Neurohermeneutics A Transdisciplinary Approach to Literature

Abramo, F., Gambino, R., & Pulvirenti, G. (2017). Cognitive literary anthropology and neurohermeneutics. A theoretical proposal, Enthymema, 8, 44–62.Search in Google Scholar

Beer, R. D. (2003). The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adaptive Behavior, 11(4), 209–243.10.1177/1059712303114001Search in Google Scholar

Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P. (2003). Psychonarratology: Foundations for the Empirical Study of Literary Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Caruana F., & Viola, M. (2018). Come funzionano le emozioni: Da Darwin alle neuroscienze. Bologna: Milano.Search in Google Scholar

Chatterjee, A. (2014). The Aesthetic Brain: How we Evolved to Desire Beauty and Enjoy Art. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18, 7, 370–375.10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.003Search in Google Scholar

Crane, M. T., & Richardson, A. (1999). Literary studies and cognitive science: toward a new interdisciplinarity. Mosaic, 32(2), 123–140.Search in Google Scholar

Cuccio V. et. al. (2013). Metafore che risuonano. Linguaggio e corpo tra filosofia e neuroscienze. EC. Rivista dell’Associazione Italiana Studi Semiotici, 7 (17): 69–74.Search in Google Scholar

Damasio, A. (2010). Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. New York/Toronto: Pantheon Books.Search in Google Scholar

Edelman, G. (2007). Seconda natura. Scienza del cervello e conoscenza umana. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.Search in Google Scholar

Esrock, E. J. (1994). The Reader’s Eye: Visual Imaging as Reader Response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier G., & Turner M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Fludernik, M. (1993). The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. The Linguistic Representation of Speech and Consciousness. London/New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Fludernik, M. (2006). An Introduction to Narratology. London/New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V. (2007) Motion, emotion and empathy in aesthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11.5, 197-202.10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.003Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, M. (1995). Metaphor making meaning. Dickinson’s conceptual universe. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 643–666.10.1016/0378-2166(95)00006-ESearch in Google Scholar

Freeman, M. (2007). Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Literary Studies. State of the art in Cognitive Poetics. In D. Geeraerts, H. Cuyckens (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1175–1202). Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York.Search in Google Scholar

Gallese V. (2004). Embodied simulation: From Neurons to Phenomenal Experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 23–48.10.1007/s11097-005-4737-zSearch in Google Scholar

Gallese, V. (2005). Embodied Simulation: From Neurons to Phenomenal Experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 23–48.10.1007/s11097-005-4737-zSearch in Google Scholar

Gallese, V. (2007). Before and below Theory of Mind: Embodied Simulation and the Neural Correlates of Social Cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London - B Biological Sciences, 362. 1480, 659–669.10.1098/rstb.2006.2002234652417301027Search in Google Scholar

Gallese, V. (2008). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis. Social Neuroscience, 3, 317–333.10.1080/1747091070156360818979384Search in Google Scholar

Gallese, V. (2009). Motor abstraction: A neuroscientific account of how action goals and intentions are mapped and understood. Psychological Research, 73(4), 486–498.10.1007/s00426-009-0232-419381683Search in Google Scholar

Gallese, V. (2011) Embodied simulation theory: Imagination and memory. Neuropsychoanalysis, 13(2), 196–200.10.1080/15294145.2011.10773675Search in Google Scholar

Gallese, V. (2012). Aby Warburg and the dialogue among aesthetics, biology and physiology. Ph, 2, 48–62.Search in Google Scholar

Gallese, V. (2014). Bodily Selves in Relation: Embodied simulation as second-person perspective on intersubjectivity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20130177.10.1098/rstb.2013.0177400618024778374Search in Google Scholar

Gallese, V. (2016). Finding the body in the brain. From Simulation Theory to Embodied Simulation. In H. Kornblith, & B. McLaughlin (Ed.), Alvin Goldman and his Critics (pp. 297–317). New York: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Gallese V. (2017). Visions of the body: Embodied simulation and aesthetic experience. Aisthesis, 1(1), 41–50.Search in Google Scholar

Gallese V. (2018). The power of images: A view from the brain-body. Phenomenology and Mind, 14, 70–79.Search in Google Scholar

Gallese, V., Rochat, M., Cossu, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2009). Motor cognition and its role in the phylogeny and ontogeny of action understanding. Developmental Psychology, 45, 103–113.10.1037/a001443619209994Search in Google Scholar

Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011). What is so special with embodied simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 512–519.10.1016/j.tics.2011.09.00321983148Search in Google Scholar

Gallese V., & Cuccio, V. (2015). The paradigmatic body. Embodied simulation, intersubjectivity and the bodily self. In T. Metzinger, & J. M. Windt (Ed.), Open MIND. (pp. 1–23). Frankfurt: MIND Group.Search in Google Scholar

Gallese V., & Guerra M. (2015). Lo Schermo Empatico: Cinema e Neuroscienze. Milan:o Raffaello Cortina Editore.Search in Google Scholar

Gambino R., & Pulvirenti G. (2012). Nello specchio delle parole: Proserpina e Ifigenia Una lettura neurocognitiva di due figure del mito classico nell’opera di Goethe. Studi germanici. 1, 193–235.Search in Google Scholar

Gambino R., & Pulvirenti G. (2013). Imagination as poetics of cognition. Enthymema, 8, 83–95.Search in Google Scholar

Gambino, R., & Pulvirenti, G. (2014). Immaginazione come poetica della cognizione: Faust nel Regno delle Madri. In S. Calabrese, S. Ballerio (Ed.), Linguaggio, letteratura e scienze neurocognitive. (pp. 128–168) Milano LEDIpublishing.Search in Google Scholar

Gambino, R., & Pulvirenti, G. (2015a). Leggere Goethe al tempo delle neuroscienze: l’immaginazione e la sua rappresentazione poetica. Cultura tedesca, 161–194.Search in Google Scholar

Gambino, R.. & Pulvirenti, G. (2015b). “Ombra della carne, o suo veleno”. Il problema mente-corpo nella “Storia meravigliosa di Peter Schlemihl” di Adelbert von Chamisso. Le forme e la storia. N.S. VIII.1, 433–454.Search in Google Scholar

Gambino, R., & G. Pulvirenti (2017). The Paradox of Ekphrasis. Metacritic Discourse, Perception and Imagination in art description. Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory. 3.1. 151-179.Search in Google Scholar

Gambino, R., & Pulvirenti, G. (2018a). Storie, menti, mondi. Approccio neuroermeneutico alla letteratura. Milano: Mimesis.Search in Google Scholar

Gambino, R., & Pulvirenti, G. (2018b). La mente di Heinrich von Kleist. Milano: Mimesis.Search in Google Scholar

Gerrig, R. (1993). Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.10.12987/9780300159240Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hanauer, D. (1997). Poetic Text Processing. Journal of Literary Semantics, 26, 157–172.10.1515/jlse.1997.26.3.157Search in Google Scholar

Herman, D. (1999). (ed.), Narratologies: New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffstaedter P. (1987). Poetic Text Processing and its Empirical Investigation. Poetics, 16: 75-91.Search in Google Scholar

Holland, N. (1988). The Brain of Robert Frost. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hogan, P. C. (1996). Towards a cognitive science of poetics. College Literature, 23, 164–178.Search in Google Scholar

Hogan, P. C. (2003). Cognitive Science. Literature and the Arts. New York and London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hogan, P. C. (2009). The Mind and its Stories: Narrative Universals and Human Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hogan, P. C. (2011a). What Literature Teaches us about Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511976773Search in Google Scholar

Hogan, P. C. (2011b). Affective Narratology: The Emotional Structure of Stories. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.10.2307/j.ctt1df4gnkSearch in Google Scholar

Hogan, P. C. (2013a). How Authors’ Minds Make Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139540629Search in Google Scholar

Hogan, P. C. (2013b). Narrative Discourse: Authors and Narrators in Literature, Film, and Art. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hogan, P. C. (2013c). Parallel Processing and the Human Mind: Re-understanding Consciousness with James Joyce’s Ulysses. Journal of Literary Semantics, 42, 149–164. doi:10.1515/jls-2013-000710.1515/jls-2013-0007Search in Google Scholar

Hogan, P. C. (2014a). Literary brains: Neuroscience, Criticism, and Theory. Literature Compass, 11 (4), 293–304. doi:10.1111/lic3.1214410.1111/lic3.12144Search in Google Scholar

Hogan, P. C. (2014b). Ulysses and the Poetics of Cognition. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203762165Search in Google Scholar

Hogan, P. C. (2014c). Conversations on Cognitive Cultural Studies: Literature, Language, and Aesthetics with Frederick Luis Aldama. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Iser, W. (1976). Der Akt des Lesens: Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung. München: Fink Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Iser, W. (1980). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.Search in Google Scholar

