Plerosis and Atomic Gestalts

Open access

Summary

Franz Brentano, 1838–1917, introduced the intriguing concept of “plerosis” in order to account for aspects of the continuum that were “explained” by formal mathematics in ways that he considered absurd from the perspective of intuition, especially visual awareness and imagery. In doing this, he pointed in directions later developed by the Dutch mathematician Luitzen Brouwer. Brentano’s notion of plerosis involves distinct though coincident points, which one might call “atomic entities with parts”. This notion fits the modern concepts of “receptive field” in neurophysiology, “perceptive field” in psychology and “differential operator” in the formal theory of scale space. We identify Brentano’s boundary points as the primordial atomic Gestalts of visual imagery. The concept deserves to play a key role in Gestalt theory.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Albertazzi L. (2002). Towards a neo-Aristotelian theory of continua: Elements of an empirical geometry. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.) Unfolding perceptual continua (pp. 29–80; esp. pp. 44–52). Amsterdam Netherlands: Benjamins.

  • Albertazzi L. (2006). Immanent realism: An introduction to Brentano. (pp. 233–268; esp. pp. 248–267). Dordrecht Netherlands: Springer.

  • Albertazzi L. (2015). Spatial elements in visual awareness. Challenges for an intrinsic “Geometry” of the visible. Philosophia Scientiæ 19(3) 95–125.

  • Attneave F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review 61 184–193.

  • Bakalis N. (2005). Handbook of Greek philosophy: From Thales to the Stoics analysis and fragments. Victoria BC Canada: Trafford Publishing.

  • Bell J. (2006). The continuous and the infinitesimal in mathematics and philosophy. Monza Italy: Polimetrica.

  • Bell J. (2009). Cohesiveness. Intellectica 9(1) 51.

  • Bijl P. Koenderink J. J. & Toet A. (1989). Visibility of blobs with a Gaussian luminance profile. Vision Research 29(4) 447–456.

  • Blum M. (1967). A transformation for extracting new descriptors of shape. In W. Wathen-Dunn (Ed.) Models for the perception of speech and visual form (pp. 362–380). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Boime A. (1993). The art of the Macchia and the Risorgimento. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Bouma H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature 226(241) 177–178.

  • Brentano F. (1974 [1874]). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Leipzig Germany: Duncker und Humblot. (English quotations from: “Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint”. New York: Humanities Press).

  • Brentano F. (1988). Philosophical investigations on space time and the continuum (Smith Trans.). London England: Croom Helm.

  • Broude N. (1987). The Macchiaioli: Italian painters of the nineteenth century. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

  • Brouwer L. E. J. (1918). Begründung der Mengenlehre unabhängig vom logischen Satz vom ausgeschlossenen Dritten. Erster Teil Allgemeine Mengenlehre. KNAW Verhandlungen 5 1–43.

  • Brown J. W. (1977). Mind brain and consciousness. New York NY: Academic Press.

  • Cartan É (1923). Sur les variétés à connexion affine et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (première partie). Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure 40 325–412.

  • Cateura L. (1995). Oil painting secrets from a master. New York NY: Watson & Guptill.

  • Chadwick H. (1992). St. Augustine Confessions. [orig. 397-400CE]. Oxford England: Oxford University Press.

  • Dedekind R. (1872). Stetigkeit und irrationale Zahlen. Braunschweig Germany: Vieweg p. 18.

  • Dunn C. (1995). Conversations in paint a notebook of fundamentals. New York NY: Workman Publishing.

  • Ehrlich P. (2006). The rise of non-Archimedean mathematics and the roots of a misconception. I. The emergence of non-Archimedean systems of magnitudes. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 60(1) 1–121.

  • Elkind D. (1964). Studies in perceptual development II part-whole. Child Development 35(1) 81–90.

  • Euclid. (1956 [fl. 300BCE]). The thirteen books of Euclid’s elements (Translation and Commentaries by Heath T. L.) Three volumes. New York NY: Dover Publications.

  • Feynman R. (1966). The character of physical law. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Florack L. (1997). Image structure. Dordrecht Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

  • Geem Z. W. Kim J. H. & Loganathan G. V. (2001). A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony search. Simulation 76(2) 60–68.

  • Giordano P. (2001). Nilpotent infinitesimals and synthetic differential geometry in classical logic. In P. Schuster U. Berger & H. Osswald (Eds.) Reuniting the antipodes–constructive and nonstandard views of the continuum (pp. 75–92). Dordrecht Netherlands: Kluwer.

  • Gödel K. (1960 [1947]). What is Cantor’s continuum problem? The American Mathematical Monthly 54 515–525. (originally published in 1947 Page references are to the reprinting of the expanded 1960 version in Benacerraf and Putnam 1983 pp. 420–485).

