Education (pp. 7–42). New York: Praeger.

  • Martindale C. (2007). Response: Psychological Foundations of Literary Theory. J. Lit. Theory 1 447–457. doi:10.1515/jlt.2007.027

  • Miall D. S. (1988). Affect and Narrative: A Model of Response to Stories. Poetics17 259–272. doi:10.1016/0304-422X(88)90034-4

  • Miall D. S. (1989). Beyond the Schema given: Affective Comprehension of Literary Narratives. Cognition and Emotion 3 55–78. doi:10.1080/02699938908415236

  • Miall D. S. (1990). Readers’ Responses to narrative: evaluating relating anticipating. Poetics 19 323–339. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(90)90002-m

  • Miall D. S. (1995) Anticipation and feeling in literary response: A neuropsychological perspective. Poetics 23 275–298.

  • Miall D. S. (2006) Literary Reading: Empirical and Theoretical Studies. New York: Peter Lang.

  • Miall D. S. & Kuiken D. (1994). Foregrounding Defamiliarization and Affect: Response to Literary Stories. Poetics 22 389–407. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(94)00011-5

  • Mukarovský J. (1964). Standard Language and Poetic Language. In Garvin P. (1964) A Prague School Reader on Esthetics Literary Structures and Style (pp. 17–30). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press Washington.

  • Oakley T. (1998). Conceptual Blending Narrative Discourse and Rhetoric. Cognitive Linguistics 9 321–360.

  • Oatley K. (1994). A Taxonomy of the Emotions of Literary Response and a Theory of Identification in Fictional Narrative. Poetics 23 53–74. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(94)p4296-s.

  • Paulson W. R. (1991). Literature Complexity Interdisciplinarity. In Havles N. K. (ed. by) (1991). Chaos and Order: Complex Dynamics in Literature and Science (PP. 37–53). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Ramachandran V. S. & Hirstein W. (1999). The Science of Art. A Neurological Theory of Aesthetic Experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 6/7 15–51.

  • Regev M. Honey C. J. Simony E. & Hasson U. (2013). Selective and Invariant Neural Responses to Spoken and Written Narratives. Journal of Neuroscience 33 15978–15988. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1580-13.2013

  • Richardson A. (1999). Cognitive Science and the Future of Literary Studies. Philosophy and Literature23(1) 157–173. Available from: https://sites.ualberta.ca/~dmiall/Cognitive/Readings/Richardson99.html

  • Richardson A. (2015). Imagination: Literary and cognitive intersections. In L. Zunshine (Ed.) Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies (pp. 225–246). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Richardson A. & Steen F. F. (2002). Literature and the Cognitive Revolution. An Introduction. Poetics Today23–1 1–8.

  • Samson W. (2015). On the neuro-turn in the humanities. Naturalism Hyper-Empiricism and Understanding. Chiasma 2 2 5. Available from: http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/chiasmaasiteforthought/vol2/iss2/5

  • Scarry E. (1999) Dreaming by the Book. New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux.

  • Schleiermacher Fr. D. E. [1838] (1977). Hermeneutik und Kritik ed M. Frank. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp Verlag.

  • Schleiermacher Fr. D. E. (1998). Hermeneutics and Criticism ed A. Bowie. Cambridge University Press.

  • Schmidt S. J. (1979). Empirische Literaturwissenschaft [1] as Perspective. Poetics8 557–568. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(79)90033-0

  • Schmidt S. J. (1983). The empirical science of literature ESL: A new paradigm. Poetics12 19–34. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(83)90003-7

  • Schrott R. & Jacobs A. M. (2011). Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren. München: Hanser.

  • Shklovskij V. (1917). Art as Technique. In Lemon L. T. Reiss M. J. (ed. by) (1965). Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays (pp. 3–24). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

  • Spolsky E. (1993). Gaps in Nature: Literary Interpretation and the Modular Mind. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Sternberg M. (2003). Universals of Narrative and their Cognitivist Fortunes. Poetics Today 24 297–395.

  • Stockwell P. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.

  • Stockwell P. (2007). Cognitive Poetics and Literary Theory. Journal of Literary Theory 1 136–152.

  • Swann J. & Allington D. (2009a). Reading groups and the language of literary texts: A case study in social reading. Language and Literature 18 (3) 247–264.

  • Swann J. & Allington D. (2009b). Researching literary reading as social practice. Language and Literature18 (3) 219–30.

  • Thelen E. Schöner G. Scheier C. Smith L. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment. A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences24 1–86.

  • Tsur R. (1983). What is Cognitive Poetics? Tel Aviv: Katz Research Institute for Hebrew Literature.

  • Tsur R. (1992a). Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • Tsur R. (1992b). What makes Sound Patterns Expressive? The Poetic Mode of Speech Perception. Durham NC: Duke University Press.

  • Turner M. (1991). Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Turner M. (1996). The Literary Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Turner M. (2006) (ed). The Artful Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Turner M. (2014). The Origins of Ideas. Blending. Creativity and the Human Spark New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Van Dijk T. A. (1979). Advice on theoretical poetics. Poetics 8 569–608. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(79)90034-2

  • Van Peer W. (1986). Stylistics and Psychology: Investigations of Foregrounding. London UK: Croom Helm.

  • Van Peer W. (2007). Towards a new Narratology: an Extended Review of Psychonarratology. Lang. Lit. 16 214–224. doi:10.1177/0963947007075986

  • Zeki S. (1998) Art and the Brain. Dædalus 127 2 71-103.

  • Zeki S. (1999) Inner Vision: an Exploration of Art and the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Zeki S. (2004) The Neurology of Ambiguity. Conscious Cogn. 13 173-96.

  • Zeki S. (2008). Splendors and Miseries of the Brain: Love Creativity and the Quest for Human Happiness. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Zeki S. Romaya J. P. Benincasa D. M. T. Atiyah M. F. (2014). The experience of mathematical beauty and its neural correlates. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00068

  • Zunshine L. (2010) (ed). Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

  • Zwaan R. A. (1993). Aspects of Literary Comprehension. A cognitive approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 94 94 14
PDF Downloads 126 126 19