Iser, W. (1991). Das Fiktive und das Imaginäre. Perspektiven literarischer Anthropologie. Frankfurt a. M.: SuhrkampSearch in Google Scholar

Ishizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2013). The brain’s specialized systems for aesthetic and perceptual judgment. European Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 1413–1420. doi:10.1111/ejn.1213510.1111/ejn.12135379247123373763Search in Google Scholar

Ishizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2014). A neurobiological enquiry into the origins of our experience of the sublime and beautiful. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11 November 2014. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.0089110.3389/fnhum.2014.00891Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, A. M. (2015a). Towards a Neurocognitive Poetics Model of Literary Reading. In R. M. Willems (Ed.), Towards a Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use, (pp. 135–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9781107323667.007Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, A. M. (2015b). Neurocognitive Poetics: Methods and Models for Investigating the Neuronal and Cognitive-affective Bases of Literature Reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 186, 1–21. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.0018610.3389/fnhum.2015.00186Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, A. M., & Kinder A. (2015c). Worte als Worte erfahren: wie erarbeitet das Gehirn Gedichte. In A. Pompe (Ed.), Kind und Gedicht, (pp. 57–76). Berlin: Rombach.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson M. (1987). The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

LeDoux, J.,E. (1996). The Emotional Brain. New York: Simon and Schuster.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, G. (1969). A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (1978). The Evolution of English poetry. Poetics 7, 231–248. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(78)90039-610.1016/0304-422X(78)90039-6Search in Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (1988). Cognition, Psychobiology, and Aesthetics. In F. H. Farley, R. W. Neperud (Ed.), The Foundation of Aesthetics, Art and Art Education (pp. 7–42). New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (2007). Response: Psychological Foundations of Literary Theory. J. Lit. Theory, 1, 447–457. doi:10.1515/jlt.2007.02710.1515/JLT.2007.027Search in Google Scholar

Miall, D. S. (1988). Affect and Narrative: A Model of Response to Stories. Poetics, 17, 259–272. doi:10.1016/0304-422X(88)90034-410.1016/0304-422X(88)90034-4Search in Google Scholar

Miall, D. S. (1989). Beyond the Schema given: Affective Comprehension of Literary Narratives. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 55–78. doi:10.1080/0269993890841523610.1080/02699938908415236Search in Google Scholar

Miall, D. S. (1990). Readers’ Responses to narrative: evaluating, relating, anticipating. Poetics, 19, 323–339. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(90)90002-m10.1016/0304-422X(90)90002-MSearch in Google Scholar

Miall, D. S. (1995) Anticipation and feeling in literary response: A neuropsychological perspective. Poetics, 23, 275–298.10.1016/0304-422X(95)00004-4Search in Google Scholar

Miall, D. S. (2006) Literary Reading: Empirical and Theoretical Studies. New York: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, Defamiliarization and Affect: Response to Literary Stories. Poetics, 22, 389–407. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(94)00011-510.1016/0304-422X(94)00011-5Search in Google Scholar

Mukarovský, J. (1964). Standard Language and Poetic Language. In Garvin, P. (1964) A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structures and Style, (pp. 17–30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, Washington.Search in Google Scholar

Oakley, T. (1998). Conceptual Blending, Narrative, Discourse, and Rhetoric. Cognitive Linguistics 9, 321–360.10.1515/cogl.1998.9.4.321Search in Google Scholar

Oatley, K. (1994). A Taxonomy of the Emotions of Literary Response and a Theory of Identification in Fictional Narrative. Poetics 23, 53–74. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(94)p4296-s.10.1016/0304-422X(94)P4296-SSearch in Google Scholar

Paulson, W. R. (1991). Literature, Complexity, Interdisciplinarity. In Havles, N. K. (ed. by) (1991). Chaos and Order: Complex Dynamics in Literature and Science (PP. 37–53). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The Science of Art. A Neurological Theory of Aesthetic Experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6, 6/7, 15–51.Search in Google Scholar

Regev, M., Honey, C. J., Simony, E., & Hasson, U. (2013). Selective and Invariant Neural Responses to Spoken and Written Narratives. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 15978–15988. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1580-13.201310.1523/JNEUROSCI.1580-13.2013Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, A. (1999). Cognitive Science and the Future of Literary Studies. Philosophy and Literature, 23(1), 157–173. Available from: https://sites.ualberta.ca/~dmiall/Cognitive/Readings/Richardson99.html10.1353/phl.1999.0023Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, A. (2015). Imagination: Literary and cognitive intersections. In L. Zunshine (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies (pp. 225–246). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, A., & Steen, F. F. (2002). Literature and the Cognitive Revolution. An Introduction. Poetics Today, 23–1, 1–8.Search in Google Scholar