  • Hartline H. K. (1938). The response of single optic nerve fibers of the vertebrate eye to illumination of the retina. The American Journal of Physiology 121 400–415.

  • Hilbert D. (1980 [1899]). The foundations of geometry (2nd ed.). Chicago IL: Open Court.

  • Hoffman D. D. (2009). The interface theory of perception. In S. Dickinson M. Tarr A. Leonardis & B. Schiele (Eds.) Object categorization: Computer and human vision perspectives (pp. 148–165). New York NY: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hubel D. H. & Wiesel T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 195 215–243.

  • Husserl E. (1991 [1893-1917]). On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time (1893-1917) (J. B. Brough Trans.). Dordrecht Netherlands: Kluwer.

  • Imbriano V. (1868). La quinta promotrice 1878-1868: Appendici di Vittorio Imbriani. Napoli Italy: Tipografia Napolitana.

  • Jacobs T. S. (1986). Light for the Artist. NewYork NY: Watson-Guptill.

  • Kandinsky W. (1926). In W. Gropius & L. Moholy-Nagy (Eds.) Punkt und Linie zu Fläche. Bauhaus Bücher Schriftleitung München Germany: Verlag Albert Langen.

  • Kanizsa G. (1980). Grammatica del vedere. Saggi su percezione e Gestalt. Bologna Italy: IL Mulino.

  • Koenderink J. J. (1984). The structure of images. Biological Cybernetics 50 363–370.

  • Koenderink J. J. (1988). Operational significance of receptive field assemblies. Biological Cybernetics 58(3) 163–171.

  • Koenderink J. J. (1990). The brain a geometry engine. Psychological Research 52(2–3) 122–127.

  • Koenderink J. J. (1993). What is a “feature”? Journal of Intelligent Systems 3(1) 49–82.

  • Koenderink J. J. (2002). Continua in vision. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.) Unfolding perceptual continua advances in consciousness research 41 (pp. 101–118). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Koenderink J. J. (2011). Vision as a user interface. In B. E. Rogowitz & T. N. Pappas (Eds.) Proceedings of SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging SPIE Vol. 7865: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XVI (pp. 1–13). San Francisco: SPIE-IS&T.

  • Koenderink J. J. (2014). The all seeing eye. Perception 43 1–6.

  • Koenderink J. J. (2015). Ontology of the mirror world. Gestalt Theory 37(2) 119–140.

  • Koenderink J. J. Albertazzi L. van Doorn A. J. van Ee R. van de Grind W. A. Kappers A. M. L. … de Vries S. (2010). Does monocular visual space contain planes? Acta Psychologica (Amst) 134(1) 40–47.

  • Koenderink J. J. & Richards W. A. (1988). Two-dimensional curvature operators. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 5(7) 1136–1141.

  • Koenderink J. J. & Van Doorn A. J. (1990). Receptive field families. Biological Cybernetics 63(4) 291–297.

  • Koenderink J. J. & Van Doorn A. J. (1992a). Generic neighbourhood operators. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 14 597–605.

  • Koenderink J. J. & Van Doorn A. J. (1992b). Receptive field assembly pattern specificity. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 3(1) 1–12.

  • Koenderink J. J. & van Doorn A. J. (1997). Local image operators and iconic structure. In G. Sommer & J. J. Koenderink (Eds.) Proceedings of the AFPAC’97. Algebraic Frames for the Perception-Action Cycle (pp. 66–93). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Koenderink J. J. van Doorn A. J. & Pinna B. (2015). Psychogenesis of Gestalt. Gestalt Theory 37(3) 287–304.

  • Koenderink J. J. van Doorn A. J. Albertazzi L. & Wagemans J. (2015). Relief articulation techniques. Art & Perception 3(2) 151–171.

  • Koenderink J. J. van Doorn A. J. Pinna B. & Wagemans J. (2016). Boundaries transitions and passages. Art & Perception 4(3) 185–204.

  • Marr D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York NY: Freeman.

  • Marr D. & Hildreth E. (1980). Theory of edge detection. Proceedings of Royal Society of London B 207 187–217.

  • Metzger W. (1936). Gesetze des Sehens. Frankfurt am Main Germany: W. Kramer & Co.

  • Misner C. W. Thorne K. S. & Wheeler J. A. (1973). Gravitation. San Francisco CA: W. H. Freeman.

  • Panconi T. (1999). Antologia dei Macchiaioli La trasformazione sociale e artica nella Toscana di metà 800. Pisa Italy: Pacini Editore.

  • Pasch M. (1912). [first edition 1882] Vorlesungen uber neuere Geometrie (2nd ed.). Leipzig Germany: B.G. Teubner p. 21.

  • Photoshop. (2014). Adobe Retrieved from http://www.adobe.com/mena_en/products/photoshop.html

  • Pinna B. (2008). Watercolor illusion. Scholarpedia 3(1) 5352.

  • Pinna B. (2010). New Gestalt principles of perceptual organization: An extension from grouping to shape and meaning. Gestalt Theory 32(1) 11–78.

  • Pinna B. (2012). Perceptual organization of shape color shade and lighting in visual and pictorial objects. i-Perception 3 257–281.

  • Pinna B. & Albertazzi L. (2011). From grouping to visual meanings: A new theory of perceptual organization. In L. Albertazzi G. van Tonder & D. Vishwanath (Eds.) Information in perception (pp. 288–344). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Pinna B. Brelstaff G. & Spillmann L. (2001). Surface color from boundaries: A new ‘watercolor’ illusion. Vision Research 41 2669–2676.

  • Pinna B. & Deiana K. (2015). The syntax organization of shape and color and the laws of coloration in vision art and biology. Art & Perception 3(3) 319–345.

  • Pinna B. & Grossberg S. (2005). The watercolor illusion and neon color spreading: A unified analysis of new cases and neural mechanisms. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 22 2207–2221.

  • Pinna B. & Reeves A. (2006). Lighting backlighting and watercolor illusions and the laws of figurality. Spatial Vision 19 341–373.

  • Pinna B. Spillmann L. & Werner J. (2003). The watercolor effect: A new principle of grouping and figure-ground organization. Vision Research 43 43–52.

  • Richards W. R. & Bobick A. (1988). Playing twenty questions with nature. In Z. W. Pylyshyn (Ed.) Computational processes in human vision: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 3–26). The Canadian Institute for Advanced Research Series in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing.

  • Richards W.R. (1982 December): How to play twenty questions with nature and win (M.I.T. A.I. Memo 660).

  • Riedl R. (1975). Die Ordnung des Lebendigen. Systembedingungen der Evolution. Hamburg Germany: Paul Parey.

  • Riemann B. (2013). [Habilitationsvortrag 10. Juni 1854]. Über die Hypothesen Welche der Geometrie zu Grunde Liegen. Berlin Germany: Springer.

  • Roeper P. (2006). The Aristotelian continuum. A formal characterization. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47(2) 211–232.

  • Schrödinger E. (1944). What is life?. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Spillmann L. (1971). Foveal perceptive fields in the human visual system measured with simultaneous contrast in grids and bars. Pflügers Archiv 326(4) 281–299.

  • Stevin S. (1585). In A. J. E. M. Smeur (Ed.) De Thiende (p. 1965). Nieuwkoop Netherlands: De Graaf.

  • Stoltz O. (1883). Zur Geometrie der Alten insbesondere über ein Axiom des Archimedes. Mathematische Annalen 22 504–519.

  • ter Haar Romeny B. M. (2003). Front-end vision and multi-scale image analysis. Dordrecht Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

  • Tinbergen N. (1952). The curious behavior of the stickleback. Scientific American 187(6) 22–26.

  • van Dalen D. (1997). How connected is the intuitionistic continuum? The Journal of Symbolic Logic 62(4) 1147–1150.

  • Veronese G. (1894). Grundzüge der Geometrie von mehreren Dimensionen und mehreren Arten gradliniger Einheiten in elementarer Form entwickelt (Uebersetzt von A. Schepp). Leipzig Germany: B.G. Teubner.

  • von Uexküll J. (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin Germany: Springer.

  • von Uexküll J. (1920). Theoretische Biologie. Berlin Germany: Springer.

  • Weber E. H. (1846). Tastsinn und Gemeingefühl. In R. Wagner (Ed.) Handwörterbuch der Physiologie mit Rücksicht auf physiologische Pathologie (Band 3 ed. pp. 481–588). Braunschweig Germany: Vieweg.

  • Wertheimer M. (1922): Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt I: Prinzipielle Bemerkungen. Psychologische Forschung 1 pp. 47–58. [Translated extract reprinted as “The general theoretical situation.” In W. D. Ellis (Ed.) (1938). A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 12–16). London UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.].

  • Wertheimer M. (1923): Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II. Psychologische Forschung 4 pp. 301–350. [Translated as “Investigations on Gestalt principles II. In L. Spillmann (Ed.) (2012). On motion and figure-ground organization (pp. 127–182). Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press].

  • Weyl H. (1925). On the current epistemological situation in mathematics [English translation of Die Heutige Erkenntnislage in der Mathematik Symposion 1 1925–1927 1–32.] In P. Mancosu (Ed.) (1998) pp. 123–142.

Search
Journal information
Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 306 167 8
PDF Downloads 130 88 2