Samson, W. (2015). On the neuro-turn in the humanities. Naturalism, Hyper-Empiricism, and Understanding. Chiasma 2, 2, 5. Available from: http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/chiasmaasiteforthought/vol2/iss2/5Search in Google Scholar

Scarry, E. (1999) Dreaming by the Book. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Fr. D. E. [1838] (1977). Hermeneutik und Kritik, ed M. Frank. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Fr. D. E. (1998). Hermeneutics and Criticism, ed A. Bowie. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, S. J. (1979). Empirische Literaturwissenschaft [1] as Perspective. Poetics, 8, 557–568. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(79)90033-010.1016/0304-422X(79)90033-0Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, S. J. (1983). The empirical science of literature ESL: A new paradigm. Poetics, 12, 19–34. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(83)90003-710.1016/0304-422X(83)90003-7Search in Google Scholar

Schrott, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren. München: Hanser.Search in Google Scholar

Shklovskij, V. (1917). Art as Technique. In Lemon, L. T., Reiss M. J. (ed. by) (1965). Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays (pp. 3–24). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Spolsky, E. (1993). Gaps in Nature: Literary Interpretation and the Modular Mind. Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sternberg, M. (2003). Universals of Narrative and their Cognitivist Fortunes. Poetics Today, 24, 297–395.10.1215/03335372-24-2-297Search in Google Scholar

Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Stockwell, P. (2007). Cognitive Poetics and Literary Theory. Journal of Literary Theory, 1, 136–152.10.1515/JLT.2007.008Search in Google Scholar

Swann, J., & Allington, D. (2009a). Reading groups and the language of literary texts: A case study in social reading. Language and Literature, 18 (3), 247–264.10.1177/0963947009105852Search in Google Scholar

Swann, J., & Allington, D. (2009b). Researching literary reading as social practice. Language and Literature, 18 (3), 219–30.10.1177/0963947009105850Search in Google Scholar

Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C., Smith, L. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment. A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 1–86.10.1017/S0140525X01003910Search in Google Scholar

Tsur, R. (1983). What is Cognitive Poetics? Tel Aviv: Katz Research Institute for Hebrew Literature.Search in Google Scholar

Tsur, R. (1992a). Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Tsur, R. (1992b). What makes Sound Patterns Expressive? The Poetic Mode of Speech Perception. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1131366Search in Google Scholar

Turner, M. (1991). Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691227788Search in Google Scholar

Turner, M. (1996). The Literary Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, M. (2006) (ed). The Artful Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306361.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Turner, M. (2014). The Origins of Ideas. Blending. Creativity and the Human Spark, New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, T. A. (1979). Advice on theoretical poetics. Poetics 8, 569–608. doi:10.1016/0304-422x(79)90034-210.1016/0304-422X(79)90034-2Search in Google Scholar

Van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and Psychology: Investigations of Foregrounding. London, UK: Croom Helm.Search in Google Scholar

Van Peer, W. (2007). Towards a new Narratology: an Extended Review of Psychonarratology. Lang. Lit. 16, 214–224. doi:10.1177/096394700707598610.1177/0963947007075986Search in Google Scholar

Zeki, S. (1998) Art and the Brain. Dædalus 127, 2, 71-103.Search in Google Scholar

Zeki, S. (1999) Inner Vision: an Exploration of Art and the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zeki, S. (2004) The Neurology of Ambiguity. Conscious Cogn. 13, 173-96.10.1016/j.concog.2003.10.00314990252Search in Google Scholar

Zeki, S. (2008). Splendors and Miseries of the Brain: Love, Creativity, and the Quest for Human Happiness. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Zeki, S., Romaya, J. P., Benincasa, D. M. T., Atiyah, M. F., (2014). The experience of mathematical beauty and its neural correlates. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.0006810.3389/fnhum.2014.00068392315024592230Search in Google Scholar

Zunshine, L. (2010) (ed). Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.10.1353/book.500Search in Google Scholar

Zwaan, R. A. (1993). Aspects of Literary Comprehension. A cognitive approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/upal.29Search in Google Scholar